MADJACK TEES

@a_meadowsweet @Megalithic12000 You want me to speculate on why the Egyptian authorities might refuse permission on a dig for which no application has been made? Because it's a Tuesday?

@MadjackTees @Megalithic12000 Not yet that I know of, but this is what everyone is asking for, that i can see. Other than egyptologists, that is.

The Giza plateau is covered in shafts like this, cut straight down into bedrock, dropping into total darkness. Dozens of them. This could lead directly to the void beneath the mound where Filippo Biondi recently announced a second Sphinx is buried. Most have never been fully explored or even documented, some are fenced off, some are filled with sand and some just sit there in plain sight while tourists walk past. What's beneath Giza that we still haven't been shown?

@a_meadowsweet @Megalithic12000 I meant that as they were excavating tombs, they needed a place nearby to put the spoil. Simple as that. And given they were engaged in uncovering buried structures, it doesn't make much sense they did this just in order to cover up other structures.

Ahh. It takes some prodding. Yes, I am asking exactly that. Why would the provenance of the sand have any impact on whether they would use it to cover shafts? Is that sand likely to be further analyzed in the future, or likely to contaminate shafts that may happen to be there? I hadn't considered that... so it wouldn't be great practice to use that sand in that manner.

@a_meadowsweet @Megalithic12000 Has there been an application to dig into the spoil heap?

Maybe you can also refuse to comment on this here: a lot of people seem to assert that it would be wrong to potentially damage monuments or the site on the back of pseudo-archaeologists' hypotheses. Why would a test hole/trench (performed by archaeologists) be refused permission at a refuse dump site?

@a_meadowsweet @Megalithic12000 What are you asking me, exactly? Do I think sand was deliberately dumped over shaft openings? Given the spoil was from an excavation of a section of the necropolis adjacent, I very much doubt it. But I'd probably have to dig into maps etc to be absolutely sure.

@MadjackTees @Megalithic12000

@fakehistoryhunt Not just for boats.

I am NOT going to show you a top view of Fort Tolucco on the east coast of Ternate in Indonesia. Come on, we're grown-ups, I refuse. And I'm sure you won't look it up, we're just going to move on, being all proper and mature.

@a_meadowsweet @Megalithic12000 I'm saying you're proceeding from an unlikely assumption to begin with.

@MadjackTees @Megalithic12000 You're choosing not to answer so?

@a_meadowsweet @Megalithic12000 Given his process is still unverified, I'd say there's every chance Biondi has made a spurious detection, meaning there's likely no shafts under the spoil heap.

How likely is it that the anomalies spotted by Biondi under the discarded mound are shafts? If those shafts had been recorded, how likely is it that a mound of discarded sand would still be located right on top of them? Would that be an OK thing to do? since most seem blocked off for public safety anyway.

@Gnosisinformant @Mr_BenPrime Don't forget, we couldn't make something that precise today!

@Mr_BenPrime Looks like it was made in a factory with laser technology !!!

“Perfectly uniform SCOOP marks”

@RapidResponse47 @VP Given Trump's corruption of American institutions and his smashing of constitutional checks & balances to gain personal power, this has a strong 'we had to destroy the village to save the village' vibe.

.@VP: "I would bet every dollar that I own that the next time the Democrats have control of the Senate, they will break the filibuster, pack the Supreme Court, and destroy this country. We have to do it NOW in order to save the country."

@CosmicEggEarth @JillyNoJabs @randallwcarlson And when someone asks him to prove his claim of 'hermetically sealed layers' with a simple reference, he gives no answer and blocks. Probably because he made it up.

@CosmicEggEarth @JillyNoJabs @randallwcarlson 'in several studies microplastic was discovered in hermetically sealed layers' Got a reference for that? It doesn't appear to be in the paper you linked & the inference is the samples were contaminated by microplastics in circulating groundwater.

