Lucio

1.7K posts

Lucio banner
Lucio

Lucio

@Lucio119111

i'm more active at TG https://t.co/9fG3yUy1mv and i've been in crypto since 2020, i do post what i like so DYOR always.

Katılım Ağustos 2024
297 Takip Edilen814 Takipçiler
CheesePad
CheesePad@cheesepad·
🧀 The CheesePad Journey 🐭 Six months ago: 2 communities. Today: 100+ public communities and hundreds of private groups across the globe and China. 🌍🇨🇳 This milestone reflects the trust and support of our growing community. 🧀 Huge thanks to @cz_binance and @heyibinance for the inspiring leadership that drives the entire ecosystem forward. 🙏 Grateful to @BNBCHAIN @BNBCHAINZH for believing in our vision, and to @BinanceWallet for the continued support. 🐭🧀 To everyone who joined us thank you. 🧀 More alliances and ecosystem updates coming soon. 🐭 Together, we will achieve outstanding results in DeFi. 🚀🧀 #CheesePad #BNBChain
CheesePad tweet media
English
160
219
212
8.1K
Thorim
Thorim@Thorim04·
Hey Ken, The community deployed a Bankrbot token to you in order to advance the development of NanoMem as a standalone module and make it go mainstream. As a community we think the functionality is great and would love to serve as a helping hand in the adoption of NanoMem. You have fees claimable via the @bankrbot the community created. I can answer any questions :)
English
12
3
15
676
Ken Liu
Ken Liu@kenziyuliu·
Sharing a super simple, user-owned memory module we've been playing around: nanomem The basic idea is to treat memory as a pure intelligence problem: ingestion, structuring, and (selective) retrieval are all just LLM calls & agent loops on a on-device markdown file tree. Each file lists a set of facts w/ metadata (timestamp, confidence, source, etc.); no embeddings/RAG/training of any kind. For example: - `nanomem add ` starts an agent loop to walk the tree, read relevant files, and edit. - `nanomem retrieve ` walks the tree and returns a single summary string (possibly assembled from many subtrees) related to the query. What’s nice about this approach is that the memory system is, by construction: 1. partitionable (human/agents can easily separate `hobbies/snowboard.md` from `tax/residency.md` for data minimization + relevance) 2. portable and user-owned (it’s just text files) 3. interpretable (you know exactly what’s written and you can manually edit) 4. forward-compatible (future models can read memory files just the same, and memory quality/speed improves as models get better) 5. modularized (you can optimize ingestion/retrieval/compaction prompts separately) Privacy & utility. I'm most excited about the ability to partition + selectively disclose memory at inference-time. Selective disclosure helps with both privacy (principle of least privilege & “need-to-know”) and utility (as too much context for a query can harm answer quality). Composability. An inference-time memory module means: (1) you can run such a module with confidential inference (LLMs on TEEs) for provable privacy, and (2) you can selectively disclose context over unlinkable inference of remote models (demo below). We built nanomem as part of the Open Anonymity project (openanoymity.ai), but it’s meant to be a standalone module for humans and agents (e.g., you can write a SKILL for using the CLI tool). Still polishing the rough edges! - GitHub (MIT): github.com/OpenAnonymity/… - Blog: openanonymity.ai/blog/nanomem/ - Beta implementation in chat client soon: chat.openanonymity.ai Work done with amazing project co-leads @amelia_kuang @cocozxu @erikchi !!
English
9
45
305
72.9K
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Some of my perspective on where the @ethereumfndn is going. First of all, this is only my own view. The board is not just me, and I have no extra special powers on the board that the other board members do not. @aerugoettinea is the one executing much of this transition. My input has been largely on technical questions. The board is in the process of expanding, and my own power within the org will continue to decrease, which is honestly what I want. The 2025 era brought many important improvements to EF and its ability to execute. Many issues were resolved, and EF continues to benefit from its improved efficiency and greater focus on concrete goals to this day. And so with those problems resolved, early this year, the largest remaining hole that I perceived was something different nagging at me: I would regularly spot people saying things like "vitalik says these beautiful things about ethereum needing to be decentralized, and have privacy, and be a sanctuary technology, but why do the EF's actions not reflect that?" Now, you may have been hearing something different. You may not have been sensing a feeling of crisis at all, and maybe were hearing people saying that finally we were taking execution and BD seriously and the main task for us is to keep going that way and be even better and faster. Then probably there is genuine difference between you and me, in what kinds of criticism I take most seriously, and what kinds of critics through their criticism are most able to make me feel pain. As an analogy, let's briefly switch over to a different domain. One belief you can have about Google is that it is a success story, and has brought a lot of good to humanity in organizing the world's