Malathi Chamarthi

24 posts

Malathi Chamarthi banner
Malathi Chamarthi

Malathi Chamarthi

@Malschamar06

Proud mom, Physician, Homeostasis, Cooking, Adventure, Music, Animals except reptiles

Texas, USA Katılım Şubat 2021
13 Takip Edilen4 Takipçiler
That 1
That 1@that_1·
it's not only the jaw,it's the whole THING 🤣
English
944
311
8.5K
1.7M
That 1
That 1@that_1·
the only title left for Harry soon
English
211
28
477
34.9K
Queen Esther
Queen Esther@XOQueenEsther·
Will Invictus Games Become the Next Sentebale? Invictus Games was once viewed as one of Prince Harry’s most meaningful achievements. Launched in 2014 under the royal family’s Royal Foundation and effectively entrusted to Harry as its founder and driving force, the Games grew into a powerful platform for wounded & injured veterans. The focus felt genuine: recovery through adaptive sport, community, and resilience. The competitors were the undisputed heart of it. Now, increasingly, the veterans feel like they’re becoming secondary to the celebrity machine surrounding Harry and Meghan Markle. The public conversation around Invictus should be about recovery stories, rehabilitation & the extraordinary resilience of service personnel. Instead, coverage too often revolves around wardrobe choices, staged photographs, luxury travel & endless PR cycles centered on the Sussexes themselves. At some point, people are naturally going to ask whether Invictus is still operating primarily for veterans or whether it has slowly become another extension of the Sussex brand. Any legitimate charitable organization receiving major sponsorships, public money & international attention should be prepared to answer questions about spending, transparency, and priorities. That is basic accountability. What raises real concern is how defensive the atmosphere around Invictus has become. Veterans, donors, and ordinary observers have reported being blocked on social media simply for asking fair questions about budgets, redacted figures, or fund allocation. That is not how serious charities build or keep - trust. Transparency should not feel threatening if there is nothing to hide. Questions people have every right to ask include: •How much money goes directly toward veterans & rehabilitation programs versus foundation operations? •How much is spent on branding, travel, PR, production, executive costs, and high-profile logistics? •Why are key figures redacted in government-linked contracts & budgets? •How much influence do Harry and Meghan have over media and narrative strategy? •Why does so much coverage still center on the Sussexes rather than the athletes? •Why are polite inquiries often met with blocks instead of answers? Those questions should not be controversial. The concerns become even harder to dismiss when major sponsors start stepping away. Boeing, a defense-linked company with deep veteran ties, had been a committed Global Presenting Partner. Now reports confirm it will not continue involvement with the Birmingham 2027 Games. Corporate sponsors don’t quietly exit high-profile causes like this without reason. It sends a signal. And this is where Sentebale becomes a warning sign. That charity, which Harry co-founded in 2006, began with enormous goodwill. It has since been marred by boardroom battles, public disputes, stepped-down patrons, and most recently Sentebale itself suing Harry for defamation. Once trust erodes around organizations tied heavily to personal branding and drama, recovery is difficult. Invictus risks heading down the same path if leadership refuses to separate the veterans’ mission from celebrity culture. The Games should never become dependent on Harry and Meghan’s image management. When the priority shifts to preserving a brand instead of serving those who sacrificed, the entire mission is compromised. Veterans deserve representatives who let the competitors stay front and center without dragging controversy into every room. Invictus can still correct course. But it requires honesty from leadership and a willingness to accept scrutiny instead of silencing it. Because charities survive on trust. The Invictus Games Foundation needs to stand up for the veterans it was created to serve, not for any individual narrative. Recommit to the original mission. Open the books. Stop blocking questions. Put every resource back into the athletes and their long-term recovery. Cut. The. Distractions.
English
76
156
1.1K
31.8K
Malathi Chamarthi
Malathi Chamarthi@Malschamar06·
@RVealingthenarc Performance all the way. The acting is so bad that even a blind person can sense it. No words needed.
English
1
0
0
640
Not a Duchess
Not a Duchess@MariehelleneH·
H remember your freedom flight 🤣🤣🤣 you are so TRAPPED 🤣🤣🤣 you are so dumb man so dumb 🤣🤣
English
54
171
999
14.9K
William
William@Will_iam_001·
🚨Public opinion poll: In your view, should ABC make the decision to remove Jimmy Kimmel from his current role/show, or allow him to continue. Please share your choice. A. Yes, he should be removed B. No, he should continue Vote now and make your voice heard!
William tweet media
English
9.9K
354
2.7K
249.2K
Malathi Chamarthi
Malathi Chamarthi@Malschamar06·
@israelUSAforeve Time for this clown to leave the USA and UK alone. May he be he should move Ukraine since he so much work to do there. He is an idiot.
English
0
0
0
6
Israel & USA forever
Israel & USA forever@israelUSAforeve·
Prince Harry says, "he’s ready to leave the U.S." Thoughts?
Israel & USA forever tweet media
English
6.5K
257
2.5K
170.9K
Daina
Daina@Dainallves·
Should Jimmy Kimmel be fired? A. Yes B. No
Daina tweet media
English
21.6K
1.1K
10.3K
499.9K
Stace1989
Stace1989@Stace1989s·
@freedom_007__ Megan’s chose Australians trauma to Merch the clothing online for 15% commissions. ..
Stace1989 tweet mediaStace1989 tweet media
English
10
21
153
10.1K
The British Prince
The British Prince@freedom_007__·
Harry and Meghan had the Sydney police put up barriers expecting large crowds but only a small crowd greeted them. Aussie taxpayers money was used to pander to their ego and self importance. They boasted about this location in Netflix but it’s empty 🫢🤣
English
1.2K
1.2K
11.7K
1M
Malathi Chamarthi
Malathi Chamarthi@Malschamar06·
@freedom_007__ @nancytsidley Megz knew where the camera was and couldn’t stop making eye contact with it only after getting her hair out to one side so that profile pic would have it best angle! This chick is unbelievable!!!
English
0
0
0
18
Nancy Sidley
Nancy Sidley@nancytsidley·
So brave & stunning.
Nancy Sidley tweet mediaNancy Sidley tweet media
English
133
5
339
183.2K
Nancy Sidley
Nancy Sidley@nancytsidley·
The look on Harry’s face says it all! 🤣
Nancy Sidley tweet media
English
288
47
791
28.9K
Malathi Chamarthi
Malathi Chamarthi@Malschamar06·
@HRHCatherine Wishing her royal highness a wonderful 44th birthday and a lifetime of good health, happiness and love.
English
0
0
0
4
Karen A
Karen A@KarenA790145758·
@ViQueenie Princess Catherine is genuinely naturally royal in every way! Meg’s streety cheap comes off slutty
English
2
2
56
6.6K
Harry, Meghan’s Spare
Harry, Meghan’s Spare@ViQueenie·
This is glorious! So accurate. So factual. So honest. So true! Well done!
Yael Moussaieff@Yisraphat

