Michael

4.2K posts

Michael banner
Michael

Michael

@M1430GL

(Genesis 12:3) בְּרֵאשִׁית יב ג

Astral Realm Katılım Ekim 2018
533 Takip Edilen634 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
Quick tip for the Jew haters: If you think that blaming us for every single problem in the world scares us or angers us or whatever you are trying to do, know that it's not working.. it's doing the exact opposite. We know who we are. All the lies you tell will not change anything. You aren't the first Jew haters in the world, and probably won't be the last. And before you go on about "why do people hate Jews?!" There are a few reasons, The simple answer is: We are only 0.2% of the world population, we are a very successful minority of people thanks to Hashem. And people hate seeing that, they don't understand how can a nation so small that has been through nightmares of slavery, exiles, holocaust, pogroms, and still have the will and strength to rise and start over again and again. You see we have been blessed by Hashem. We don't want to conquer the world, We don't convert people by force, All we want is our Land, Israel, thats it, we want to live in Israel and serve Hashem. We want there to be peace in the world. Your hatred is uniting us, making us stronger, and after this war we will rise even stronger and united. This is who we are! #AmIsraelChai🇮🇱
English
18
13
57
11.1K
אהובה
אהובה@Little_Ms_Nope·
Interesting, why dont you apply Peshat (the plain, straightforward meaning) when you read Isaiah 2:22? The verse says: "Cease from man, whose breath is in his nostrils; for in what way is he to be accounted?" Or even better... "I am Hashem, that is My Name; and My glory I will not give to another" Isaiah 42:8 You override this consistently.
A Cloistered Hermeneutic@Exodus15_11

You cannot override the fact that the Lord will return to dwell at Zion with a verse taken out of context. This is not the time to apply the 'Sod' form of interpretation of PaRDeS.

English
4
4
22
739
אהובה
אהובה@Little_Ms_Nope·
Show me in Tanakh where it states you are required to worship mashiach in replacement of HaShem. HaShem does nothing without revealing to his prophet's ahead of time. There is no prophecy of HaShem becoming a human with perfect hair, dying, floating up to heaven, then coming back to leave again promising to fulfill what he failed at the first time he came back to be worshiped by a different name.
Judah@Judah0451

@Little_Ms_Nope To reject HaShem's Mashiach is to reject HaShem and the heart of Jewish identity. To reject Yeshua is to deny what makes one a Jew.

