Nessie 🐍

853 posts

Nessie 🐍 banner
Nessie 🐍

Nessie 🐍

@Lochness2000

Present

Location is false Katılım Mayıs 2021
391 Takip Edilen323 Takipçiler
H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞
H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞@justinsuntron·
This Is World Tyranny, Not World Liberty Financial — Here's Why This proposal has been packaged as a "governance alignment signal" and a "long-term commitment," but strip away the packaging and what you have is one of the most absurd governance scams I have ever seen. Let me break it down. I. Vote Against and Get Punished — Classic Coercion Tactic This is not a legitimate voting exercise, not even close.  The design of this proposal is a logical trap: anyone who votes against it has their tokens locked indefinitely with no unlock path whatsoever. In other words, if you oppose this proposal, you get punished. This is not voting. This is coercion. What kind of democratic process rewards agreement and imprisons dissent? II. Voters Have Been Selectively Frozen Out I personally hold approximately 4% of the voting power, yet my tokens have been frozen and I am forced out of this voting process. I am not alone. A large number of holders with significant voting rights are in the same position. Meanwhile, the team controls the power to freeze tokens — they decide who can vote and who cannot. What does this mean? It means the outcome was determined before the vote even began. This is not a governance vote. This is a performance where the police have already barricaded the doors of parliament and only let their own people inside to raise their hands. The voter pool has been purged. Only yes votes remain. The result of such a vote carries no binding force whatsoever. III. All Actual Power Has Been Seized by Anonymous Actors The actual control over the WLFI smart contracts lies in the hands of a 3/5 anonymous multisig and a single anonymous guardian EOA has the power to blacklist addresses holding WLFI. Let me emphasize — anonymous. This anonymous multisig can override any vote result and execute any operation directly at the contract level. The so-called governance proposals, on-chain votes, and community discussions are nothing but theater. Real power has never been yielded to anyone but themselves and it’s laughable that they try these tricks to fool the community. The bottom line is this, the power sits with anonymous wallet addresses whose owners nobody knows or can verify. This is not decentralized governance. This is dictatorship wearing the mask of a DAO. IV. Voters Must Identify Themselves, but the Rulers Are Anonymous — Worse Than Tyranny Here is the most ironic part: WLFI requires every participating voter to complete identity verification, electronically sign acknowledgements, and meet compliance eligibility requirements. You want to exercise your rights? Show your face first. But who are the guardian and multisig signers who hold the power of life and death over the contract? Nobody was told and there is absolutely no transparency.  While the governed must identify themselves, the governors with absolute power are anonymous. Your voters must register, submit to scrutiny, and be vetted and dictated how to vote— while your dictators won't even show their faces. V. A Naked Violation of Property Rights Worth Billions of Dollars Let us not forget the real stakes of this proposal: this is not some trivial parameter adjustment or protocol upgrade. This vote seeks to decide the unlock schedule for billions of dollars in assets, the reallocation of governance and vesting rights, and most extreme of all, the permanent destruction of billions of tokens. This is a naked expropriation of holders' property rights. In an environment where voting against the proposal is punished, where large numbers of holders have been frozen out of voting, and where actual control rests with anonymous wallets, using this sham vote to decide the fate of billions of dollars in assets? This is not governance. This is a sham and flies in the face of what this protocol was meant to be. No society governed by the rule of law would permit this. In traditional financial markets, any asset disposition of this scale would require rigorous regulatory review, independent board approval, and minority shareholder protections. Here, a few anonymous wallets get to decide everything. The permanent burning of tokens means holders' property is irreversibly destroyed, no compensation, no recourse, no due process. This has gone far beyond the realm of so-called "decentralized governance." This is a systematic violation of property rights. Conclusion I repeat that this proposal is not governance. It is an exercise of power by the selected few who are carefully engineering a further power consolidation and property expropriation operation. Dissenters are punished for voting no. Opponents are frozen out. Actual control lies with anonymous wallets. Those who exercise their rights must prove their identity while the fate of billions of dollars in assets is decided by a sham vote. This is not what decentralized finance was meant to be, results produced under these sorts of conditions carry no legitimacy, should not have binding force, and should not be recognized. I call on all WLFI holders to see this proposal for what it truly is, to voice their opposition across all public channels, and to reserve all legal rights of recourse.
WLFI@worldlibertyfi

We’ve just posted a governance proposal to the forum for community discussion, and we believe it represents one of the strongest long-term governance alignment signals in DeFi. Here's what it does 🧵