information. Another belief you can have about Google is that they had a beautiful idealistic beginning, but at some point the corruption of mainstream corporate attitudes seeped in, and they slowly bit by bit completely abandoned the "don't be evil" slogan. My belief on Google specifically is probably somewhere between the two. BUT, if you had taken me back in time to ~2008, and offered me a button to press to make Google one or two standard deviations more "dogmatic", eg. give Richard Stallman permanent veto power over some key policies, I would immediately press it. Why? Because a choice for one company is not a choice for the world, or even one country. Google existed and exists in the context of a technology industry generally drifting away from early idealistic don't-be-evil roots and toward greed for financial gain, totalizing visions of accelerated superintelligence, infiltration by sociopaths, and craven capitulation to (or worse, active participation in) government pressure for ideological control, surveillance and war. And so *one company* doing something different, positioning itself to be what George Bernard Shaw calls the Unreasonable Man, resisting the trend of the times, would have been better for freedom, balance of power and stability of society as a whole, than *all* large companies bending to dominant trends. This is a part of my version of pluralism. This line of thinking is not just mine, but I also is not too far off from what Aya and others had in mind with the Mandate. Now how does this all get to the role of the EF? EF is not a "center of Ethereum", rather EF is "one node, with a defined purpose, alongside other nodes". We've always said that the EF should be the latter, but many in the Ethereum ecosystem (and even within the EF) wanted us to be the former. Now, we are taking action to ensure that we will be the latter. This is particularly important because EF is a limited organization, with limited resources and limited organizational capacity. The EF has only ~0.16% of all ETH (less than many other individual ETH holders), whereas among other blockchains it's common for "the central foundation" to have 10-50%. Fiscally, the EF was originally designed to fulfill a limited work scope defined in the token sale docs and other pre-launch materials (building the chain software; getting through Frontier, Homestead, Metropolis, Serenity), which was fully completed in 2022; it was not designed to be an eternal steward. And so today, the EF is choosing to use its remaining resources to pursue longevity over breadth (yes, this means we sell less ETH). The EF focuses *specifically* on those activities critical to the success of ethereum as a censorship/capture-resistant, open, private and secure system, that would not happen otherwise. This means making hard choices, and in some cases even activities that we highly approve of and people that we highly respect becoming outside of the EF. People of great technical talent, public respect and even alignment with the mission and CROPS being outside of the EF is in fact necessary if we want important tasks to be able to attract outside capital. This also means the EF taking opinionated stands culturally. This is all intended in cooperation with all other parts of ethereum. We recognize that many other parts of the ethereum world highly respect CROPS and related values. But highly respecting is not the same as choosing to specialize and totally dedicate to a domain (Compare in a different domain: I think reducing animal cruelty is important, and I like vegan food, but am not full unconditional vegan myself) EF is still in a transition period, and we expect its new long-term form to stabilize over the next few months. What are the guiding principles of this new form? Again, I am only one person, but I can give my answer from a technical perspective (there are also critical non-technical aspects). At the core, *Ethereum must be impressive*. We are living in an age of highly intelligent AI and all kinds of other technological acceleration. "Status quo EVM, with a hard fork or two a year to optimize for short-term needs of users" is not interesting. To some, "impressive" means: 250ms latency and 1M TPS. I think Ethereum trying to go that route is a mistake. Being as fast and as scalable as possible, and only a small epsilon more decentralized than the others, is a route to mediocrity, and if we try it we will lose. I think Ethereum should scale. But I think Ethereum should strive the hardest to be deeply impressive in a different dimension: the CROPS dimension. This means things like: * Provably bug-free Ethereum. This is a goal that all cybersecurity researchers would have thought is absurd and impossible, up until roughly 6 months ago. Now, it's on the cusp of being possible, thanks to AI-assisted formal verification. So we should be frontrunners in doing this. * Available chain consensus. Ethereum is, and with lean consensus will cotninue to be, the ONLY chain that has both (i) traditional-BFT style properties that it's safe under asynchrony up to a high level of fault tolerance, and (ii) the bitcoin PoW-style property that under synchrony it's safe up to 49% attackers. As far as I can tell, literally no other chain has this or is planning for it; bitcoin goes for (ii) only