FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders

855 posts

FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders banner
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders

FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders

@MarkRedman26327

Born a Red, will die a red. My childhood club was stolen from me for the sake of profit, I now belong to a cause that will not tolerate being used as a cash cow

Katılım Ağustos 2024
382 Takip Edilen103 Takipçiler
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@iamjabberwacky @MartinTweats @TheSkepticWiz Atheism may view religion as a lazy approach to discovering the truth using blind faith. Religion may view that scientific research is a gift from God, but are happy to leave science to others on the basis that if science does confirm a creator then happy days, job done.
English
0
0
0
9
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@iamjabberwacky @MartinTweats @TheSkepticWiz Religion & science are prepared to travel anywhere to understand why, it's an infection of wanderlust. Despite both sides of the debate adamant that they're right, neither has been able to provide an objective answer other than what we can see, the rest is just subjective.
English
1
0
0
11
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@blackrock0778 @higgyboson I was unable to read the full article. What I gathered is that there is a theory that maybe the findings are not as conclusive as originally thought. This doesn't debunk the present consensus that the Cheader man was dark brown/black skinned.
English
1
0
0
8
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@blackrock0778 @higgyboson I forgot to add, the evidence you provide on this post shows a representation of a dark complexion male, based on, as thorough, modern face reconstruction available.
English
1
0
0
11
Higgy
Higgy@higgyboson·
I'll sum up this post for those who can't be bothered to read it. "Many, many years ago an absolutely miniscule number of people living on this island had darker skin than the other 99.9999% of the population. Therefore we should open our borders to allow millions more to live here. Probably rent free, with no obligation whatsoever to contribute anything.
Sam@SamCKx

I can no longer hold my tongue seeing the utter lies being spread about Britain, our history of migration, and how this country was built into what it is today. For those so deeply buried in fake news, manufactured outrage and billionaire‑funded propaganda, I’m going to lay out the truth – and exactly why you’re being fed all this poison. Britain was never a sealed white island. From Roman times there were African soldiers stationed on Hadrian’s Wall and living in British towns, people from across the empire walking these roads nearly 2,000 years ago. Through the Middle Ages and Tudor England you still find Black people in the records – sailors, craftsmen, servants, musicians – even Black musicians at the royal court and Africans being baptised, marrying and being buried in English parishes like anyone else. This isn’t some modern experiment; it’s older than half the castles people visit on their bank‑holiday tours. As Britain went out into the world, the world came here. Sailors and traders from India, Yemen and beyond were arriving in British ports from the 1600s. Some of those men were practising a new faith to most Britons at the time, praying quietly in boarding houses near the docks while they worked brutal shifts in the engine rooms of British ships. Over the centuries, more people from North Africa, the Middle East and South Asia passed through and settled, bringing their languages, foods and beliefs into port cities that were far more mixed than today’s nostalgia merchants like to admit. After two world wars, the truth is simple: this country asked the Commonwealth to come and rebuild it. People from the Caribbean, Africa and South Asia didn’t sneak in; they were recruited. They came to drive buses and trains, staff the NHS, work in mills and foundries, clean offices, run corner shops, open takeaways and small businesses, and yes, build prayer spaces and community centres alongside churches and temples in the neighbourhoods everyone now pretends were always “traditional” and “unchanged”. They did the work that kept Britain going while being told to go home, refused housing, and treated as permanent outsiders. And what have they been paid back with? Scandals where people who’ve lived, worked and paid taxes here for decades get told they don’t belong. Policies designed to make life so hostile that some give up and leave. A media that uses their names, accents, clothes or places of worship as props in endless scare stories. The message is always the same: you might toil for this country, but you will never fully be of it. So when you hear that “Britain was white until recently” or that the country has been “overrun”, understand that you don’t arrive at that belief by accident. You get there because your history has been deliberately ripped out and replaced with a comforting myth: that “real” Britain is white, homogenous, and constantly under siege from people who look, speak or pray differently. Now look at when this myth has been turned up to max volume. Wages frozen. Housing a sick joke. Energy and food prices out of control. Public services hacked to pieces. At the same time, the number of people hoarding unimaginable wealth at the top has exploded. Funny, isn’t it, how every front page is about boats and “swarms” and “our culture”, and almost never about the landlords, hedge funds, private equity and offshore trusts quietly buying up your city and your future. That’s because this isn’t just prejudice; it’s a strategy. If you’re sitting on a mountain of wealth, the last thing you want is ordinary people – of every colour and background – realising they have the same problems and the same enemy. Much safer if the factory worker is furious at the new family down the road. Much safer if the person who can’t see a doctor blames the nurse with an accent instead of the minister who cut the funding. Much safer if a man who can’t afford his rent spends his rage on the woman in a headscarf at the bus stop instead of the billionaire who owns half his city. Racist rhetoric, religious dog‑whistling, all of it, exists to break solidarity. It turns neighbours into enemies and stops people seeing that Black, brown and white working‑class communities have far more in common with each other than any of them will ever have with the people flying in on private jets. It keeps you so busy policing skin colour, passports and prayer mats that you never get round to asking why your kids can’t afford a home, why your parents can’t get a hospital bed, why you’re working harder and standing still. The real story of Britain is this: a crossroads, not a fortress. Africans on Hadrian’s Wall. Black people in Tudor courts and city streets. Sailors, traders and workers from South Asia, the Middle East and beyond in the ports. Caribbean, African and Asian workers rebuilding the country after the war, staffing surgeries and hospitals, driving cabs, running shops, cooking food, teaching kids. Today’s multi‑ethnic, multi‑faith working class is not a glitch; it is Britain. It built this place and it keeps it running. If you’re genuinely angry about what’s happening to this country, good. You should be. But aim it where it belongs. Britain was never pure, never untouched, never “theirs” to take back. The people ruining your standard of living are not the ones risking their lives to get here, or the ones whose names you struggle to pronounce. They’re the ones buying politicians, owning media outlets, writing the story of this country so you never learn your own – and never realise who is standing beside you.

