Michigan Beer Taster

Dear @elonmusk , Can you schedule a couple of Florida launches between May 25 and May 30th? Will be in FL that week. Kthx!

@AnnieAgar Literally the worst pick ever

“how big of a hater are you?” me:

I regret voting for Trump

@tiktok_us hi can you please restore my video? 1. It’s satire. 2. It was clearly reported by an angry Bigfoot believer 3. You could substitute Barney the Purple Dinosaur for the PGF Bigfoot video. I’m missing the wave of popularity by 24 hours

@greg16676935420 1.50? Bit steep

I’d love to go out to lunch (at the Costco food court) with this legend

@megynkelly Wow you’ve really gone off the rails

You wanna rip the GOP apart right to its core and prevent a single America First voter from participating in the midterms? Indict Joe Kent and Tucker Carlson. See how that works out.

Courttv didn’t have any Afromam coverage when I checked at 6pm . Sad

@3YearLetterman I think once the population becomes mostly non hetero , then population falls Coach

God is good

@Bugimus Munns has been thoroughly debunked. Meldrum thought the tracks were real, he thought drying artifacts in plaster casts were ‘dermal ridges’ he was only taken seriously by Bigfooters.

@MIbeertaster Have you seen the film? Unless it rebuts Munns’ and Meldrum’s analyses point by point then it doesn’t prove Bob Gimlin is lying.

Science vs. Story: Why Capturing Bigfoot May Not Close the PGF Case Hairy Man Road’s “I Saw the Footage…It’s A Hoax” was the first review I watched after the documentary “Capturing Bigfoot” premiered at SXSW. I had read summaries from other reviews that clearly stated the suit in the new footage did NOT match the PGF suit, but came close. So I was surprised by the Hairy Man Road review claiming it was a 100% match. After watching the full review, it became clear that Eric bought the documentary’s narrative hook, line, and sinker. But if the suit/gait/staging was a 100% match, then why didn’t any other reviews—or the director himself—mention it? I have yet to see the footage and will certainly reserve full judgment until I do, but in the meantime I must point out that Bill Munns has done more detailed analysis on “Patty” than anyone else. He adamantly maintains that the new footage is clearly a fake and that the PGF footage shows 100% a real biological creature. I acknowledge that Capturing Bigfoot brings strong corroborative evidence to support the PGF hoax theory, but in a lot of ways, we’re left with the same old debate. We’re faced with two competing theories bolstered by two separate paths of evidence—hoax supporters lean on people/lives/context-based arguments, and Patty supporters lean on science/forensic arguments. One of these categories is “good” evidence and the other is “not as good.” I’ll leave it to you to decide which is which. People/lives/context: Testimonies, motives, confessions, family drama, financials, and the 1966 clip (as proof of practice) are circumstantial and subjective. They rely on human reliability—witnesses can lie, misremember, have agendas, or be influenced by money/family pressure. The 1966 footage shows premeditation but (per most reviews) a cheaper/skinnier figure—not resolving how it evolves into Patty’s alleged realism. Science/forensics: Munns’ costume and camera expertise and Meldrum’s anatomical analysis are frame-by-frame, measurable, replicable in principle—focusing on what the 1967 footage objectively shows (muscle flow, gait biomechanics, proportions, lack of suit artifacts, mid-foot flexibility, etc.). These stand independently from who Patterson was, what his life story was, or what people later said. No replication using only 1967 tech has matched it, and the doc doesn’t attempt one or counter Munns point-by-point. Clearly, Eric prioritizes the people/lives/context category—once you have strong proof of hoax planning + direct admissions, the “how did they make it look that good?” becomes a secondary puzzle, not a deal-breaker. But the documentary doesn’t bridge the gap technically—it leans on narrative/emotion (Clint’s estrangement, Patricia’s “nest egg,” Al DeAtley’s villainous portrayal, Gimlin’s blocked confession attempt) to make the hoax feel inevitable. That’s why it converts viewers like Eric but leaves forensic-focused people unconvinced. The PGF’s scientific case hasn’t been falsified by this doc; it’s been contextualized around it. If more people (like Eric) accept the story over the science, it shows how powerful human drama can be—even when the core visual data remains unchallenged. At this point my stance remains unchanged: the PGF stands on its own merits until someone replicates Patty with period tech. Buckle up because we’re witnessing a new chapter in Bigfoot history, and it’s only going to get more contentious from here. #Bigfoot #CapturingBigfoot #PattersonGimlin

@greg16676935420 FUCK

🚨BREAKING: 𝕏 is currently down and no one is able to post

@MalloryMcMorrow I'd pay a little more for gas than have someone get vaporized

Higher gas prices aren’t inevitable. They’re a choice by Donald Trump and his yes-men like Mike Rogers. This November, let’s choose better.

