
MI Dendream
4.7K posts

MI Dendream
@MDendream
Linda Liau fanatic, engaged Biotech Investor, GLove spreader, Big Time Cheerleader. I am not an investment advisor or attorney my opinions are just that







Tomislav Ivisic has enjoyed a healthy offseason, added weight and strength, evolved his game and is itching for the start of the season for the #illini. "He's way more physical, way stronger with the ball. I think it's going to benefit him greatly." 247sports.com/college/illino…






🦋 $MMAT | 🧬 $NWBO ⚖️ NWBO v. Canaccord Genuity LLC, et al. Case No. 1:22-cv-10185 (S.D.N.Y.) 📅 Filing Date: July 29, 2026 📄 Document 304 – Response to Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration (Filing attached below.) ⚠️ Not legal advice. QUICK SUMMARY and in relation to MMAT: NWBO is telling the court, “Don’t just show us the trades—show us what was driving them.” So far the Court in NWBO is requiring this kind of discovery. This could be a good sign for the MMAT Trustee that courts are willing to look under the hood when questions are raised about automated trading. 🏛️ Overlapping Parties Citadel Securities LLC Virtu Americas LLC 🔥 Quick Highlights ✅ NWBO says the Court has already ruled the requested trading algorithms are “plainly relevant and proportional” and defendants have offered no basis for reconsideration. 🤖 Algorithms—not just trade data—are the focus. NWBO argues that order and trade records alone cannot explain why quotes appeared, disappeared, or changed. Only the underlying algorithms, source code, and quote-generation logic can answer those questions. 📚 Harrington isn’t the defense defendants claim it is. NWBO argues Harrington actually supports its position because defendants there attacked the plaintiff’s expert for not having algorithm evidence of intent. NWBO also notes the algorithms in Harrington “simply did not exist” when they were subpoenaed. 👇🤥👇🤥👇🤥👇🤥👇🤥👇🤥👇 🎭 NWBO accuses defendants of changing positions and playing “word games.” According to NWBO, defendants previously claimed they did not use algorithms to trade NWBO. Now, they acknowledge using automated trading systems, models, and routing logic—just under different terminology. 🤨 NWBO argues defendants are attempting to avoid discovery through semantics rather than substance. 🔐 Confidential doesn’t mean undiscoverable. NWBO argues existing protective orders already safeguard proprietary source code, so confidentiality is not a valid reason to withhold relevant evidence. ⸻ 🦋 Why MMAT holders are watching This filing does not decide the Meta Materials bankruptcy, but it is another example of a federal court being asked to determine whether market makers must produce the internal logic behind their automated trading systems—not just their trade records. If NWBO succeeds in obtaining algorithm and source-code discovery, it could provide persuasive authority (though not binding precedent) for similar discovery requests in other cases where comparable issues are presented, including potential litigation connected to the MMAT bankruptcy. dropbox.com/scl/fi/x0hwutd…









Find one shitco, scamco or fraud I’ve been wrong about. CEI BBIG GTII MULN BBBYQ MMTLP MTPLF QNTM GNS GDC FNGR HLBZ CRTD MMAT NWBO DJT Every last one has been painfully obvious. If you’ve owned two or more of these you should lose your right to vote.




$NWBO New Docket On July 29, 2026, NWBO's counsel at Kasowitz LLP sent a letter to Magistrate Judge Gary Stein requesting permission to file its Response to Defendants' Motion for Clarification or Reconsideration with limited redactions. NWBO explains that its response discusses: Information that Defendants themselves designated as "Highly Confidential" under the Protective Order in the case. Exhibits that the Defendants have already asked the Court to seal in earlier docket entries (Dkts. 298, 299-1, and 299-2). NWBO asks the Court to: Allow the public version of its response to contain narrowly tailored redactions. Permit the complete, unredacted version to be filed under seal.











