Tomas

Donate to help Chud fight these charges. Love him or hate him, no one should ever face violence for speaking their mind. Free speech means nothing if people can be attacked for it. Stand for the right to speak and to defend yourself when threatened. givesendgo.com/HelpChud?utm_m…

It's not required that your attacker have a gun before you can go to your gun in lawful self-defense. Zimmerman shot an unarmed Trayvon Martin. Acquitted of all charges. Rittenhouse shot an unarmed Joseph Rosenbaum. Acquitted of all charges. You're really not very good at this. First time?

@TER4M @nurse_mdt @iFightForKids No, we live in a free country where you can’t assault people over mean words. You want that kind of oppression? Get out of the USA.

@nurse_mdt @iFightForKids I grew up in a time where fist fights didn’t lead to a charge. Most of us took an ass whoopin and moved tf on with our lives. It made society more respectful knowing you could eat a knuckle sandwich for crossing lines

Can anyone explain without chimping out why saying nigger is somehow more offensive than faggot?

@ElizabethM10333 @ZeekArkham some ppl actually do feel oppressed that saying certain words can make them a target for assault and threats on their lives. In America, that should not ever be the case.

Maybe I’m naive, but I just don’t understand why anyone would willingly cause division, perpetuate racism, all for a buck. If they feel the need to prostitute themselves that way, then they’ll stoop to a new low daily. We are in a war of good vs evil, morales vs amoral, and the people you least expect, fall into the rabbit hole…Stay true to yourself Zeek, your a shining example of the goodness in this world, trying to make a difference….

This is the last I’m going to talk about this Chud guy because I sincerely don’t think he merits the discussion or attention. - The “hard r n-word” doesn’t bother me enough to get me to swing on someone. I’ve been called that by both right and left wing folks. At this point, it wouldn’t get more than an eyebrow raise out of me. It’s not a word I use, or want to use, out of respect for my ancestors who were called it. - I support the first amendment, including words that are defined as “hate speech.” Again, they’re not words I use, but I don’t think people should be penalized for saying them. - However… if you’re going to pick a fight, don’t be surprised when someone eventually rolls up their sleeves. - I don’t feel a shred of sympathy for Chud. He knew exactly what he was doing when he started. He knew exactly what kind of response he was hoping to get. He weaponized racism for likes, clicks, and money. There’s someone I used to be friends with on this app who is doing the exact same thing. He was a genuinely good dude before he figured out that a bunch of weak men and women would flock to him by using the same racist tactics Chud was using. - If this bothers you, go ahead and unfollow me. You don’t even have to announce it; simply unfollow and go. You’re not my target audience, anyway. - I’ve always said my fight was good against evil. Sometimes evil has a mustache and carries bear mace and then shoots himself in the leg by trying to be a badass.

@ZeekArkham I mean, not a bad take, assuming you mean actually someone trying to fight others, not being surprised someone fights back. I will not be unfollowing you, even though I think Chud should walk until I see evidence that he acted unlawfully.

Two hundred and fifty years ago today — on May 17th, 1776 — the Second Continental Congress called for a day of humiliation, fasting, and prayer. Today, exactly 250 years later, we gather to do the same. To humbly ask once more for God's mercy and guidance — as we enter the next 250 years of this republic.

Hey guys I got baptized today🤍

@TmthyPatrick @VaporSnake1 @therobbieharvey Agreed, can.

@MeYapper @VaporSnake1 @therobbieharvey Fighting words doesn’t legalize the assault on Chud But that provocation can eliminate his claim to self defense

I’ve gone back and spoken to Chud The Builder’s previous victims. They say the same thing police say… Chud went for his weapon.

@VaporSnake1 @therobbieharvey Even if speech is unprotected, it doesn’t create a legal right to retaliate physically; assault is still evaluated under separate criminal law and self-defense standards.

@VaporSnake1 @therobbieharvey That’s still a category error. “Fighting words” is about whether the state can punish speech, not whether it justifies or “contextualizes” violence.

@VaporSnake1 @therobbieharvey Youre mixing doctrines. Even if speech is fighting words and loses First Amendment protection, that only means it can be punished by the stateit does NOT justify assault or “revoking” protection to excuse violence. Assault is still judged separately under criminal law, not speech

@MeYapper @therobbieharvey It doesn’t matter if it gives it legal permission. What matters in court is did the choice of words initiate a breach of peace. If it did, then the protection by 1st Amendment is revoked. Connecticut vs Liebenguth is an excellent example of this.

@VaporSnake1 @therobbieharvey Intent is central to incitement (Brandenburg), not fighting words. And even if speech isn’t protected, that still doesn’t give anyone legal permission to assault someone.

@VaporSnake1 @therobbieharvey “Fighting words” isn’t mainly about subjective intent; it’s an objective test (Chaplinsky + later cases): whether the words are likely to cause an immediate breach of the peace when directed at someone.

@VaporSnake1 @therobbieharvey Even if something qualifies as “fighting words,” it’s not a license to assault. At most, it may affect whether the speech is protected under the First Amendment, whether someone else’s reaction could be evaluated under self-defense standards (which is a separate legal doctrine)

@VaporSnake1 @therobbieharvey The "fighting words" doctrine does not allow you to legally assault someone. It originated in the 1942 Supreme Court case Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire. The Court has narrowed it: must be directed at an individual and carry real risk of imminent violence. not merely offensive.

You don't have to pay anything to have a relationship with the REAL JESUS!👏🏾

I’m so sick of this narrative. #TRUTH

funny if people disagree, they need to "shut up" so we can't take into account Chud's own words and the words of those who said they were watching it live n form our own opinions. We need to shut up and wait while everyone else gets to smear him. NOT GONNA HAPPEN OL SON.

@BigDaddyLiberty @MajToure From a lawyer with years of experience. x.com/TheBrancaShow/…

No lies detected. Solid take and analysis by @MajToure.

President Donald J. Trump reads 2 Chronicles 7:11-22: "Thus Solomon finished the house of the Lord, and the king's house: and all that came into Solomon's heart to make in the house of the Lord, and in his own house, he prosperously effected. And the Lord appeared to Solomon by night, and said unto him, I have heard your prayer, and have chosen this place to myself for an house of sacrifice. If I shut up heaven that there be no rain, or if I command the locusts to devour the land, or if I send pestilence among my people; If my people, which are called by my name, shall humble themselves, and pray, and seek my face, and turn from their wicked ways; then will I hear from heaven, and will forgive their sin, and will heal their land. Now mine eyes shall be open, and mine ears attent unto the prayer that is made in this place. For now have I chosen and sanctified this house, that my name may be there for ever: and mine eyes and mine heart shall be there perpetually. And as for you, if thou wilt walk before me, as David your father walked, and do according to all that I have commanded you, and shalt observe my statutes and my judgments; Then will I stablish the throne of thy kingdom, according as I have covenanted with David your father, saying, There shall not fail you as a man to be ruler in Israel. But if you turn away, and forsake my statutes and my commandments, which I have set before you, and shall go and serve other gods, and worship them; Then will I pluck them up by the roots out of my land which I have given them; and this house, which I have sanctified for my name, will I cast out of my sight, and will make it to be a proverb and a byword among all nations. And this house, which is high, shall be an astonishment to every one that passeth by it; so that he shall say, Why has the Lord done thus unto this land, and unto this house? And it shall be answered, Because they forsook the Lord God of their fathers, which brought them forth out of the land of Egypt, and laid hold on other gods, and worshipped them, and served them: therefore hath he brought all this evil upon them."