Let’s stop pretending this has ever been complicated. Catherine isn’t just “a popular royal woman.” She is the mother of a future king. That makes her the monarchy’s central human asset. That’s not PR. That’s the constitution. And yet for nearly eight years she’s been treated as disposable so a louder, more profitable story could be sold. The original lie was equivalence. Two women. Two futures. A rivalry. There never was. Constitutionally, Meghan isn’t like Fergie - she is Fergie. Married to the spare. Outside the line. Structurally peripheral. That’s not cruelty, it’s how monarchy works. The cruelty was pretending otherwise - because that fantasy required Catherine to be undermined. Meghan was never Diana. Diana mattered because she carried the future of the Crown. Harry, however, has increasingly been encouraged to be Diana - traumatised, endangered, convinced everyone is out to get him. Meghan has played the Bashir role: validating fear, feeding grievance, shaping a story that isolates him while flattering his wounds. They didn’t even hide it. Endgame. A game. Catherine is the casualty of that game - precisely because she couldn’t fight back without damaging the institution she was trying to protect. Oprah was sold as vulnerability. In hindsight, it reads as leverage. “It would be too damaging to their reputation” wasn’t concern - it was a threat. Catherine will have known that. William too. The public caught up later. And here’s the part the media still won’t say out loud: if we take Harry and Meghan’s own logic seriously - that sustained stress, public vilification and psychological pressure cause real harm - then William would be entirely within his rights to ask whether the years-long campaign against his wife contributed to her illness. Whether science can draw a straight line isn’t the point. The pressure was real. The duration was extreme. The risk was obvious. Harry’s trauma is real. That’s exactly why this is so disturbing. He hasn’t been helped to integrate it - he’s been encouraged to perform it, monetise it, and build an identity around it. Diana is the template. Harry is the one living it. Meghan isn’t the wounded figure here. She’s the narrator. The interpreter. The Bashir. And the press? You’ve known for years that the Meghan narrative was a lie. Not misunderstood. Not exaggerated. A lie. She was never a passive victim. She was an active player from the start. Catherine, meanwhile, absorbed it all in silence - smiling, enduring, and carrying the future of the monarchy while others played games with trauma, reputations and power. That isn’t weakness. It’s restraint. And it’s long past time it was named as such.

English
6
33
645
42.9K