Mantis

1.6K posts

Mantis banner
Mantis

Mantis

@MantisSwap

Single-sided AMM for trading spot and futures of correlated assets by Mantissa Finance. Discord: https://t.co/duyLdUhvpL

Multi-chain Katılım Mayıs 2022
7 Takip Edilen24.5K Takipçiler
Mantis
Mantis@MantisSwap·
Our Discord is currently hacked. Please don’t click any links. We’re working to get it back.
English
2
2
7
1.7K
Chip.hl // Evgeny Yurchenko
Got early access to @sershokunin's Trade[XYZ] and honestly? The UI slaps. Responsive, clean design, solid foundation. Real feedback for the team @tradexyz : 1. Click-to-price on charts → auto-populate order entry. Basic but critical. 2. Smart orders are missing. I need chase functionality. Stay on top of the orderbook, follow the price if it moves without filling. Only seen this on insilico terminal and Bybit. Why isn't this standard everywhere? Plus this saves users on fees and makes the orderbook deeper. Win-win. 3. Full conditional logic like Supersexy has. Example: market exit my ETH long if BTC loses a certain level. Cross-asset logic should be table stakes. You've built something beautiful. Now make it dangerous. So we could really have a shot at House All the Finance.
Chip.hl // Evgeny Yurchenko tweet media
English
62
23
300
20.6K
bittards.hl
bittards.hl@crypto_ronpaul·
everyone talks about kinetiq and hyperswap but imo @hyperbeat is going to have the most epic tge and airdrop
English
23
6
126
9K
altoshi
altoshi@stablealt·
today a HyperEVM project DMed me and asked for my honest opinion and review. It already raised angel money and started building but… after my “audit” we came to a conclusion that it doesn’t work (technically) honestly, I see so many Hyperliquid projects with good teams, but their execution and PMF are so bad. although the trend I see is that many projects treat their X as their personal account, retweeting low-quality memes, sharing personal opinions, etc. every successful founder will tell you that traffic is half of your success. for crypto projects, the main source of the user base is X. So why you treat it like an instagram account while large companies are spending millions on CT leads and media? GM-ing everyday won’t bring you loyal user base. Hire a professional CT lead. After this, I decided to open myself for advisory roles. want to dedicate myself more to the ecosystem, while making it more quality and industry-standard. If you’re building something on Hyperliquid, my DMs are open and we may discuss a potential collaboration. Hyperliquid.
English
28
2
171
16.3K
Mantis
Mantis@MantisSwap·
dear algorithm please show this post only to people interested in a native stableswap on HyperEVM thank you & Hyperliquid
English
5
1
10
924
Po 🐼
Po 🐼@0xMasterPo·
So long story short: - Binance uses USDe as collateral for leverage market but uses its own orderbook to price USDe instead of using a robust oracle feed with price from multiple sources - USDe had an isolated depeg ($0.65) on Binance and was trading around 1$ everywhere else - This faulty pricing logic led to liquidations on Binance and cascade effect across other exchanges - Aave uses hardcoded $1 price for USDe (through a USDT oracle) and that’s why didn’t have any forced liquidations this time - CT debating once again on oracle vs 1:1 hardcoding for stablecoins Getting 2022 vibes all over again.
DEGEN NEWS@DegenerateNews

NEW: GALAXY BLAMES FRIDAY’S SHARP CRYPTO DOWNTURN ON EXCHANGE-SIDE PRICING RISK CASCADING THROUGH A LEVERAGED MARKET - “THIS WAS NOT A FAILURE OF THE UNDERLYING STABLECOIN SYSTEMS OR DEFI PROTOCOLS”

English
2
0
7
486
Mantis retweetledi
Po 🐼
Po 🐼@0xMasterPo·
"If you are not the primary venue for an asset (which Binance is not for USDe) then you should look at the price on the primary venue. If you are only looking at your own order book, you will liquidate too aggressively" TLDR: Pricing for pegged assets should involve both exchange level and external (via oracle) pricing. That's one of the key design decisions we made while building @MantisSwap: oracle-adjusted pricing + custom AMM mechanics designed for pegged assets. Pushing the price below peg gets expensive fast -> harder to cause depegging -> LPs lose less money. Hyperliquid
Haseeb >|<@hosseeb

