Mrunal Dhawankar

@hawakeye009 Abe apni country ki chinta karna

Why are people assuming BJP winning because some rigging in elections. Haven't you had enough interaction with bio mass of India online to see that these people are like that and want BJP to win

@CorneliusG14926 @elonmusk U European are such a cuck. Yes be proud

@MDhanwankar @elonmusk You realize this makes me the ansestors of them and their children not the people they replaced

@CorneliusG14926 @elonmusk Bud u got conquer and replace we didn't

@L5nc_Yu5_0sx1 It always dehati. If u know history of Bengal under TMC

Dehatification of Bengal starts with this this slogan

@Sortakaron1540 U people only good at mocking people. Not different from chaddi at all.

@MDhanwankar Average saar cant agree saar

The answer is you can not skip the having a armed revolution step Of building a Civilization Dont let the Gandhian slop deceive you Stop worshipping the electoral gods (by worshipping the electoral gods you leave your fate to the ruling class) India cant skip the armed revolution, independent banking system, purging the traitors / elites / ruling class / kulaks stage of civilization

@iAkshP Not really vidarbh is dominated by marathi thus many speak hindi

Nagpur was part of Central provinces, which is mostly MP now, under British rule. It borders the Hindi speaking states, so Hindi is quite mainstream, not only in Nagpur but entire Vidarbha.

@akshatrai387362 @Jamie_Venom Nagpur is also marathi city

How come Hindi isn't lingua franca in Pune unlike Mumbai and Nagpur It so weird

@bedagarkenjoyer Desi stuff is Mostly North Indian thing. More specifically Punjab- haryana - dehli side people.

kya lara raj tamizh hai ya desi? broader question - do south indian people identify with the shared "desi" identity?

@Icarus_punk21 Muslim are always worse

Hardcore's religious hindus and hardcore religious muslims are the same.

@jai14101956 Yes, public humiliation of perpetrator and his family can only way to stop rape and caste discrimination.

@MDhanwankar That will set good precedent. Handover perpetrators of khairlanji, hathras etc. Street justice account caste & economic status

Marathi paj33ts mindset lives in 16th century, Suffocates in democratic system. thinks himself as siva bhosle, Tanhaji, Bajirao mastani, chhava etc but cry like pvssy in theatres. Don’t give sh!t about law & order in state unless perpetrator is LC. Wants justice by savagery

@PickleMoocher @jai14101956 Every ethnicity is Subhuman. Marathi are Creamy layer of that.

@jai14101956 do you think marathi are subhuman

@lulagachi @machinistmarx Same as Muslim one.

@machinistmarx Hindu rule is itself a colonial construct.

India could have become a legendary beacon of anti colonial struggle for the world. Instead we became a casteist feudal shithole.

@Rustum_0 Your "38% Muslim land given in charity" is nonsense.These were dynastic nawabs ruling Hindu majorities, not eternal Muslim property. Awadh annexed 1856, Bengal power lost 1757. Stop adding random centuries-old maps like bad math. History = conquest, not your victim fanfic. Cope.

Hindus owned nothing in the first place to make any charity. In fact, around 38% of India (1,250,727 km²) was Indian Muslim sovereign landmass, which was given to Hindus in charity by the British. Here is a rough estimate (#read_in_full): The Nazimate of Bengal, Bihar and Orissa (≈431,608 Km²), with its power base in Murshidabad (India), extended over modern West Bengal, Bihar, Jharkhand, Tripura, the districts of Kokrajhar, Dhubri, Chirang, Bongaigaon, Goalpara, South Salmara-Mankachar in Assam, and present-day Bangladesh. In 1947, the British transferred ≈283,148 km² to the Indian Republic (Hindu dominated) and ≈148,460 km² to the Pakistani Republic (dominated by Sindhu Muslims). The Nawabate of Awadh (≈152,923 Km²) covered most of Uttar Pradesh except Mirzapur, Chitrakoot, Jhansi, Agra, Aligarh, Meerut, and Saharanpur divisions, and was transferred to India in 1947. The Nawabate of Shamsher Bahadur (≈32,269 Km²) based in Banda, the Khudadad Sarkar of Tipu Sahib (≈253,800 Km²), and the Nawabate of Carnatic (≈44,700 Km²) were also integrated into India in 1947. The Northern Sarkar and Guntoor Sarkar of the Nizamate of Hyderabad (≈78,000 Km²), along with the Nizam's gains in Ahmadnagar and Bijapur (≈12,940 Km²) in War with Peshwa, were transferred to the Indian Republic in 1947. Ali Rajas of Arakkal held the Lakshadweep Islands (32.62 Km²), which were transferred to the Indian Republic by the British in 1947. Sheikh Imad-ud-din (born in Hoshiarpur, India) had seized and established his overlordship over Himachal and Jammu-Kashmir, with power base in Srinagar (Jammu, India), covering ≈111,211 Km². The British removed his overlordship. Today, the Himachal (55,673 Km²) and Jammu & Kashmir UT (42,241 Km²) are parts of the Indian Republic, while Pakistan holds 13,297 Km². From 1856, the Indian Muslims ruled ≈295,000 Km² in form of the Princely States, until 1947, after which these territories were integrated into the Indian Republic within a year. In total: The Indian Muslims Lost Amal (Rule) Over ≈1,412,484 Km² due to the British colonialism.

