Liz Hodgson

278 posts

Liz Hodgson banner
Liz Hodgson

Liz Hodgson

@Lizzysrsly

Writes about the intersection of politics and culture on Substack.

Katılım Temmuz 2023
860 Takip Edilen141 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
Who remembers when Canada was known for its humour exports? 🙋‍♀️ It was perhaps years in the making, but this week we became a different country—one that stages taxpayer-funded pageants in which political elites, state-approved “artists” and state-funded media applaud each other in a sealed echo chamber… My take on the Juno Awards 🏆 AND that crazy NDP convention 👇👇👇 nosrsly.substack.com/p/canada-is-no…
English
0
0
0
46
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
This is hard to watch. Halperin is trespassing all over his own integrity. She knows he’s damaged goods from #metoo accusations and can’t push back on the boss. I think she’s enjoying her power over him. A few months ago she told some humblebrag tale on her podcast about how Joe Scarborough thanked her for “helping out our friend Mark.” She’s beginning to look psychotic.
English
1
3
35
897
Ally
Ally@AllyJKiss·
Megyn Kelly is excited about her and Tucker’s new Muslim audience- “he’s defending Islam!” 🥴
English
197
96
531
103.2K
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
Here’s click whore Megyn Kelly claiming this morning that Tucker was very “deft” in his NY Times interview and that “any sort of traps the interviewer was laying for him, he saw from a mile away.” She claims we don’t like Tucker because we’re “threatened by him.” So much for objective journalism, ya old whore. A true journalist would’ve covered both the good and the bad from the interview—and there was plenty that reflected badly on Tucker.
English
351
241
2.3K
147K
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
@craiginite @NJBeisner “Great minds” as they say. Also, the cringe of that makeover segment could be seen from space. It was so Regina George! Like Megyn the pretty one offering a glow-up to the plain one. I thought Emily was smarter than this.
English
1
0
5
57
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
Laura, you are correct. HBC became a dead man walking in 2008 when NRDC Equity Partners swooped in, not to build or innovate, but to strip the Bay for parts and offload liabilities, reducing it to a hollowed-out shell. More interested in its real estate holdings than reinvesting in stores or customer experience, these global rentiers sold off valuable locations, loaded the company with debt and left a once-mighty brand to rot.
English
0
0
2
38
Laura Minquini
Laura Minquini@LauraMinquini·
@erinotoole The buck stops with leadership, and strategy and direction was set by whoever held the capital, aka the private equity buyer. They own the potato, they make what it becomes of it. So the failure was with them.
English
3
0
12
401
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
@Awurabena2 @NJBeisner I’m talking about the Church. Not Candace. (I doubt she’ll ever repent.) My point was… Candace’s confirmation is not a sign that the Church is lost. It has never turned away sinners.
English
1
0
2
16
Natalie Jean Beisner
Natalie Jean Beisner@NJBeisner·
Sorry but the fact the Catholic Church confirmed her is evidence of how lost the Roman Catholic Church actually is
Natalie Jean Beisner tweet media
English
345
145
1.5K
65.9K
Larissa Phillips
Larissa Phillips@larissaphillip·
In the 90’s I wrote a few articles for national women’s magazines. They were weird, assigned pieces, usually with inflated sexy theses that made no sense—but they paid really well and my family and friends were impressed. For one article I had to go to a Chinese herbalist and tell her I had sexual dysfunction and get her to prescribe teas and acupuncture. But I was 26 and newly in love and not sexually dysfunctional. The herbalist kept tilting her head and staring at me quizzically and asking to see my tongue again and feeling my pulse etc. One time, maybe for the same article, I had to get a quote from a traditional doctor who would say something like, “Just take two aspirin and call me in the morning.” The editor told me to feed the line to this nice old Kansas doctor she found and ask him to say it back to me so we could quote him. On another article, a different editor wanted me to write something crazy and impossible and stupid. I protested, saying that it made no sense. She said to me, “No offense, but it really doesn’t matter what you think.” That was the last article I wrote in that genre. It wasn’t a good fit. I have the same feeling about what it would be like to be on staff at some of these legacy outlets. I often write about things I can’t talk about with people I’ve been close with for a long time because they would be offended and angry. I almost never post my essays (or opinions) on FB; a large swath of my family and old friends find it disgusting that I write for The Free Press and occasionally let me know, but mostly we agree to pretend it’s not happening. I navigate many social occasions like I am walking through a mine field. It’s incredibly depressing and infuriating to exist like this. I leave these occasions feeling like I have narrowly escaped from a dark and claustrophobic place and can finally breathe again. Writing for some of these legacy outlets would be like going back into that cave and writing and conversing as if from the heart about things I not only don’t believe but that I think are destroying everything of value—but wow, look how much love and adulation they give me when I go along with their program. Murder’s cool. America is evil. Biological sex isn’t real. Oct 7 was terrible but can you blame them?... The fact that I can say what I think, on X and in the Free Press, has been a lifeline for me. I completely understand what Helen Lewis means. I feel the same way. xoxo to you all, even the jerks.
Neeraja Deshpande@neerajadeshp