English
20
5
72
2.2K
JP
JP@JPd4wc·
@Little_Ms_Nope @Cole73James @M1430GL @jjking5691 That says on that day you did not see an image. You’re trying to use that to override the times God was seen such as in Judges 13. And again where is your messiah in Zechariah 12-14
English
2
0
1
55
D.
D.@outtheboxx·
@Little_Ms_Nope @Daikvarnu @JPd4wc Isaiah 53 - We considered him stricken by God but he was bruised for our transgressions You consider Jesus an apostate and crucified by God But he was bruised for your transgressions The peace of Israel is upon him and all the nations look to him Yeshua is Yahweh 🎉🎉🎉🍾
English
3
0
1
91
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
A reminder to speak out and continue to oppose the sins and abominations that are trying to be spread in Eretz Yisrael by the homosexuals and crossdressers. Don't shy from speaking out, don't fear anyone but HaShem. Show where you stand. Do you stand with cultural trends of sins? Or do you stand with The Creator of the Heavens and the Earth?
Michael tweet mediaMichael tweet media
English
1
2
4
163
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
@Cole73James @jjking5691 @JPd4wc @Little_Ms_Nope No, the "Me" wasn't thrust through, that's what I'm trying to explain to you. The "him" was thrust through. "they mourned him" You are ignoring the "him" who was thrust through and who was mourned by "they".
Michael tweet media
English
2
0
1
27
imagoodobserver
imagoodobserver@Cole73James·
@M1430GL @jjking5691 @JPd4wc @Little_Ms_Nope The “me” was pierced. Who is the “me”? The verse began w/ “I” It’s the same person… There is 1) the speaker (I/ME) & 2) the 🏠of David & inhabitants of Jerusalem (THEY) That’s it. 2 parties. Reconciliation when THEY look upon the speaking pierced (I/ME) that THEY pierced.
imagoodobserver tweet mediaimagoodobserver tweet mediaimagoodobserver tweet mediaimagoodobserver tweet media
English
1
0
0
36
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
Are you really using numbers out of context? You can say 1 human, or 1 table set. When HaShem Tells us that He is One, He is One. When HaShem Tells us that there is no other besides Him, there is no other besides Him. When HaShem Tells us His Name, That is His Name. You don't go trying to claim God is a set of beings, and that others are within Him, and that He has a different name, that's heresy. In Deuteronomy 17:6, are you going to claim 2 or 3 people can come as 1 witness? No, because you understand that's not what's Written in The Verse.
Michael tweet media
English
1
0
0
11
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
@elmer_is21 @Little_Ms_Nope You missed the next word that is connected to the previous. איש מלחמה איש can mean man, husband/master. איש מלחמה - master of war - warrior. Context and grammar matter. Here is an example:
Michael tweet media
0
0
1
19
E Rod
E Rod@elmer_is21·
@Little_Ms_Nope Exodus 15:3 that actually names Him also calls Him a man... let me help explain this to you in my next message...
E Rod tweet media
English
2
0
0
49
אהובה
אהובה@Little_Ms_Nope·
A thread of rebuttals from Tanakh. When they say the "son of man" is also HaShem, which is also mashiach according to their ideology. Bamidbar / Numbers 23:19 לֹא אִישׁ אֵל וִיכַזֵּב וּבֶן אָדָם וְיִתְנֶחָם הַהוּא אָמַר וְלֹא יַעֲשֶׂה וְדִבֵּר וְלֹא יְקִימֶנָּה׃ G-D is NOT a man, that He should lie, NOR a son of man, that He should change His mind. Has He said, and will He not do it? Or has He spoken, and will He not fulfill it?
7
5
29
1.2K
E Rod
E Rod@elmer_is21·
@Little_Ms_Nope Who literally spoke here? An angel or the Lord Himself? The text tells us.
E Rod tweet media
English
1
0
0
12
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
HaShem is Talking in Zechariah 12:10, HaShem is Saying “I will Pour” and “to Me”, Why would HaShem refer to Himself as “him” in the Verse? Just by following the basic grammar of the Verse you can see that the people who are mourning “him” are mourning the one who was “thrust through” and the people will look to God because of this. God cannot be stabbed, if the god you believe in can, he’s mortal.
Michael tweet media
English
3
0
1
55
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
I'm reading the Hebrew. The people look to God because of the one who was thrust through. The rest of the Verse even proves this.. This is basic Hebrew grammar, God is Saying וְשָׁפַכְתִּי "and I will Pour" and אֵלַי "to Me" and וְסָפְדוּ עָלָיו "and they mourned him" Do you not see how God is Talking throughout the Verse "I will" and "Me" and "they will mourn him". The "him" is the one who is thrust through.
Michael tweet media
English
1
0
1
45
JP
JP@JPd4wc·
Your color coding is interpretation layered onto the text not the text itself. The Masoretic Hebrew literally says: וְהִבִּיטוּ אֵלַי אֵת אֲשֶׁר־דָּקָרוּ “they will look to Me whom they pierced.” The direct object marker אֵת links אֲשֶׁר־דָּקָרוּ (“whom they pierced”) back to אֵלַי (“to Me”). You are not showing a different Hebrew reading. You are reinterpreting the existing MT wording to avoid the tension. And the subject flow remains the same throughout: - וְהִבִּיטוּ = “they will look” - דָּקָרוּ = “they pierced” - וְסָפְדוּ = “they will mourn” Same “they” unless the text explicitly changes subjects. So my statement stands. The plain MT has YHWH speaking in first person (“to Me”), connected to the pierced clause, with the same group doing the looking, piercing and mourning.
Català
1
0
1
60
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