Did Ethena Really Depeg? I’ve seen a lot of chatter about the Ethena depeg during the market mayhem this weekend. The story is that USDe briefly depegged to ~68c before recovering. Here’s the Binance chart everyone is quoting: But digging into the data and talking to a bunch of folks over last couple days, it's now clear this story is not correct. USDe did *not* depeg. First thing to understand about USDe: its most liquid venue is actually not on exchanges, it’s on Curve. There’s hundreds of millions of dollars of standing liquidity on Curve, while only tens of millions on any given exchange, including Binance. So if you just look at that chart of USDe on Binance, it looks like USDe depegged. But if you superimpose the other liquid venues for USDe, you get a different picture: We see here that while USDe wicked down on every CEX, it did not do so uniformly. Bybit briefly hit $0.95 then quickly recovered, yet Binance depegged a crazy amount and took forever to regain the peg. Curve meanwhile dipped a mere 0.3%. What explains this difference? Remember, every single exchange was under immense load on that day—it was the single largest liquidation event in crypto history. Binance was extremely unstable during this period, causing MMs to be unable to shift inventory because APIs were failing and withdrawals and deposits were bricked. Nobody was able to step in and arb. It’s like a fire broke out on Binance, but all of the roads were blocked and firefighters couldn’t make their way in. This caused a wildfire to break out on Binance, but pretty much everywhere else, that fire was immediately put out by bridging liquidity. (As Guy shows in his post, USDC also depegged a few cents temporarily on Binance due to the same general instability issues—liquidity just couldn’t get ferried in, but this wasn’t a depeg event for USDC either.) So OK. Unsurprising that while there’s API instability, prices on exchanges are wildly different because nobody can get inventory in. But why did it decline so much deeper on Binance than on Bybit? The answer is twofold—first, Binance did not have any primary dealer relationship with Ethena to be able to directly mint and redeem on-platform (Bybit and other exchanges have this integrated) which allows MMs to stay on-platform and still perform peg arbitrage. This is huge, as otherwise an MM has to take their money *out* of Binance, go do the Ethena peg arb, and then bring back their inventory. Nobody was doing that in a moment of crisis when APIs were failing (plus so many other coins were cratering). Second, Binance had their oracle poorly implemented and started liquidating positions they shouldn’t have—good liquidation mechanisms don’t trigger on flash crashes. If you are not the primary venue for an asset (which Binance is not for USDe) then you should look at the price on the primary venue. If you are only looking at your own order book, you will liquidate too aggressively. This caused Binance to start liquidating USDe as though it was worth $0.80 or whatever, which caused a cascade. This is a big part of the reason why Binance is refunding people who were liquidated on USDe (other exchanges AFAIK are not doing so)—they messed up by only looking at their own price instead of the true external price. So this was a Binance-specific flash crash, which better market structure could’ve prevented. USDe on its primary venue, Curve, was actually trading at a tight peg the entire day. This is really different from what you’d describe as a depeg. If you remember USDC in 2023 during the banking crisis, this is what an actual depeg looks like: During the banking crisis, USDC traded down on every single venue. There was *no* place where you could buy USDC for $1. Redemptions were literally halted, so $0.87 was the *true* price. That’s what a depeg means. This instead was a Binance-specific dislocation. It’s a big lesson for market infra, but critical to understand the nuance here if you are trying to draw inferences about USDe’s mechanism from this weekend. USDe was fully collateralized and worth $1 on its primary venue through the entire episode and actually increased its backing collateral over the weekend due to the price action. That said, this kind of market instability is ultimately good because it exposes lessons for the whole industry. Guy’s post below lays out how any exchange, including Binance, can avoid this kind of issue in the future. TL;DR: USDe did not depeg, Binance did.