and most other chains go for (i) only. Some will remember I fought hard for this, Unreasonably insisting that it is not OK for ethereum to rely on social consensus and hard forks to rescue ethereum from 34% of nodes going offline. It's OK for chains like hyperledger, bnb, solana, tempo, etc. It's not OK for bitcoin or ethereum or eg. zcash. * Intermediary minimization. The fact that smart contract wallets, protocols like railgun, etc have to send transactions through intermediaries to get included onchain is honestly embarrassing, and it's a constant point of fragility. Hence the work on FOCIL and EIP-8141 (and 7701 and years of work before) to make transaction sending intermediary-minimized with public mempool and strong inclusion properties, in a truly general-purpose way, that covers not just eg. secp256r1, but also privacy protocols and much more. Kohaku is pushing intermediary minimization at the user layer, pulling Ethereum away from the dystopian status quo world where our wallets don't even verify the chain, send our private data out to a dozen third-party servers, and toward a brighter CROPS future. Some of these goals are Unreasonable - maybe Ethereum would be "fine" getting only 50% of the way - what if we depend on intermediaries, but make it easy to switch? But going 50% of the way would not make Ethereum Deeply Impressive in the CROPS way. So we push for 100%. Fortunately all these goals are compatible with high TPS, this is a major focus of research (esp. on scaling the state). Well-designed L2s can also help, especially L2s optimized for specific applications (eg. high-volume trading, privacy...). These goals are even compatible with significantly lower slot times, thanks to Raul's work on erasure-coded P2P, and many other optimizations. The most high-value "product" of the ethereum blockchain, financially speaking, is ETH the asset. Ethereum secures $250 billion of ETH. The types of properties of Ethereum that I mentioned above are very good for ETH the asset. Nearly 90% of my net worth is in ETH, and most of the remainder is ~$40m of onchain fiat of which every dollar has already been allocated for some open-source biotech or software or hardware initiative. That said, there are aspects of supporting ETH the asset - *necessary* aspects even - that are outside the scope of the EF. This is where we need other heroes (some of whom hold more ETH than the EF does) to step in and help. EF has been recently thinking more about how it will relate to other such organizations, and give them needed initial support. EF will be a smaller ship than in previous years, a more opinionated one - in some cases more opinionated in ways that might be difficult to comprehend - but a longer-lasting one, and one suited to making sure that ethereum brings something meaningful to the world. We are grateful to all those inside and outside the EF who are helping to make this happen.
English
1.5K
1.4K
7.6K
3.7M
MooKadir
MooKadir@MooKadir11·
Aped into PNP thesis is simple for this one tomorrow is binance pizza day so chances they will spam it all day is huge Binance might as well change their PFP to it, just like BNB chain did potential is good on this one ngl. 0xa1b009899efee9e1b0d106832039993b7b664444
MooKadir tweet media
English
3
1
5
410
Whalex0
Whalex0@Whalex0o·
$TERMINUS at a clean dip (700–800K) smart money loading. Strong team, solid holders, listings + marketing still ahead… momentum is building. 2–3M+ looks very doable from here. If you were waiting for an entry this is it habibis. Ca: 0x7D74a3497856d0F463Af55CD489823a98Dfa6666
Whalex0 tweet media
English
16
18
25
1K
TERMINUS A city on Mars
TERMINUS A city on Mars@TERMINUSAcityOM·
📣Most memes need attention. $TERMINUS is built around one of the biggest attention machines on Earth: Mars. 📣And the craziest part? The logo and information updated on @MetaMask wallet in a few hours. 📣Don't get left behind.
TERMINUS A city on Mars tweet media
English
33
25
53
1.9K
Whalex0
Whalex0@Whalex0o·
@XFreeze We don’t just earn the stars… we build where they take us. See you in Terminus on Mars.
Whalex0 tweet media
English
1
1
4
261
Whalex0
Whalex0@Whalex0o·
@BigImpactHumans The stars aren’t the endgame… Terminus on Mars is where early believers land habibi.
Whalex0 tweet media
English
2
1
7
146
LilHumansBigImpact
LilHumansBigImpact@BigImpactHumans·
We don’t inherit the stars, we earn them. Starship and Super Heavy V3 ✨
LilHumansBigImpact tweet media
English
8
9
93
1.5K
Lucio
Lucio@Lucio119111·
1.8m market cap first candle and chart holding at 900k mc right now i think its a good dip to enter so don't miss. 0x7D74a3497856d0F463Af55CD489823a98Dfa6666 t.me/terminus_mars x.com/TERMINUSAcityOM
Lucio tweet media
English
20
18
22
431
Yoda
Yoda@yodacalls·
1 week ago i deposited $2.3k in hyperliquid chain Now i have $57.8k ty $Hyper Szn, $Stonks Snz and $Alt Snz hyperliquid
Yoda tweet media
English
20
1
54
3.3K
DowVille
DowVille@DowVilleFNF·
The DowVille Family. Rebranded, Time to continue cooking.
DowVille tweet media
English
17
5
58
3.2K
NΞO
NΞO@NeoCallss·
gm lets print
English
19
0
24
2.4K
Tailz
Tailz@tailzgainz·
t.me/tailzhunts Called the cleanest 20x on this play. Why are you not eating with me?
Tailz tweet mediaTailz tweet media
English
18
3
40
736
NΞO
NΞO@NeoCallss·
turn on notis
English
16
0
46
4.5K