MSGPlayz

@YouTube @YouTubeCreators tagging if these accounts are actually run by humans or another Ai group like the one that suspended my ypp account for no reason. 90 days of "IDGAF about my creators let them suffer cuz it's fUnNy"

Hey @YouTube @YouTubeCreators calling again to see if you can read this. Take a look at my channel and tell me what I did wrong ti get the flag and no explanation over 90 days suspension? Is anyone there? Hello?

@YouTubeCreators I'll do that once you take off the invalid suspension on my channel. No traffic at all! So yeah

hook viewers in the first 3 seconds — skip the long intro and dive straight into the video 😌

@gugsi2002 @TeamYouTube @YouTubeCreators does not care. I tried and given up. Might be ending being a creator here ther is no point. Good luck to you tho

Dear @TeamYouTube please 🥺 review my channel, it is my primary source of income. You demonetized COLD START for "inauthentic content". This is not fair, I manually edit & animate every 2.5D video from scratch (see timelines)! Please restore my monetization, with over 32M views!

@TheMG3D Ya'll putting him in the spotlight by sharing whatever he does lol then again it's the only way to get that impressions isn't it 🤣

It deserves all the backlash, how is the biggest YouTube in the world going to use generative AI?

@CloudWrestling Ray tracing turnbuckles eating 20 frames

Now that WWE 2K has finally left last-gen behind, I really hope WWE 2K27 delivers a noticeable graphics upgrade. The current games already look good, but it feels like it’s time for better lighting, improved character models, and more realistic presentation overall. Do you think WWE 2K27 will give us the visual upgrade we’ve been waiting for? #WWE2K26 #WWERaw #WWE2K27

@FreeBirdFly777 @nvidia Ok

Where Bernie Sanders’ argument is weakest (text‑only version) 1. He treats Musk’s rising net worth as if it comes from taxpayers. Musk’s wealth is almost entirely unrealized stock value. Stock price increases don’t come from taxpayers — they come from investors voluntarily buying shares. Sanders’ framing makes it sound like public money was taken, which isn’t how valuation works. 2. He calls government contracts “subsidies.” NASA and DoD contracts are competitive procurement. The government buys rockets and launch services the same way it buys ships or aircraft. SpaceX won those contracts by offering lower cost and better performance. Calling that “theft” is a rhetorical stretch. 3. He ignores that SpaceX saved taxpayers tens of billions. Independent audits show SpaceX reduced launch costs by 70–90% compared to legacy contractors. NASA saved enormous amounts of money by switching to SpaceX. This contradicts the idea that Musk “took” from the public. 4. He assumes workers create all value and founders create none. Sanders’ worldview is rooted in a labor‑theory model where owners extract value from workers. But Musk’s companies are engineering‑driven, capital‑intensive, and innovation‑dependent. A huge portion of the value comes from technology, design, risk, and capital — not just labor hours. This makes Sanders’ framing incomplete. 5. He talks as if Musk extracted cash from the economy. Musk rarely sells stock. His wealth is illiquid and tied to company valuations. Unrealized gains don’t remove money from the economy and don’t reduce public resources. This undermines the “stolen wealth” narrative. 6. He ignores the wealth Musk created for others. Tesla and SpaceX created thousands of millionaires among early employees. They generated massive returns for pension funds and retail investors. They created entire supply chains and new industries. Sanders’ argument doesn’t account for this broader wealth creation. 7. He treats a moral belief as if it were an economic fact. Sanders believes billionaires shouldn’t exist. That’s a moral position, not an economic one. When he says Musk “stole” wealth, he’s expressing a value judgment, not describing an actual economic mechanism.

Computing is undergoing its biggest shift in 60 years. Our CEO Jensen Huang explains why the world is moving from retrieval to generation—expanding what humanity can build, discover, and solve. This shift represents a multi trillion dollar opportunity across the 5 layer AI cake ecosystem. @Sequoia

@itsomegaguy @X Heyyyyyyyy

Post 1 Hey @X

@Marky_X_ You like to be sour or is that personality?

Making a lot of promises while barely delivering them seems on-brand for a Fable game, at least

@DejaWukong I never played the original and I am glazing it because I care simply about the fun I am giving to have. Just relax for once and enjoy.

I feel people glazing this didn't play the original fables 😅

@SamPalafinFan @tnzaa_xd 🤣 what?!

Never underestimate how much Capcom regrets re6

@ChampionSunsFan @tnzaa_xd That's not a regret lol they glad they did 6 that led to 7. Would have been regret if they had done the same with 7 and ended the series.

@MSGPlayzYT @tnzaa_xd 6 did so poorly in capcoms eyes that they had to revamp the entire series from tone, focus, down to the very engine. The fact that 7 was such a ‘game changer’ shows how much they regretted 6 since they had to change everything about the direction of the franchise

@AdamVzz You needed to announce that publicly? Lol

Tem que cancelar a versão PS.

@YouTubeCreators How about remove that invalid suspension?

switch up the vibe: test some different content formats for your niche and see what your audience is going to vibe with 💡

@iam_fafnir @papa_silencer Imagine not playing the game and calling it "shit" 🤣 what's your favorite game? Red dead redemption 2? A walking simulator

@MSGPlayzYT @papa_silencer Imagine calling a shit damage sponge that does not react to heavy swings an example of “good combat”

This shit stinks dude idk why I got the idea to replay this slop

@YouTube @YouTubeCreators platform that doesn't care about its creators. Thank you for ruining the year by invalid suspension.