Lily

8.4K posts

Lily banner
Lily

Lily

@LilyAidin17

#WomanLifeFreedom

Katılım Şubat 2021
300 Takip Edilen56 Takipçiler
Lily retweetledi
The Resonance
The Resonance@Partisan_12·
Without Gulf bases the US couldn’t casually project power against Iran. Russia understood this perfectly, that’s why it refused to let Ukraine become a NATO launchpad on its border.
English
25
421
2.3K
32.5K
Lily
Lily@LilyAidin17·
@YahyaEtemad ۲ سال پیش هم رفتن اسرائیل شخصا در خواست جنگ کردن…
فارسی
0
0
8
389
یحیی اعتماد | Yahya Etemad
رضا پهلوی، ۹ اسفند: «كمكى كه رئيس جمهور ايالات متحده به مردم شجاع ايران وعده داده بود، اكنون رسيده است. اين يك مداخله بشردوستانه است». رضا پهلوی، ۳ مرداد: «این جنگ را جمهوری اسلامی به ایران تحمیل کرده، و مسئولیت آن بر عهده همین رژیم و حامیان آشکار و پنهانش است». بی‌ناموس!
فارسی
42
145
1.2K
12.4K
Mel
Mel@Villgecrazylady·
Bullshit. It was the hits on US assets in Iraq. Something happened in Erbil a few hours ago and whatever it was, it was bad. I don’t know, and at this point I don’t care. Tell whatever lies you have to tell. JUST BRING OUR TROOPS THE FUCK HOME.
Zachary Cohen@ZcohenCNN

VP JD Vance & Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Dan Caine both raised concerns about the US munitions stockpile to Trump during a White House meeting on Friday as he weighed potentially escalating the war with Iran, a US official tells me.   Operations are “on a hold,” a Pentagon source told CNN Saturday. It’s currently unclear if the stockpile concern was the primary reason why the US paused strikes or whether it will continue to do so.   Speaking to reporters after Friday’s meeting with Cabinet members & top advisors, Trump stressed US officials were actively negotiating with Iran, though he also said it was possible the military could continue its bombing campaign or “make it a heavier dose.” He claimed Iran seemed to be getting “more serious” in ongoing talks.    As of Friday afternoon, the Trump admin was still deliberating over what a potential escalation would look like, per source familiar. Gulf countries have urged restraint in recent conversations with Trump officials.   Even after Trump said he was considering a massive attack against Iran this week, he had privately directed his negotiators to “keep talking,” per source familiar, underscoring how the president has been grappling with the reality of limited escalatory military operations short of putting US troops on the ground.   Few within Trump’s inner circle, or inside the Pentagon, believed the president's options for escalating would yield the results he was looking for, per multiple sources. New reporting w/ @jimsciutto

English
55
207
1.5K
75.4K
Contentius IX 🔨
Contentius IX 🔨@Contentius9·
مراد ویسی: مهمترین نقطه ضعف آقای قالیباف اینه که به نظر میرسه فرد با عرضه‌ ایه و آقای خامنه ای از افراد با عرضه خوشش نمیاد همچنانکه شاه از نخست وزیران با عرضه ای مثل قوام،مصدق و علی امینی خوشش نمیومد. #حافظه_تاریخی 😏
فارسی
18
102
796
21.4K
Lily retweetledi
JonnyUtd
JonnyUtd@Fx1Jonny·
They claim it all started on Oct 7th 2023. This is Gaza in 1993.
JonnyUtd tweet media
English
435
8.6K
30.6K
216.8K
Nazanin Nour
Nazanin Nour@NazaninNour·
Drop Site continues to be the absolute worst on Iran. HRANA confirmed 7,000 deaths, and listed 11,744 more deaths were under review. The count was then stopped due to government repression, a regime imposed internet blackout, and a war. I wish these guys loved Iran and its people as much as they love the Islamic Republic. Also where are these “countless videos?” I’ve watched, and posted, countless videos of regime forces slaughtering civilians and leaving pools of blood on streets I’ve walked on. You guys posted one video months ago that turned out to be from another date and time. Shameful.
Nazanin Nour tweet media
English
38
24
113
6.9K
Lily retweetledi
Aaron Maté
Aaron Maté@aaronjmate·
The New Yorker accepts the Biden team's dehumanization of Palestinians and endorsement of Israeli state terror against them: "Virtually everyone involved thought that Israel was killing more Palestinians than was necessary to achieve any legitimate objective." Unless you're a fanatical racist, there's no number of dead Palestinians that is "necessary", and no "legitimate objective" that can justify it. And we know what Israel's objective was: destroying Gaza and committing ethnic cleansing. That's also why there is no "war in Gaza." It's a genocide. When you accept the illegitimate premise that an occupying power can have a "legitimate objective" and slaughter a "necessary" number of occupied people, you're engaging in genocide apologia. This article's value is in documenting more of the Biden team's dissembling. But it shares the same moral rot.
The New Yorker@NewYorker

