Matityahu Matt Kahn

Expect to see and hear a lot of obfuscation and distraction regarding the war. Such attempts will be designed to obscure that the war began with an attack on Israel in which Israeli citizens were brutalized, murdered and abducted. Keep a clear focus on how this #IsraelWar began.

@Shane_TC_ @NicholHoneycutt @megynkelly Megyn is choosing vindictiveness over principle and has been allowing herself to be manipulated by the anti-Israel first crowd.

@NicholHoneycutt @megynkelly Oh shut up. She’s not required to dogpile the people you want dogpiled. You don’t give a shit about Erika, you just care that your dumb Israel-first influence is crumbling. And you’re handling it very poorly.

Remember when we all had your back at the time this controversy happened & defended you to the hilt? And then when even more absurd allegations of anti-Semitism were leveled against some of us, you refused to join the mob & ardently defended those of us who helped you Ilya? Yeah, me neither. Instead, you piled on like a coward, and now we don’t care about your precious speaking gig at the 92d St Y getting cancelled.

@_ungovernable_ legitimate claim to the land of Israel.

@_ungovernable_ entitlement that they should dominate the whole Middle East and North Africa, based on an Arab-Muslim empire that emerged out of the Arabian peninsula in the 7th century. They need to de-center themselves and realize that there is another people, the Jewish people, who have a

As soon as you accept that Israel must exist as a "Jewish state" no matter what, you are accepting that there will never be peace in the middle east. Because Israel cannot exist as it is without nonstop violence. Show a Zionist a map where Israel does not exist as a Jewish state and a map where the entire middle east is on fire except for Israel, and then ask them to pick a future, and they'll pick the second one every time. That's the worldview that's baked into Zionism. The worldview you're not supposed to bring up in mainstream discourse about the Zionist ideology. You're not supposed to mention the demented murderousness inherent in the premise that Israel must exist as a Jewish ethnonationalist state no matter how many people need to be killed in order to make that happen. But that's the reality. It's a simple matter of historical record that Israel cannot exist without continuous violence and abuse. That's not my opinion, that's historical fact. There has never been a modern state of Israel which does not constantly kill and abuse its native population and the inhabitants of neighboring countries. And the typical Zionist response to such criticisms is to blame everyone but themselves. It's the fault of the Palestinians, the Arab nations, the Iranians etc, because they refused to tolerate the west's imposition of a brand new ethnostate dropped on top of a pre-existing population who became victims of mass displacement and apartheid as soon as it was created. But nobody has ever been able to provide me with a convincing argument why the original inhabitants of the region ever should have accepted this arrangement. They've never been able to put me in the shoes of a Palestinian in the 1940s and lay out a reason why I should have been fine with the things that were happening to me and my people. Nobody has ever been able to provide me with a convincing argument why the Muslims of west Asia should not have stood in solidarity with the Palestinians and their plight. The only solid argument they've ever given me is "They should have laid down and submitted, because that's what was required in order for the Israelis to stop killing and abusing them." And that's still the only argument they've got to this very day: that the Palestinians and their neighbors should lie down and submit to the existence of this genocidal apartheid state that was inserted into their homeland like a glass shard into a foot. But the fact of the matter is that they did not lie down and submit. Many Arabs did out of sheer self-preservation, but many did not. You can tell me they should have given up and submitted, but that's just arguing with reality. That's not a solution, it's just whining about the inevitable. And this is where that leaves today. Israel and its allies butchering human beings throughout the middle east, creating countless war orphans who are naturally going to grow up desiring violent retribution. Generation after generation Israel creates the violence it pretends to be defending itself from, all because it was decided that there must be a "Jewish state" in historic Palestine no matter what needs to be done in order to accomplish this. And Zionists are fine with this. They don't care if the entire middle east is turned into an ocean of fire so long as the Israelis are still dancing to their electronic music in the middle of it. That's what this slogan "Israel has a right to exist" really means. It means Israel and its allies have a right to keep the middle east in a nonstop state of war, and the strongest argument for why this must be the case is that some dead guys made some stuff up and put it in a book thousands of years ago. At a certain point you need to admit that this is a psychopathic status quo which cannot be allowed to stand, and that anyone who supports it is complicit in the bloodshed. The ethnonationalist apartheid state of Israel must be dismantled. People's various religious objections to this statement must be disregarded as infantile tantrums made by adults who believe silly fairy tales. A wildly different status quo needs to be established from the Jordan River to the Mediterranean Sea. Because the alternative is a middle east that exists in a permanent state of nonstop violence and chaos.

@GenFlynn Israel. It expresses a desire for equality, i.e. to have what other peoplehoods/nationalities have, and liberation. See Luke 21:24, Romans 11:25, Romans 9:4, Romans 11:29 and Romans 15:8 for more reference. The land promise remains, and God is not finished with the Jewish people.

@GenFlynn Zionism is as old as the patriarch Abraham, and a careful reading of the gospels reveals that Jesus is a Zionist. The modern version of Zionism expresses the right of Jewish self-determination in the historic, ancestral, indigenous and spiritual homeland of the Jewish people,

Thomas Jefferson famously declared, “The constitutional freedom of religion [is] the most inalienable and sacred of all human rights”. As a primary architect of American religious liberty, Jefferson, along with other founders, advocated for a strict separation between church and state, holding that government should not interfere with matters of conscience. We should applaud those who understand this principle and then stands up for the value of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness for all of humanity. @Joseph_DeMarzo Amen 🙏🏼 @CarriePrejean1

@caitoz legitimate claim to the land of Israel.