No, the Hebrew doesn't say that. Stop using twisted and corrupted translations. I added the Hebrew Verse below, I took out the English. I marked which words are who. The words marked in yellow is referring to HaShem. The green is referring to the people. The red is referring to the one who was thrust through and being mourned by those marked in green.
Michael tweet media
English
1
0
1
53
JP
JP@JPd4wc·
This is a future physical war with real military casualties, a human leader pierced by enemies, the people of Jerusalem mourning him, and HaShem delivering them. “ The plain Hebrew in Zech 12:10 has YHWH pierced and has the same “they” who look and mourn as the same “they” who pierced. That is the straight Masoretic Text.
English
1
0
0
41
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
Angel means messenger. The Angel speaks in The Name of his Sender, you find this all over Tanach. That doesn't make the messenger The Sender. You NEVER worship the messenger. For example, if a human king sends his messenger to you, and tells you to sign a document, and you later tell your friend that the king asked you to sign a document. That doesn't mean the king himself was there, and it doesn't mean you promoted the messenger to king. It's a way of speaking. The Angel in Judges 13 even tells Manoch not to offer to him but to HaShem! For example, in Isaiah 7:10 It Says that HaShem continued to speak with Ahaz. Who was delivering the message there? Did HaShem Himself Speak to Ahaz or was it the Prophet Isaiah? Are you going to worship Isaiah? E-LOHIM is a title name that can be referring to God, Angels, Judges, depending on the context. Moshe is called this twice in: Exodus: 4:16, 7:1. This doesn't mean we are to worship Moshe. Seeing Angels is a great thing, and people would fear that since they have seen God's messengers they would die. See Judges 6:22-23. Genesis 19:13-14 is another example of Angels being Sent by HaShem, since the Angels were Sent by HaShem to destroy the place, Lot says HaShem will destroy the city. But the Angels said they were the ones who were sent to destroy, so who is destroying? Is it the Angels or HaShem? The example above with the king explains this. Messengers act in the name of their sender. HaShem is the Sender and the Angels are the Messengers doing their mission. Angels and Prophets are messengers of God's Words on Earth, that doesn't mean they are to be worshipped as if they themselves are God. We worship only HaShem.
English
1
0
0
50
JP
JP@JPd4wc·
@Little_Ms_Nope @M1430GL @Cole73James In Judges 13:3–23, the angel of YHWH appears to Manoah and his wife, speaks as God, performs a miracle by ascending in the flame of the altar, and afterward Manoah says, ‘We shall surely die, for we have seen God’ Is that a demigod?
English
1
0
0
64
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
Claiming Targum Yonatan and the Talmud claim that Isaiah is talking about the Mashiach as the dominant view before Rashi is just false.. The Talmud is filled with debates, Verses from Isaiah 53 are used in many other places in the Talmud that don't say it's about the Mashiach, so what you are doing is cherry picking. origen (a christian source..) claimed to have a disputation with Jews about Isaiah 53 and that the Jews said that it's referring to the nation of Israel and not one individual. This is from ~800 years before Rashi. So both Jewish sources and your own disprove your claim. The AI you used missed the entire point of those commentaries on those Verses.. taking one Verse out of context. Go read what Targum Yonatan says about Isaiah 53, it's the opposite of what you think the Mashiach will do. The word Mashiach means Anointed, and he will be someone from the lineage of king David, a human, born to a mother and father. Your concept of a messiah is something else entirely, so no, they weren't referring to what you think. About Isaiah 49, Verse 3 Identifies the servant as Israel, Israel isn't just one person, so Israel helping save the rest of the nation of Israel isn't something that doesn't make sense. The righteous remnant will help, similar to the way the Prophet comes to help the rest of Israel.
English
1
0
1
42
David Jayatillake ✝️
David Jayatillake ✝️@DSJayatillake·
I will post the reply to this underneath my point on AI. The LLMs of today are so powerful and competent at language and translation that especially with context and cross-reference will outperform you and I or any human at translation. The tools I have extended the agents with give it so much context it can hold simultaneously that no human could ever have. Reading scripture is firstly about accurately reading what it says. We will never be better at translation than AI currently is and we will only get left further into the rearview mirror. As long as you architect the AI system to have good context, guardrails, original language which it can read very well… better than us, then it is better. We should also seek this accuracy whether Jew or Christian if we hold scripture sacred. Agent’s response to you: On the Dead Sea Scrolls: 1QIsaa is textually almost identical to the MT in chapters 41–55. It preserves the same servant passages with the same wording — including 49:5’s “to bring Jacob back to him” and 53:8’s “for the transgression of my people.” The scroll doesn’t add interpretive glosses identifying the servant as Israel in ch. 53. It transmits the text; it doesn’t editorialize. If you have a specific 1QIsaa reading where the scribe explicitly identifies the ch. 53 servant as Israel, cite the column and line — I’ll engage it directly. The scroll’s significance is textual stability, not interpretation. On context and “collective from the start”: Yes, the corporate-Israel servant is in chs. 41–48 explicitly. Nobody disputes