Lisa Mock
2.3K posts


@Robbie_Reasons Never
They don't object to selling it in their shops!
English

🇬🇧 4,000 POLICE DEPLOYED FOR TOMMY ROBINSON RALLY
The Metropolitan Police are deploying over 4,000 officers, drones, helicopters and live facial recognition for this weekend’s Unite the Kingdom rally in London.
Large numbers of officers are expected to be in riot gear for what is primarily a demonstration centred around free speech, immigration and national identity.
Meanwhile countless other disruptive protests across Britain are routinely handled with a far softer approach and far less policing.
More and more people are asking the same question - why does one set of protesters face overwhelming force while others appear to get endless leniency?
The accusations of two-tier policing are only going to grow louder after this.
English

@Victoria00025 Only one law it's called English Law as this is England! Not difficult to understand is it?
English

@TheConstit71705 Talk about keep it in the family! They won't be in office long enough to issue the cards! They are CARDS along with 🥜
English

@Artemisfornow They are absolutely terrified of the indigenous people of this nation! They know we can gain power by peaceful means. They hate that!!!
English

er … This whole article is deeply troubling but the most alarming bit is this …
Not only have 8 foreign speakers been banned from entering the country but for the first time, police have imposed speech conditions on speakers at the Unite the Kingdom march (and the Palestinian march)
Organisers are now being held responsible for ensuring invited speakers don’t break the law by … “platforming unlawful extremism or hate speech” and they will be held responsible if they do.
Whatever your politics, this is terrible for free speech. Who decides what hate speech is? People who simply don’t like what is said?
In addition live facial recognition will only be used at the Unite the Kingdom march.
These are pre-emptive speech controls used subjectively to shut up dissent and close down debate … for your safety.

English

@Never_Again2020 The working class don't live like that, it's a 1970's Mock up. My question is where did Mr I can make your tits bigger con artist get to afford a 2 million town house? Where did a loser like him get that kind of money? Interesting thought! I heard he owes council tax?
English

@ACSPARTAN1 These are exactly the sort of do called judiciary ruining our country!
English

SENIOR SITTING JUDGE ALLOWS A SEX OFFENDER TO WALK FREE AFTER ORDERING THE OFFENDER TO BUY THE VICTIM A NEW BIKE .
Judge Julian Hall who once again found himself at the centre of public anger after allowing a convicted child sex offender to walk free.
The decision, handed down in a case involving a teenage abuser, added to a growing list of controversial sentences that have raised serious questions about the judge’s approach to crimes against children.
Judge Hall, already under scrutiny for earlier rulings, had previously caused outrage when he spared a 71‑year‑old man jail for sexually assaulting a six‑year‑old girl, ordering him instead to pay compensation “enough to buy a new bike.”
His sentencing choices had become so contentious that victims’ advocates publicly accused Oxford judges of prioritising offenders over the children they harmed.
In this latest case, the judge again opted against a custodial sentence for a teenage sex abuser, a decision that echoed his earlier lenient rulings. Critics argued that Hall’s pattern of sentencing suggested a troubling judicial philosophy one that emphasised the offender’s circumstances while minimising the long‑term impact on victims.
One survivor of childhood abuse described such sentences as “laughable,” saying she could not understand “what planet the judges are on.” Oxford Mail
Judge Hall’s decisions had already drawn the attention of the Solicitor General, who previously referred one of his child‑sex sentencing decisions to the Court of Appeal for being “disturbingly lenient.”
Child‑protection advocates warned that his remarks in court including comments about victims’ appearance or offenders’ supposed good character risked undermining public confidence in the justice system.
As criticism mounted, campaigners insisted that the judge’s approach failed to reflect the seriousness of sexual offences against children.
They argued that his repeated willingness to spare offenders jail sent a dangerous message, leaving victims feeling unprotected and offenders insufficiently deterred.
In the wake of this latest ruling, calls intensified for a review of sentencing practices at Oxford Crown Court and for Judge Hall himself to reconsider the principles guiding his decisions.
HARDDRIVE CHECK ⛔️

English

@NotFarLeftAtAll Proof that mental health is surely endemic among us. They say there's more out than in!
English

@FlossCarmeli Does this sad story have any connection at all to Brighton?.
English

@Skint_Eastwood1 I can't believe we are allowing this. I thought bigamy in this country was illegal, irrespective of your religion or culture. If it is your culture to have more than one wife go live where that is widely practised, not here. We don't want to Pay for your sexual relationships
English

🚨 STARMER’S DWP GIVES 4.8% BENEFITS BOOST TO HUSBANDS WITH MULTIPLE WIVES 😡
Starmer’s Britain is screwing the working man and woman again.
While you’re working overtime, paying taxes, and struggling with the cost of living, Keir Starmer’s DWP is handing out a 4.8% benefits increase to husbands with multiple wives.
Your hard-earned money is now funding higher payments for polygamous households.
The government is literally giving more to men with extra wives while British workers get squeezed harder every year.
This isn’t fair. This isn’t right.
Working people of this country are paying for this nonsense, and Starmer doesn’t give a damn. 🤬
English






























