Liberty LightUp🗽

2.3K posts

Liberty LightUp🗽 banner
Liberty LightUp🗽

Liberty LightUp🗽

@Liberty_LightUp

Katılım Ekim 2016
162 Takip Edilen84 Takipçiler
Liberty LightUp🗽
Liberty LightUp🗽@Liberty_LightUp·
To genuinely answer your first question… daddy trumps endorsement and Paxton being attorney general I’m sure are the key reasons. To answer your 2nd question… the majority of the people that voted for Ed were over the age of 65 and that group also happens to make up about 50% of all the votes. People over the age of 65 are easily accessible to manipulate and will blindly follow Trump.
English
0
0
0
14
John Snavely
John Snavely@JWSnavely·
@Liberty_LightUp @TheRightMelissa So again… why was Paxton able to pull it off when he was outspent 10:1? Hageman defeated Liz Cheney despite Cheney’s fundraising advantages. Trump beat Kamala despite her spending over a billion dollars. Even AOC won her election after getting outspent 8:1 so why not Massie?
English
1
0
0
23
Melissa Tate
Melissa Tate@TheRightMelissa·
AIPAC is not the reason Thomas Massie Lost.. there is no conspiracy… Money doesn’t equal winning in politics. Kamala spent $1 Billion to lose to Trump. Massie lost because he went against the President his constituents voted in by a 40 point margin. That it.
English
917
445
2K
65.7K
Liberty LightUp🗽
Liberty LightUp🗽@Liberty_LightUp·
Come on dude…. Israel lobbies spent over $15.5 million on a district that has 750,000 residents. Cornyn got $588,000 from Israel lobbyists with a state population of over 31 million. Sure, money spent per vote isn’t the only deciding factor in every race but to think that Ed could have pulled it off without the Israel lobbyists 15.5 million is laughable.
English
1
0
0
20
John Snavely
John Snavely@JWSnavely·
@Liberty_LightUp @TheRightMelissa Ok so in Texas Cornyn spent $106 per vote thanks in part to his AIPAC funding and Paxton only spent $6 per vote… Why did Paxton win if money spent per vote is the deciding factor? Paxton also wasn’t the incumbent. But like Gallrein, he was endorced by Trump…
English
1
0
0
37
Speaker Mike Johnson
Speaker Mike Johnson@SpeakerJohnson·
President Trump is bringing Iran to the negotiating table from a position of STRENGTH and showing how Republicans are putting America FIRST. @foxandfriends
English
1.7K
359
3K
106.2K
Liberty LightUp🗽 retweetledi
Colin
Colin@ColinNienaber·
Massie has sponsored over 100 bills. Such as Interstate Milk Freedom Act — would legalize interstate sales of raw milk. * Milk Freedom Act — related to raw milk regulations. * Surveillance Accountability Act — aimed at limiting government surveillance powers. * No Immunity for Glyphosate Act — removes certain liability protections tied to glyphosate products. * No Funds for Foreign Abortions Act — blocks federal funding for abortions overseas. * Interstate Commerce Freedom bills — multiple bills reducing federal restrictions on interstate trade and agriculture. * One Subject at a Time Act — requires congressional bills to address only one subject. * Read the Bills Act — requires bills to clearly show changes to existing law. * To Terminate the Department of Education (H.R. 899) — abolishes the federal Department of Education. * Abolish the ATF Act (co-sponsored) — would eliminate the ATF. * War Powers resolutions — including efforts to block unauthorized military action in Iran and Yemen. * Smith-Mundt Restoration bill — would restrict domestic distribution of U.S. government propaganda materials. * Balanced Budget Amendment proposals — constitutional amendments requiring balanced federal budgets. * Bills repealing authorizations for war in Iraq and elsewhere. * Bills protecting firearm rights for 18–20 year olds. * Ukraine Fatigue Resolution — called for ending U.S. military and financial aid to Ukraine. Just to name a few. Which one of these do you disagree with?
English
448
1.7K
8K
248.4K
Congressman Randy Fine
I’ve been in touch with the @WhiteHouse tonight about the potential Iran deal and let me say this: President Trump will land this deal and end the conflict on his terms. The Mullahs will never have a nuclear weapon.
English
3.6K
1.8K
13.3K
418.8K
Liberty LightUp🗽
Liberty LightUp🗽@Liberty_LightUp·
@LauraLoomer Bombing countries to creat regime change has never worked, and it never will. We’ve attempted this many times in the past, and to think it will somehow work this time proves you’re insane or ignorant.
English
0
0
1
356
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
Now is the time to shit or get off the pot as it pertains to Iran. We need to bomb the Iranian regime. It’s time to put an end to this 47 year problem once and for all.
English
5K
4K
19.9K
723.4K
Liberty LightUp🗽 retweetledi
Sal the Agorist
Sal the Agorist@SallyMayweather·
If Russia spent $30M to unseat a congressman we’d never hear the end of it.
English
277
5.2K
40.4K
485.5K
Liberty LightUp🗽
Liberty LightUp🗽@Liberty_LightUp·
If he would have came out and supported Trump on all the decisions he’s made like thinking the Epstein files were a hoax, increased government spending, and starting stupid wars in the Middle East, then Massie would have made a 180 on his principles. To thinking Massie is the one that changed instead of Trump is kindergarten thinking.
English
0
0
1
54
Brandon Tatum
Brandon Tatum@TheOfficerTatum·
The voters in Kentucky didn't change, Thomas Massie did. When you do a 180 on the movement, the base is going to do a 180 on you. Why on earth would a conservative district keep a Republican who acts as a secondary wall of obstruction? The people voted for Trump's agenda.
English
1.6K
1.7K
12.8K
178K
Robert P. Murphy
Robert P. Murphy@BobMurphyEcon·
at least the aipac money is being spent in america
English
54
48
601
8.4K
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
Thank you! Very nice of you to say. I am proud of the people of Kentucky for rejecting Thomas Massie. It’s a good day for America. It was my pleasure to help shave off a few points by informing @RepThomasMassie’s constituents of who he really is.
Paul A. Szypula 🇺🇸@Bubblebathgirl

@LauraLoomer @RepThomasMassie @EdGallrein Your exposés were pivotal in making this happen. You’re an invaluable member of the Trump administration. Congratulations! This is your win too, Laura. Massie got LOOMERED!

