Malcolm Nicholas

@paulAFC84 @henrywinter Thanks for being so nice about it 🤭

@MalcolmNichola1 @henrywinter 😂😂😂😂😂 Harry Kane used to go down easily to win penalties when he was in the Prem. Also used to love backing into opponents so they used to go over the top of him, with them facing potential injuries. But lovely character reference

Does honesty pay? Haaland could have reacted theatrically to Gabriel and got him sent off, and a 3-match ban. Arsenal have cover but Gabriel would have been a loss. Haaland is honest. Stayed on his feet. PL Key Match Incidents panel says Gabriel should have got red not yellow 1/2

Marjorie Taylor Greene goes complete Scorched Earth on Trump. Calls out what happened regarding the Epstein Files. Names Trump, Bondi, Patel, JD Vance… How they’re knowingly protecting a Pedophile. How she and her family have received Death Threats. Trump said Marjorie Taylor Greene deserved the Death Threats. Watch, repost, tag every MAGA account you can think of.

@iam_flourish_uk @tompatt1989 @henrywinter Why are Arsenal fans suddenly bemoaning being unfairly treated in a fight for the title? There's still a few games left. Anything could happen.

@tompatt1989 @henrywinter He plays for city isn’t it?

Marjorie Taylor Greene confirms what we all knew, that Trump is the sole reason we don't have the Epstein files. And that @SpeakerJohnson has been protecting Trump the entire time.

BREAKING: SOUNDS OF SILENCE — Senate hearing goes deadly quiet as Trump’s federal judicial nominees REFUSE to admit third term is illegal. . Donald Trump is nominating people to lifetime federal judgeships who won't confirm that he can't run for a third term when they come before the Senate for their approval hearings. Let that sink in. Senator Chris Coons of Delaware asked what should be the easiest constitutional law question in American history at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this week. He asked Trump's judicial nominees about the 22nd Amendment. The first nominee, John Marck, said that his career had been in criminal prosecution and that he hadn't had occasion to use that particular amendment. A federal judicial nominee. Unfamiliar with the 22nd Amendment. Seeking a lifetime appointment to interpret the Constitution. Another candidate eventually offered that it "deals with the two-term limitation." Correct. Gold star. Coons then asked the simple follow-up: is President Trump eligible to run for president again in 2028? Marck's response was a masterpiece of evasion: "Without considering all the facts and looking at everything, depending on what the situation is, this to me strikes as more of a hypothetical." Coons was patient. He walked Marck through it like a kindergarten teacher explaining why you can't eat paste. Has Trump been elected president twice? "President Trump has been certified the President of the United States two times." Is he eligible to run for a third term? "I would have to review the actual wording of it." A man seeking a lifetime federal judgeship needs to review the actual wording. Of the 22nd Amendment. Which is 61 words long. Coons then turned to the full panel and asked if anyone — anyone — was willing to simply state that the Constitution of the United States bars Trump from seeking a third term. A heartbreakingly long silence ensued. He asked again. Anyone willing to apply the Constitution by its plain language? More ominous silence. Nobody. Not one of Trump's judicial nominees would say out loud, under oath, in a Senate hearing, that the 22nd Amendment means what it plainly says. This isn't ignorance. These are lawyers. They know what the 22nd Amendment says. They know Trump has been talking openly about a third term. And they calculated — correctly, based on what happens to people who cross this president — that telling the constitutional truth was more dangerous than staying silent. The frightening thing is that these are the people who will be interpreting your rights for the next 30 years. Please like and share this post if you think federal judges should be willing to say the Constitution means what it says — even when the president doesn't want to hear it.

@va1iumskies @BBCSport Most knowledgeable sporting audiences will appreciate great players. In Tennis, Golf, etc. spectators will show support for skill, sportsmanship, and brilliant ability.

@BBCSport Why were so many Englishmen rooting for a Chinese player?

You certainly weren't being booed, Wu! 😅❤️

@crimble123 Bentancur has been a key player for some time. The best players are often understated; they lead on the pitch by example. Not flashy, but reliable, and "boss" their zones. His name on the team list settles the nerves.