English
21
74
728
19.8K
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@blackrock0778 @higgyboson In conclusion, there is no reference from myself re indigious being sub-Saharan related. Experts/Peers accept the likelihood that the Cheader man was of a dark complextion. It was reasonable for me to post my original reply to demonstrate the hypocrisy of the original.
English
0
0
0
5
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@blackrock0778 @higgyboson Although research continues regarding the 'shade' of his dark skin colour. The scientific conclusion is that he likely had dark skin is widely accepted by experts. I'm always open to learning, can you demonstrate how it's been objectively debunked & by whom.
English
5
0
0
37
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@blackrock0778 @higgyboson This has no relevance to the discussion. The indigenous people were thousands of years earlier. All it suggests is that mistakes happen. Mistakes happen on either side of a debate
English
0
0
0
7
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@blackrock0778 @higgyboson Again, this thesis makes reference to the likelihood that the complexion was dark brown/black & is accepted by experts. Further research will continue to analyse the shade of the dark skin. The article doesn't debunk the indigenous people weren't dark skinned.
English
0
0
0
10
M. Mac Lorcáin
M. Mac Lorcáin@blackrock0778·
@MarkRedman26327 @higgyboson This is a link to the original dna profile of cheddar man created by the scientists that carried out the dna testing, they admitted A WEEK after the national history museum unveiled the statue that they couldn’t determine skin tone from dna that old. biorxiv.org/content/10.110…
English
1
0
0
19
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@blackrock0778 @higgyboson Again, this supports the findings that the indigious people had dark brown/black complexions. The NHM & peers agree that it's extremely likely to be a correct conclusion,. The continued research is to determine what shade of complexion it would lie on the Fitzpatrick scale 5 & 6
English
0
0
0
9
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@blackrock0778 @higgyboson Where did I make reference to sub-Saharan ethnicity? My response was to the original poster who's using retorhic to support his opinions on immigration. My response is merely a factual statement that the, as far as evidence suggests, inhabitants complexion was dark brown/black.
English
0
0
0
13
M. Mac Lorcáin
M. Mac Lorcáin@blackrock0778·
@MarkRedman26327 @higgyboson Native Europeans are white, you could argue that someone native to Portugal is not white but ‘darker skinned’ but Europeans are not subsaharan Africans
English
1
0
0
18
Preeti
Preeti@MadridPreeti·
Unpopular Opinion - Cristiano Ronaldo has a better first touch than Lionel Messi
English
79
95
664
17.8K
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@LiamMeech @higgyboson . A good example of darker skin colours surviving in northern areas are the Inuit people, their diet continues to be rich in Vit D, therefore no requirement for skin to adapt to gather UV Vit D.
English
0
0
0
10
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@LiamMeech @higgyboson This was the case for 1000's of years. It was only when the agriculture ofgrain, with a less Vit D content, did skin adapt to gather UV Vit D, but this wasn't an overnight change.
English
1
0
0
11
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders
FCUM Crumpsall Crusaders@MarkRedman26327·
@SoFar9570 @higgyboson Yes there is. DNA was extracted in 2018, the findings of the analysis states that the Cheader man did not have a complexion any lower than 5 & 6 on the Fitzpatrick scale.
English
1
0
0
5