Michael

1.5K posts

Michael banner
Michael

Michael

@Michael_M305

United States Katılım Temmuz 2023
333 Takip Edilen164 Takipçiler
Barstool Spring Break
Barstool Spring Break@barstoolspringb·
Rone may have pushed a button when asking Nicky Smokes about Annika’s “Situationship”
English
90
7
1.7K
365.5K
Dave Portnoy
Dave Portnoy@stoolpresidente·
What the hell just happened.
English
1.8K
181
6.8K
3.2M
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
@BarstoolBigCat Guess let him do a beer bracket of the original cast members as they get knocked off.
English
0
0
0
132
Big Cat
Big Cat@BarstoolBigCat·
Absolutely not. The Beer Bracket is exactly where Doitche shines. If we did a spring break house but it's just dudes making beer brackets together he'd be a mega star on that show. And maybe we should do that show.
Andrew Hawkins@DrewRHawk

@BarstoolBigCat Does this hurt any future beer brackets? Cause that’s what’s important here

English
65
5
1.6K
401.1K
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
@Breaking911 Doordash driver preparing to go pick up an order
GIF
English
0
0
0
54
Breaking911
Breaking911@Breaking911·
WATCH: All out brawl at a Whataburger in Waco TX
English
6K
2.3K
16.3K
7.5M
Big Cat
Big Cat@BarstoolBigCat·
ZXX
196
55
7.6K
817.9K
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
@DrKarlynB Because according to your profile, you live in New Hampshire which doesn’t have a state income tax
English
0
0
0
13
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
Voluntary compliance is IRS speak for a self-assessment system: you calculate and report first, rather than the government sending you a bill upfront. - United States v. Sullivan - United States v. Tedder - United States v. Richards - United States v. Gerads - Wilcox v. Commissioner - United States v. Hartman - Woods v. Commissioner - United States v. Pottorf - United States v. Middleton - United States v. Drefke - United States v. Still hammer - Keenan v. Commissioner
English
0
0
9
1.1K
Peter Schiff
Peter Schiff@PeterSchiff·
26 U.S.C. § 5001 imposes a tax on alcohol. 26 U.S.C. § 5005 creates the liability to pay the alcohol tax. 26 U.S.C. § 5701 imposes a tobacco tax. 26 U.S.C. § 5703 creates the liability to pay the tobacco tax. 26 U.S.C. § 4401 imposes a tax on wagering. Section 4401(c) creates a liability to pay the wagering tax. 26 U.S.C. § 1 imposes an income tax. However, there is no section that creates a liability to pay the income tax. That is not an accident. It's because the payment of the income tax is legally voluntary. The payment of those other taxes is mandatory. If anyone can find a section of the IRC that specifically creates a liability to pay the income tax, in the same way that the IRC establishes a liability to pay the alcohol, tobacco, or wagering taxes, please reply to this post with the citation.
English
128
228
1.5K
126.5K
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
@FmrRepMTG See United States v. Sullivan (1927) Flora v. United States (1960) Garner v. United States (1976) Fisher v. United States (1976)
English
0
0
5
144
Former Congresswoman Marjorie Taylor Greene🇺🇸
Today, millions of Americans volunteer to pay federal income tax that actually is not required by law.
Peter Schiff@PeterSchiff

@SUDHIRT64354301 That's not what the IRS says. They will tell you it's based on voluntary compliance. If compliance were compulsory it would violate the Constitution on many grounds. For one, none of the information on the return could be used against you. But it's all used against you.

English
559
819
4.3K
839K
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
@Amy_Siskind You do know that you can translate this as opposed to just believing what the post says, correct?
English
0
0
3
223
GBX
GBX@GBX_Press·
Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Faisal bin Farhan: ​"The era of relying on the US has ended. How can Trump protect us when he cannot even protect his own country?"
English
818
7.6K
24.6K
1.5M
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
@LaurenWitzkeDE @mtgreenee Again, good luck. Hasn't held up in court while the 16th amendment has. And since IRS already looks at high earners, not a risk worth taking for me. Would rather focus on government spending with money it already collects.
English
1
0
0
39
Lauren Witzke
Lauren Witzke@LaurenWitzkeDE·
@Michael_M305 @mtgreenee He wasn’t a member of freedom law school when he filed his taxes, Peymon tried to help him so of course the media ran with it that he was an FLS student of his. Out of thousands of people this is the only headline they can make about him.
English
1
1
3
162
Samantha LaDuc
Samantha LaDuc@SamanthaLaDuc·
American blockade of Hormuz isn’t stopping Chinese tankers. “The presence of a Chinese warship proved sufficiently deterrent.”
Rémi Philiponet 🇨🇵@remi_philiponet