People are being jerks to @herandrews about this, but anyone who has taken the professional and intellectual risk of rejecting the borg knows exactly what she’s saying. Helen, with whom I often vehemently disagree, is erudite, witty, and, on the sentence level, simply a much better writer than Jia Tolentino. She went to an elite college (Yale) and could have easily stayed on that elite track. Had she compromised ideologically, she probably could have attained Jia Tolentino’s level of mainstream recognition—and yet in doing so, would have fallen to the same bland prose, the same mediocrity that plagues the New Yorker and essentially every other mainstream cultural institution. Tolentino has never written anything that has truly challenged any tenet of millennial feminism. Even the “stealing lemons from Whole Foods” is regurgitated Tumblr. Helen, on the other hand, has defended women against sufferage and cigarette smoking and was hating on boomers years before these became memes on the right; she’s written essays on how cronyism might not be so bad, which is a confounding position to hold but that’s almost beside the point. The point is that the mark of a great writer isn’t mainstream recognition or agreeableness—again, there are a million things I think Helen in particular is dead wrong on—but intellectual integrity. Everyone saying “haha you just couldn’t hack success” is missing her point entirely (or perhaps proving it).

English
7
25
365
35.5K
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
@larissaphillip LOL right? If anyone can figure out the DEI angle, it’s the Globe and Mail!
English
0
0
1
146
Larissa Phillips
Larissa Phillips@larissaphillip·
@Lizzysrsly Perfect encapsulation, but now it would have a DEI dimension to the answer.
English
2
0
3
647
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
@ConceptualJames As an American, you know more about Canada's politics than most Canadians. Impressive.
English
0
0
4
92
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
@NJBeisner Note the use of the word “comprehend.” Not “understand” or “get.” Classic midwittery. (Like her constant use of the phrase “in terms of.”) Smart people don’t talk like that. This is a woman MK described as “brilliant.” 🙄
English
0
0
8
630
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
The comments on her YouTube are hilarious: one half disappointed ex-fans. The other half—roughly—anti-Israel conspiracy nutters and Candace Owens fangirls. Also, a smattering of leftists who keep demanding to know how she ever supported Trump in the first place. She may have a few friends left but not the kind anyone would want.
English
0
1
9
596
Ally
Ally@AllyJKiss·
Megyn Kelly’s career was in the trash after her first attempt to bring down President Trump. In this video, she credits Ben Shapiro for getting her “loser” ass off the couch. He helped her out of her slump- it’s why she started her show, she says. Poor Megyn… she learned nothing. How very very stupid to try this charade again. This time is different, however, as she has burned many bridges. She’s replaced old friends with Woke Reich influencers. The type of people that only know how to love themselves. This time, when her ship sinks, she’ll have no one to save her career—Candace won’t be coming to help her lol. I for one, am very much looking forward to it.
English
74
148
1.4K
85.8K
Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei
Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei@MKhamenei_ir·
We will certainly demand full reparations for all damages caused, as well as blood money for the martyrs and compensation for the war's wounded.
English
532
2.2K
11.2K
212.9K
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
@AntSpeaks Oddly I don’t sense her confidence. I see cognitive dissonance. I think she’d genuinely like to turn back the clock. Too stubborn perhaps. Or feels like it’s too late. Or Candace has some of her texts saying not very nice things about Erika. Hard to say.
English
0
0
7
67
Aɴᴛ
Aɴᴛ@AntSpeaks·
It's hilarious how confident Megyn Kelly is in thinking she’s right. Claiming regime change hasn’t happened while the war is still ongoing... She has a habit of making herself look like an idiot, and I’m confident it will be no different this time.
English
19
25
646
11.8K
Sasha Stone
Sasha Stone@realsashastone·
You have major voices aligning themselves with Candace Owens and legitimizing her and her dangerous conspiracy theories about Iran and Charlie Kirk - there is no fixing that. That is a disease rotting on the Right.
English
4
1
100
994
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
Men are better at childcare than you may think. Their superior muscle strength puts them at a huge advantage because it can be such a physically demanding job. Especially young boys who can run and play literally forever. If you can’t throw a ball, boys get bored with you very quickly and end up staring at tablets.
English
1
0
0
27
Owen Gregorian
Owen Gregorian@OwenGregorian·
It’s not just about the jobs. It’s about the children. Women are biologically superior at raising children. They are designed for it. They are necessary for it. And they have more happiness and life satisfaction when they raise their children. Do what is best for the kids.
Rachel Wilson@Rach4Patriarchy

“why can’t men stay home with the babies? Why does it have to be women?” aside from the obvious fact that men cannot have babies, we quite literally need all the men to go to work or there’s no civilization. Not so with most women’s jobs.

English
11
5
78
3.6K
Liz Hodgson
Liz Hodgson@Lizzysrsly·
@NotTheirScript @LauraLoomer @SecWar @POTUS Yes, it’s a poverty mindset writ large. You’re lucky to be in the US. Canada’s national identity is poverty, except when it comes to NGO profligacy in the third world.
English
0
0
2
33
The Undercurrent
The Undercurrent@NotTheirScript·
@LauraLoomer @SecWar @POTUS I don’t think they are truly upset that we blew up $300 million worth of equipment. I think they are mad that we can afford to… and that we can afford to do it again, and again, and again. They are jealous of that prosperity.
English
6
3
87
1K
Laura Loomer
Laura Loomer@LauraLoomer·
Someday there is going to be a movie made about this rescue mission in Iran. But man, what a morale booster for our military to know that @SecWar and @POTUS will blowup $300 million worth of our own military aircraft to rescue one US soldier. No man left behind! 🇺🇸 God bless our troops!
English
2K
6.5K
41.6K
393K