In a new report, David D. Kirkpatrick writes about the Biden Administration’s handling of the war in Gaza—and the top officials who now express regret about it. “Virtually everyone involved thought that Israel was killing more Palestinians than was necessary to achieve any legitimate objective,” Kirkpatrick notes. “What surprised me the most was the vast gulf between what the Biden Administration knew internally and what they said to the Israelis privately, and, on the other hand, what they said and did publicly.” Read his investigation: newyorkermag.visitlink.me/9lWBC-

English
58
870
2.5K
80K
Lily retweetledi
S.B.S
S.B.S@Wallface·
These are 500 posts by @benshapiro from his penthouse, encouraging war and criticizing anyone who disagrees with him. Here is every single one.
S.B.S tweet mediaS.B.S tweet mediaS.B.S tweet mediaS.B.S tweet media
English
126
1.3K
5.3K
106.6K
Lily
Lily@LilyAidin17·
@AdamKinzinger Didn’t the president say he had concept of a plan? What happened to that concept?
English
0
0
0
45
Lily retweetledi
Mohammad Ebrahimi
Mohammad Ebrahimi@Moh_ebrahimi·
تمام این صدا بیسیم های که بنام دی ماه داره منتشر میشه فیک و ساختگیه براساس PTT Tone پایان مکالمات بیسیم نشون دهنده دستگاه بیسیم موتورولاست تقریبا نزدیک ۱۲ سال که موتورولا ازسیستم نظامی ایران حذف شده جاشو داده به هایترا! که در ۵ سال اخیر حتی آتش نشانی هم هایترا استفاده میکنه
فارسی
2
7
88
3.2K
Lily retweetledi
Lily retweetledi
samira (تلخ نویس)
اعتراف دیرهنگام! مرادویسی اعلام کرد عدد جان‌باختگان دی‌ماه ۳ هزار و ۲۲۲ نفر است. در واقع همان عددی که دولت خودش اعلام کرد. هرچند ۳ هزار رقم کوچکی نیست و در برابر جان انسان، حتی ۱ هم بسیار بزرگ است، اما نباید فراموش کنیم با عددهای ۴۰ هزار و ۳۰ هزار جاده‌صاف کن جنگ شدند!
Islamic Republic of Iran 🇮🇷 فارسی
346
347
2.6K
154K
Lily retweetledi
Lily retweetledi
Open Source Intel
Open Source Intel@Osint613·
Trump: Rubio, Vance talking with Iran
English
115
49
992
106.3K
Lily retweetledi
Rosemary Kelanic
Rosemary Kelanic@RKelanic·
Iran has already suffered $300 billion in direct damage from U.S. airstrikes. Even if it collects $50 billion/yr in Hormuz tolls (a high-end estimate), it would take 6 years for Iran to break even. Let Iran have the strait. Spend the next 5 yrs derisking from Hormuz. 👇
Rosemary Kelanic@RKelanic

(WSJ gift link) Again, the world finds out weeks later that the Iran War has already escalated more than publicly acknowledged. Bahrain and Kuwait conducted airstrikes on Iran earlier this month — timeline very vague. Direct belligerents now include: 1) U.S. 2) Israel 3) Iran 4) Saudi Arabia 5) UAE 6) Bahrain 7) Kuwait Not to mention Hezbollah and the Houthis. Not a good sign. Trump’s “excursion” in Iran has already turned into a regional conflagration. This was never the White House plan on February 28th. The whole thing was supposed to be over in a weekend, with a new regime in Iran, before oil markets even noticed. Now President Trump is talking about “massive” escalation. If this is what “an excursion” brought us, what will “massive” escalation do? It will cost U.S. lives, ruin the region, spike oil prices, further harm the global economy, and enmesh the US *even more* in Mideast dysfunction. All because the president won’t suck it up and let Iran impose $1/barrel tolls through Hormuz. It’s embarrassing for Trump, but Hormuz tolls are the lesser evil, by far. Iran has already suffered $300 billion in direct damage from U.S. airstrikes. Even if it collects $50 billion/yr in tolls (a high-end estimate), it would take 6 years for Iran to break even. In 6 years, we can make a lot of progress de-risking from oil and building Hormuz bypass pipelines. When Iran finally breaks even, Hormuz would matter much less. Pragmatism needs to win out, and the sooner the better. Let Iran have the strait. Arguably, it’s also the most “America First” option. If Trump escalates, he is risking U.S. lives and treasure to prevent the ENTIRE WORLD from paying tolls. That means he’d be using U.S. military force to provide the global public good of free access through the Strait instead of paid access. Should the U.S. taxpayer pay these costs so everyone else gets toll-free Hormuz access, even though they free-rided? “America First” would say no. (Yes, I realize this whole mess is the US’s fault and it’s maddening for Trump to walk away having caused it. But since massive escalation won’t work to reopen the strait anyhow, it’s actually in the world’s best interest for the U.S. to walk away now, rather than months from now, after a devastating war that has kept Hormuz closed for the duration. Trying to thread a lot of needles here.) wsj.com/world/middle-e…

English
27
30
138
15.6K