Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Palsgraf Italian
4.8K posts
Palsgraf Italian
@ManForAllTakes
The Court's good servant, but God's first.
Katılım Eylül 2021
287 Takip Edilen98 Takipçiler
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
Understand that 97% of abortion procuring women are like this and that makes them remorseless murderers.
Kia 🧸ྀི@xevekiah
My abortion is the kind people love to judge the most. I wasn’t underage, I wasn’t assaulted, and there was no medical emergency. I got pregnant because I knowingly had unprotected sex, no accident, no rare failure, just my own choices. By their standards, it was “irresponsible.” I knew abortion was an option, and I took it. Not because I couldn’t survive it or raise a child, I simply didn’t want one. I wanted sex without becoming a parent, and I chose not to carry the pregnancy. There’s no redemption arc here. I don’t regret it. Nothing terrible happened to me afterward, no punishment, no downfall. My life is still good. And that reality alone challenges everything people like to assume about women who make this choice.
English
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
Imagining explaining to the Founding Fathers that the president imposed tariffs without an act of Congress and then removed them at the request of the King of England
Christian Datoc@TocRadio
NEW: Trump dropping all tariffs on Scottish whiskey in honor of King Charles
English
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
uhhh.... this is a much higher share of Muslim/African combined than the US.
UBERSOY@UBERSOY1
France is not as brown as people think. Here is a share of Muslim and African surnames share of births 2024. Much better than Britain and decades away from the United States and Canada. [];;;]
English
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
All pro choice people at their core hold this position
But they will spend all day deflecting — what about rape, what about poverty, what about health conditions
Bla bla bla
This is why when debating pro aborts the only thing you need to ask is: if abortion was allowed for all of these situations would you then be anti abortion
And the answer is obviously no.
It is not about wether a child in the womb is alive or is a person or a human, it is simply about women having the ability to avoid the consequences of their own actions.
𝗞lark@KnightClawk
i would support abortion even if i believed life began at conception
English
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
Oral arguments today were intriguing. When will the Supreme Court rule on whether Italians are white?
English
@justalexoki No. My only hope is a pardon (i.e. the Grace of God).
English
@untimelysalts The ENTIRE human race? What about people in comas? What about infants that can't understand speech? What about the blind? The question is ill-formed. If they said "every human over the age of 6" the result would be very different!
English
@untimelysalts The question sucks because thought experiments usually assume every agent is a somewhat-rational actor, unless the problem explicitly says otherwise.
Saying "the entire human race" is nonsense. Too imprecise.
English
The thought experiment is that the *entire human race* has to vote.
Is the whole world a “high trust society”? No.
+ MachDominus +@MachDominus
English
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
They all think this btw
𝗞lark@KnightClawk
i would support abortion even if i believed life began at conception
English
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
You can’t call Republicans racist when this is their dream Supreme Court:
English
@baalzamon35 The Prisoner's Dilemma doesn't ask you to consider "what if the other guy is my 6 year old son?" That's out of scope. The problem assumes adult, rational actors.
English
@baalzamon35 It's essentially a framing problem. Most would agree that, interpreting the problem literally ("everyone on earth"), the right choice is blue.
But the problem is framed as a thought experiment, which usually implies everyone involved has agency unless it says otherwise.
English
The crusher is a great way of illustrating this problem.
For the Red Button folks, they see this as an abstract where the crusher kills nobody until/unless they make an informed decision. Obviously, you'd get out of the way right? Hell, everyone should move, the scenario will wait long enough to get everyone out.
For the Blue Button folks, they picture a helpless child or maybe even all helpless children trapped and are willing to risk their lives (on paper at least) to hold the crusher up and protect those unable or unwilling to move. Who wouldn't risk their life to save another? Or at least, WANT the courage to do so.
Chibi Reviews@ChibiReviews
The whole blue and red button drama is basically this summarized If everyone clicked red, nobody would die. Those that click blue have suicidal empathy
English
@esjesjesj Well yeah, if you are specifically helping black people and not non-black people... that's racist.
English
The right is so racist they think helping black people at all is racism
The Babylon Bee@TheBabylonBee
In Blow To Democrats, SCOTUS Rules They Have To Stop Being Racist buff.ly/9urAhTQ
English
@extradeadjcb CA is pretty hard to draw GOP districts in, anyways. You need some hardcore Republican gerrymandering to even approach a proportional Congressional delegation.
English
very funny that this absurd spaghetti gerrymander is only +4 worse than what they're already doing
Zachary Donnini@ZacharyDonnini
If Republicans aggressively gerrymander the South and eliminate up to 10 Democratic seats under a narrowed VRA, Democrats could respond in blue states. For example, this 52-0 California map could become legal, flipping four seats from 🔴 to 🔵.
English
@_MayDay35 @greg_price11 1. Zip codes are based on geography, not population
2. AI is a black box, nobody will trust it.
That said, there *are* transparent algorithmic approaches to redistricting. They've got their own problems, but it's an oft-discussed solution to gerrymandering.
English
@greg_price11 It's 2026, why can't we use AI to create districts based on already established boundaries like cities, counties, zip/area code? Zip codes are 9 digits......
English
The actual argument from Callais' detractors is that black people in America don't truly have equality unless congressional districts can be drawn specifically for the purpose of giving black voters a majority where only a black person can be elected-- something that has neither statutory basis in Section 2 of the VRA, nor is constitutional in any way.
Marc E. Elias@marceelias
Today's VRA decision is intellectually dishonest and wrong. The conservatives basically said: Black people can vote for their preferred candidates, as long as they prefer the right candidates -- which will be Republicans. An absolutely mockery of the law and stain on the court.
English
Palsgraf Italian retweetledi
@ReverendWarnock By... banning racial segregation in redistricting?
English
Trump's Supreme Court is dragging us back to the dark and ugly days of Jim Crow.
x.com/abc/status/204…
ABC News@ABC
BREAKING: The Supreme Court has delivered a 6-3 decision limiting the use of the landmark Voting Rights Act. Read more: abcnews.visitlink.me/vqDLP1
English
@AlDefinitely The VRA simultaneously forbids and requires racial gerrymandering. Calling it a 'disastrous misadventure' is quite appropriate.
English
Genuinely what the fuck is his problem
Politics & Poll Tracker 📡@PollTracker2024
Justice Clarence Thomas in his concurrence agreeing with the Supreme Court’s decision in weakening the Voting Rights Act: “Today’s decision should largely put an end to this ‘disastrous misadventure’ in voting-rights jurisprudence”
English