The reason we can't find evidence of an advanced ancient civilization may have nothing to do with whether one existed - and everything to do with what we are looking for. Randall’s argument is direct. If the definition of civilization is held up as a mirror of what humanity has built in the last three to four centuries - scientific, industrial, recognizably modern - then anything that doesn't reflect that image back gets dismissed. The search is circular by design. Ben van Kerkwyk extends that argument into its most provocative implication. A previous advanced civilization could have progressed down an entirely different technological tree - solving the same fundamental problems through entirely different means, arriving at solutions that would look almost alien to modern eyes. Not primitive. Not undeveloped. Just different. Danny Jones distills the whole conversation into four words - we are looking for the wrong thing. Randall closes it honestly. Anything beyond that, he acknowledges, is speculation. But the framework itself - the willingness to look without the mirror - is where the real search has to begin.

@randallwcarlson So similar stone working across distant sites is evidence of a prior civilization, but the apparent lack of evidence for a prior civilization is because we can't recognize the prior civilization. Is the prior civilization in the room with us right now?

@wakenminds Yes. It's stupid.

Have you researched Tartaria?

@ufologiacosmos @derek__olson Better hope the Hall of Records is waterproof because the groundwater level is only about 15 feet beneath the Sphinx.

@derek__olson There was this hole, but it was sealed because it was one of the paths leading to the Sphinx's underground, which contains tunnels, halls, various columns, and the place of great interest and importance to all, the Hall of Records.

The one thing we do know, is that the Great Sphinx of Giza has a hole in it’s head…

@Megalithic12000 And if you multiply it by 1.91213327372735, you get the distance from my front door to the nearest McDonalds.

🚨 The Great Pyramid is a 1:43,200 scale model of planet Earth. The maths prove it. Multiply its height by 43,200 and you get the polar radius of the Earth. Multiply its base perimeter by 43,200 and you get the equatorial circumference. Both accurate to within less than 1%. 🔹Accurate to within 1% 🔹Scale factor: 600 × 72 🔹Height × 43,200 = polar radius 🔹Perimeter × 43,200 = equatorial circumference The scale factor is the key. 72 years is the time it takes for one degree of precessional shift, an astronomical cycle so slow it takes 25,920 years to complete. The scale factor isn't arbitrary. It's derived from one of the most complex motions of the Earth itself. A geometrical scale model of the planet, built on a ratio rooted in deep astronomical knowledge. Who encodes that into stone and why does mainstream archaeology still call it a tomb?

@4gottnHistory They don't look perfectly uniform to me. They look very much like what might be expected from the use of dolerite pounders - which have been found in abundance at the site.

Ah yes… nothing screams dolerite pounders were used on the Unfinished Obelisk more than perfectly uniform scoop marks in solid granite. Look no further, my friends, this clearly is the work of the ancients banging hard rocks together.

@Raker57 @andycparsons @InterstellarUAP True enough.

@MadjackTees @andycparsons @InterstellarUAP Really, I think people just love to argue about things on the internet and will seize upon any opportunity to do so.

🚨 Graham Hancock on Piers Morgan: Priests CHANTING to LEVITATE 70-ton granite blocks up the Great Pyramid? “I’m reading ancient texts that talk about priests chanting and raising a huge block into the air.” “Nobody has yet come up with a convincing explanation” after 100+ years… and the ramp theory? “Completely ludicrous.” Lost ancient tech… or something extraterrestrial? What do YOU think really built the Pyramids? Aliens? Sound levitation? Or total myth? Drop your theory below 👇

@benwehrman This is the dumbest post I've seen this month. And competition has been stiff.

Do you believe this building was built in 1892 with donkey carriages? The materials in these cathedrals often came from hundreds, even thousands of miles away. There weren't even proper roads back then. Just mud. Stop, and really think about this.

@Megalithic12000 I'm sorry. First I thought it was 'this hill is a buried 2nd sphinx'. Then when it became fairly clear it was spoil from modern excavations, it changed to 'deliberately dumped over underground entrances'. Not to worry! I'll ask the chaps to move the goalposts somewhere else;

Show me where I said there's a second Sphinx for certain. I'll wait. What I've actually said is there's a real possibility one is buried there, along with tunnels and chambers we still haven't been allowed to explore. Asking 'what's under there?' isn't a claim and it isn't moving goalposts.

The point about spoil being deliberately dumped over underground entrances is huge. We already know Giza sits on top of a massive subterranean network that's never been fully explored. Even if there's no second Sphinx here, the SAR scans are picking up something significant beneath this site. How can so many people declare there's nothing here when nobody has actually looked?