people’s fact checker

@israeliens1 @aglouares @mostproo @Unikron_ 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@aglouares @mostproo @Marxistfact @Unikron_ I am telling you the defense never performed any 'tests,' they sent material in BUT THE DEFENSE NEVER SENT ANY DNA FROM THE VICTIM OR CHILD, YOU FUCKING RETARD

This is the dumbest account on this app by far

@israeliens1 @aglouares @mostproo @Unikron_ He's mentally handicapped as proven in this image, unfortunately

@aglouares @mostproo @Marxistfact @Unikron_ Still desperately try to run away from this huh? Pathetic retard Factor of 100? The link I sent you says the machines and equipment required cost $100,000 to $300,000 actual facility built cost more than that You're simply a retard So not a factor of 100... ur wrong again

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol No, because the goal isn't to remove all classes and reform into one new proletariat class. Sublation is in reference to the class form, not to the proletarian class that, as subject, assumes said form...

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol It does

So true.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol No it isn't

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol No. Its taking an old form of Marx.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol It's not, because it's not a revision of Marx when it is completely removed from Marx's premises

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol I mean it is focused on Idealism. I have read Marx. I like Marx, I like Sorel. I am a Syncretist for a reason. You can hate Idealism but what I am saying is right historically.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol And this has quite literally nothing to do with Marxism is my point

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Aufheben which comes from Hegel but Marx used it through materialism is "to overcome" or "To abolish". The goal is to remove all classes and reform into one new Proletariat class. Fascism believes to overcome and to move everyone to an Aristocratic Class-

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol The goal is the sublation of the state

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Mode was the wrong word. I mean more the transportation to the later stages of the transition. The goal was always to use the state as a means of distribution.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Communism is a mode of economic production

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Communism is not the mode of transportation, it is the end goal. Marxism was good in Russia due to its class situation and economic standing. DOTP is part of the transition, it is a political embodiment of the Proletariat, similar to Vanguardism which Lenin pushed for

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Marx believed in the sublation of class

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol It comes from Sorel who took the idea of Marx's removal of all classes and believed in rather after the revolution (class conflict based), it would rejuvenate both classes into one unified class.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol ''Italian production was focused around Sorel'' this is idealistic drivel, read Marx.

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol It was different but not by much. Italian production was focused around Sorel, a revisionist of Marx rather than Marx himself. Its why I don't say Marxism-Mussolinism but rather Marx-Revisionism. The goal of distribution of production was done through trade unions-

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Except no syndicalist calls themselves marxist lol

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol who were in partnership with the state. a Dictatorship of the Proletariat. Sorelians believe that Syndicalism is the True Marxism. Every group does. Welcome to the world.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol There is no transitional stage that Lenin and Stalin pushed for. Socialism is not actually a transitionary stage. DotP is nothing but a political form in kickstarting the shift from a capitalist mode of production to a socialist one and the abolition of the lawo f value

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol The transitional stage which Lenin and Stalin pushed for was. The goal through the transition is to push for worker ownership with state distributionism. You nationalise the production to equally distribute it especially when you are early within the transition.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol There was still a bourgeois class and Mussolini had to make plenty concessions to big industrialists

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol had more power over them, workers could not be fired without state permission and workers could vote related to their industry. Many women got voting rights (Not full but it was a lot for the time) and female healthcare.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol None of this is Marxism or revisionism of Marx

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Italy's goal was to make everyone part of the Aristocratic Class. The war made that difficult and I can say he was retarded when he signed the anti-comintern pact (They had good relations at that time) The "Bourgeois" did get heavily stunted, the Proletariat and State-

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol The NEP was required especially because the USSR had eradicated their bourgeois class... something Italy never achieved.

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol but I can admit the accomplishments after that date. The transition is different but worked, used national companies and low tariffs instead of the NEP. Later on Fascism formed into Fascist Syndicalism which is the mid transition which forced nationalisation of all industry

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol nationalized production =/= Marxism. USSR's production side looked entirely different than that of the Italians. Towards Stalin, the law of value in the economy was nearly entirely abolished...

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Mussolini was truly inspired by Marx. Its why he also wanted to keep good relations with the USSR. It was a Brotherly love and competition. Both nations had the highest nationalised production in the world. USSR was first, Italy was second.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol The end goal is not the same. Where does Fascism seek to abolish capitalist social relations?

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol The end goal is still the same, regardless of the means. The ends justify the means. If they believe the best way to class consciousness and equality of the one class then it aligns with the no class equality that Marx pushed for.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol It goes fully against the idea Marx believes in because Marx is not a class collaborationist.

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Yes it does. Its goal is to use the state and submission of big business in the later stages of the Transition was a better form. I would personally disagree as I am a Sorelian but that doesn't fully go against the Idea that Marx believed in.

@Castonian1 @Against_Abraham @TankieLol Marx was young and fairly quickly moved on to materialism. Marxism is inherently materialistic and Marx hadn't conceived anything coherent in terms of political economy either. Gentile's analysis of Marx was idealistic and Hegelian and therefore not Marxism.

@Marxistfact @Against_Abraham @TankieLol It was a brief time but that time is still etched in history and it what took Gentile's interest. Again Gentile was one of the most read on Marx.