Mike K

3.3K posts

Mike K banner
Mike K

Mike K

@MamazMike

PM exploring how AI is rewriting work. From a job seeker to after hour founder. https://t.co/c50Kcfon9e https://t.co/rgH6refzDo Posts are my own opinion

California, USA Katılım Mart 2013
264 Takip Edilen362 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
I still believe the world can be a better place. So I built a tiny app. Maybe it nudges the needle. @mketab86/why-i-built-kindnesssender-com-32d07882e8b6" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">medium.com/@mketab86/why-…
English
7
1
40
11.9K
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
A new responsibility in the enterprise landscape for employees, especially PMs: “AI response validator” Evaluating responses from another chatbot built by 100 people, which is nothing more than a UI + API hooked to a model provider and trained on a pile of crappy documentation.
English
0
0
0
8
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
@Jason You don’t know how stupid these people can be. That’s why they can kill thousands of people with no regret because of their beliefs.
English
0
0
0
158
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
Me checking TL after a week
GIF
English
1
0
2
31
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
@VictoriaBanasz That’s not the brain, that’s the procrastination genie we let out at the most important times
English
1
0
1
7
Victoria Banaszczyk
Victoria Banaszczyk@VictoriaBanasz·
Trying to stay motivated but my brain is like: Let’s do everything… except the thing.
English
4
0
3
89
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
Companies push employees to adopt AI, then once things get more efficient, they cut half of them. That’s not “productivity.” that’s creating future rivals with a revenge arc. you’re not optimizing the company. you’re naively funding your next competitor.
English
3
0
4
91
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
@jack, it was probably a cause behind many of the recent layoffs across the industry, but no one else had the guts to say it out loud so bluntly and soullessly. From here on, it’ll be a domino effect, with @blocks as the reference point.
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
0
0
0
13
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
Funny story and a lesson: I run in the neighborhood at the busiest time on purpose. When people are out walking, I push harder because I want them to see me as “a runner” 😂 It’s basically building in public. Put yourself up for judgment and it turns into fuel.
English
1
0
3
28
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
@Scobleizer I don’t think they went against it, user used wrong method to login, Antigravity oAuth shouldn’t have been an option to use in the app bc of T&C
English
0
0
1
46
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
One thing I like about @AnthropicAI is that, so far, they haven’t bought an agentic platform. It shows they want to be the supplier of intelligence and let people build businesses on top of it, instead of going all the way to the end-user market and killing agentic products.
English
0
0
2
29
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
@VictoriaBanasz I hate luggage drop off, and god forbid if it’s half a pound overweight, then you gotta open that magician bag and pull out a random pair of socks just to keep it within the limit.
English
1
0
1
17
Victoria Banaszczyk
Victoria Banaszczyk@VictoriaBanasz·
QUICK: what’s your least fav part about airports?
Victoria Banaszczyk tweet mediaVictoria Banaszczyk tweet media
English
3
0
6
226
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
If what you do as a PM can’t be translated directly into $ value for the business, you’re a project manager, business analyst, or an architect with the title of product manager.
English
0
0
1
14
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
@mcuban I could see that coming. At this price rate from frontier models, I don’t think a reliable agent can be priced for consumers, and no real product can be sustainably built on frontier APIs.
English
0
0
0
21
Mark Cuban
Mark Cuban@mcuban·
This is the smartest counter I’ve seen to ai taking over jobs, in the short term. Is the ((aggregate tokens cost to do what an employee does + plus fully encumbered developer and maintenance costs ) / (fully encumbered employee cost ) )<= productivity ? If it takes 8 Claude agents, at $300 for tokens, per day, plus $200 per day in dev/maint , to do what an employee does per day, at a fully encumbered cost of $1200. That’s 2600/1200. But then you need to factor in the productivity rate. Is it more than 2.16 x productive ? Are there qualitative issues like morale, morality, whatever , that can’t be quantified, that need to go into the decision? What is the going forward progression of burdened costs for the tokens ? Curious what people think about this ?
The All-In Podcast@theallinpod

What Happens When AI Tokens Cost More Than Your Employees? @Jason: “We, with our agents, hit $300/day per agent using the Claude API, like instantly. And that was doing, maybe, 10 or 20%. That's $100k/year per agent.” @chamath: “We're getting to a place where we have to basically now say, ‘What is the token budget that we're willing to give our best devs?’” “And then if you aggregate it across all people, you can clearly see a trend where you're like, ‘Well, hold on a second, now they need to be at least 2x as productive as another employee.’” “That is actively happening inside my business, because otherwise I'll run out of money.” Jason: “Yeah. This is a very interesting trend that you're not going to hear anybody else talk about, but when do tokens outpace the salary of the employee?” “Because you're about to hit it. I'm about to hit it.”

English
867
417
5.8K
2.3M
Mike K
Mike K@MamazMike·
This kind of post on Reddit keeps my hopes up that we still need tech people in the world of AI.
Mike K tweet media
English
3
0
1
50