PlaceholderHuman123 (Formerly Richard)

Those photos have words in them. You are anything but reasonable. You are a petulant child who just wants to have his way. For instance: just because you say I didn’t address something doesn’t mean I didn’t address it. If reason were so on your side and your arguments so sound you could answer my questions easily. Let’s stick with this one: where does one go to find this immutable book of reason? Just answer that one…

@MacPipkin @LilaGraceRose A lump of cells is not a child. A photo is not an argument. Not a single point you make addresses this allegedly "flawed" argument I presented. Not a doubt that you have no answer.

At fertilization, a “zinc spark” flashes—marking the beginning of a new human life, with a complete genetic code, inherent value, and a future ahead. Not potential. Not a possibility. A child. Wonderfully made in the image of God.

So not allowing women to kill the child in them, which over 90% of the time is for the convenience of the mother, makes a society “savage” in your view? Why end a human life when adoption is available? So we have to be greedy and self-centered to the point we will end the lives of other human beings in order to maintain a lifestyle and to not do this is “savage” in your eyes? Unreal. Are the EU nations more “savage” than the US because they restrict abortion exponentially more than we? Next, where does one go to find this absolute dissertation of “reason?” If you can’t cite a source then you’re just making it up as you go along. What is reasonable to one is not immutably reasonable to another. Murder has become so common in our society we’re starting to not justly punish the people who commit it. Does that make us more or less savage? Is this an indicator of a greater respect for human life or less respect for human life? Finally, no, an apple isn’t a tree, but a sapling is. No, separated sperm and egg cells aren’t a human being, but a zygote is. It’s just the first stage in a human life cycle and we aren’t a plant or amphibian. We’re supposed to be human beings, but some will not rise to the occasion and instead choose to hide behind vapid banners like ‘reason’ to excuse their lack of humanity. The analogy you keep repeating ad nauseam is fundamentally flawed…

A society either respects individual rights or is a tribe of savages. A civilized society knows the difference, because it enshrines reason as an absolute. Reason tells you that an apple is not the same as a tree, and that a frivolous digression is a contradictory attempt to convince others that there is no Free Will, by the action of attempting to change another person's mind (using irrelevant facts) Just becuase you don't have Free Will does not mean I don't, nor that you can infer that a lump of cells is someone related to canada's assistance suicide programs.

A society either respects human life or it does it. The lines in your head have no meaning beyond you. Also, nothing ever stays in place. Society is always in motion. It’s either moving towards something better or something worse. A disabled veteran in Canada asked for an updated lift to get up her stairs and was instead offered suicide (cbc.ca/news/politics/…). This was 2 years ago. Canada‘s MAID program has gone from something that was supposed to not be mentioned and people could take advantage of if they thought they were at the end of the rope to something that is being routinely recommended. Canada euthanized over 16,000 people last year. Do you think that number is going to go up or down? Meanwhile, elsewhere: lozierinstitute.org/netherlands-fo… It’s only a matter of time until even the illusion of choice is removed because we don’t respect human life. Your road has one destination…

@MacPipkin @LilaGraceRose No. Two disastrous flaws. The argument is about individual rights, not human life. Cancer has no rights, even if cancer cells are human. Next, the standard of value comes from individual rights, not societal dispensation.

@Lantenac @LilaGraceRose So human life only has as much value as society grants, right?

@MacPipkin @LilaGraceRose Not a matter of being humans. It is a matter of being individuals. Birth = individuation.

@Harmonkey_ @jessmachadoshow @DoctorTurtleboy I don’t think she’s capable of being her own person. Something happened there. It seems all she can do is mimic what she thinks people are supposed to do. Try to leave her and she loses it. She honestly needs help…

@jessmachadoshow @KyleSharkey8 @DoctorTurtleboy There’s just so much wrong here. Is she comparing her and Aidan’s drama to facing prison time for a murder? Is she comparing being victorious to Aidan vs Norfolk county DA? What’s the message here??? That she put up the same fight Karen did?? I’m getting sick to my stomach

@DoctorTurtleboy's ex-girlfriend dressing like Karen Read for her own court date is absolutely WILD.

@Lantenac @LilaGraceRose So exactly when do we become human?

@LilaGraceRose An apple is not a tree. And two, four, eight, a glob of cells is not a human.

@emilymiller @AndySaunders_1 One was taken during the day while the other was taken at night. Needless to say, environmentalist jumped all over that image and have been misrepresenting it for the past five days…

@AndySaunders_1 Was it a different time of year so more cloudy on left?

Left - Apollo 17, 1972 Right - Artemis II, 2026 Two photographs taken by one of us, of all of us, over half a century apart. What's changed?

