Obi

@SebasP49474734 @Cryptobacking That silance after 😂❤️❤️🙏🏼

Deep down I’m curious 🤨 Can someone explain why $QNT #Quant shows a total supply of 45.4M from the original creation on Etherscan, but most trackers only show around 14M circulating supply? 🤔 And how does that translate into an on-chain market cap of over $3.6B?

@gverdian Congratulation Mr. @gverdian and @quantnetwork 🙏🏼

A decade in the making, we have published an ISO standard for blockchain interoperability. This is a milestone I've been working towards since 2015, Remitt was founded with the conviction that blockchains could transform financial services but only if the industry solved interoperability and harmonised around global standards. Without that, blockchain would remain fragmented, siloed, and locked out of mainstream institutional adoption. In April 2016, we published what was the world's first proposal for a blockchain standard (remitt.com/blog/2016/04/2…) a bold move at a time when the industry was still largely focused on proofs of concept and competing protocol narratives, not standardisation. The idea was simple but ambitious: if blockchains were going to serve global markets, they needed a common framework that transcended any single protocol or vendor. Central to this thinking from the very beginning was the concept of a multi-gateway architecture, leveraging the know-how of 20 years of experience in cybersecurity to frame the principle that interoperability shouldn't depend on a single bridge or point-to-point connection, but on a layered gateway model that could abstract away the differences between underlying DLTs and connect them through a common interface. This was the architectural foundation of what would become Overledger, and it was also the design philosophy we brought to the standards process. The belief was that a viable international standard for blockchain interoperability had to be protocol-agnostic and gateway-driven, enabling any DLT to communicate with any other DLT (any-to-any) and with existing networks, without requiring those ledgers to change how they operate. The standard and the technology were born from the same insight. That same year, I worked closely with the team from @standardsaus (Standards Australia), who had the foresight in 2015 to champion the initiative at the international level. Together, we pushed for ISO to establish a dedicated Technical Committee for blockchain and not to be absorbed into an existing committee, but to stand on its own as a recognition that this technology warranted its own global standards programme. The industry demand was there, the use cases were multiplying, and the fragmentation was becoming a real barrier. In September 2016, the New Work Item Proposal (NWIP) received global approval, and ISO formally gave the green light to establish a new Technical Committee (remitt.com/blog/2016/09/1…). TC 307 — Blockchain and Electronic Distributed Ledger Technologies — was born (remitt.com/wp-content/upl…). The inaugural meeting was held in Sydney in April 2017, and from that moment the real work began. As the standards work progressed internationally, the mission at Remitt was evolving too. What started as an effort to use blockchains for financial services and solve interoperability grew into something far larger, a full enterprise infrastructure platform for connecting any blockchain to any network. Remitt became Quant, and we built Overledger, the world's first blockchain operating system to deliver on that original vision. The multi-gateway architecture that informed the standards thinking became the core of Overledger's design: a technology layer that sits above all blockchains, providing institutions with a single integration point to access any DLT, any network, and any existing system. The interoperability challenge that drove the standards work was the same challenge we set out to solve commercially and the two efforts reinforced each other throughout. For close to a decade since TC 307's formation, subject matter experts across the world have contributed their time and expertise to Working Group 7 — Interoperability is the committee I chair. International standards are not built quickly they are built through consensus, technical debate, and relentless refinement. The same methodology and rigour that created the Internet, through publishing standards. The result is a published international standard for blockchain interoperability. 🔗 iso.org/standard/82098… A huge thank you to @isostandards as the international standards developing organisation, to the team at @standardsaus who started the initiative in 2015 and worked tirelessly to get TC 307 approved and established globally, and to every subject matter expert who contributed to Working Group 7 over the years. This would not exist without that collective effort. From a blog post proposing the world's first blockchain standard in 2016, to a published ISO standard in 2026 and from Remitt to Quant, from an architectural concept of multi-gateway interoperability to Overledger and a global standard, this has been a decade-long journey of building both the standards and the technology to make blockchain interoperability a reality for institutions worldwide. There is still much more work ahead. More standards to develop, more to evolve, and more to build. But today, we mark a significant milestone. #Blockchain #ISO #Interoperability #Standards #TC307 #DLT #Quant #Overledger

@Toatse ?

@NCashOfficial 🤡

RIGHT NOW is the best time to be preparing your crypto bags for maximum profit. Below I created a list of 15 solid altcoins to be researching & buying right now. Let's dive into them ⬇️⬇️⬇️

@ywk0211 @gverdian No time for fud, ciao!!

Not a single mention of $QNT, horrible reporting as usual coming from Cointelegraph.

