Sep

@ParetoPrincipl @CFTC @SECGov please look into this. PolyMarket is running an onsider trading loophole for its decentralized voting panel where the final voters of a market outcome are allowed to buy in to the market they are voting on.

This time we should protect market integrity! Endless times we can see how UMA rocks manipulate market outcomes (farming UMA tokens rewards and simultaneously trading on polymarket). Two big problems with this market: 1.) Vague rules and inconsistent polymarket clarification. By rules we have: Only remarks which are broadcast or streamed live will count toward this market's resolution. By polymarket team clarification: Footage that was not broadcast live, even if filmed during the relevant events and released during market timeframe, will not qualify toward resolution. They subverted their own rules. There is a BIG difference in meaning: (broadcast) OR (streamed live) != (broadcast live) or (streamed live) Polymarket's clarification is trying to manipulate the semantics - we need urgent attention to this. 2.) A lot of evidence of live translation, or at least of broadcast. We have a lot of evidence of live translation of time-frame that clarify to market resolution on YES side. And we also have overwhelming amount that clarifies that video fragment is broadcasting and should resolve to YES. WHAT DO WE NEED TO DO? "If you believe you've witnessed potentially manipulative or prohibited trading activity on Polymarket, we want to hear from you." Send letter with complaint here - Integrity@polymarket.com

@cryptoshakal @Vlad_Web3 @Polymarket Yeh I saw the clarification but you cant just change the rules after disputes have resulted in Yes twice. The rules were clear Broadcast or streamed live. It was broadcast! And streamed live but now we're in technicalities of what live means. It feels like I'm betting children.

@MetaSep1 @Vlad_Web3 @Polymarket Yes, they add a rule post factum and it changed everything. Nice rekt. I’m also underwater.

one of the wildest Polymarket moments today 💀 "did Trump say 'Iran' during his meeting with Xi?" odds were sitting at 99.5% traders found a video of Trump saying it and pumped the market… then the clarification dropped market nuked from 99.5% → 0% in seconds does YES still have a chance? the comments section is absolutely unhinged

@0xEmoni @Polymarket Rules said Broadcast OR streamed live prior to two disputes.

Turning $1 into $100 by carefully reading the market rules The @Polymarket market: What will Trump say during bilateral events with Xi Jinping? looked, at first glance like a potential 100x opportunity. Traders focused on three key words: Iran Strait / Hormuz Nuclear During the events involving Trump, videos circulated showing these words being used in his remarks. As a result many traders became convinced that the market outcome would almost certainly resolve to YES. 🔷However, what many participants overlooked was a crucial clause in the Polymarket rules: Only statements that are broadcast live or streamed live will count toward market resolution. Recorded footage even if filmed within the event timeframe and released later does not qualify. 🟦This is where the difference between massive profit and loss was decided. Had someone carefully read just this single rule, they could have taken the opposite side of the market while most traders were positioned for YES And potentially achieved returns of up to 100x. 🔷Simple but important lesson: In Predictions, it’s not hype that wins It’s precision in reading the rules that determines the outcome.