Mary E Davis

@antepedium x.com/i/status/19976…

@GovMikeHuckabee I don't see Tucker a bitter man. You're lying that he hates Jews. He hates what Hamas did and he hates what Israel is doing in Gaza. He is angry w/ US politicians, including you,supporting Israel with the continuation of destruction of Gaza and mass killings of civilians.

The NYT did extensive intvu w/ Tucker Carlson-& questions were legit & professional. In it, Tucker accused me of advocating for killing of children & civilians. Asked to respond, I sent the following. (In fairness, NYT couldn't use all), but here it is: “Poor Tucker needs help.  He’s clearly circling the drain by saying something so outrageous.  No sane person “advocates” for the murder of children or civilians.  Even the allegation is sick and evil. Tucker  apparently limits his compassion to the unfortunate souls who have died in Gaza as a result of the stubbornness of Hamas to release hostages and who murdered their own citizens and intentionally put them in front of military assets where they would be most likely to become victims of the war.  One never hears Tucker lament the massacre and mutilation of 1200 women, babies, and elderly people butchered by Hamas on October 7 or the torture, rape and starvation of the 251 hostages taken and held by Hamas.  I am heartbroken by the slaughter of innocent civilians wherever they are and whoever they are.  Tucker’s irrational hatred of Jews in general and Israel in particular blinds him to the horrific savagery inflicted upon the victims of October 7, including the rape of women in front of their children, the beheading of babies in the presence of their mothers, or setting fire to elderly people who sat in wheelchairs and were burned alive, all of which were captured on video taken by Hamas terrorists who were so proud of their despicable acts that they wore Go-Pro cameras to record it as if they were taking movies of a dance recital.  Tucker’s contempt of President Trump is just another instance in which the Tucker Carlson I once knew has become someone unrecognizable.  I pray he finds himself and God.  He has become a very angry and bitter man and it’s truly tragic to watch.”

Great song ! I hope Mr David listened to it. But you would think he might have gone to a Catholic mass on a Sunday(before spreading lies) & had seen that we stand for the gospel reading & before the gospels 2 other readings to show continuity of salvation history.

Do you get it now Dr Brian?

@Milajoy @LeaderJohnThune Thune can’t block them alone. Speaker Johnson also has to coordinate with Thune and call the House into proforma sessions to stop Trump from making recess appointments. They’re working together on this. secure.thomasmassie.com/donate

Excellent response, Joshua. As you note, the graphic is worthless because it’s fallacious; its entire argument resting on a false premise. The Catholic Church has never taught that the Fathers are the “Final Authority” over Scripture. The graphic misrepresents and thus fails to interact with the actual Catholic position, which is tripartite: Scripture, Sacred Tradition, and the Magisterium together. What the Catholic Church actually teaches regarding the Fathers is the consensus patrum: their moral (not absolute) unanimity and convergent witness across centuries, receiving, confirming, and handing on the living Tradition and the authentic meaning of Scripture, never replacing it. Once that’s understood, the graphic’s central fallacy becomes clear and each of its four claims collapse on their own, because, collectively, they argue against a position the Catholic Church doesn’t hold. From its title to its final bullet point, the graphic is one extended straw man fallacy.

@HamannLily @GregMil64864612 @nosoup4knowles Probably older than you. Please get over yourself

@MaryEDavis60 @GregMil64864612 @nosoup4knowles Exactly! Do to others as you would have them do to! I wonder how old you are? The criticisms against a woman whose husband was shot not even a year ago is atrocious and utterly disgraceful and disgusting! Are you envious of her position somehow?

If I'm wrong about Erika Kirk (I'm not), the worst I'll be guilty of is defending a woman from being tried without evidence. If you're wrong about Erika Kirk, you'll be guilty of making a widow's life a living hell after an unspeakably horrific tragedy.

