Sasha

2.7K posts

Sasha banner
Sasha

Sasha

@Markie_int

'Blessed are they that have not seen. And yet have believed' John 20:29 |Finixcan| ✝️🇺🇦

Katılım Aralık 2021
145 Takip Edilen30 Takipçiler
Sasha
Sasha@Markie_int·
@MagellanQuest The problem is that the EU have started to micromanage its citizens. It's turning into a nanny state. With all the indiscriminate surveillance they want to introduce, as well as online-ID we're on the path to becoming a police state. All the good the EU has done, erased.
English
0
0
0
12
MagellanQuest 🇪🇺/acc
MagellanQuest 🇪🇺/acc@MagellanQuest·
People mock the EU as weak, bureaucratic and dying. Yet countries keep trying to join it. Ukraine. Moldova. Georgia. The Western Balkans. Nobody spends years reforming laws, institutions and economies to enter a “failed project”. The EU is not perfect. But it is still the continent’s main gravity well.
MagellanQuest 🇪🇺/acc tweet media
English
506
283
1.8K
56.9K
Sasha retweetledi
Big Brother Watch
Big Brother Watch@BigBrotherWatch·
🆔Stop digital ID checks online We’ve joined 19 rights groups and tech companies calling on politicians to protect privacy & freedom on the internet Read the joint letter⤵️ blog.mozilla.org/netpolicy/2026…
Big Brother Watch tweet media
English
27
302
672
11.9K
Sasha retweetledi
FCCE
FCCE@the_FCCE·
"For years, the EU has been getting no to chat control, but it won't accept the no. Despite the expired transitional rule and contrary to massive warnings from privacy advocates, private communication is to be subjected to state access once again."
Tichys Einblick@TichysEinblick

Die EU bekommt seit Jahren kein Ja zur Chatkontrolle, aber sie akzeptiert das Nein nicht. Trotz ausgelaufener Übergangsregel und entgegen massiver Warnungen von Datenschützern soll die private Kommunikation weiter unter staatlichen Zugriff geraten. tichyseinblick.de/kolumnen/aus-a…