@ogafroman They are making it too got damn easy for you Afroman!

Randy Walters is a son of a bitch youtube.com/watch?v=u4Aiuq…

@alexboge Yes, and the face of the PGF Bob Gimlin, who for 60 years, has lied to people's faces that he wasn't involved in any hoax, is shown in the practice video, NOT WEARING the Navajo wig he wore later.

Roger Patterson didn’t just stumble across Bigfoot in 1967. He had already spent years obsessed with it. He wrote a book. He was actively trying to raise money. And months before the famous film, he was already shooting a Bigfoot movie with volunteers that included Bob Gimlin and Bob Heironimus. That matters. Because now the story isn’t “two guys saw something.” It’s “a guy trying to make a Bigfoot film suddenly produced the perfect Bigfoot shot.” They went to Bluff Creek - not a random location, but the most famous Bigfoot hotspot in America… already tied to earlier footprint hoaxes. Then comes October 20, 1967. Patterson claims he just happens to encounter a Bigfoot while carrying a 16mm camera… while already working on a Bigfoot production… and manages to capture the only clear footage of the creature in the last 60+ years. Convenient doesn’t begin to cover it. What happens next is even more telling. The film is rushed into development under a murky timeline. Within days, Patterson is showing it to promoters and discussing distribution. This looks less like shock and more like rollout. Then the cracks start forming. Bob Heironimus - already connected to Patterson from earlier filming - later says he wore the suit. He describes how it was done. Family members and friends say he talked about it long before going public. A costume shop owner says he sold Patterson a gorilla suit that same year, and was asked how to modify it. Even Gimlin eventually admits that if it was a hoax, it would have been Patterson’s doing. And now, nearly 60 years later, new documentary footage reportedly shows what looks like a rehearsal from the year before. Additionally, Patterson’s own son claims the family knew of the hoax for decades. Let’s step back and look at the full picture: A man obsessed with Bigfoot. Already filming a Bigfoot movie. Using people tied to that production. At a location already associated with hoaxes. With immediate financial incentive. Followed by a man-in-a-suit confession. And now possible rehearsal footage and testimony. This isn’t an unexplained mystery. It’s beyond circumstantial. It was a staged production that worked so well people stopped asking how it was made. And once people believe something like that, the footage stops being evidence… and starts being mythology.

I saw this on Reddit, it was then that I realized this is the same Canadian that hates the US.

Team #afroman

@mezmerising @redpillb0t OK good catch

@MIbeertaster @redpillb0t Try better, not the same ears!!!

THIS VIDEO FROM THE EPSTEIN FILES IS GOING VIRAL AS PEOPLE RECOGNIZE WHO THIS IS

@matthewmaddock Worthless

The leftists want an 80mph train from Ann Arbor to Traverse City. Cost would be 2 billion. Round-trip price would be $667 to pay for it in 20 years. Ticket price of 100 would take 1,000 years to pay for itself. Makes total sense.

@Liz_Wheeler This you?

These podcast wars are embarrassing. Tucker Carlson, Megyn Kelly, Mark Levin, Ben Shapiro, Candace Owens... What are we, toxic mean girls in high school? These vulgar ad hominems being hurled back and forth by leaders of the conservative movement…I still have absolutely no idea what they're talking about. They never mention the substance on which they disagree. We in the conservative movement—especially in the media—are supposed to be thought leaders. And when you’re a thought leader, you are supposed to persuade people about why your position is best. That's your job. That's my job. We are supposed to challenge and dismantle ideas that are bad, dangerous, and wrong. But is that what we're doing? No, that's not what we're seeing here. The biggest voices on the Right are acting like a nasty episode of Real Housewives. What’s next? Pulling hair extensions and scratching? This is not the highest and best use of our platforms, voices, and this influence that we have been afforded. The midterms are around the corner and the only group being helped by these petty, superficial, juvenile spats are the Democrats. We are facing an ACTUAL crisis in our nation that everyone is ignoring because they're addicted to drama. We have ONE CHANCE at mass deportations. ONE CHANCE. And we're squandering it because the leaders of the movement would rather… beef?

@mchooyah Ok that, then a half eaten dog bone

I’m gonna stick with IED on this one…