@ljnarnia @jaleneforbis @nosoup4knowles Another one who likes to call others names. So high IQ of you

@MaryEDavis60 @jaleneforbis @nosoup4knowles

@HamannLily @GregMil64864612 @nosoup4knowles Test Everything and hold on to the good.

@MaryEDavis60 @GregMil64864612 @nosoup4knowles She FINALLY defends herself and your response is this? Typical? If so, disgraceful

@witnesstograce @nosoup4knowles No ruse. I do care about her children. I don't believe Charlie wanted that for his children. He frequently spoke of a mother of young children staying home to raise the children. He said she said.

@MaryEDavis60 @nosoup4knowles Who convinced her it was a good idea to immediately take the CEO position? Charlie, her husband. He had mapped out the succession plan in case of his death. I don’t believe you really care about her kids- that’s just a ruse to justify your nasty attacks.

@AUFanInNC42 @nosoup4knowles I just love these anonymous accounts that do the name calling. I'm sure you can do better than just calling me bad. I'm a widow and live in Tx..sure you can come up with some better names to call me. Free speech..go for it.

@MaryEDavis60 @nosoup4knowles Wow. You're a bad person

@kalkitemm @reddeadpatriot @nosoup4knowles Good for you! Glad you found proof. 👏

@MaryEDavis60 @reddeadpatriot @nosoup4knowles x.com/paramounttactc…

@LuciusSullvvcx @breeadail Go ahead. I'll let you. Ask away

@MaryEDavis60 @breeadail Ask grok right here: “has George farmer been publicly accused of sexual assault by Raheem Kassam”. And “did Milo say George gets plunged by guys.” I’ll wait. Candy cultists are a different kind of crazy aren’t they. All this for a woman whose daily outfits are worth more than you

This is true, and especially for Catholics who support the abuse of our Faith by Candace and her ilk.

@PurpleWolvy22 @nosoup4knowles Lol. Charlie Kirk did not have the unilateral legal power to "leave" the leadership of TPUSA. "Rational thought and evidence is key to healthy discussions-I've carved my own path you followed your wrath But maybe we're both the same." Your words Mr Purple. My favorite color! 😊

@MaryEDavis60 @nosoup4knowles He literally left the company to her lol. Nothing will convince you

@Annefy1 @pendragons411 @nosoup4knowles Ok. Not sure why you brought her up then.

@MaryEDavis60 @pendragons411 @nosoup4knowles I don't care enough to. But it was before internet outrage culture. Which is all the rage now

@PurpleWolvy22 @nosoup4knowles He said she said. He was a really smart guy. I think he would've, if he truly wanted her to be CEO of a large non profit over staying home to raise their children, it would've been put in some kind of document for the board - to create a formal written Succession Plan.

@MaryEDavis60 @nosoup4knowles Charlie convinced her.

@nosoup4knowles Really? She had to take on the CEO role to do that?

Can you imagine if Erika had decided to just stay home this whole time? "Where is his widow? Why isn't she speaking out? Why isn't Erika involved with TPUSA? doesn't she care about his legacy? She wanted the insurance money!"

@Regan_Carter @nosoup4knowles It's called freedom of speech.

@MaryEDavis60 @nosoup4knowles Why is it any of your business?

@kalkitemm @reddeadpatriot @nosoup4knowles Prove where Candace has accussed her of the killing or called her a black widow. But she has implied with questions of Erika knowing something of his assassination. Everyone has the right to question a public figure on their words and actions.

@MaryEDavis60 @reddeadpatriot @nosoup4knowles she has accused her of killing her husband. She said Erika is a black widow and should write “if I did it” book like OJ

@Annefy1 @nosoup4knowles But she was still saying he is guilty. She didn't say IF this young man killed my husband. Her forgiveness doesn't automatically affect whether the state can pursue or obtain the death penalty. Innocent until proven guilty.

@MaryEDavis60 @nosoup4knowles Erika forgave TR so that she was not going to be part of the jury's consideration when the death penalty was decided.