LitchiDup

4.9K posts

LitchiDup

LitchiDup

@Litchidup

My filter is broken. So is my ability to tolerate stupid people!

Katılım Ekim 2025
67 Takip Edilen66 Takipçiler
LitchiDup retweetledi
Heidi Matthews
Heidi Matthews@Heidi__Matthews·
Flotilla participants are arriving at Istanbul airport. This is what Israel military and prison personnel did to them.
Heidi Matthews tweet mediaHeidi Matthews tweet media
English
5.1K
65.7K
157K
3.9M
Iranian Force
Iranian Force@MrImranPk·
"If, after the war ends, you get a golden opportunity to visit Iran for free, would you go? 🤔🇮🇷 Let us know in the comments, Yes or No and why?"
Iranian Force tweet media
English
1.2K
394
2.5K
46.1K
Middle Eastern Affairs
BREAKING – 46% of Israelis say they would avoid visiting New York City after Mamdani becomes Mayor Israelis are feeIing very afrαid now
Middle Eastern Affairs tweet mediaMiddle Eastern Affairs tweet media
English
935
282
1.5K
51.2K
LitchiDup retweetledi
J
J@jyapsalot·
Saw this coming. A thousand Charlie videos of him expressing his love and support for Thomas Massie. No comment from Erika or TPUSA to acknowledge the fact that Charlie supported him. But she’ll come out of no where talking about Spencer Pratt lol. Same as the Iran war. Never said anything publicly to stand on Charlie’s word and how he felt about the war. In that secret recording she said “idk what Charlie would say about the war”. Instead of addressing the elephant in the room, she tweets Thank God for our men and women in uniform for fighting in Iran. Apparently the only time she knew what would do is when she said Charlie was dancing with God about their employees working 80 hour weeks. Iran War? No clue what Charlie would say Thomas Massie? Who is that?
Erika Kirk@MrsErikaKirk

Regardless of the outcome of Spencer Pratt’s race, what he’s doing is authentically American. See a problem, become a part of the solution. His campaign ads are unconventional, but that’s the point; it’s refreshing. Instead of speaking like a career politician, he’s speaking as an American who sees and deeply understands how fragile the simple things in life are when leadership fails. This is what this country is all about. Citizens willing to step into the political arena, unafraid, and challenge a failing system, much like the one that has destroyed Los Angeles. I hope moments like this inspire more Americans to throw their names into the mix, run for office, get involved and stand up for what makes this country exceptional.

English
16
46
500
9.6K
Conservative Momma
Conservative Momma@conmomma·
Candace Owens interviewed Hunter Biden today, and a lot of the responses I’m seeing are about how we need to find humanity in one another and extend grace. I couldn’t agree more. But that’s not what I’ve witnessed from Candace. She has, day in and day out, relentlessly attacked a mother of two whose husband was brutally a**assinated for the world to see. Where’s the “seeing humanity and extending grace” for Erika? Where is the “Hey, I might not do what this widow does or say what she says, but I’m going to extend grace because I can’t imagine walking in her shoes”? Where is it? Is grace only extended for those who got their deceased brother’s wife addicted to crack, had vile incriminating evidence on their laptop, had multiple affairs, did drugs with prostitutes, sat on the board of an oil and gas company with zero experience in the industry, and took 10% for the “big guy”? I am all for grace. I really am. No one is perfect. No one. We all mess up. We are all imperfect. Why can’t this grace be extended to the widow?
English
41
40
323
7.2K
LitchiDup
LitchiDup@Litchidup·
@sarahadams Did you have the same energy for Larry Loomer after IT exposed Candace's personal vehicles on social media? I hope so, otherwise you're just a hypocritical shill!
English
0
0
1
22
Sarah Adams
Sarah Adams@sarahadams·
Teaching Moment: How Rhetoric Creates Pathways to Violence This is how radicalization language works online, and people need to start recognizing it before it escalates further. Those who liked a post like this may want to take a hard look inward and ask themselves whether they are allowing themselves to be manipulated into normalizing extremist rhetoric and becoming useful idiots for it. Nobody has to say “go hurt someone” directly for rhetoric to become dangerous. Modern extremist-style agitation often works through implication, emotional conditioning, moral justification, and repetition. The goal is to make harassment, intimidation, or even violence feel understandable or deserved in the minds of unstable people consuming the content. When someone says things like: “Now I understand why they took him out.” OR “He had to be removed from the equation.” OR “Your silence speaks volumes.” …they are doing more than criticizing someone politically. They are framing violence as rational, justified, or inevitable while psychologically isolating and targeting a specific person. In this case, the widow of a man who was himself a victim of the same kind of radicalizing rhetoric, @MrsErikaKirk. That matters because this is how stochastic radicalization spreads online. You create an atmosphere where followers begin viewing a target not as a human being, but as an obstacle, traitor, or symbol that “deserves” consequences. The speaker keeps plausible deniability because they never explicitly call for harm and at times even hide behind religion in this case Catholicism, but the audience still absorbs the message. This is the same reason threat analysts and law enforcement pay close attention to rhetoric that implies violence was justified, promotes martyrdom narratives, suggests someone “had to be removed,” encourages targeted pile-ons, morally licenses aggression against an individual, or selectively excuses terrorism and extremist violence while condemning any effort to confront or stop those responsible. This type of language can condition audiences to view hostility, intimidation, or violence as understandable, justified, or even deserved, which is why it is recognized as part of broader pathway to violence. People should learn to identify this behavior early instead of pretending it only counts when someone explicitly says “attack them.” This post goes beyond just jealously or bullying. By the time rhetoric reaches the stage we are seeing below with the language so perfectly crafted to manipulate, the radicalization process is usually already well underway.
Carrie Prejean Boller@CarriePrejean1

Why didn’t you say the same thing about your late husband’s favorite congressman? I’m starting to see now why they took Charlie out. They wanted to take out his voice and his influence. Charlie would have undoubtedly campaigned alongside Thomas Massie publicly and unapologetically. Your silence speaks volumes Erika. The more people watch this, the more obvious it becomes why Charlie had to be removed from the equation. Charlie would have been boldly campaigning alongside @RepThomasMassie against billionaire donor Miriam Adelson.