English
0
8
32
635
Sasha retweetledi
Krzysztof Mulawa
Krzysztof Mulawa@krzysztofmulawa·
Inwigilacja w UE wkracza na nowy poziom. Bruksela forsuje przepisy, które pozwolą na stałe i automatyczne skanowanie prywatnych wiadomości, zdjęć i plików w komunikatorach, nawet tych z szyfrowaniem. Projekt Chat Control 2, bo o nim właśnie mowa, byłby najdalej idącą ingerencją w prywatność w historii UE. Cyfrowy nadzór, albo i nawet cyfrowy totalitaryzm - tak powinien nazywać się projekt, w którym urzędnik lub korporacja decyduje, co wolno nam pisać i jakie pliki możemy przesyłać. Prywatność to fundament wolności. Nie gódźmy się na ten cyfrowy dyktat.
Krzysztof Mulawa tweet media
Polski
77
757
1.9K
48.4K
Sasha retweetledi
Paweł Usiądek
Paweł Usiądek@PUsiadek·
📱 Chat Control 2.0 wrócił. Tym razem chcą skanować twój telefon, zanim wyślesz wiadomość❗ Na początku kwietnia wygasł w UE tymczasowy wyjątek pozwalający firmom technologicznym masowo skanować prywatne wiadomości użytkowników. Wielu odetchnęło z ulgą. Za wcześnie. ▪️ Chat Control 2.0 zakłada obowiązkowe skanowanie treści WSZYSTKICH użytkowników - nie tylko podejrzanych ▪️ Aby objąć kontrolą zaszyfrowane komunikatory jak WhatsApp czy Signal, projekt przewiduje tzw. client-side scanning - aplikacja skanuje zdjęcia i wiadomości bezpośrednio na twoim telefonie, zanim zostaną zaszyfrowane ▪️ Komisja Europejska i Rada UE popierają masowe monitorowanie - Parlament Europejski się sprzeciwia, ale może ustąpić pod presją argumentu "ochrony dzieci" ▪️ Prezydencja Cypru chce porozumienia przed końcem lata System ma chronić dzieci, ale dane z działania Chat Control 1.0 są druzgocące. Microsoft przeanalizował 11,7 miliarda obrazów i wiadomości - zgłosił policji zaledwie 32 tysiące przypadków. Według niemieckiej policji 48 procent zgłoszeń było nieistotnych. 40 procent ściganych nie stanowiło przestępstwa. 99 procent materiałów zgłaszanych przez Metę było już wcześniej znanych organom ścigania. Zamiast ścigać przestępców, policja tonęła w setkach tysięcy bezwartościowych sygnałów. Europol w operacji "Alice" zlikwidował ponad 373 tysiące stron pedofilskich i zidentyfikował setki sprawców - bez żadnego masowego skanowania. Dobrze ukierunkowana praca śledcza działa. Masowa inwigilacja wszystkich - nie. Bo może tu nigdy nie chodziło o ochronę dzieci? Skanowanie wiadomości, zakaz VPN, weryfikacja tożsamości – wszystko co teraz dzieje się na szczeblu UE to pełzający totalitaryzm. Celem jest zdobycie informacji o nas samych.⁩
Paweł Usiądek tweet media
Polski
230
1.5K
3.6K
165.3K
Sasha
Sasha@Markie_int·
@EU_Commission Have you forgotten about Article 7? Does the DSA overwrite our rights? Or did the EU find a loophole to bypass our rights? Then they were never really rights, were they? fra.europa.eu/en/eu-charter/…
Sasha tweet media
English
3
0
10
244
European Commission
European Commission@EU_Commission·
Meta's own terms indicate its services aren't for children under 13. Yet Meta is failing to keep them off Instagram and Facebook. We've found Meta in breach of the Digital Services Act. ℹ️ link.europa.eu/yPBWgY
European Commission tweet media
English
103
73
223
19.3K
Sasha
Sasha@Markie_int·
@EC_StockholmRep Om det är föräldrarnas jobb, varför lägger då EU sig i och ska micromanage alla medborgare inom EU? Det blir alltså inte föräldrarnas jobb, utan EUs jobb. Nej tack!
Svenska
0
0
1
64
EU-kommissionen i Sverige
EU-kommissionen i Sverige@EC_StockholmRep·
Att uppfostra barn är föräldrarnas uppgift. Inte plattformarnas. EU-appen för ålderskontroll är redo. Och den uppfyller alla kriterier. ✅ Världens högsta standarder för integritet ✅ Fungerer på vilken enhet som helst ✅ Lätt att använda ✅ Helt öppen källkod
EU-kommissionen i Sverige tweet mediaEU-kommissionen i Sverige tweet mediaEU-kommissionen i Sverige tweet mediaEU-kommissionen i Sverige tweet media
Svenska
35
0
0
2.1K
Sasha
Sasha@Markie_int·
@FrenchResponse Responses like this is exactly why governments shouldn't have the ability for Indiscriminate surveillance and unlimited access to peoples private data. If the privacy of citizens doesn't matter, then can the person who made this response publicly identify themselves?
English
0
0
4
1.4K
French Response
French Response@FrenchResponse·
Impressive list. Might be worth a second look in daylight 🥴
French Response tweet media
International Cyber Digest@IntCyberDigest