@SacredHope @KYMaverick1 @LamarVsAllen You’ll probably get an offer from Netflix to buy your idea…

@KYMaverick1 @LamarVsAllen Unhinged client hires unhinged attorney. What could go wrong?

I wonder who will be representing O'Neil come Monday? To clarify the reported incident: The attorney representing O’Neil allegedly struck @lamarVsAllen with his coat inside the courtroom. He then reportedly exited the building and struck Tom CPU’s camera while Tom was recording outside. In short, the attorney may indeed find himself in need of legal representation. Who is this attorney?

Point to me on the graph where the "genocide" touched you

Haters will say it's fake

No, it’s a daft world you live in. I’ve never said murderers shouldn’t receive punishment. I’ve only said everyone has a right to a vigorous defense when facing criminal charges. And guess what?… We do!… If someone is found not guilty of murder or any other crime then that means police/investigators/prosecutors didn’t do their due diligence. Don’t like our right to a vigorous defense against criminal charges? Then by all means, North Korea awaits your arrival. Bon voyage… BTW, I’ve wasted more than enough time on your stupidity and will waste no more. If you don’t get it by now, you never will. Be well and, by all means, stay out of trouble because goodness knows you’ll never hire a defense attorney to defend yourself from any charges, right?

@MacPipkin You think God and our founders wanted murderers to NOT receive prison time. Its a weird world you live in.

The same people who wrote we have a right to life liberty & the pursuit of happiness also wrote we have a right to a defense against criminal charges. They also wrote these rights did not come from them, they come from God. This means we are born with them. 🤦🏻‍♂️ Not my words, their words. If you’re going to run around quoting people you may as well know what/who you’re quoting and the context in which they wrote/said what you’re quoting…

@MacPipkin @YannettiJohnson God didn't write the constitution. Mortals did. And you know what else they wrote? That we the people have the right to life. Psychos don't have the right to end it. Ergo, murderers are violating the Constitution. But apparently you want them to get no consequences for it.

Whine and cry about it all you want, our rights are God-given in that we are born with them. But remember, if you ever are accused of a crime do not hire a defense attorney. You do not want nor should you need someone like that in your perfect life. BTW I have never been arrested yet I understand the need for competent defense attorneys to fight for their clients because I am a human being and I have a functioning brain…

@MacPipkin @YannettiJohnson God has nothing to do with defense attorneys and, the Bible doesn't have a caveat for Murder like you do. Ps. Its not that difficult to live a life without a criminal arrest, 75% of society accomplishes it easily. You obviously rep for the deviant population. Good choice.

And this is the case every time? Normally I’d say you can’t be this daft, but you are. Sometimes the person accused did it, but believes there are mitigating circumstances that should be stressed in order to avoid something like prison. Whether you like it or not every defendant has a right to a defense. It is a God-given right recognized by our constitution. If you are ever accused of a crime do NOT hire a defense attorney. Don’t be a hypocrite. You sit there and you take every drop of your medicine because whether you did it or not you are being accused and that alone means you deserve it… right?

@MacPipkin @YannettiJohnson "Avoiding prison" is the goal. Its on his website. This has nothing to do with the person "not doing it." Nothing to do with his hero bullshit.

@YannettiJohnson @kreadisinnocent Covering the above video is wrong, but X did get this right…

@DianaLasso1355 @YannettiJohnson So should society come and check with you to determine who deserves to spend their rest of their life in prison? If the government can’t prove their case beyond a reasonable doubt then maybe the person didn’t do it…

@YannettiJohnson Its not about constitutional rights but its hilarious that you are peddling that bullshit. It is about getting your client off after they killed someone. Its about making money by blocking justice for the evil committed against victims and survivors. You are scum.

Just want to confirm this post, it is unfortunately factual. Some people are fueled with evil, she is one. The root of evil is abuse of power.

Nate, stop whining and crying about the left abandoning this platform because it became a level playing field and this platform not wanting to boost NYT subscriptions. If you want leftist content artificially elevated above everyone else run to Bluesky and/or Threads where they will more than happily promote any bilge you choose to spew. Or, you can run an independent website that isn’t behind a pay wall and see more engagement…

In what sense is it intellectually dishonest, Nikita? The context is clear. My thesis is: I think your algo surfaces too little quality. And I think your excuses in these back-and-forth exchanges have been validating of that. To your credit, it's clear enough you agree with me.

How many people of the left ran away from this platform when it became a level playing field? Funny thing happens when one side abandons an intellectual battlefield, the other side takes it. Go to Bluesky or Threads and you’ll see a more lopsided result for the left because both of those platforms aren’t a level playing field, therefore, that’s where the left feels safe. So either Nate can fight the good fight here or run away like everyone else. Frankly, I don’t care because we all know the left can only win when they control the narrative from stem to stern…

Watching a liberal slowly wake up.