@caitoz entitlement that they should dominate the whole Middle East and North Africa, based on an Arab-Muslim empire that emerged out of the Arabian peninsula in the 7th century. They need to de-center themselves and realize that there is another people, the Jewish people, who have a

@KarlKramkj @GenFlynn “Separation of Church and State” is a summary phrase for the Establishment and Free Exercise clauses of the Constitution.

The Constitution says nothing about separation of Church and State other than the State cannot establish a religion. The fact is that the State without the moral guidance of Christianity cannot last. We are discovering this right now with the abandonment of morality, particularly in the Democrat Party.

@NoakesJacob @GenFlynn You obviously do not understand the Constitution.

@GenFlynn The freedom of religion was designed for different branches of Christianity specifically Protestantism. Even Catholics were barred from political office. If the founding fathers saw that we allowed Muslims and Jews to rule over us, they would hang us for treason. Do you agree?

@CforCatholics @RealRichardBail @CarriePrejean1 @Joseph_DeMarzo Israel. It expresses a desire for equality, i.e. to have what other peoplehoods/nationalities have, and liberation. See Luke 21:24, Romans 11:25, Romans 9:4, Romans 11:29 and Romans 15:8 for more reference. The land promise remains, and God is not finished with the Jewish people.

@CforCatholics @RealRichardBail @CarriePrejean1 @Joseph_DeMarzo Zionism is as old as the patriarch Abraham, and a careful reading of the gospels reveals that Jesus is a Zionist. The modern version of Zionism expresses the right of Jewish self-determination in the historic, ancestral, indigenous and spiritual homeland of the Jewish people,

A PRIEST WITH COURAGE: There is nothing like a priest who is masculine, Josephine in his humility, and fearless in defense of Truth. God Bless this priest @Joseph_DeMarzo for standing behind @CarriePrejean1

@CforCatholics @Joseph_DeMarzo @CarriePrejean1

#Israel #Prophecy #Christianity #MessianicJudaism m.youtube.com/watch?v=j5biT1…

@no_one__wins @JustinTLogan @megynkelly No, credible evidence does not have to be that. If you want to know what credible evidence is, then research it yourself. I’m not going to give you my list of credible evidence so you can just question and refute me more.

@MMattKahn @JustinTLogan @megynkelly You are right, I don’t think much of trump at all. If you’re idea of credible evidence is you being in the room during negotiations or Netanyahu explicitly saying that he pushed the US to go into war then there isn’t a point in debate as you clearly think I’m stupid

"Do NOT say Israel pushed for this war!" But also: ft.com/content/092e23…

@EMichaelJones1 @JendersII @ArchbishpSample those verses were talking about Jews in Paul’s day and are not a perpetual indictment against all Jewish people for all time.

@EMichaelJones1 @JendersII @ArchbishpSample past, but, unfortunately, there are people like you who want to bring it back toward spiritual darkness. Also, Thessalonians 2:15–16 was likely added because it does not fit the context of the verses before and after it and it does not sound like the Apostle Paul. In any case,

Dear @ArchbishpSample, Stop rehashing ADL talking points. youtube.com/watch?v=vfAIVB… Try proclaiming the Gospel instead. Stop blaming Catholics for the odium Jews have heaped upon themselves by their ruthlessly immoral behavior. Stop mentioning councils with no citations to back up your claim. Nostra Aetate said "the Jewish authorities and those who followed their lead pressed for the death of Christ." Catholics who say the Jews killed Christ are faithfully following Church teaching. The Jews obviously doesn't mean all Jews. No one ever said the Blessed Mother or Christ's Jewish followers called for his crucifixion. By saying "the Church is the new people of God," the Church reaffirmed supersessionism as the true teaching of the Church. The American bishops, as you probably know, had to remove the phrase "The Mosaic covenant is eternally valid" from their catechism because dual covenant theology is heretical. If holding the Jews collectively responsible for what happened on Good Friday is wrong, why did St. Paul say,  "the Jews are the people who killed Christ and are enemies of the entire human race" (I Thess 2, 14)? Catholicism is not the cause of hatred of the Jewish people throughout history. The main cause of that hatred is Jewish behavior, most recently the Israeli genocide in Gaza. Stop talking about unnamed "conspiracies and lies," and start defending Catholics against predatory Jewish behavior, like the IDF shelling of Holy Family Church in Gaza. Stop allowing the Jews to determine who is a faithful Catholic. Please retract your preposterous claim that Catholics are responsible for the universal hatred of Jews in our day. The Jews earned this hatred by their behavior. I suggest that you rewrite your statement after you have talked things over with Cardinal Pizzaballa and Pope Leo. Before claiming that there is a "strong connection between religious freedom and anti-Semitism," contact @CarriePrejean1, who got kicked off President Trump's religious freedom committee for daring to say that she as a Catholic had the religious freedom to oppose the Jews' determination to impose their Zionism on the American people by hijacking American foreign policy and leading this country into another immoral war in support of Israel. Defending religious freedom means protecting Catholics like Mrs. Boller from identity theft. While revising your statement, please define the term "anti-Semitism," for which there is currently no Catholic definition. Do Catholics have to accept as binding on their conscience any speech Jews don't like? That is the current meaning of the term. Stop defending Jewish crimes against humanity and start defending the Catholic flock God consecrated you to defend.