English
592
447
2.2K
465.1K
H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞
H.E. Justin Sun 👨‍🚀 🌞@justinsuntron·
I am calling on World Liberty Financial @worldlibertyfi to publicly disclose who controls the single guardian EOA and the 3/5 multisig that govern the WLFI smart contract. Every investor has the right to know who holds the power to freeze their assets. Here is what on-chain records show: A single guardian EOA — which also sits on the multisig — blacklisted my wallet. That same address is the sole owner of a second guardian Safe with a threshold of 1. This means one person — one single individual — has the unilateral power to freeze any token holder's assets. Seizing those assets requires a 3-of-5 multisig vote, but freezing requires only one signature. Who is that person? The community deserves an answer. Let me be clear about what this structure means: community governance and voting are meaningless. Every proposal, every vote, every claim of decentralized decision-making is theater. Real power — the power to freeze, to move funds, to control the protocol — sits with one anonymous EOA and a 3-of-5 multisig that answers to no one. The entire governance framework has been hollowed out from the inside. A project that claims to stand for decentralization and financial freedom cannot concentrate this level of power in a single anonymous address. If the WLFI team has nothing to hide, they should have no difficulty identifying who controls these keys.
banteg@banteg

justin sun vs wlfi the original token deployed sep 2024 had no blacklist and no seizure, but it was upgradable. the blacklist was added in v2 on aug 24, 2025. 11 months after sun invested and one week before trading opened. on nov 19, 2025, another upgrade added batch reallocation, essentially seizing, justified with saving phished funds. whatever the paper contract said, the code for vesting contract supports cliff dates, linear schedules, and up to 8 segments per category. wlfi used none of these to restrict sun. they chose 20% instant lump-sum unlock, then punished him for using a fraction of it. the remaining 80% has no vesting schedule at all, 7+ months later, claimable() returns 0. the vesting contract has per-category schedules to enforce token lockups. what's interesting is wlfi has carved out a special category 3 specifically for justin sun, he's the only user in it. the other 519 investors are in category 1. 14 minutes before sun activated his wallet, wlfi's own 3-of-5 multisig configured category 3 to release 20% of his 3b allocation as freely transferable tokens at trading start. over the next 3 days sun transferred out 55m. a single guardian eoa (also on multisig) blacklisted him. that address is also the sole owner of a second guardian safe with threshold 1. so one person can freeze anyone, while seizing requires 3-of-5. meanwhile, the same multisig is using 5b wlfi as collateral on dolomite to borrow $250m in stablecoins. they represent 98% of all wlfi on dolomite and 86% of the protocol's entire borrow volume. two safes with the same five signers, running a usd1/usdc loop that recycles borrowed usd1 as collateral to borrow usdc and feed it back.

English
739
451
3.1K
533.4K
Nessie 🐍
Nessie 🐍@Lochness2000·
@dangambardello You don’t need to defend yourself. Keep doing what you are doing. Thanks
English
0
0
2
57
Dan Gambardello
Dan Gambardello@dangambardello·
If people would actually sit and listen to my analysis, they would probably agree with most of what I say. I've realized that the problem is people can't stand my optimism...therefore they don't even listen to my analysis.
English
87
11
434
14.4K
David Sacks
David Sacks@DavidSacks·
After all the accomplishments in our first year, President Trump has even bigger priorities for 2026. The President's Council of Advisors on Science and Technology is hitting the ground running to deliver more wins for America. foxbusiness.com/politics/trump…
English
718
253
4.1K
434.4K
Lark Davis
Lark Davis@LarkDavis·
Imagine waking up and your life savings are worth nothing. War is coming. You need to leave NOW. Banks are closed. Internet is down. ATMs capped at $1.83 a day. You have a house. You can't sell it in time. You have a car. You can't take it with you. All you have is the cash in your pocket and maybe some jewelry. That's Iran right now. 1 million rials to buy 20 bucks, probably less by the time you are reading this. Now imagine you had Bitcoin instead. No bank. No border. No government can touch it. Just a hard wallet in your pocket and enough to survive anywhere in the world. Most people will read this and scroll on. Some are living it right now.
English
409
392
3.5K
465.7K
Nessie 🐍
Nessie 🐍@Lochness2000·
@bensig You are not going to get a 6 year old to sit in front of a computer with an AI teacher. Tudor sure, actual grade school teacher no.
English
28
0
113
14.8K
Ben Sigman
Ben Sigman@bensig·
Get ready to lose your job…
Ben Sigman tweet media
English
3.8K
5.2K
23K
3.5M
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
Big moment - you can now trade stocks on Coinbase. The everything exchange is growing. This is another step toward our vision of offering tokenized equities. We’re not stopping until Coinbase is the #1 financial app in the world.
Coinbase 🛡️@coinbase

Trade stocks. Around the clock. → 24/5 trading → Zero commission → One unified portfolio for stocks & crypto → Buy fractional shares for as little as $1 Now available to all eligible U.S. traders on Coinbase.

