Maximus Quanticus

Hyperliquid feels serious because its UI is clearly designed by traders. $Aster feels feature-led, confusing, and not serious largely because of UX. Here is exactly what Aster needs to fix 🧵 1/ Unify the product - Simple vs Pro fractures flow - One layout. Mode = execution setting - Persistent mode indicator + one-line explainer 2/ Charting is broken at a basic level - TradingView does not remember settings - Vol indicator constantly returning is a perfect example - Persist indicators, timeframe, drawings, layout, last market 3/ Privacy should be default - Make Hidden Order Mode default. - Simple toggle: Hidden / Public. - One-line explainer in order ticket. - Same execution flow. 4/ Fees must be visible before confirm - Show worst-case total cost: fee + slippage + any close/liq logic. - No surprises. 5/ Risk clarity - Liquidation price always visible. - Buffer + margin ratio. - Live updates as size or leverage changes. - Simple risk meter. 6/ Order reliability - Cancel must be bulletproof. - In-app recovery flows. - Clear order states. - Deterministic errors. 7/ Reduce cognitive load - Default to essentials. - Collapse advanced options. - Presets + hotkeys. 8/ Trade history readability - Show one collective order per action. - Avg fill, size, fees, slippage, realised PnL. - Fills in expandable drawer. 9/ Trust signals - Show slippage impact, liquidity depth, spread, uptime, latency. - Transparent volume + OI. These fixes are not cosmetic. Right now Aster’s UI makes it feel like a not-serious trading DEX. Ship these and perception changes fast.

@becker_ahmet patience

@Max_Quanticus And still the price didnt move😒

$ASTER ~177M burned ~46M staked ~223M removed / 9% of supply Interesting

@MaximusOnX_ 2.45b circ

@Max_Quanticus That’s nothing compared to 8b supply

@Seanbaba1 Ticket in discord?

@Max_Quanticus 24 hours gone, nothing shows ...staked 90+

@NeckDok vpn?

@Max_Quanticus I would stake a bunch but don’t see it possible in USA.

$ASTER staking. it's time. Early numbers look aggressive: ~60% base ~150–180% with lockups 200%+ if you go long duration Theyre trying to pull supply off the market fast + front load incentives. What matters is how much supply gets locked in the first few weeks. What’s everyone doing?

@ArnoldDuncUncle We’ve effectively been in a bear market for the past year already. Feels like we’re at or very close to the bottom here

@Max_Quanticus we're very likely going deeper into a bear market. i would say your bear case price predications are a better match for your bull case requirements. that said, the narrative is strong enough to carry through. base case for me sideways around $0.4-$0.5 till next year

$ASTER bull case You need 3 things to land together 1. L1 works properly - fast - stable - no UX regressions 2. Staking locks supply - 30–60%+ circulating locked - buybacks continue - float tightens materially 3. Privacy actually “clicks” - default, not optional - traders feel the difference - larger size starts rotating If that happens revenue expands again, supply contracts, narrative strengthens. You get multiple expansion + float squeeze Price implication: Base $2–3 Strong cycle $4–6 Full reflexive scenario $8–10+ $ASTER bear case - UX still feels messy - modes remain fragmented - privacy feels like a feature, not default - staking participation is weak fees don’t recover Then: - no multiple expansion - supply doesn’t tighten enough narrative fades Price implication: stays rangebound $0.5–1.2 or drifts lower if market weakens

@FrankieOneye staking + buybacks + burn, will tighten supply over time

@Max_Quanticus Need to burn overhang no matter what asap

@Jaime1700 Yeah a lot riding on the staking + UI/UX update

@Max_Quanticus Aster holders need a W.

All eyes on what APYs they’re cooking for $ASTER spot staking. Think they go aggressive early and tighten supply straight away

@m0lloch already happening under the radar

@Max_Quanticus 4. CZ steps in and buys with his frens.

@CookerFlips @dschamis @tradexyz @sershokunin @HypeStrat @HyperliquidX Mr Schamis, have some respect

@dschamis @tradexyz @sershokunin @HypeStrat @HyperliquidX One step closer to singularity David

This is a really great affirmation from one of the pillars of the financial system. Amazing work by @tradexyz and @sershokunin Hyperliquid @HypeStrat @HyperliquidX $PURR

@0xCygaar sunset by Q3

the tldr: we know which projects are active and which aren't, so we made several changes to more accurately reflect that in the XP distribution this will end up being much more fair to the teams and users that show up and actually use the chain

Since you guys keep QTing this post, I'll address some points here: - We made slight adjustments to the XP given to top NFT collections (by onchain activity, volume, market cap). We updated the calculation for many of the longtail collections because we received many reports of people mass holding super cheap NFTs to farm large amounts of XP. NFT projects that are no longer active were diluting the rewards for active NFT builders - this is not the behavior we want. - We will introduce a more dynamic system for NFT holdings designed to reward the most active collections starting next week. This system will adjust week by week and look at trading volume + onchain activity + overall ecosystem participation (ex. building interesting apps with your IP). - For memecoin holdings, we were basing the XP given based off of inflated trading volume and price data. A lot of this was done to soften the blow from the steep price decreases seen throughout crypto since October. We have since updated our internal values to be up to date which resulted in a decrease in memecoin XP. Starting next week, we will ramp up the XP given to memecoin teams actively building their IP and growing their holder base. - As communicated to our app builders previously, there will be an influx of XP given to teams creating onchain usecases, onboarding new users to Abstract, and building innovative mechanics. Several of these teams will be launching new apps and mechanics in the coming weeks. - We originally didn't want to change the calculation for holdings too much, which is why I tweeted the below tweet 3 weeks ago. However, after doing a deep dive into the XP distributed to inactive projects as well as going through the reports our community had flagged to us about XP abuse, we had to make changes to better reward those that are still active onchain participants in the ecosystem.

$ASTER L1 is live. Frighteningly fast - explorer’s a blur. UI overhaul - finally. Staking pulled forward to this week - the big one. What happens to price once supply actually starts tightening?

It's time to $ASTER-maxx

@BraveTom can't wait, hope they nail the ui/ux

@Max_Quanticus L1 soon soon

L1 about to go live just as the broader market starts turning. Feels like the stars are starting to align. If they execute cleanly here, this is where $Aster properly announces itself.

On March 5 wallet 0x8f01 rotated 650 ETH (~$1.4M) into 1.88M $ASTER, lifting its bag to 4.45M tokens (~$3.18M). Smaller inflows continue, including 1.6M withdrawals from @binance in February. Broader signals stay bullish: new wallets surged 857% MoM (leading mid-to-large cap projects) with whales rotating into weakness around the $0.68–$0.74 POC. No large-scale selling pressure, positioning screams anticipation for mainnet and staking.

@CryptoPeakX Yes

Will $ASTER reclaim $1 in March ?