Matthew Protti

701 posts

Matthew Protti banner
Matthew Protti

Matthew Protti

@MatthewProtti

Chief Bug Finder

YYC Katılım Mart 2011
489 Takip Edilen511 Takipçiler
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
@canada_spends @sustainrach A PEI taxpayer pays federal taxes like everyone else, but PEI as a province does not "pay into" equalization as a province, as PEI is a net recipient of equalization. Your framing is misleading. PEI receives $728 million in 26/27 while Alberta receives zero.
English
0
0
0
4
Canada Spends
Canada Spends@canada_spends·
@sustainrach A PEI resident who earns 137k pays more than an Albertan making 100k. This is not rocket science.
English
0
0
4
353
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
@thsottiaux 5.2 is the model that we launched Compliance Health's Monitor software with. Today Codex created a Bench test for me looking at token use vs answer accuracy to pick the best model. Looks like 5.4 mini is the winner. Crazy.
English
0
0
2
974
Tibo
Tibo@thsottiaux·
To simplify our Codex compute fleet management, we will be sunsetting GPT-5.2 and GPT-5.3-Codex in Codex on June 2nd when logged in with your ChatGPT account. For free plans, GPT-5.5 will be the default frontier model to build and work with going forward. These models will remain available on our API.
English
439
88
3.2K
225.7K
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦@andrew_leach·
@MatthewProtti And, as for "politically blocked" infrastructure, in QC the province was the primary decision maker on the terminal, then you still had the pipeline to come. Short of declaring the whole thing to be federal, it wasn't getting built.
English
1
0
1
95
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦@andrew_leach·
If these contracts would have been on the table at that point, for either GNL or Goldboro, we would have had a very different conversation about those projects. As it was, IIRC the only Euro contract for eastern LNG was a short-term Spanish one for part of Goldboro?
Erin O'Toole@erinotoole

But Trudeau said there was no business case…this is very good news. The sad reality is that GNL Quebec was tailor made for this deal but a lack of vision in Ottawa and Quebec City set us back a decade. nytimes.com/2026/05/26/wor…

English
4
7
40
6K
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
The Canadian failure was not simply “no demand.” Reuters reported Scholz came to Canada hoping a G7 ally might one day ship LNG to replace Russian gas, but Canada’s answer was basically “don’t count on it.” The issue was Canada lacking a credible LNG path, especially east coast. reuters.com/business/energ…
English
0
0
0
28
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦
Andrew Leach 🇨🇦@andrew_leach·
@MatthewProtti Incorrect. In 2022, Germany was interested in access to LNG *then*, not long term deals. They were talking about hydrogen, etc. They shifted that position since, but at the time they were still thinking they had alternatives.
English
2
0
3
150
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
@_joshyoung @indy2k0 @business I love fresh water too. That’s not the point. The question is why a natural gas pipeline is uniquely unacceptable in Quebec. Natural gas pipeline risk is mainly rupture/ignition/methane emissions, not persistent freshwater contamination like an oil spill. It's not an answer.
English
0
0
0
12
Bloomberg
Bloomberg@business·
Canada is set to announce a deal to supply Germany with liquefied natural gas from a planned export facility on the coast of British Columbia bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
English
132
389
1.5K
187.6K
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
You're clearly not interested in a good faith discussion. A natural gas line failure is dangerous, but the core risks are ignition/explosion, confined-space asphyxiation and methane emissions — not irreversible freshwater contamination like an oil spill. I'm talking gas you're talking oil.
English
1
0
0
59
mt
mt@indy2k0·
@MatthewProtti @business Pipelines carry a unique, extremely high risk of contamination and damage is often irreversible. What the fuck does traditional infrastructure have to do with it. Talking about entirely different risk management here. NO PIPELINES IN QUÉBEC PERIOD
English
2
0
1
55
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
@indy2k0 @business Pipelines, rail, ships, highways, dams and power lines all carry non-zero failure risk near freshwater. If the standard is “a failure could happen,” then the answer is simply no modern infrastructure. Ever. Policy has to compare risks, benefits, controls and liability.
English
1
0
0
66
mt
mt@indy2k0·
@MatthewProtti @business But it is an answer. Pipelines already cross fresh water sources and sensitive areas… spills and bursts do happen, and public funds are used to clean it up *every single time*. There is no technology that can prevent pipeline failures, and most failures are detected by humans..
English
1
0
2
62
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
@ExnerPirot Heather, not this deal obviously but do you see there being any movement in QC on this? A pipeline to support our democratic allies in Europe during the worst energy crisis in a generation? They're still saying no?
English
1
0
5
800
Heather Exner-Pirot
Heather Exner-Pirot@ExnerPirot·
This is a detail that matters👇 what other democracy are you going to secure 20 years of incremental natural gas from in 2026? Canada will definitely not be peaking in that time frame, and will have no reason to consider export restrictions to maintain affordable domestic supply. We are swimming in nat gas. This contrasts favourably to USA, Norway and Australia.
Matina Stevis-Gridneff@MatinaStevis

