Steven Pagano

I wish more was known on this case. It’s heartbreaking. lcs-analysis.com/blog/what-happ…

@Saniya_200 There’s at least ONE that does.

Prove me wrong??

Statement regarding Mrs. Carrie Prejean Boller   In recent days, I have become aware of the removal of Mrs. Carrie Prejean Boller from the Presidential Religious Liberty Commission, along with the public accusations that have followed. After reviewing her account and the circumstances surrounding this matter, I believe it is necessary to speak plainly.   Ms. Boller has been treated unjustly.   A Catholic woman, speaking from a well-formed conscience and in fidelity to the teachings of the Church, has been publicly criticized and removed – yet no clear, substantiated reason has been provided. Such a lack of transparency does not serve justice. It damages reputations and undermines trust.   More troubling still is the apparent cause: that she raised legitimate questions about Zionism and defended the simple truth that Catholics are not bound to any political ideology.   Let me be clear.   The Catholic Church does not teach that the modern State of Israel holds a divine mandate that must be supported by all believers. Nor does the Church teach that opposition to political Zionism is inherently antisemitic. These are not doctrines of the Catholic faith.   At the same time, the Church unequivocally rejects all hatred toward the Jewish people. Every human person is to be loved, defended, and treated with dignity. But this truth must not be distorted. To question the policies or actions of a modern nation – any nation – is not hatred. It is a moral responsibility when innocent life is at stake.   We are witnessing great suffering in the Holy Land. Innocent men, women, and children – especially in Gaza – have endured immense devastation. To speak on behalf of human life, wherever it is threatened, is not political extremism. It is fidelity to the Gospel of Jesus Christ.   Mrs. Boller did what many are now afraid to do: she spoke.   She spoke for Catholics who are increasingly pressured to conform to political narratives that do not reflect the fullness of our faith. She spoke to ensure that antisemitism is not wrongly conflated with legitimate moral concern. She spoke for the dignity of all human life – Jew and Palestinian alike.   For this, she has been mischaracterized.   It is especially disheartening when such treatment appears to come, in part, from those within the Church who should be the first to defend the faithful when they speak truthfully and in good conscience. Shepherds are called to protect, not to abandon; to clarify, not to confuse; to stand with the sheep, especially when they are under attack.   Silence in the face of injustice is not prudence. It is a failure of charity and truth. Therefore, I express my support for Mrs. Carrie Prejean Boller.   I affirm her right, as a Catholic and as an American, to speak clearly about matters of faith, morality, and public life without being unjustly labeled or removed without explanation. I also call for greater clarity and fairness from those responsible for her removal, so that truth – not speculation – may prevail.   This moment calls for courage.   Not political courage, but Christian courage – the kind that stands firmly in truth while remaining rooted in charity. We must reject hatred in all its forms, but we must also reject the misuse of that charge to silence those who speak in defense of life and moral truth.   Let us pray for peace in the Holy Land – for Jews, for Palestinians, and for all who suffer. And let us pray for the Church, that she may always speak with clarity, charity, and unwavering fidelity to Jesus Christ, who is the Truth.   In Christ, Bishop Joseph E. Strickland

@onlyyou_5510 127

Brain test 98% failed

@ScottRoberts Correct. Jesus is the head of the Church. The Church is the mystical body of Christ.

Jesus Christ is the Head of the Church, not the Pope.

@GmorganJr Why did he say it? Was he telling us what someone else once said? Or was he using the quote to make his own point? The statement is blasphemy and he repeated it. Now you are defending it?

As much as I don’t like Netanyahu, you are absolutely correct.

Who is “we”? Also, fair to ask who was “losing daylight”?

@T030541 @TaylorSphynx If you don’t mind, but at your convenience. No need to rush.

@LinguisticCS @TaylorSphynx Yep. I'm Australian & I know the case well. There are lots of great statements & interviews to analyze. Do you want me to send you the best clips & statements here? It's still morning here now but I will gladly send them to you this arvo/evening when I have the time!

What is being denied and what is not? Are the denials implicit or explicit? What is the priority?

@T030541 @TaylorSphynx Do you know where I can find statements or interviews? Thanks

@LinguisticCS @TaylorSphynx ah, that makes sense, truth telling or not there's an interesting case (Keli Lane) that I'd love to read an analysis on (I think finding out what happened to baby Tegan would be straightforward).I'd love to hear your analysis on that in the future if that case would interest you

@scrowder @GmorganJr So does that include Trump?

Maybe MAGA shouldn’t be defined by quitters of MAGA.

@T030541 @TaylorSphynx “That” is distancing, but I think it can be appropriate to her narrative of a false allegation.