🚨🇪🇺 The European Commission is about to steal your search history in one of the largest forced data grabs in the history of the open internet, and almost nobody is talking about it. The scope is staggering: 🔴 Every query you type 🔴 Every voice and photo search 🔴 Every autocomplete you accept 🔴 Your language, your device 🔴 Your country pinned to a ~3km² grid 🔴 Every result you saw, every link you hovered 🔴 Every click and scroll 🔴 The full chronological order of your search sessions Meaning the European Union now knows your: 🔴 Health symptoms 🔴 Pregnancy 🔴 Sexual orientation 🔴 Political views 🔴 Religious beliefs 🔴 Financial distress 🔴 Legal trouble 🔴 Addictions 🔴 Affairs Under the proposed measures for DMA Article 6(11), Google would be ordered to ship the daily search behaviour of hundreds of millions of Europeans to multiple third parties through a daily API feed. Any approved "online search engine," AI chatbots included, would get five years of access. The things people only ever type when they think no one is watching. All of it now scheduled to flow daily into an open-ended list of third parties scattered across the European Union. Brussels promises "anonymisation." The reality is a thin technical veneer that has been broken in academic literature again and again for over a decade. Search behaviour is a fingerprint. Stripping a name does not change that. Mass data leaks become inevitable. Every new beneficiary is a new attack surface, and every annual audit is a year of silent exposure between checks. The 2025 Discord vendor breach already showed how fast 70,000 government IDs can leak through a single weak link. Now imagine that link holding Europe's search history. Surveillance without consent becomes the default. Hundreds of millions of EU citizens never agreed to have their queries packaged and shipped to companies they have never heard of. The legal fiction of "anonymisation" cannot manufacture consent that was never given. Behavioural search data is a goldmine for phishing, blackmail, social engineering, and corporate espionage. Foreign intelligence services get a back door without effort. They do not need to breach Google. They only need to compromise the weakest name on the beneficiary list. One insolvent startup. One compromised contractor. One approved entity quietly acquired by a hostile state. In the name of "competition," the EU is about to manufacture a permanent, distributed, daily-refreshed copy of Europe's collective search history. A surveillance dataset Brussels itself would never approve if any other government tried to build it. The public consultation closes Friday, May 1, 2026 at 23:59 CEST. The final binding decision lands July 27, 2026. After that, the door does not close again. Tag your MEPs! File a response! Make noise!

English
38
126
1.2K
77.5K
Sasha retweetledi
Tuta
Tuta@TutaPrivacy·
🚨Age verification seems to be unstoppable. 🚨 Following the Australian precedence, Greece & Brazil now also passed laws that will require age checks for social media.🇦🇺🇬🇷 🇧🇷 What’s sold as “online safety” means #surveillance via IDs checks or face scans. Privacy & anonymity protect journalists, whistleblowers & activists. We must fight against age verification - or the free web dies! 👉 More: tuta.com/blog/age-verif…
Tuta tweet mediaTuta tweet media
English
159
1.2K
3.9K
636.7K
Sasha
Sasha@Markie_int·
@AngryArcRaider @DqRoman1 It didn't in 1.6 or Source and people still played consistently, people are still playing 1.6
English
0
0
0
56
Angry Arc Raider
Angry Arc Raider@AngryArcRaider·
@DqRoman1 You're wrong, CS has a ranking system which rewards players with higher rank. Arc Raiders doesn't. It's that simple.
English
5
0
0
4.8K
dqRoman
dqRoman@DqRoman1·
I hate when people try to be intellectual about games by just saying random buzzwords. CS players been playing the same game mode on dust using the same gun for 50 fuckin years. It doesn't have shit to do with updates no matter how much the internet tries to point that as the blame. Reality is, the core gameplay of arc raiders just isn't something that's gonna keep players for 10k hours like some other titles. People played the fuck out of it for a couple months straight, had a blast, then got bored. Arc raiders is one of the least competitive extraction shooters out there, and competition is what makes a lot of live service games thrive long term especially in the shooter space. Constant updates is a bandaid fix that brings people back for update day, then the numbers just dip even lower after a week. Just like destiny. It's big spikes, then bigger drops. Updates can't hide shallow gameplay forever. The gameplay loop just isn't one to invest all your free time into. And that's okay. Every game doesn't have to consume your life.
Vara Dark@Vara_Dark

I've seen talk about Arc Raiders playercounts dropping significantly since launch. It's a really fun game, but the devs only have themselves to blame. You NEED to be updating your game with new maps, guns, modes and skins if you want players to return and they haven't done that.🤷‍♀️ DO BETTER and your players will stick around. Otherwise, there's millions of other experiences to choose from.

