Hargrumph

14.9K posts

Hargrumph banner
Hargrumph

Hargrumph

@Mathieuw17

Je râle. C'est mon superpouvoir.

Paris, France Katılım Şubat 2019
273 Takip Edilen109 Takipçiler
Hargrumph
Hargrumph@Mathieuw17·
@BunchesOfStoats @dejardinant He didn't. I wonder how he had the patience to try and explain things to you for so long. I wouldn't have had the patience. You're a fool. Farewell.
English
2
0
0
7
Dejardin Antonin
Dejardin Antonin@dejardinant·
@BunchesOfStoats, another questionyou didn't answer, what are, according to you, these objective rights we have and where do they come from?
English
1
0
0
12
Rep. Sean Casten
Rep. Sean Casten@RepCasten·
Following the hateful and antisemitic shooting at Bondi Beach, Australians immediately got to work to prevent the next tragedy. I'm ashamed that the United States, after 393 mass shootings so far in 2025, refuses to follow suit.
English
1.4K
526
2.4K
60.1K
ER
ER@MiddleTNboogie·
@Mathieuw17 @SomeWelder @dejardinant @RepCasten You see in nature things exist without being told to or approved by anything other than nature. Natural rights are the same. We are born with said rights. Humans can violate those rights, but it doesn’t mean we don’t have them as rights. Some would say by god but I don’t.
English
2
0
1
15
ER
ER@MiddleTNboogie·
@Mathieuw17 @SomeWelder @dejardinant @RepCasten Clearly you are the one mistaken. All humans are born with natural rights intrinsic by birth. It is governments, and assholes such as yourself, that want to violate those natural rights.
English
2
0
1
12
ER
ER@MiddleTNboogie·
@Mathieuw17 @SomeWelder @dejardinant @RepCasten Suppression of the 2A is possible by the government. it’s also a violation of our right to self defense which is a natural right. the government allowed slavery when being free is a natural right. Just because the government says something doesn’t mean it isn’t a rights violation
English
2
0
1
20
Hargrumph
Hargrumph@Mathieuw17·
@SomeWelder @dejardinant @RepCasten Still not inalienable rights. It is not a matter of subverting b ut of interpretation, United States v. Cruikshank ring a bell ? You had to wait until 2008 for the Supreme court to rule otherwise. What link do you think exists between the Supreme court and the government ? !
English
1
0
1
19
Some Welder 🇺🇸
Some Welder 🇺🇸@SomeWelder·
@Mathieuw17 @dejardinant @RepCasten If the supreme court tries to subvert the constitution, then the government is now illegitimate and we will not comply. Have you actually read the constitution and the bill of rights? Maybe you should.
English
1
0
1
16
Hargrumph
Hargrumph@Mathieuw17·
@SomeWelder @dejardinant @RepCasten They're not inalienable. Suppression of the 2nd amendment is a possibility. Or a more reasonable interpretation of it buy the Supreme court.
English
3
0
0
27
Some Welder 🇺🇸
Some Welder 🇺🇸@SomeWelder·
@dejardinant @RepCasten "Shal not be infringed" is pretty simple language, you just don't like it and no one here gives a shit what you like when it comes to our unalienable rights.
English
1
0
3
35
Hargrumph
Hargrumph@Mathieuw17·
@dejardinant @Ellies2ndaccnt This is why I very rarely visit the Xloaca. It's become a slurry pit. Talking with people like her is just a loss of time. Enjoy.
English
1
0
1
11
Dejardin Antonin
Dejardin Antonin@dejardinant·
@Mathieuw17 @Ellies2ndaccnt Or get washed again. There's a whole flock of these people, always with the same inept answers, the same contempt for logic, the same disregard for intelligence, the same lack of empathy, the same obscene selfishness. They are beyond repair.
English
2
0
0
13
Dejardin Antonin
Dejardin Antonin@dejardinant·
@Ellies2ndaccnt Inrinsinc vale is impossible, value requires an evaluator. No, you are evil because you want to force women to continue unwanted pregnancies without being able to justify your position. You are despicable, and everything a Christian should not be.
English
2
0
0
11
Ellie's saved✝️
Ellie's saved✝️@Ellies2ndaccnt·
🙄 The woman is not the evaluator. Why is there an unwanted pregnancy? There is no such thing as an unwanted pregnancy. I justified my position. You have not. You think it is ok to dispose of a human being if they are not convenient. Im not interested in what you think a Christian should be, you are clueless
English
2
0
0
22