@LinguisticCS @TaylorSphynx Is she also saying "that" to distance herself from the accusations (which she hasn't even denied explicitly or even implicitly like you pointed out)? I thought of this after I saw you point out her use of "that" as being singular, making the part/s she's referring to unclear

@LauraLoomer Which of the Trump supporters’ podcasts was he invited on but turned down?

Candace Owens and Tucker Carlson have both announced they are interviewing Joe Kent this week. Kent resigned from his job as Director of the National Counter Terrorism Center less than 12 hours ago and he is already booked on the shows of 2 of the biggest Trump haters. You’ll recall, shortly after Charlie Kirk was assassinated, there was a big blow up between the FBI and ODNI because Joe Kent was trying to create the narrative that Israel was involved in Charlie’s death with zero evidence at all. He was told to stop, because he was jeopardizing the FBI investigation with conspiracy theories. If Joe Kent wasn’t so obsessed with Jewish conspiracy theories, maybe he would have done his job and stopped the 4 Islamic terror attacks we have had in the US over the last 2 weeks. He allowed Americans to be killed by Islamic terrorists. He should have spent more time doing his job and less time talking to Tucker and Candace. Kent was so busy trying to make Israel the enemy, that he did nothing to stop the Islamic terrorists who just murdered Americans on US soil. Like I have said, these people are a national security threat. They want you to think our ally is an enemy while they disarm Americans in front of the actual Islamic enemy. It’s a sickness. Every single one of these people needs to be purged from the Trump admin.

Friends, on St. Patrick’s Day, let us honor this extraordinary man whose primary preoccupation was sharing the Christian faith with his people.

@TaylorSphynx Astute! She only explicitly denied crying while putting it higher on her list of priorities than addressing the criminal accusations. She doesn’t even implicitly deny the drug use or drug dealer. “That” is singular. Which part was proven a lie by the FEC?

@LinguisticCS She is denying crying about “sh*t” - not a specific thing. She is not denying the accusations, either (drug dealer, misusing funds); rather, she’s stating what Candace “swore.” It seems like the priority is to attack Candace’s character as well as not be perceived as a cryer lol

On behalf of the Christians of the #MiddleEast, and of all women and men of good will, I appeal to those responsible for this conflict: cease fire! May paths of dialogue be reopened! Violence can never lead to the justice, stability and peace for which the peoples are waiting.

What does the statement, “Not everything is a conspiracy” imply about her perception of @RealCandaceO ‘conspiracies theories?’

@JesusisChristX Redeemer Savior

Describe Jesus in one word.

@LauraLoomer @TimSheehyMT He is not “A Palestinian” he is AN American and a veteran. Nor does he call him “A Palestinian.” He says his family is Palestinian. Some Americans’ family’s are Irish or Nigerian or Polish. They too are Americans.

EXCLUSIVE VIDEO: US Marine Corps veteran Brian McGinnis who “protested” the Senate Armed Services Committee hearing today and was physically dragged out by Capitol Police and GOP Senator Tim Sheehy @TimSheehyMT is a Palestinian, according to a video I uncovered of him, in which he is wearing Islamic garb. In the video, McGinnis is seen wearing a Keffiyeh while talking about how people should support the Keffiyeh and the Free Palestine movement. He said he and his family are Palestinian. While he was assaulting Capitol police today, McGinnis was ranting and screaming about his hatred of Israel. McGinnis has since been charged with 3 counts of assault on a police officer. @BrianMcGinnisNC The Islamic and Palestinian movements are both extremely violent and anti-American movements that have no place in America. @SenateGOP

@TheRightMelissa @tylerbowyer Please Note: Charlie didn’t answer the question, which tells us it was a sensitive question for him. Answering with, “I support President Trump…,” in its place suggests that he could not bring himself to say he supported the bombings.

Charlie Kirk on the night we bombed Iran last June: “And you might say, ‘Charlie, do you support or oppose this?’ I SUPPORT THE PRESIDENT, THAT’S MY ANSWER. I know the man…He’s the man for the hour…So in a situation like this, I support my friend. And he’s had my back, and I have his.” Based on this, Charlie would be supporting President Trump’s actions in Iran today.

Yes, Charlie was opposed to war. No, Charlie wasn’t opposed to action. Yes, Charlie thought Iran was a threat. No, Charlie wouldn’t have turned on the President.

NOTE: 1) The specific “outrageous allegations” Huckabee asked him about are not clearly stated. 2) Huckabee did not state what Herzog’s response was to his questions. 3) The president’s office did not tell us explicitly who made the denials. Passive language was used.