English
590
524
4.5K
408.2K
MartyParty
MartyParty@martypartymusic·
Top $IBIT shareholders tells you who is managing the accumulation Wyckoff of #Bitcoin - Jane Street Who is Jane Street? (full name: Jane Street Capital or Jane Street Group) is one of the world's leading quantitative trading firms and market makers. It's a highly secretive, tech-driven proprietary trading powerhouse that uses advanced algorithms, machine learning, statistics, and low-latency systems to trade across global markets. Founded: 2000 (by former Susquehanna International Group traders: Tim Reynolds, Robert Granieri, Marc Gerstein, and Michael Jenkins). Headquarters: New York City (main office at 250 Vesey Street), with global offices in London, Hong Kong, Singapore, Amsterdam, and others. Employees: Around 2,600–3,000 people (heavily skewed toward engineers, quants, researchers, and traders many with strong math/CS backgrounds). Provides liquidity as a market maker in equities, ETFs, options, bonds, currencies, commodities, and increasingly crypto-related products. Trades its own capital (proprietary trading) using sophisticated quantitative strategies. Heavy emphasis on technology: They build their own tools, low-latency networks, distributed systems, and apply deep learning/ML to trading.
MartyParty tweet media
English
26
39
351
23.9K
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
Retail users on Coinbase have been very resilient during these market conditions, according to our data: - They’ve been buying the dip - we’ve seen a native unit increase for retail users across BTC and ETH - They have diamond hands - vast majority of customers had native unit balances in Feb equal to or greater than their balances in December
English
735
350
4.1K
363.7K
Nessie 🐍
Nessie 🐍@Lochness2000·
@coinbase Why is the CEO dumping stock while also holding up Clarity act?
English
0
0
3
230
Coinbase 🛡️
Coinbase 🛡️@coinbase·
Ask Coinbase anything. Live on 𝕏 next week, at 10:15AM PT on February 17. Got questions? Comment them below.
Coinbase 🛡️ tweet media
English
226
80
412
137.4K
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
Bitcoin on pace for first positive day in 12 months
English
199
140
4K
269K
zerohedge
zerohedge@zerohedge·
CPI 0.2% MoM, Exp. 0.3% CPI Core 0.3% MoM, Exp. 0.3% CPI 2.4% YoY, Exp. 2.5% CPI Core 2.5% YoY, Exp. 2.5%
Português
64
148
968
264.2K
Nessie 🐍
Nessie 🐍@Lochness2000·
@SergeyNazarov Yes we are all excited for you guys to get nothing done like usual
English
0
0
14
440
Sergey Nazarov
Sergey Nazarov@SergeyNazarov·
Excited to join this great group of leaders from our industry on the CFTC Innovation Advisory Committee. I am looking forward to doing everything I can to help provide feedback on the key role of oracles as critical infrastructure for the reliable operation of markets, as well provide whatever insight I can on how the Cryptocurrency, DeFi and RWA industry can evolve successfully in the US as its primary global hub. @ChairmanSelig it has always been a pleasure speaking with you during your time at the SEC, I was thrilled to hear of your appointment to this new role and I am very excited about how you and this committee can work together to the benefit of both our industry and the US economy. Thank you again for forming this committee.
Mike Selig@ChairmanSelig

Here is the full roster of the @CFTC Innovation Advisory Committee.👇

English
91
169
1.1K
77.5K
Mike Selig
Mike Selig@ChairmanSelig·
Here is the full roster of the @CFTC Innovation Advisory Committee.👇
Mike Selig tweet media
English
272
436
2.2K
873.2K
Nessie 🐍
Nessie 🐍@Lochness2000·
@brian_armstrong You are a net negative for the industry. Most of crypto should not be on exchanges
English
1
0
21
781
Brian Armstrong
Brian Armstrong@brian_armstrong·
It’s earnings day. 2025 was a strong year for Coinbase, and we built a solid foundation for continued growth in 2026. Our thesis is actually very simple: crypto is updating all financial services, and we're the best positioned company to capitalize on this transformation. Some highlights: - Total trading volume grew 156% Y/Y and our crypto trading market share doubled in 2025 - Assets on Coinbase increased 3x over the last 3 years - We now have 12 products generating >$100M of revenue on an annualized basis - New all time highs in USDC and Coinbase One Onwards
English
470
227
1.5K
243.8K