English
0
1
4
1.1K
Po 🐼
Po 🐼@0xMasterPo·
Looks like a super efficient native stableswap is needed on @HyperliquidX
English
1
0
6
244
von
von@von_hl·
not enough people building dope shit there's an epidemic on creativity
English
6
0
23
1.1K
BAYN 🖋️
BAYN 🖋️@baynPSD·
Hi I'm Bayn, an artist on Hyperliquid and this is my art.
BAYN 🖋️ tweet mediaBAYN 🖋️ tweet mediaBAYN 🖋️ tweet mediaBAYN 🖋️ tweet media
English
157
57
861
83.1K
Mantis retweetledi
Po 🐼
Po 🐼@0xMasterPo·
What a time to be going live with what js probably the most unique points program on HyperEVM for @MantisSwap NFT communities already onboard: ✅ @PiPonHL@baldbrothers_@tinyhypercats@ADHD_HL And now Hypurr holders will also be included. Hypurrliquid
Hyper Foundation@HyperFND

Hypurr NFTs have been deployed on the HyperEVM. Participants had the opportunity to opt in to receive a Hypurr NFT after the HyperEVM went live as part of the Genesis Event in November 2024. The HyperEVM launched in February 2025 as the general programmability interface to the Hyperliquid L1. The HyperEVM is not a standalone EVM. Rather, it allows developers to trustlessly tap into the liquidity on HyperCore. Read precompiles allow smart contracts on the HyperEVM to read L1 state, and the CoreWriter contract allows HyperEVM smart contracts to send actions on HyperCore. This two-way communication between Core and EVM secured by the same HyperBFT consensus protocol unlocks powerful new primitives. Many novel applications have been built on the HyperEVM exploring these possibilities, including LSTs, lending, and vault tokenization protocols. The goal of the Hypurr NFT collection was to share a memento with those who believed in and contributed early on to Hyperliquid’s growth. Each NFT is unique and captures the different moods, hobbies, tastes, and quirks of the Hyperliquid community, as depicted by Hypurr. There are a total of 4,600 NFTs in the collection. 4,313 NFTs went to Genesis Event participants, 144 went to the Hyper Foundation, and 143 went to core contributors, including Hyperliquid Labs, NFT artists, and other contributors. Ownership and use of Hypurr NFTs are subject to the Hypurr NFT Terms and License available here: hyperfoundation.org/nftTerms. Participants who opted in to receive a Hypurr NFT as part of the Genesis Event were screened according to the Foundation's risk-based program. In addition, clustering analysis was conducted to protect against sybil behavior and cap the total number of NFTs received by any given user. Contract address: 0x9125E2d6827a00B0F8330D6ef7BEF07730Bac685. To be clear: No action is required. You do not need to mint. The NFT collection has already been distributed. As always, beware of scams and impersonations.

English
2
4
14
1.2K
Po 🐼
Po 🐼@0xMasterPo·
🎯 Time to go full Jeff mode. Super focused on my own product from now on. Was pissed seeing people with influence overhype their forked product and deceiving users but in the end its not worth to get involved in their gimmicks. Let them say and do whatever they want. Its net -EV so its much better to focus on building a better product and outcompete them. (have clarity on how to beat them now) In the end I know how much time I have invested into building a better and unique product. From co-founders jumping ship when things got hard to losing almost all of my earnings its been a tough journey but seeing @chameleon_jeff and team’s success gives me hope and courage to keep pushing hard and just focus on winning. Hyperliquid
pump@hasntpumpedyet

Hyperliquid team / Jeff shouldn't put out an Aster statement tbh Alon didn't say anything when Bonk fun had it's day in the sun, winners just focus on winning

English
4
2
7
424
Mantis retweetledi
Po 🐼
Po 🐼@0xMasterPo·
If you’re building a DEX on HyperEVM then you probably know that arbitrage (Hypercore <> HyperEVM) is majority of orderflow. Liquidity depth matters only to the level of supporting median swap sizes with min price impact. Any liquidity beyond essential is additional liability that needs to be incentivised. The name of the game here is efficiency. And for that you need an AMM mechanics to: - Provide minimal slippage to traders (or HL arbers) - Allow LPs to earn same amount of fees with less capital - Protect LPs from principal losses Target is not 100M TVL but to process 100M swap volume with much less TVL. Not everyone will get it. Not everyone will get in. Mantis is almost ready to fly!!
English
3
2
13
1K