We were all waiting for Kudus, Madders, Deki to get back but this guy has low key transformed us since his return from injury. We look a different team with him in the XI. He won’t get the headlines, but if Conor’s the lungs, Rodrigo’s the heartbeat. #COYS #THFC

@AlasdairGold cont. enjoying the day they get to beat up their favourite victim. Tbh I find their attitude appalling. Perhaps they have behaved like this every season and I've just missed it. I don't know who will be officiating, but I pray the match gets decent officials.

@AlasdairGold I've noticed this morning Sky Sports' rather nasty "if it quacks it's a duck" phrasing suggesting Tottenham will be relegated this season. Can you put something out there about this? For any Tottenham fan it feels very isolating, rather like the playground bully

@ITV7Racing #ITV7InItToWinIt Newmarket.

Competition time We have a £50 cash prize up for grabs. Follow @ITV7Racing, answer today's question, and use the hashtag #ITV7InItToWinIt, and you could be our lucky winner, announced at 10am tomorrow. Tap for T&Cs 👇

@reece_dinsdale Ridiculous. I said in a previous post that your career has included some notable performances. I might not always agree with you in politics, but I respect your views. Some people seem to derive a strange satisfaction from slating others. I don't know why.

Someone having a go at me for my politics suggested it was poor form that the highlight of my career had only been Threads. It was A highlight, if not THE highlight. Imagine something akin to Threads being the highlight of anyone’s career… & it being a source of derision! 😄

@footballconfid1 I have wondered whether the plan was to get Tottenham relegated? There is something very suspicious about the way these two have been going about their business for this season. The Times did an expose on Lewis and Levy a few years back. Someone needs to investigate these two.

Whatever happens this season at Spurs, both of these need to go this summer.

@AlasdairGold Crikey. A look at the EPL table shows 9 points covering 6 teams. 38 points used to be considered the benchmark for survival. However, if Tottenham won their remaining games they would be on 46 points. Sunderland are currently on that total lying 12th. Imho survival is still on.

Joao Palhinha scores! A corner in the box falls for Richarlison and his effort is squirming wide before the midfielder slides the ball into the net. football.london/tottenham-hots…

@brettski7259 @BBCMOTD Cont. of your games where it really matters to you, and the @FA_PGMOL admits their fault to a whole raft of decisions you feel caused Sunderland to lose, which robbed you of a European place next season, how are you going to feel?

@MalcolmNichola1 @BBCMOTD I’m a Sunderland fan but why should Tottenham get a point? You were one nil down to a goal scored by a player that hadn’t committed several fouls or was controversially, (dependant on your opinion), still on the pitch? You had been toothless up front all day.

Brian Brobbey should have been sent off in Sunderland's recent win against Tottenham, the Premier League's key match incidents panel has ruled.

@brettski7259 @BBCMOTD Cont. authorities fully reviewed it and found so many poor decisions that they offered both sides a chance to play again with different officials? Probably not because Sunderland won, and their fans (as you are one) would rightfully object. So when you get poor officials in one

@brettski7259 @BBCMOTD Because the EPL is not about being fair. It's a cash cow for lots on interested parties who don't care. That published decision was 'virtue signalling', imho. They acknowledged their own mistake, but nothing came of it. Would anyone object to replaying the match if the

@HACKETTREF In context, I didn't care who won, but this incident shocked me. What sort of example is this to youngsters who play at school, or in their own leagues, who believe they can do this and get away with it? It's like watching the NFL.

@HACKETTREF I watched this happen and thought both should have gone. I'm a Tottenham fan, but I was shocked that this incident only warranted 2 yellow cards. Dermot Gallagher should have come clean and said, "The ref fixed this."

Here is the law - Sending off offence —/—- physical or aggressive behaviour (including spitting or biting) towards an opposing player, substitute, team official, match official, spectator or any other person (e.g. ball boy/girl, security or competition official etc.)