English
264
672
5.1K
90.4K
Liberty LightUp🗽
Liberty LightUp🗽@Liberty_LightUp·
@tedcruz That’s Bull 💩! You are loving the bad press he’s getting on this comment.
English
0
0
0
183
Liberty LightUp🗽
Liberty LightUp🗽@Liberty_LightUp·
@AP4Liberty Oh my!! Trump would never say anything this absurd or condone this type of behavior! Give me a break bud….
English
0
0
4
248
Ed Gallrein
Ed Gallrein@EdGallrein·
Let’s not forget that Thomas Massie was the only Republican member of Congress to vote against the SAVE Act. Today is Election Day. Today is the day to send a message by firing Thomas Massie. Polls are open until 6 PM. Every vote matters.
English
7.2K
2.6K
10.2K
1M
Liberty LightUp🗽
Liberty LightUp🗽@Liberty_LightUp·
The entire U.S. is watching you Kentucky
English
0
0
0
5
Liberty LightUp🗽
Liberty LightUp🗽@Liberty_LightUp·
@catturd2 If warm body Ed wins, it shows we have been successful infiltrated by a foreign government on all fronts and very much live in a plutocracy….
English
0
0
1
39
Catturd ™
Catturd ™@catturd2·
If Massie wins, all the Democrats in Congress will be celebrating. That’s all you need to know.
English
1.9K
2.9K
16.9K
178.2K
Agathatopian
Agathatopian@MagisFuturum·
@Liberty_LightUp @kevinolearytv I live in Utah, have no direct connection to or financial interest in the project & support it. 🤷‍♂️ You don’t speak for me or many others.
English
1
0
0
11
Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful
Kevin O'Leary aka Mr. Wonderful@kevinolearytv·
Great to see support growing for this project now that the truth is out about the long term economic benefits to #Utah !
Jason Chaffetz@jasoninthehouse

Data Center in Box Elder County I am fully supportive of the data center project in Box Elder County. When I first learned of the project, I had some of the same questions you might have. I, too, worry about people, water, power, the health of the Great Salt Lake, and why it would be good for Utah. I had an opportunity to meet with the people bringing the project here and to get those questions addressed. I was impressed by their answers so I introduced them to my friend, Kevin O’Leary, who later decided to move forward with the project. I believe it is going to a be huge net positive for the State of Utah. Here’s what was shared with me and why I’m excited about it: Energy · This project is not taking anything out of the existing power grid. · The price Utahns pay for power should not go up because of this development. · More than a decade ago, a 42” pipeline from Wyoming called the Ruby Pipeline, with Natural Gas, was constructed. It’s already there - permitted and installed underground. Regulatory standards are already in place at the state and federal level. · The data center may even feed surplus power back into the grid and other renewable power sources may be deployed. Water · When the developers put the private land under contract, they agreed to paying a premium price, multiple times greater than market rate for the area. They were candid about the potential. The project uses the existing private water rights that were in use by the previous landowners. · It doesn’t need additional water beyond what already belongs to that property. · The water they’ll be using currently does not feed into the Great Salt Lake. · There might be a net increase of water going into the Great Salt Lake by using the water supply and flowing it down to the Great Salt Lake rather than being used for agriculture. · The water available to that property is currently low quality and brackish. · Water put into the Great Salt Lake would need to be higher quality and treated. Those are the concerns. But what is most exciting are the opportunities. Tax revenue · The 40,000 acres was generating roughly $250,000 annually in taxes for Box Elder County. · When fully implemented, it’s anticipated the county will receive more than $100 million annually in tax revenue from those 40,000 acres. Today the Box Elder total budget is less than $80 million. · The state, via sales tax, will receive hundreds of millions of dollars annually when fully developed. All Utahns benefit from that. This is all new revenue to the state. HAFB · The proximity of the data center makes Hill Air Force Base (HAFB) a more attractive asset for the Pentagon. · That accessibility may protect Hill from future BRAC closure threats. In a rapidly changing world, data centers in the USA are safer for Americans. Having them in Utah helps with jobs, viability long-term for Hill, and providing a national security asset. · The data center supports the mission of both HAFB and the Utah Test & Training Range (UTTR). · ”Top of Utah” is heavily dependent on Hill for a whole ecosystem of jobs and businesses. Keeping our economy vibrant in northern Utah is an imperative. That’s good for Utah jobs (thousands of new jobs in Top of Utah), our economy, and national defense. We have to be able to process data. This facility will do so with minimal disruption to the taxpayers who benefit from it. It’s off the beaten path in an area that is hard to make productive. It will also bring additional private sector companies and advanced manufacturing our state can not support because our current energy supplies are not big enough. It can be done cleanly, supporting our state with jobs, revenue, and making Utah a leading place to do business while supporting our quality of life.

English
275
22
385
59.2K