@malekanoms I get the skepticism — it’s fair. @quantnetwork isn’t a chain, VM, stablecoin, or DeFi platform, so it doesn’t answer which blockchain ICE uses. It only fits as middleware: orchestrating multiple ledgers, keeping logic off-chain, and enabling a conservative, centralized outcome

Sorry to interrupt the love fest over this NYSE announcement, but this reads like vaporware and yet another corporate fantasy masquerading as innovation. I am happy to be proven wrong, but everything they've put out so far leaves out all the crucial details: - Which chain? - What programming language or VM? - Which stablecoins? - What jurisdictions? Will it be domestic or global? - Will the tokens be permissioned, permissionless, or some hybrid? - What will be the fees and economics be - ICE is a for profit entity - Why do we even need this when we have DeFi? The fact that they are seeking regulatory clarity makes the lack of details even more suspect - regulators would need all of these questions answered for approval. The NYSE is a centuries old institution that owes its entire existence to laws and regulations that guarantee its profits and success. The success of every person who works there, and every cent of its profits, stems directly from this highly centralized and oligopolistic architecture, one built around core principles like delayed settlement that don't exist in crypto. Tokenization represents a radically different architecture. It requires different skills and business models to be useful. It changes things. It is highly unlikely that a TradFi firm like the ICE succeeds at both. It would be great for society if they did, but that's usually not how things work. Those of who have been in crypto for more than a cycle have heard this story before. It always ends the same way. The suit simps will be disappointed yet again.

Exciting progress on #QuantFusion as we kick off 2026! 1. Fusion Firewall Updates We recently upgraded Fusion's Multi-Ledger Rollup to deploy critical updates to Fusion Firewall #smartcontracts. Key enhancements based on institutional feedback: - Self-managed token whitelists for institutions - Liquidity isolation options for shared tokens - Privacy-preserving on-chain whitelist synchronisation 2. Bring Your Own Node (BYON) - Now Live A foundational upgrade for #QuantConnect users. BYON allows users to attach their own nodes to Fusion via our Quant Connect UI. It’s as simple as selecting the network and entering a URL. Starting with pre-selected node providers to ensure reliability and simplify setup, with plans to expand to user-hosted nodes. The infrastructure is fully generic, any EVM-compatible node can connect, with minimal adjustments needed for non-EVM chains. Currently testing on Sepolia and Amoy testnets. 3. Staking Infrastructure in Development We're evaluating staking algorithms that balance inclusivity with meaningful participation. The goal: encourage QNT staking at all levels without disadvantaging smaller holders. Staking will be tied to BYON, users stake QNT against their nodes to earn rewards. Rather than slashing, we're following proven models (like Avalanche) where withholding rewards effectively incentivises node reliability. #Blockchain #Interoperability

@SebasP49474734 Oh no, 😐 but you guys would hyped me up again and then quanties would be bought 😂 so maybe good for my bank account🫡

@Makobi92 F*** somehow the space record option was switched off… 🤬🤬

@SebasP49474734 It just says: "show details" no replay possible

@Makobi92 x.com/sebasp49474734…

@SebasP49474734 Where can I find i?t?? Will definetly go all in on that one 😎🙏🏼

@Makobi92 Yeah.. we were on Monday for a change… I hope you like the replay

@SebasP49474734 Just came back from work 😵

@SebasP49474734 Nooooo it was today 🫠🫠

@SebasP49474734 🤩🤩 awesome !!

@SebasP49474734 need another $QNT RoundTable with the Elite @DPGmaximus @KingChanning @APEXCONSULTNFA 🧐 so much to speak !! + speacial guest @MindCrypto_

@Brospeare @UPtheroad48 Haha, lass es einfach! Is ok wenn du so denkst aber dann verabschiede dich vom Projekt und sprich nicht mehr drüber 🤷‍♂️ kommt ja eh nix sinnvolles raus außer FUD 🫡💨

@UPtheroad48 @Makobi92 Beobachte den Preis. Der Token kommt nicht mehr hoch.

. @RomanReher hatte von anfang an recht!

@UPtheroad48 @Brospeare x.com/Tokenicer/stat… Bitte vorher research bevor du über Themen redest wo du dich nicht auskennst 😊

@Brospeare wenn du als Usecase rein und allein den Nutzen für den Enduser ansiehst, dann ist außer privacy token natürlich alles fake.. Der Usecase in diesem Fall ist dass der Token fürs ganze Ökosystem benutzt wird (Lizenzen fuer Software, anbieten von Diensleitsungen etc.)

@gverdian @___V7___ A $QNT hoodie would be nice 🤩

@___V7___ @quantnetwork No need, after Sibos will giveaway merch to our community. Stay tuned for more info!

Getting the limited edition @quantnetwork merch ready for #Sibos Frankfurt. Get them from stand DISM13 and join us at the Discover Welcome Event on Tuesday at 16:30CEST in the Discover Area.