@Rustum_0 Indian Muslim identity is shaped by a blend of Persian and Indian cultures, in which local Muslims initially had limited influence. The kings and elites that some people admire often did not consider themselves ‘Hindustani’ Muslims.

Similarly, Hindus have hijacked the "Indian" identity. In fact, the "Hindu" identity (not term) itself is an Indian Muslim construct. (#read_full) Circa 1150, a Khwarezmian prince is recorded by the name "Hindu Khan" (lit, the Indian lord). At that time, almost all Indians had never even encountered the term Hindu, and Islam had not yet established itself in India as a political power. When Islam emerged in India as an independent political force after 1192–93, the earliest Indian known to style himself with the title "Hindu" was Malik Hindu Khan Mihtar-i Mubarak, circa 1210. His title may be rendered as "Lord the Indian Khan, the Blessed Chief". He was reportedly a Vedic convert to Islam, served as Imperial Treasurer, and was Lord of the governorships of Uchh and Jalandhar. Likewise, figures bearing names such as Hindu Beg (Indo-Muslim) and Gholam Ali Hindu Shah also appear in historical records. Isami, himself an Indo-Persian, describes the Indo-Muslim forces led by Malik Kafur (a local convert) which defeated the Mongols, as "Hinduwan" (Indians). Those forces included men of varied backgrounds: Muslim Mongols, Muslim Turks, local Vedic converts, Muslim Tajiks etc.. This strongly suggests that these Muslims were fully conscious of the fact that they were Indian-born and identified collectively as Indians. In short, "Hindu" originally functioned widely as a regional or ethnocultural identifier, and Muslims adopted it freely in names and titles. Its transformation into a primarily religious identity during the late eras of the Indo-Muslim rule. ——— A similar process is now unfolding with the Indian identity, and it has been remarkably successful. Indian Muslims number around 220 million, which is roughly 53% of the Muslim population of North Africa and the Middle East combined. Muslims are not some insignificant minority in India either, they make up about 16% of India’s population. Yet their presence is overlooked, as the Indian identity is increasingly (mis)appropriated as exclusively Hindu by the Hindus and non-Indians both.

@Rustum_0 It funny how muslim Kang on elite Muslim and Muslim monarchy. Muslim princely states never was "own" by Muslim King. It is land of people live there which are majority of non- Muslim. Muslim themselves take there share of land and build pakistan and Bangladesh.

Hindus owned nothing in the first place to give anything. It is like Hindus saying they gave Europe to Europeans. In reality, ~10% of India consisted of Muslim princely states that were integrated into the Indian Republic. Also, Muslims did a favour on Hindu by partioning India and creating Pakistan which united Hindu numerical strength and revived unprecedented Hindu political strength.

@chotamotahandle @sisyphusissad They are ethically marathi

@sisyphusissad Chupkar..by that logic even Babasaheb and Lataji are not Marathi..Pt Bhimsen Joshi was born in Bombay Province before Language based division of states happened so did Babasaheb and Lataji..They all are more Marathi than anybody else..

Bhimsen Joshi is not Marathi

@WolfgangSingh Just fact, it might evolve in different religions but basic principles are mix of islam and Hinduism.

@MDhanwankar Ok bro

Sikhism, a new one, was forged through fire of the Islamic barbarism and it managed to rise from the ashes like a phoenix.

@praz_6542 They also bring relegion and caste whenever it suits them

A 4yr old kid literally got raped and stoned to death and y'll are bringing caste into this??? CASTE???