BREAKING: Canada Seals Landmark Deal to Export LNG to Germany. To export from BC coast, starting "early 2030s", for two decades, up to 1 million metric tons/year. Per two officials with knowldedge. nytimes.com/2026/05/26/wor… *Some details of the deal were first reported by BBG

English
16
43
241
24.1K
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
That’s not an answer. Pipelines already cross rivers, wetlands, aquifers and watersheds across Canada. Freshwater protection is a routing, engineering, monitoring and liability issue, not a categorical reason Quebec can’t allow a natural gas pipeline while BC can host LNG export infrastructure.
English
2
0
3
196
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
Equalization is not a separate fund that residents “pay into.” Finance Canada says it is funded from federal general revenues, largely federal taxes, and provincial governments make no contributions. PEI receives Equalization payments; Alberta receives none. So there is no way a taxpayer in PEI could "pay more" into equalization than an Alberta taxpayer.
English
0
0
1
87
Windscribe
Windscribe@windscribecom·
In Canada, your tax money goes to funding propaganda accounts on social media. Every post from this profile is just straight up lying to you about Bill C-22 and its consequences. The bill can force any business that so much as touches the internet in Canada to store metadata about what you do for a year, so that law enforcement can have access to it if needed. This is like saying "No no, the police aren't watching you through your windows and writing down everything you do... they're just forcing your landlord to install cameras in each room and keep a year of footage so that if police ever need to check, the evidence exists."
Public Safety Canada@Safety_Canada

(1/2) Part 2 of Bill C-22 does not create new authorities, such as surveillance powers, for law enforcement and CSIS. It ensures that electronic service providers are able to respond to lawful access requests from law enforcement and CSIS.

English
24
465
1.8K
37.9K
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
@KimKim595512924 @Honickman Catalonia is an example of unilateral secession failing internationally. It doesn’t show Canadian territory is indivisible under Canadian law. The Quebec Secession Reference says no unilateral secession, but also says a clear democratic mandate creates a duty to negotiate.
English
0
0
0
16
Asher Honickman
Asher Honickman@Honickman·
Howard is correct. I say this as someone who's long been an advocate of provincial autonomy and who sympathizes with Alberta's grievances. Alberta's very existence is a function of Crown sovereignty and legislation. Its boundaries were literally delineated by an Act of Parliament that forms a part of the Canadian Constitution. Unlike BREXIT, there is no status quo ante to which Alberta can return. So it's crucial for separatists and skeptics alike to remember that there is no principle by which the province can separate while also insisting on some right to retain its current form. If Alberta can be reconstituted outside the Crown, then all bets are off as to what this new entity looks like and what parts of the current province remain with Canada.
Howard Anglin@howardanglin

Democracy also requires that all Canadians have a say when a fraction of the electorate in one part of the country tries to break Confederation. And democracy requires that in the event of an actual attempted separation, the parts of the province that don’t want to leave Canada, such as, oh, say, the cities of Calgary and Edmonton, remain part of Canada. If Canada is divisible, then Alberta is divisible. But none of this is about democracy. Democracy is not a free floating concept. It operates within existing institutions and social constructs. Separatists aren’t engaged in a democratic project, they are proposing a revolutionary act of constituent power. Democracy is the wrong lens through which to view attempts to break up a country in the absence of genuinely inhumane conditions or systemic oppression. And as much as I agree enthusiastically with many separatists’ grievances with Ottawa (and other provincial governments), this is not that.

English
32
10
46
13.6K
Matthew Protti
Matthew Protti@MatthewProtti·
Fair, but that’s why I focused on the BREXIT/status quo ante line. I agree Alberta couldn’t simply assume the new state would inherit the province’s exact current form. But the absence of a prior sovereign Alberta doesn’t itself answer the secession question. New states can be constituted.
English
0
0
3
186
Asher Honickman
Asher Honickman@Honickman·
@MatthewProtti I did not say that new states require a previous incarnation. I said that one cannot assume this "new state" would look like the former province.
English
1
0
5
471