Mrs Mop

Argentina’s president, Javier Milei, is still in Israel, hugging the Western Wall.

Yes, because you now have two homes.

I don’t know who needs to hear this, but if the corporate-state intelligence nexus can upload a U2 album to your device w/o your consent, they can also upload a word document which makes you sound like a crazed lunatic, title it “manifesto,” then frame you for a spree of crimes…

POLICE WATCHDOG ASKED POLICE TO WATCH THE POLICE. WHAT COULD GO WRONG. A woman was murdered by a serving Met officer. Women gathered on Clapham Common to grieve. The Met sent officers to arrest the grieving women. Then the government asked a watchdog to review whether that was fine. The watchdog, @HMICFRS, concluded the Met had acted "sensitively and proportionately." Problem solved. Everyone go home. Except a civil servant inside HMICFRS filed a formal complaint saying the review panel was stacked almost entirely with police officers. No independent voices. No meaningful input from the women who were arrested on the night. That last part was later confirmed by a parliamentary group as a "significant failing" that made it impossible to give the watchdog's findings "full weight." The complaint directly attacked the credibility of the verdict. It accused the review of systematic pro-police and anti-protester bias. HMICFRS never publicly acknowledged the complaint. The whistleblower was never named. They remain anonymous to this day. Then the High Court stepped in. In March 2022, judges ruled the Met had unlawfully interfered with the human rights of the vigil organisers, violating their rights to freedom of expression and assembly. None of the force's decisions, the court found, were in accordance with the law. So the watchdog cleared the police. A whistleblower said the watchdog was compromised. The High Court then proved the whistleblower right. The system reviewed itself and gave itself a pass. A nameless civil servant said that was wrong. A court agreed. That person still has no name. No recognition. Nothing. Source: The Guardian, BBC, Bindmans LLP

And it begins Sullivan & Cromwell just admitted to a federal judge its court filings contained AI hallucinations The firm apologized to the federal judge as they had to submit multiple corrections focused around: • Fictitious Case Names: The filing included names of legal cases that do not exist • Fabricated Quotes: The document contained direct quotes that were never actually spoken or written • Non-existent Statutes: The AI incorrectly analyzed or entirely invented provisions within the U.S. Bankruptcy Code The primary team and secondary review all failed to catch these errors, meanwhile the firm's partners bill $2,000+ per hour

👁️Man hauled to court after facial recognition mistook him for someone else…he was: 🔸wrongly arrested at a live facial recognition deployment 🔸held in custody for 24 hours 🔸taken to court before getting his name cleared This scandal shows police's use of this Orwellian tech has seriously damaging consequences for British public⤵️ thesun.co.uk/news/38887870/…

As the Metropolitan Police rolls out facial recognition nationwide, remember that the software is from Israeli firm Corsight AI and was used as part of the Gaza genocide first.

Boring to keep using he same word to describe Starmer's approach here, but it is the right one: forensic.

ANNOUNCEMENT: After discussions with my legal team, we will now begin the process of opening proceedings against Labour peer Mike Katz for his defamatory comments against me. For too long, senior political figures have used their status and backing to slander independent voices. I am determined to hold this Labour government to account. If that means defending myself legally, then so be it. They will not delegitimise our work or silence our voices. Legal campaigns cost money, but it's vital that we stop the government clamp down on dissenting voices. We have now passed 80% of our target, thanks to your generous support. If you are able to do so, please consider making a contribution: chuffed.org/project/175916…

💢 BREAKING | Israeli settlers shoot dead a 14-year-old student and a 32-year-old man at a West Bank school, with Israeli forces providing protection Israeli settlers opened fire on Al-Mughair Boys School in the village of Al-Mughayyir, east of Ramallah, on Tuesday afternoon, killing a 14-year-old student, Aws Hamdi Al-Naasan, and a 32-year-old man, Jihad Marzouq Abu Naim, and wounding three others with live bullets, according to the Palestinian news agency WAFA and the Ministry of Health. A paramedic at the scene said at least three settlers deliberately fired at children attempting to escape from classrooms from a position approximately 50 meters away, with a level of accuracy he described as close to sniping. An eyewitness said shooting was directed at classroom windows and balconies still full of children as residents attempted to evacuate the school by crawling. Israeli forces arrived during the attack and, according to witnesses, provided protection to the settlers rather than stopping them. A 63-year-old man, Attallah Abu Aliya, said he was shot in the leg by an Israeli soldier without warning as he walked toward the school after hearing it was under attack. Their deaths bring the West Bank toll to four killed on Tuesday alone, after a 16-year-old boy was run over by a settler's vehicle in Hebron and a 49-year-old woman died from injuries sustained in an Israeli army shooting in Jenin.

Facial recognition isn’t the end point, it’s the infrastructure. Let me explain. Step 1: introduce the technology for a “reasonable” purpose crime prevention public safety efficiency Step 2: normalise it “law abiding citizens have nothing to fear” only used in limited cases, nothing to worry about Step 3: expand its use more locations more databases more integration with other systems Step 4: connect it ID systems Digital banking Currency Travel online access public services Step 5: enforce through it access granted or denied movement tracked behaviour monitored By that point, it’s no longer optional, that’s how digital control systems are built through layers. Once the infrastructure exists, it rarely stays limited. What it’s used for today is what it makes possible tomorrow.

