Max Powderz

3.6K posts

Max Powderz

Max Powderz

@MaxPowderz

Retired

Toronto, Canada Katılım Eylül 2025
2.5K Takip Edilen113 Takipçiler
Max Powderz retweetledi
Matt Stoller
Matt Stoller@matthewstoller·
My dumb read on Iran is that you can tell it’s a real deal when Trump starts effusively praising Iran’s leadership in a cringe and slightly homoerotic manner.
English
16
167
2.7K
187.4K
The Wall Street Journal
As Coke Zero gets bigger, and threatens to dethrone Diet Coke as the most important diet soda property in the Coca-Cola extended universe, the feud between Diet Coke fans and Coke Zero drinkers is getting pretty fizzy. on.wsj.com/4wKhvI5
English
310
166
1.8K
8.2M
Frank Luntz
Frank Luntz@FrankLuntz·
Insider reporting from an unnamed White House official says the Iran deal is “95% done.” The remaining 5% of negotiations are focused on Iran opening the Strait of Hormuz and turning over all nuclear material.
Scott Jennings@ScottJenningsKY

🚨After receiving a briefing from a Senior TRUMP Administration Official on the status of the Iran negotiations (someone in the know & not just speculating), I can tell you the following: -USA IS NOT GIVING IRANIANS MONEY FOR NOTHING. All speculation and propaganda to the contrary is false. Some hardline elements of Iran’s govt (IRGC) have pushed fake stories & propaganda to try to kill this negotiation. -Iran deal is NOT done (95%, but still haggling over some language). No deal being signed today. May be a few more days before this is done. -Iran will NOT get any money or sanctions relief up front. -Iran must turn over nuclear stockpile to get anything. USA position is that failure to meet deal commitments means Iran gets nothing. -Long term USA objective is preventing Iran from having nuclear weapon. -Initial deal point is to re-establish free flow of commerce by reopening Strait of Hormuz. Deal should have 2 phases: Step 1 - Open Strait of Hormuz. Give world economy breathing room. Iran agrees to give up enriched uranium. Step 2 - Get the nuclear material turned over. Only then can Iran get sanctions relief. Bottom line: goal is to make a deal that lowers costs for Americans, calms world energy markets, and guarantees that Iranians cannot have a nuclear weapon over the long term. We aren’t there yet. Iran takes forever to get you a response on even small things. But we are close although it still could be a few days. “If we get what we are demanding, this is going to be a historic deal,” SAO says. SAO sounds prepared to do no deal at all if all Iran will do is a “bad deal.” SAO admits deal could fall apart yet. But if a deal is reached, SAO expects very senior USA admin officials to take part in a signing ceremony of some sort. Iran has agreed in principle to the framework but there are still a couple points USA isn’t satisfied with. 95% done. But literally changing words sometimes requires days in Iran’s system. Haggling over language. But USA feels like we have a commitment on nuclear stockpile and on opening Strait of Hormuz. If IRAN doesn’t deliver on commitments, they get nothing. “Iran’s ability to project power is a lot more limited than it was two months ago,” SAO says. “Their industrial base for building ballistic missiles has been substantially destroyed.”