English
51
23
770
98.4K
Autumn Christian
Autumn Christian@teachrobotslove·
None of these people actually worship Satan, but if you were to ask most people why they use Satanic iconography they would say it is ironic or about inverting hierarchical structures or an attempt to reclaim their power in the world or it just looks cool. Okay, why does it look cool? Because it presents the profane as seductive and beautiful. So, in essence, pretending to worship Satan by using his image is not functionally any different than actually worshipping Satan. Many things are like this. The power is not in your belief or consent. It exists within the functional purpose of the thing itself.
𝕊𝕠𝕝𝕒 ℂ𝕙𝕒𝕕 🎚️@sola_chad

Why do celebrities worship Satan?

English
164
142
2.4K
214K
Sasha retweetledi
Tuta
Tuta@TutaPrivacy·
Today the EU Parliament said NO. ❌ Voluntary scanning by Outlook, Gmail, LinkedIn, etc. might come to an end on April 6 in the EU. Keep pushing everyone! 👏🥳
Tuta@TutaPrivacy

Today is the day, the EU decides on Chat Control 1.0. Will they let the Trojan Horse through the gate and let Google, Microsoft, LinkedIn etc continue to scan all your messages? We at Tuta say NO. ❌ No scanning ❌ No mass surveillance ❌ No age verification Instead we fight for: ✅ Encryption ✅ Privacy ✅ Open Source And so should the EU. Stop #ChatControl now! 🥊 Curious if your emails are safe? Check here which providers scan your data: 👉 tuta.com/blog/voluntary…

English
43
1.2K
6.1K
107.4K
Emil Moghaddam Horozovic
Emil Moghaddam Horozovic@emil_moghaddam·
🚨🚨 JUST NU: Abir Al-Sahlani (C) klipper håret av sig i protest mot USA:s och Israels operation mot den iranska regimen. 🚨🚨
Emil Moghaddam Horozovic tweet media
Svenska
185
26
284
67.7K
Sasha
Sasha@Markie_int·
@Gigabeef @PlaySafe_ID Having to verify your ID, your governmental ID to a third-party private company that PROMISE to not abuse your private information, just to play an online video game is not the way. Way too much risk for no reward.
English
0
0
0
62
Gigabeef
Gigabeef@Gigabeef·
This is the classic issue of anticheat software... cheaters get infinite tries to break the system It's not a symmetric battle, it's highly skewed in favour of the cheaters Honestly why I believe that a system such as @PlaySafe_ID layered on top is the ONLY way we will make any progress at stopping what has become an epidemic Otherwise, no matter how good the anticheat system gets, they aren't fighting a fair fight & will inevitably lose Battleye & the rest are actually pretty sophisticated - but when your opponent gets unlimited tries, you don't stand a chance...
VeryBadSCAV@VeryBadSCAVR

why do companies use balttleye so much, is it actually the only options for them? 🫠 x.com/i/status/20135…

English
13
4
62
16K
Sasha
Sasha@Markie_int·
@Thiath_ @UNEP Instead it is not viable to manufacture goods in the EU, it is too expensive to keep factories open. This has honestly slowed down any climate efforts the UN and EU hoped to do. And all they say now is how even lower the EU has to go.
English
0
0
0
7
Sasha
Sasha@Markie_int·
@Thiath_ @UNEP True. If the EU and UN had been smarter, there would have been an environmental import tax on goods from China that would lower the more environmentally friendly it is manufactured. Have the same standard on imported goods as it is if made in EU.
English
1
0
0
23
Sasha
Sasha@Markie_int·
@pinkheretic @UNEP Renewable won't be enough. Nuclear is needed as well. It is good that China is doing this now, no doubt.
English
0
0
0
9