FLASH, MARK STONE, AND THE £102 MILLION COVER-UP A Metropolitan Police officer spent seven years living as an environmental activist. His name was Mark Kennedy. His undercover name was Mark Stone. He was known to friends as Flash. He attended protests. He went to meetings. He helped plan direct actions. He was arrested alongside the people he was spying on. He committed crimes on behalf of foreign police forces. He had sexual relationships with multiple women who had no idea he was a paid state agent. His supervisors knew everything. Every call. Every move. Every relationship. His cover officer, he said, was the first person he spoke to in the morning and the last at night. He claimed he never sneezed without a superior knowing. In October 2010 activists unmasked him. Within months prosecutions collapsed. The whole rotten architecture started to fall apart. What Kennedy triggered was the Undercover Policing Inquiry, a £102 million public investigation into decades of political spying by the Metropolitan Police @metpoliceuk that has been running since 2015 and may not conclude until 2032. Hundreds of activist groups infiltrated since 1968. Dead children's identities stolen. Campaigns for justice for murder victims like Stephen Lawrence spied on and undermined. Women deceived into years-long relationships by officers following orders. An Investigatory Powers Tribunal ruled that what was done to the women Kennedy targeted was an abuse of the highest order. That it had grossly debased and humiliated them. The Metropolitan Police has since apologised. Multiple times. At least 12 women received compensation. The inquiry grinds on. Kennedy told one activist after being unmasked: I hate myself so much. I owe it to a lot of good people to do something right for a change. The institution that put him there has never said anything that honest. Police Spies Out of Lives @out_of_lives are still fighting. The inquiry is still hearing evidence. The officers who gave the orders are still mostly anonymous. One cop got unmasked. The scandal behind him goes back sixty years. Sources: The Guardian @guardian | Wikipedia (Mark Kennedy) | Statewatch | Police Spies Out of Lives @out_of_lives | Rob Evans @robevansgdn | Campaign Opposing Police Surveillance | Undercover Policing Inquiry | The Telegraph @Telegraph|

Why is the BBC - which is meant to be balanced - running what amounts to propaganda for the AI industry, presented as reporting? In this segment: - we are told it “can only be good for all of us” - concerns of job replacement are dismissed - concerns of students being overly reliant on AI are dismissed - someone says AI will only take away boring, repetitive jobs - using AI to generate images is celebrated without mentioning the models are powered by theft - Google, Microsoft & other tech companies are celebrated as supporting the drive to embrace AI, with no mention made of the lawsuits against them - the presenter ends with “AI is here to stay” Is the government behind this segment? If not, why does it sound like an ad for AI?

Wow. The establishment judges voted in favour of the establishment cops using technology to violate people’s rights in the name of protecting the establishment. Shocker. ‘Cause for a second there we didn’t know which way that might go.

UBI will go from “wahoo free money” to “inject this experimental drug or starve” really fast.

We now have IDF child killers as Labour Party councillors Can you imagine the UPROAR if a Muslim woman joined a foreign army to kill children & then entered UK politics? Can you fucking imagine? But because it’s Israel it’s ok This STINKS.

Here we go…

"This thread is not hypothetical. This infrastructure is being built right now. CBDCs. Digital IDs. AI surveillance. Social credit systems. We have to stop it before it goes live. Before the people we love become leverage against us."

Amazon just got caught running a secret price manipulation operation with Levi's, Home Depot, Walmart, and many more. Every time you "comparison shopped" online, you were looking at prices that were already rigged. Here's what happened: Amazon would monitor prices on Walmart, Target, Best Buy, Home Depot, and Chewy in real time. The second a competitor listed a product cheaper than Amazon, they'd contact the brand directly and tell them to "fix it." And the exact emails are now PUBLIC. Amazon sent Levi's links to two Walmart listings with the subject line "styles of concern." They basically said the prices on Walmart are too low and we have a problem. The next day, Levi's responded: "I talked to Walmart and they have partnered with us to take Easy Khaki Classic fit back up to ladder SPP price, $29.99 immediately." Levi's literally called Walmart and told them to raise the price. Because Amazon told Levi's to make the call. Walmart complied. Then Amazon matched the HIGHER price. Both retailers ended up charging more. The customer paid extra. Nobody competed. Same playbook with Hanes: Amazon sent them links showing Target and Walmart prices were lower. Hanes confirmed they "reached out to Target and Walmart to have the prices increased." Target increased the prices. Walmart increased the prices. Amazon kept their margins. But it gets even worse... Amazon told Allergan (the company that makes eye drops) that their product was "suppressed" on Amazon because it was cheaper on another site. Allergan responded: "Walmart got their price back up to $16.99." Amazon then unsuppressed the listing. They did this with pet treats on Chewy. Furniture on Home Depot. Products across dozens of categories spanning YEARS. The mechanism is simple but terrifying: If you're a brand and you sell cheaper on Walmart than on Amazon, Amazon suppresses your product, removes you from the Buy Box, buries you in search results, and effectively makes you invisible to 300 million customers. Brands can't afford that. So they call Walmart and Target and say "raise your prices or we'll lose our Amazon listings." Walmart and Target comply because they need the brand's products. Amazon captures 40 cents of every dollar spent online in America. That gives them the leverage to set prices across THE ENTIRE internet. Not just their own platform. So turns out, you were never comparison shopping. You were looking at a coordinated price floor set by Amazon through backroom phone calls between brands and their competitors. "Amazon is working to make your life more unaffordable." 3 separate antitrust trials are now scheduled for 2027. The FTC has its own case. 18 states plus the DOJ are piling on. This is literally happening during the WORST affordability crisis in a generation. Groceries up 25% since 2020. Housing unaffordable. Wages flat. And the largest ecommerce company on Earth has been secretly coordinating with brands to make sure you can't find a cheaper price ANYWHERE. "Competition" in retail is just a fantasy.

Thiel said this in 2010: “The basic idea was we could never win an election… because we were in such a small minority. But maybe you could actually unilaterally change the world without constantly having to convince people… through a technological means.” He must be stopped.