English
1.2K
119
943
700K
Max Powderz
Max Powderz@MaxPowderz·
@CliffordAsness Lol trump is such a weak bitch. Complete folly to start this. Billionaire arrogance chef’s kiss.
English
0
0
0
138
Ted Cruz
Ted Cruz@tedcruz·
I am deeply concerned about what we are hearing about an Iran “deal,” being pushed by some voices in the administration. President Trump’s decision to strike Iran was the most consequential decision of his second term. He was right to do so, and we achieved extraordinary military results—including destroying all of their missiles & drones and sinking their entire navy. If the result of all that is to be an Iranian regime—still run by Islamists who chant “death to America”—now receiving billions of dollars, being able to enrich uranium & develop nuclear weapons, and having effective control over the Strait of Hormuz, then that outcome would be a disastrous mistake. The details are still coming out—and I pray the early reports are wrong—but the fact that Biden’s Rob Malley is praising the deal is not encouraging. President Trump believes in peace through strength, and his strong leadership has already made America much safer. He should continue to hold the line, defend America & enforce the red lines he has repeatedly drawn.
English
15.3K
8.7K
41K
7.1M
Max Powderz
Max Powderz@MaxPowderz·
@Dcpcooks Seems like you have a good marriage you will do fine. Required lying or danger zone for a lot of folks.
English
0
0
3
102
DCP
DCP@Dcpcooks·
Wife wants to play cards
DCP tweet media
English
23
0
37
5.3K
Max Powderz
Max Powderz@MaxPowderz·
Iran will become a verified nuclear weapons state within 3 years. Probably sooner.
English
0
0
0
13
Max Powderz retweetledi
Branislav Slantchev
Branislav Slantchev@slantchev·
I don’t often agree with Kagan but he seems to be right that this is what Trump is hoping for. He started a war without a plan, wasted billions of dollars in equipment, failed to prepare obvious targets for defense, which resulted in unnecessary deaths of American soldiers, hollowed out the Pentagon’s ability to assess targets, which resulted in us murdering over 150 civilians, mostly girls, when we bombed their elementary school in Minab, handed Iran incredible strategic victory by allowing them to take de facto control of the Strait of Hormuz and show that we are powerless to stop it, exposed the strategic isolation of the U.S. that his antagonism to our allies has brought us in, and now he’s trying to slink away with some cockamamie cover that he’s going to use to claim victory. The Iran hawks are clamoring for him to “finish the job” but he’s already finished, and Iran knows it. He doesn’t have a mandate to send ground troops, and even he he orders more bombing, it will be a cosmetic tactic designed to disguise the defeat. What can you possibly accomplish by trying the exact same thing after it failed the first time except now you have depleted a lot of the ammo and Congress has gotten more assertive about not expanding the war?
Branislav Slantchev tweet media
English
130
1K
3.1K
521.1K
Max Powderz
Max Powderz@MaxPowderz·
@Peppy_Bismilk Wut? This is 100% on brand. If there was only some obvious scam involved it would check all his boxes.
English
0
0
2
188
Peppy Bismilk
Peppy Bismilk@Peppy_Bismilk·
I can't believe Trump missed his son's wedding to caputulate to Iran.
English
46
329
2.9K
41.7K
Max Powderz
Max Powderz@MaxPowderz·
@uscfan981 Met a guy in college who became a friend who was from there but otherwise i got nothing.
English
0
0
2
288
Andrew  Anderson
Andrew Anderson@uscfan981·
Say something nice about Alabama.
Andrew  Anderson tweet media
English
889
29
235
3.7M
Julian Klymochko
Julian Klymochko@JulianKlymochko·
Let’s be real. Diet Coke can’t hold a candle to Coke Zero. And it’s not even close. Anyone who says otherwise is delusional and lying to themselves. Are you telling me that you actually prefer the taste of metal and chemicals instead of smooth sugarless coke?
Julian Klymochko tweet media
English
7
0
10
2.3K
Max Powderz
Max Powderz@MaxPowderz·
@micsolana @wolfejosh Taxing billionaires to fund X is a red herring. Extreme wealth inequality driving oligarchic control of media, government, technology, etc. is the problem and taking away the money they could not spend in 1,000 years - except through economic power projection - is the solution.
English
0
0
0
8
Mike Solana
Mike Solana@micsolana·
if bezos handed a billion dollars to nyc public schools tomorrow literally nothing would change and everyone knows it, bc the problem isn’t lack of funds it’s shitty government. but these people don’t care bc they don’t care about kids. they just hate you and want your things.
Melanie D'Arrigo@DarrigoMelanie

Jeff Bezos paid $500M for his super-yacht and $75M for his super-yacht’s mini-yacht — both of which he’s allowed to write-off on his taxes. That alone would cover $180 in classroom supplies for every public school teacher in the U.S.

English
154
892
8.2K
226.8K
Sky Bingo
Sky Bingo@skybingo·
Hot weather calls for something ice cold! 🧊 Will you be trying this?
English
2
0
17
307.3K
Max Powderz
Max Powderz@MaxPowderz·
@eastdakota He shoulda known - and probably did know - filing a frivolous lawsuit could result in having to pay your adversary’s legal fees. He went ahead and took that risk anyway and lost. He was trying to unfairly take your money. I wouldn’t feel bad at all for having him pay legal fees.
English
0
0
1
1.3K
Matthew Prince 🌥
Matthew Prince 🌥@eastdakota·
Have a problem I genuinely would love input on. My wife and I own a local newspaper. In our town the police arrested a member of the community for having what they thought were naked pictures of a juvenile on his phone. Held him for days. Turns out, it was his own kid and none of the pictures were sexual. Terrible. Newspaper we own reports on it. Just the facts. Also report on when he’s released and there are no charges. Exactly what local news should do. He sues us and the local radio station, which had also reported on the arrest. We’re like: dude, we just reported the facts. Radio station settles (not sure terms). We push on because we did nothing wrong and the nature of a newspaper is reporting what happened. So we win. No cause of action against the paper. And then we, under statute, get awarded attorneys fees. They amount to tens of thousands of dollars. So what’s the right move? I don’t particularly care about the money. But I do want to discourage other caseless plaintiffs against suing us. Has been a costly distraction. But also seems wrong to bankrupt the guy. Genuinely looking for what to do next…
English
244
3
520
146.3K
Max Powderz retweetledi
Rutger Bregman
Rutger Bregman@rcbregman·
This sounds nice, but it's a great way to undermine the welfare state. The strongest welfare states in the world (the Nordics) tax everyone, including nurses. And they give everyone universal healthcare, childcare, pensions, education in return. When the middle class has skin in the game, they defend the system. When welfare is 'just for the poor', it becomes a poor program: stigmatized, underfunded, easy to gut. That's why billionaires keep pushing this idea. The real scandal isn't that this nurse pays $12k. It's that Jeff Bezos pays $0.
Shay Boloor@StockSavvyShay

Jeff Bezos said the bottom half of Americans should pay zero federal income tax. He cited a nurse in Queens making ~$75K and paying ~$12K in taxes saying “we shouldn’t be asking this nurse in Queens to send money to Washington.”

English
509
3.4K
15.4K
718.1K