English
70
263
1K
64.8K
LitchiDup retweetledi
David Nino Rodriguez
David Nino Rodriguez@ninoboxer·
My Candace Owens- Victor Marx assessment: Victor Marx began the Candace Owens podcast by making sure he controlled the pace and narrative.. He began the conversation like a prize fighter landing the first punch. He opened up the dialogue by sowing seeds of doubt into her investigative research while imposing his dominance and authority. Instead of answering her questions on her own platform, he pulled out an extremely small and minute falsehood about his years in military service, and magnified it into unrealistic & grandiose proportions so that she would lose all credibility. Even asking for an apology. This is a classic manipulative technique any seasoned psychopathic narcissist would use to establish and impose dominance. Whenever Candace Owens cornered him about his past, he used methods of deflection to take away from her power points. He would take advantage of her very finite questions to persuade the audience into believing that he was a victim of abuse, so that he could develop an emotional connection with the audience. This is a tactic of deflection and sympathy used by psychopaths, that if she does try to discredit him, she is also discrediting millions of harmed and abused children. I didn’t buy any of it. In my humble opinion this guy is a very dark and dangerous individual with a high level of nefarious connections within the government.
English
323
384
3.3K
54.2K
LitchiDup
LitchiDup@Litchidup·
@JayTC53 Proof that he's a child predator? Because i find fuck all on that.
English
0
0
0
1
J
J@JayTC53·
Candace Owens LOVES to accuse everyone as being a "member of the Epstein class" Then will invite a child predator, sexual abuser and foreign influence peddler who faced zero accountability Hunter Biden into her home for a cozy friendly chat. Candace Owens is a fraud. Always has been.
J tweet media
English
17
63
219
1.9K
LitchiDup
LitchiDup@Litchidup·
@PageofMAGA @JayTC53 You clearly didn't watch the interview, so politely shut the fuck up, you sound like an idiot!
English
0
0
0
1
MAGA
MAGA@PageofMAGA·
@JayTC53 Candace Statements on Hunter Biden
MAGA tweet media
English
1
0
0
37
LitchiDup retweetledi
ELIZABETH LANE
ELIZABETH LANE@imelizabethlane·
If this is a real picture, @nickshirleyy , great job posing with a pedophile’s friend who has consistently lied about his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein and has been caught multiple times. And all he had to respond with was a smug smile. Could you have picked a better person to pose with? Then you have issues when people doubt your intentions? - ''Oh no, Candace Owens came after me, blah blah.'' Yeah, keep posing with pedophile’s friends with shaky 9/11 alibis and she won’t be the only one coming after you buddy.
ELIZABETH LANE tweet media
English
101
262
1.8K
20K
LitchiDup retweetledi
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
@BrentScher @BCC_Mitchell You guys interviewed Bibi Netanyahu. Hookers and crackheads are infinitely more moral than the creature who conducted a genocide in broad day light.
English
164
580
6.5K
65.6K
LitchiDup retweetledi
Baron Coleman
Baron Coleman@baroncoleman·
Blake Neff’s constant obsession with @RealCandaceO makes perfect sense in light of his documented racism. You just think he’d be more subtle about it. Get help, Blake. Especially the targeting and harassing specific women part of your vile history.
Baron Coleman tweet media
Blake Neff@BlakeSNeff

What a lovely prayer

English
152
271
2.4K
75.2K
LitchiDup retweetledi
Kay Su
Kay Su@KaySu00·
@EthanLevins2 Went to look up Tucker Carlson. Out pops a Ben Shapiro ad. How very Jewish of him.
Kay Su tweet media
English
1
1
14
146
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸@EthanLevins2·
Ben Shapiro has placed his ENTIRE show as a YouTube ad. I wish I was joking.
Ethan Levins 🇺🇸 tweet media
English
763
2.4K
52.1K
4.8M
LitchiDup retweetledi
Cenk Uygur
Cenk Uygur@cenkuygur·
@EthanLevins2 This is an old trick our competitors used to do all the time. They would buy views by using their videos as ads. Why? So, they could trick investors into thinking they’re popular. Guaranteed Ben is looking for investor money right now.
English
36
134
3.5K
63.2K
LitchiDup retweetledi
Candace Owens
Candace Owens@RealCandaceO·
Yes. This is what I meant when I said he literally buys his views. I know the people who were tasked with buying the ad-for-views for him. This has been going on for years now. It bizarre that he then arrogantly cites his monthly viewership and says “haters can kiss my ass”. His monthly viewership is effectively just how much money he’s willing to burn. It’s a completely unsustainable business model outside of a charitable organization.
English
236
711
15.9K
223.8K
LitchiDup
LitchiDup@Litchidup·
@AllyJKiss Don't worry, they are keeping a space for you too, fucking useless shill!
English
0
0
0
13
Ally
Ally@AllyJKiss·
There’s a special place in hell for Carrie.
Ally tweet media
English
218
282
2K
21.6K