

The Manipulator’s Logbook
118 posts

@ManipulatorsLog
If “show more” feels like an assault… flee to shorts 😏 and rot your brain freely. Reserved for rare souls who read full paragraphs without emergency dopamine.





Barbed Wire for Citizens: The EU’s Soft Tyranny Exposed “Another sign of a tyrant is that he prefers foreigners over his own citizens, lives among them, and invites them to his table; for the former are his enemies, while the latter do not compete with him in any way.” — Aristotle Yesterday we saw tyranny in action with our own eyes. European citizens tried to deliver more than 530,000 signatures for the “Save Europe” remigration initiative. Instead of open dialogue at the headquarters of what is supposed to be “democracy in action” — an institution that should protect citizens, ensure their security, sovereignty, and freedom of speech — they were greeted with barbed wire fences and police cordons. This is the same system that for years has claimed “we cannot close the borders,” yet it managed to do so within hours — when the goal was to protect itself from its own people. Why? Because citizens have rights, expectations, and the potential power to resist. They can question those in power and demand justice. To the EU’s tyranny, they are the “enemy” because they represent a real threat. Foreigners, on the other hand, are dependent on the authorities’ goodwill. They do not resist injustice — in fact, they often support it, since they live off the same resources: taxes and rights extracted from working citizens. They are grateful for their place “at the table” and willingly serve as bodyguards, advisors, or tools of repression. A tyrant surrounds himself with those who do not challenge his dominance. Modern tyranny is not a single person or family, but a sprawling network of institutions, oligarchs, and political elites who maintain power through lobbying, algorithmic manipulation, censorship, mass surveillance, financial dependency, lawfare, and cultural authoritarianism — including cancel culture, mandatory gender ideology in schools and workplaces, climate alarmism used as a control mechanism, and engineered mass migration. All of this serves to shield their power from their own people. This system now dominates much of the Western world and key supranational institutions (the EU, UN, Big Tech, and global financial bodies). Understanding what is truly happening helps us recognize threats to freedom in any era. The philosophical study of tyranny shows us that it is not about uniforms or titles. It is about the relationship between those in power and the citizens: whether the state and its institutions serve the common good, or whether they exist primarily to maintain and expand their own dominance. When authorities begin to treat their own people as the enemy — blocking petitions with barbed wire and silencing dissenting voices — we are witnessing classical tyranny, only in a modern, “soft” form. It is time for citizens to remind the elites who is really in charge in Europe.


Suddenly, the EU proves that they CAN protect borders when they want to. Convenient that. They placed a barbed wire fence against patriots during the Save Europe Remigration rally. They are the extremists, not us.









So proud of what we achieved today with the @SaveEuropeAct. Despite all their best efforts to stop us, we brought Remigration to the belly of the beast. And this is just the beginning. Thank you all!

Everyone is allowed to protest on the Place du Luxembourg in front of the European Parliament: whether they are Antifa, Pro-Palestine, Pro-Curdistan and Pro-refugee. But the EU does not seem to like Pro-European They want to shut down ONLY our demonstration. The current EU is an anti-European engine of destruction."

#022 „Send Them Back” – Is That Too Harsh? Humanitarian aid, fundraising, and accepting refugees in genuine crises are an obvious moral imperative. However, when the label “refugee” is abused, an entitled attitude takes centre stage, and the level of misuse and financial costs far exceeds any reasonable limits, questioning the scale of this assistance becomes not only legitimate — but necessary. Over time, genuine empathy has been transformed into a sweeping moral duty to accept ever-larger numbers of people, regardless of cultural differences, their willingness to integrate, or the actual social and economic capacity of the receiving country. Any discussion about borders, the pace of inflows, problematic and dangerous behaviours or the costs involved is immediately framed in moral terms, making honest debate almost impossible. Society has thus been confronted with a done deal: a mass influx of people from distant cultural backgrounds who, despite every possible integration effort, frequently create parallel societies while drawing on and straining the welfare system and the financial resources of citizens. It is possible to address this issue politely and cautiously, avoiding politically incorrect language. But when logical, reasonable voices are silenced, ridiculed, and driven out of the public square, diplomacy and restraint no longer suffice. It is time to speak harshly! We can no longer pretend that profound cultural and civilizational differences do not matter. We cannot keep telling people that their fears for the future of their own children amount to “xenophobia.” Europe does not need to apologize for wanting to survive as Europe. True compassion means helping those who truly need it — but on our own terms, with strict selection and firm requirements for integration. Anything less is dangerous naivety that will bring tragic consequences for future generations of Europeans. It is time to end this suicidal hospitality. It is time to set clear boundaries. It is time to raise our voices.






