Michael Munday

At the close of this year, I offer this eloquent prayer, from the Reformed Episcopal Church _Book of Common Prayer_.

Trump administration to investigate euthanasia death of gang rape victim, scolds Spain for 'human rights failures'. The rapists and everyone who failed this girl should be the ones executed. Get dirty Sanchez out.

There will be no parallel legal systems in Texas hiding behind the First Amendment. Sharia Law is incompatible with Western Civilization and has no place in this country. chiproy.com

ESPN, unsurprisingly, avoided the Jaden Ivey topic the entire day yesterday. This is a young man who wants to come out from under his childhood trauma in a biblical way, and the NBA and the media want to get rid of him because it doesn’t push their secular agenda.

To the Supreme Court: For years the American people have been told that the Constitution requires the United States to grant citizenship to almost anyone born here—without any regard for such key questions like whether or not the parents were in the country legally in the first place. That claim has shaped our immigration system and our politics for decades. It has also reshaped how many people think about what it means to be an American. But if you actually read the Constitution, examine the ratification debates, and research the common law, that claim is far from obvious. And that is why we are here today. This debate is not just about immigration policy. It is about the meaning of American citizenship. Citizenship is not just paperwork issued by the government. It is not a bureaucratic label. Citizenship is the essential bond between a nation and its people. In a republic like ours, that bond carries enormous weight. Because in the United States, sovereignty does not belong to a king or a ruling class. It belongs to the American people themselves. Citizenship defines the legal recognition of who the American people are. Citizenship defines the political community that governs the United States. It defines who exercises the sovereign authority of this republic. For most of our history, Americans understood citizenship in straightforward terms. It reflected allegiance to the United States. It meant loyalty to this country and attachment to its institutions. It meant belonging to the American nation. But over the past several decades that understanding has been steadily pushed aside. Lawyers, activists, and policymakers in Washington have advanced the idea that citizenship has little to do with allegiance or membership in the national community. Under that interpretation, citizenship is devoid of connection to the American people. Instead, regardless of if your parents are tourists, foreign students, or illegally in the country—if you are born here, you are automatically a citizen in equal standing with the American people, even if you have no connection to the national community. That is a dramatic departure from how most nations understand citizenship. And it has produced predictable results. Foreign nationals travel to the United States late in pregnancy for the purpose of securing American citizenship for their children. An entire birth tourism industry has emerged around that goal. Illegal immigration is fueled by the belief that a child born here will receive automatic citizenship. And one of the most serious institutions of the American republic is increasingly treated like a loophole in the immigration system. Citizenship should never be a loophole. Citizenship should mean belonging. Every serious nation recognizes that citizenship reflects membership in a national community. It reflects allegiance. It reflects loyalty to a country and its laws. Nations also recognize something else. They have the sovereign right to define the boundaries of their own political community. A nation that cannot determine who belongs to its political community begins to lose control of its sovereignty. A nation that cannot define who belongs to it has lost control of its sovereignty. The Constitution addresses this issue directly. The Fourteenth Amendment provides that all persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States. Those words matter. “Subject to the jurisdiction thereof.” That phrase reflects allegiance. It reflects political authority. It reflects belonging to the United States. The Supreme Court should have the courage to do what is right and what the constitution demands. End the Birthright citizenship scam for Illegal Aliens and Tourists.

Democrat Congresswoman Delia Ramirez: "I'm a proud Guatemalan before I'm an American." I'd say this is a perfect example of why we must end birthright citizenship.

@bendellwerry Aye.

If I had to choose between the constitution and my nation I would simply throw out the constitution. please read carefully before replying. no second chances on this one.

The reason the United States had to basically quit its incredible, iconic moon program and spend the next 40 years futzing around on a vestigial "ISS" doing high school-level science experiments is because the government had to come up with massive budget cuts to fund the mass importation and cradle-to-grave benefits of ~50 million noncitizens.

@MAGAVoice Amen.

