MR_Bagelman/Weatherman

MMTLP @johnbrda John, can you please clear something up for the community. drew has repeatedly tried to use you agreeing with him/vouching for him in order to validate what he is saying at any given time. Normally I'd be going on and on about how drew is a scumbag and a pathological liar etc etc, but I'm not going to do that. I'm actually going to take a page out of his book and ask you, on behalf of a significant portion of the community, if you think he's right or wrong when he opens his trap and talks about not needing a sharecount and doing so in a condescending and patronizing way because he thinks he's smarter than he actually is. jorl shares his opinions because of course she does, she doesn't have any of her own. Well, at least none that aren't half-baked. Considering you've said back in January of this year, (HEY drew, JANUARY OF THIS YEAR IS FIVE MONTHS AGO, WHICH IS SIGNIFICANTLY LESS THAN TWO YEARS AGO), that ANY resolution STARTS with a sharecount, will you please respond to this post and confirm whether or not you still hold this opinion or you agree with drew. His M.O. is known to all of us by now, and your response here will make it impossible for him to yet again lie about what he's said or try to give Symone Biles a run for her money when in comes to (mental) gymnastics. So, John, do you still believe that any resolution STARTS with a sharecount, or do you agree with drew that it is absolutely not necessary. I'm hopeful that the engagement on this post will serve as proof that the community wants to know just as much as I do. Please and thank you, sir.

@PuzzledRaccoon @palikaras The raccoon @puzzledraccoon sure is feisty this morning...here, have some MMTLP Kibble. nom nom