Sergey Linksmith

$LINK will be a top 5 Crypto market cap coin in 2 years. @SergeyNazarov saw this connectivity problem back in 2008 when he claimed the domain of @Smart_Contract ... #LINKUP

@anishmoonka So you’re saying it’s Vrabel’s child

Researchers in Stockholm put a woman's egg in a dish next to sperm from two men: her partner and a stranger. Half the time, the egg pulled in more sperm from the stranger than from the man she'd chosen. This was a 2020 study from Stockholm University and the University of Manchester, published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B. Until then, nobody had shown a human egg doing this. The fluid that surrounds an egg in a woman's body releases chemicals that act like a scent trail. Sperm follow the scent. The team put samples in thin glass tubes and counted how many sperm from each man swam in. All the eggs and sperm came from real couples going through IVF treatment. The pull was uneven. Eggs attracted 18 to 40 percent more sperm from one man over another, and inside the egg's fluid, sperm built up about 10 times more than in a plain comparison liquid. The team ran the experiment over and over, and the same pattern came out every time. The bigger finding came in who got picked. In half the cases, more sperm got pulled toward a stranger than toward her partner. The same sperm performed differently depending on which woman's fluid it was in. Sperm tails have a tiny gate on them. When the gate detects a hormone called progesterone (the same hormone tied to a woman's monthly cycle), it opens and the sperm kicks into a higher gear. Each woman's fluid has its own chemical mix, so different men's sperm respond differently. Some sperm get a strong push. Others barely react to the same fluid. Roughly 1 in 4 UK couples in fertility treatment have no idea why they can't have a baby. Every standard test comes back normal. If the egg and sperm reject each other chemically, no test catches it. The cycle fails. They get no answer, and they have to go through the entire thing again. In fertilization, the egg gets its own vote. The woman never feels it happen. Half the time in this study, that vote went to a stranger.

@Puck_Figs @LinkiesLeaks Let’s go

@LinkiesLeaks Summer Bod loading…

I don't see any Sergey interview for a while, is he still alive? He left the team?

@BacardiCapital 1. Brays Bayou, Houston, TX

Best runs in the US West Side Highway, NY, NY Brickel Key, Miami, FL Lakeshore Drive, Chicago IL

@StockPatternPro I love the content and I’d like to learn, but there’s no free educational content (afaik), other than your feed here of course. Most other TA out there has endless free resources to get an idea or start.

data is the new oil $LINK is a commodity

Ethereum is one siloed peer hosted ledger that needs to not only to be connected to other siloed peer hosted ledgers, but also to our existing financial networks (SWIFT, DTCC, Fedwire, FIX, credit card networks, etc) which clear and settle transactions entirely outside of blockchains altogether. Thus, an orchestration layer protocol that sits above and across all of these separate networks and blockchains is needed to compose workflows across all of these systems. Stating otherwise is unserious cosplay.

@KevinKevvvv0004 @ChainLinkGod Everything you post in English is AI. Stick to writing in Italian if you can’t respond without AI.

@ChainLinkGod No hate for $LINK, on the contrary: it's an excellent messaging middleware. But without a liquidity bridge like $XRP for the final settlement, the circle doesn't close. XRP is the missing piece to make LINK complete in real banking operations.

$LINK ETFs hold a higher percentage of LINK’s circulating supply (~1.4%) than $XRP ETFs hold of XRP’s circulating supply (~1.2%) When you adjust for market cap (mid cap vs large cap), LINK’s ~$97M in net inflows would be equivalent to ~$1.35B in inflows for an asset XRP’s size (13.8x market cap difference) LINK ETFs have never had a single day of outflows while XRP ETFs have had at least over a dozen days with net outflows The more you know

@chainlinkchad69 @uCeLiNk @kwok_phil Just realized yesterday there’s 2 of them lol. Phil and Dom Kwok. Thought it was the same account all this time

@uCeLiNk @kwok_phil Hasn’t this dude hated on $LINK forever and now he gets it? Lmao

quadrillions. one of the most important people we’ve met this week said this. QUADRILLIONS. we were sitting around a grand mahogany table. and i almost fell off my chair. big things are afoot in washington dc. i literally can’t stop thinking about it. quadrillions…

@ChainLinkGod Yes

Chainlink is...

@colorado_crypto Incredible really.

These mfers are so far behind the ball it’s not even funny. 🤦🏻‍♂️ $Link

@kwok_phil New to the quadrillions gang I see? Looking forward to all that value utilizing @chainlink’s services and paying in $LINK

@FightLike36 @TheATX1 Just realized that. I saw that red roof and thought it was the church next to Castilian.

@LinkMar1ne @TheATX1 Castilian is on 24th

Here's a rendering for a West Campus tower called The Aspire. It is/was proposed for 23rd & San Antonio. I don't know if this is still planned.

@Evidentioual @TheATX1 The street is “San Antonio St.” This is in Austin

@TheATX1 Invest at your own risk, SA is worse than Chicago.

@AdamJWexler SWARM

#Texans S Reed Blankenship said he got a call from DeMeco Ryans during the process and he could tell that Ryans and the Texans really wanted him. Said it was the first time in his career that if felt like someone really wanted him. Says hearing what Ryans had to say, he was already bought in. Feels like he landed in a great spot.

@coleadamss What else is there to do in Ohio? Can’t blame them.

Again if you’re confused Xavier fans drove an hour to Dayton to chirp Texas fans in a game their team didn’t play in because their former coach left for Texas last year

@xrpmickle @CatfishFishy XRP killer use case? Still TBD

@CatfishFishy I love how the killer use case of LINK was a feature added in 2025 💀

What does $LINK actually do? $LINK:

@xrpmickle Mickle: XRP class of 2021 bagholder. Must be pretty heavy.

@_NineThreeCo @CatfishFishy @uptownsaul Next time try an reply without AI

@CatfishFishy A vs B is a false dichotomy. XRP isn’t Ripple equity—it’s the XRPL utility token for fast/cheap payments. Ripple’s $750M stock buyback (valuing Labs at $50B) is normal private company finance rewarding shareholders/employees. Their success funds more ecosystem work that drives XRP adoption (ODL, RLUSD). Garlinghouse’s ‘North Star’ holds. Different from LINK’s model, but not contradictory or predatory. You’re seeing the separation wrong.

I'll add to this and take it even one step further. I literally don't even care if $XRP holders are being taken advantage of by Ripple. I just want them to understand that they are so that they can at least understand what they are signing up for. Every day $XRP social media slop merchants tell me that XRP holders clearly understand that they have no exposure to Ripple Labs (RLUSD, money transmitter licenses, corporate acquisitions, Ripple is a bank) by owning XRP, and then every week Garlinghouse tweets out that "XRP is Ripple's North star" or "XRP is at the center of everything Ripple does."