that. The interpretive question is whether the fourth Servant Song (52:13–53:12) maintains that referent or shifts — which is exactly what 49:5–6 sets up by giving the servant a mission to Jacob. The DSS doesn’t resolve that question; it preserves the same tension the MT does. On Talmud and rabbis: I’m not condemning rabbis. I’m pointing out that Jewish interpretive tradition itself is not monolithic on this chapter. Targum Jonathan (read in synagogues, authoritative in rabbinic Judaism) opens 52:13 with “my servant the Messiah.” Sanhedrin 98b cites 53:4 of the Messiah. These are Jewish sources interpreting their own text — that’s not me imposing Christianity on Judaism, that’s me pointing out that Judaism’s own tradition contains both readings. Rashi’s reading became dominant; it wasn’t the only one, and it postdates the Targum and Talmud by centuries. If the collective reading is correct, it’s correct on the merits of the text — not because “Judaism always read it that way.” It didn’t. That’s a historical fact about Jewish sources, not a Christian polemic. The actual exegetical question — does 49:5’s servant-with-mission-to-Jacob carry through to 53 — is what I’ve been asking. I haven’t seen an answer to it yet beyond “family logic,” which doesn’t address why the servant is “formed from the womb” specifically for the mission of restoring Jacob.
English
2
0
0
38
אהובה
אהובה@Little_Ms_Nope·
Isaiah 53 explained in the most simple way possible. Long ago, HaShem chose the Jewish people to be His special helper in the world. He called them "My servant" The servant (the Jewish people) had a very hard life. Other nations were mean to them. They hurt them, pushed them around, and made them suffer a lot. The Jewish people were and still are like a sad, hurt person that nobody wanted to look at. The other nations think: "HaShem must be punishing the Jews because they are bad" But one day, those same nations will open their eyes and say "Wait, we were wrong!" "We are the ones who did bad things. The Jewish people were hurt because of us" They carried our mistakes and our meanness on their shoulders. They suffered so much, but they stayed HaShems helper" And HaShem says the Jewish people did not deserve all that pain. In the end, HaShem will make everything right and show the whole world that the Jews are His special servant. And when He does, His Name will fill the world and everyone will know HaShem.
English
25
17
76
2.3K
Edward Macomb
Edward Macomb@EdwardMacomb·
...right in the middle of a harsh, unforgiving desert. i never understood how Sarah could cast out another mother and child into the desert frankly😭 Genesis 21:10–21 (KJV) 10 Wherefore she said unto Abraham, Cast out this bondwoman and her son: for the son of this bondwoman shall not be heir with my son, even with Isaac. 11 And the thing was very grievous in Abraham's sight because of his son. 12 And God said unto Abraham, Let it not be grievous in thy sight because of the lad, and because of thy bondwoman; in all that Sarah hath said unto thee, hearken unto her voice; for in Isaac shall thy seed be called. 13 And also of the son of the bondwoman will I make a nation, because he is thy seed. 14 And Abraham rose up early in the morning, and took bread, and a bottle of water, and gave it unto Hagar, putting it on her shoulder, and the child, and sent her away: and she departed, and wandered in the wilderness of Beersheba. 15 And the water was spent in the bottle, and she cast the child under one of the shrubs. 16 And she went, and sat her down over against him a good way off, as it were a bow shot: for she said, Let me not see the death of the child. And she sat over against him, and lift up her voice, and wept. 17 And God heard the voice of the lad; and the angel of God called to Hagar out of heaven, and said unto her, What aileth thee, Hagar? fear not; for God hath heard the voice of the lad where he is. 18 Arise, lift up the lad, and hold him in thine hand; for I will make him a great nation. 19 And God opened her eyes, and she saw a well of water; and she went, and filled the bottle with water, and gave the lad drink. 20 And God was with the lad; and he grew, and dwelt in the wilderness, and became an archer. 21 And he dwelt in the wilderness of Paran: and his mother took him a wife out of the land of Egypt
English
1
0
0
32
אהובה
אהובה@Little_Ms_Nope·
After the Exodus and the revelation at Sinai, everyone moved out of miracle mode and into the harder terrain of reality. Stepping up under pressure creating order, defining roles, and learning how to live with the Holy Presence right in the middle of a harsh, unforgiving desert. Relying on HaShem through fear of the unknown. Who is ready right now, who will draw close to HaShem who will stand up and say "I've had enough" and stand bodly for our G-D? Who will trust in HaShem, to step forward and guard what is sacred? Who is for HaShem? Shabbat Shalom 🕯️✨🕯️
English
10
5
37
584
Michael
Michael@M1430GL·
@Cole73James @JPd4wc @Little_Ms_Nope Where in Tanach do you see that being said about Mashaich ben Yosef? Yosef's bothers didn't think Yosef wanted to be worshipped. They said what they thought in Genesis 37:8 When they later bowed it wasn't out of worship, it was out of respect.
Michael tweet media
English
1
0
2
43
imagoodobserver
imagoodobserver@Cole73James·
@M1430GL @JPd4wc @Little_Ms_Nope It was certainly reverence. Quibble whether it was worship or not. Yosef had a vision of them bowing to Him & they reacted in disgust. “The nerve!” But then it happened. It’s a picture of what happens w/ Mashiach Ben Yosef. Rejected. Suffered. Will be recognized & bowed to.
English
1
0
0
38