If you are praying for the safety of the Hero Patriot ARTEMIS II Crew, drop an “AMEN” below 🙏

I feel you Ron, but not possible. If the Court affirms birthright citizenship in the 14th that’s a constitutional ruling that no congressional statute alone can reverse. Congress won’t touch it. You’d need a new amendment. Also won’t happen. So the only way out is to deny judicial supremacy and assert Executive prerogative to annul. Thankfully, our founders would be okay with this (see link).

@jjfThompson Deo Vindice.

Take some time to honor and remember the sacrifices of our brave ancestors!

Please wish a Happy Birthday to Larry McDonald - Georgia Congressman and Chairman of the John Birch Society. He was one of the Greatest American Statesman of the 20th century, taken from us too soon when the Soviet Union shot down his plane KAL007 en route to Korea 9/1/1983.

Birthright citizenship is a national security risk

Article II, Section 3 of the Constitution gives the President the authority in extraordinary circumstances to the convene both houses of Congress, or either of them. The longest government shutdown in American history of the Department of Homeland Security during an elevated threat environment certainly would qualify as extraordinary. The Senate has been derelict in its responsibilities. President Trump should immediately move to convene the Senate pursuant to Article II, Section 3 until they do their job and fund ALL of DHS.

“The citizenship clause was passed in order to give citizenship to the children of freed slaves, not illegal immigrants.” Birthright citizenship has been twisted to make U.S. citizenship a free-for-all. Our country is not up for grabs.

🚨 HOLY CRAP. President Trump is now considering using his Constitutional powers to END the Senate and House paid vacation to make them come back and fund DHS This would be EPIC! Article II, Section 3 grants Trump this special power. Make them WORK. Do it Mr. President! 🇺🇸

Lots of people are talking today as if the rape gangs are no longer happening. Trust me - they are. All over Britain. In almost every town and city. Vulnerable young white British girls raped and abused by gangs of Muslim men - predominately Pakistani, although a growing number of nationalities participate. The tactics have changed and evolved, but the outcome remains the same. Drugged and plied with alcohol, becoming increasingly reliant on these men - through fear, blackmail or addiction. Turned against their families. It's so much darker than people realise. There are national criminal networks behind so much of it. Torture, murder, abduction. With the same names coming up again and again. That is what shocked so much at our inquiry hearings. It was the level of organisation and sophistication that is involved. It's not just a handful of men, it is everywhere. It's all connected. Most disturbingly, it's how often these girls are trafficked overseas. Almost all of the survivors we spoke to had at some stage an effort to remove them from Britain. Most failed. Some did not. How many women are currently trapped overseas? I've raised this in Parliament. Almost nobody cares. It is devastating. I am still waiting on a response from the Home Secretary about one of the most harrowing stories we heard - no answer. Our inquiry continues. The report is progressing, with more news to come soon. Additional women have come forwards, and our team are working with them. We are doing everything in our power to help them tell their stories. But if you take one message from our inquiry, please let it be this. The rape of Britain continues today.

This is an incredibly important thread for all evangelical Christians, but especially Southern Baptists. So what happened here is that @WorldRelief, which works with the Evangelical Immigration Table to promote open borders and amnesty, commissioned (read *paid for*) a poll from Southern Baptist publisher and pollster @Lifeway. It claims that pastors support amnesty for illegal aliens and want further legal immigration. The implication is that we are talking about doctrinally sound evangelical pastors. But is Jon shows, look under the hood of the sample and you find roughly 36% are MAINLINE pastors. United Methodists. PCUSA. ELCA Lutherans. In other words, nearly 40% of the sample are whitewashed tombs who support homosexuality, transgenderism, and abortion, along with open borders. This is a deceitful attempt to convince ordinary pastors, ordinary Christians, but most importantly, Republican lawmakers that evangelicals support amnesty and want more immigration. But as Jon demonstrates in his thread, when you re-weight the survey to isolate evangelical pastors, you find the opposite. It’s a deceptive tactic, but unfortunately, it’s often effective.

The Tenth Amendment makes it clear: powers not delegated to the federal government belong to the people of the states. That means states have both the authority and the duty to nullify unconstitutional federal laws.

@JasmineForUS She doesn’t even know what a woman is. Glad you’re gone. 🤦🏻‍♀️