"Peu après l'annonce du blocus américain, quatre superpétroliers chinois – le *COSCO Everest*, le *Hai Rong Hai*, le *Jin Hai Hua* et le *Jiu Yang Bonansa* – n'ont pas rebroussé chemin ni interrompu leur route malgré le blocage américain, mais ont continué leur route vers la sortie du golfe Persique, conformément à leurs itinéraires initiaux. La Chine a publié une déclaration affirmant que le passage de ses navires dans le détroit était un acte légitime et que les États-Unis n'avaient aucune raison d'intervenir. Cette assurance reposait sur le fait que la frégate lance-missiles de type 054A *Daqing*, stationnée à environ 500 milles nautiques à l'ouest du détroit, dans le nord de la mer d'Arabie, y était présente depuis plus d'une semaine. Ce navire de guerre, qui venait de participer à un exercice conjoint sino-pakistanais, n'est pas rentré avec la flotte, mais a fait route de manière indépendante et a jeté l'ancre à une position stratégique près du détroit d'Ormuz." La présence d'un bâtiment de guerre chinois a été suffisamment dissuasive. C'est exactement ce que j'avais prévu. Le blocus américain du détroit d'Ormuz sera violé par les puissances navales capables d'envoyer des navires de guerre dans la zone et qui ne se laisseront pas intimider par Oncle Sam. Seule la force est respectée. La marine de guerre chinoise compte plus de navires ultra-modernes que l'US Navy. La Chine produit à un rythme soutenu, ajoutant l'équivalent d'une marine nationale de taille moyenne tous les deux ans. Entre 2019 et 2023, ses quatre principaux chantiers navals ont produit 39 navires de guerre majeurs, portant la flotte à plus de 370 navires et sous-marins, soit la plus grande marine du monde. La capacité de production inclut des porte-avions (trois actifs au 16 mars 2026), des destroyers, des frégates et des sous-marins. La Chine est le premier constructeur naval au monde en termes de tonnage brut, atteignant 39 millions de tonnes en 2024. La marine chinoise a dépassé la flotte américaine en nombre de navires, le Pentagone confirmant plus de 370 bâtiments en 2026. La Russie et la Chine sont reliées par des gazoducs et des oléoducs pétroliers dont les capacités doivent être augmentées par des chantiers en cours de construction. L'Iran a construit un oléoduc pétrolier dont le terminal se situe dans un port indien. Le trafic maritime du détroit d'Ormuz a baissé de 93% depuis le 28 février 2026.

English
13
19
109
15.2K
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
@SparrowOat @killthepedophil @daviddunn177 I believe she is referring to the 11k in tips being used to reduce taxable income. A follow up interview she stated her savings is between 3k and 4k. Not seeing her actual 1040 I don't know what her actual savings actually are.
English
1
0
0
16
Evan
Evan@daviddunn177·
She says to Fox News that she’s saved $3-4,000 dollars. When she was standing with Donald Trump, she said she saved $11,000 dollars. Which is it?
English
1.3K
2.7K
14.6K
648.5K
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
@SparrowOat @killthepedophil @daviddunn177 But if it's a joint return, which it probably is, the MAGI is $300k. Not sure where you are equating a 44% marginal rate because you are correct, that wouldn't be possible.
English
1
0
0
17
Oat Sparrow
Oat Sparrow@SparrowOat·
@Michael_M305 @killthepedophil @daviddunn177 Yea, single or married, its not possible to have a 44% marginal rate and still be eligible for the 25k deduction. The deduction is not allowable if your income is over $150k. The max possible marginal rate at $150k is 22% for a single filer
English
1
0
0
30
Oat Sparrow
Oat Sparrow@SparrowOat·
@killthepedophil @daviddunn177 If you think she saved 3-4k on taxes youre an imbecile 🤣 She said she made $22k last year, the standard deduction is $16k. Saving 10% on $6k is $600 in savings max
English
1
0
5
318
Rep. Melanie Stansbury
Rep. Melanie Stansbury@Rep_Stansbury·
As someone who worked in the Executive Office of the President for a number of years—let me assure you, there are no DoorDash deliveries to the West Wing.
English
4.1K
3.5K
27.3K
855.1K
Michael
Michael@Michael_M305·
@RepRoKhanna Restricting U.S. crude exports to "keep supply at home" wouldn't lower gas prices, it would likely backfire due to our refining mismatch.
English
0
0
2
51
Rep. Ro Khanna
Rep. Ro Khanna@RepRoKhanna·
My proposals will help lower gas prices by taking on corporate profiteering. They put working and middle-class Americans first. The Gasoline Export Ban Act restricts giving American crude oil to foreign countries when the average price is higher than $3.12. That keeps supply at home to reduce prices here. It only includes refined gasoline, not diesel fuel, to protect our allies. The Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act would return joint filers $324 dollars and would push gasoline prices down. The tax only applies to 50% of the price per barrel compared to the average last year and is levied against only the largest 30% of companies. Under my bill, producers have more incentive to invest to increase supply, not just profiteer. The tax bill decreases as producers bring prices down through increasing supply. Trump’s war of choice in Iran is the clear cause of this price spike. Gas is up 38 percent since the war began. The average across the country jumped from $2.98 per gallon to $4.13 today. That’s projected to give $63 billion in profit to U.S. Big Oil. Real relief will come from stopping this war and ending Big Oil’s profiteering.
US Oil & Gas Association@US_OGA

Good evening @RepRoKhanna. We hope you had a nice Saturday. Several people have requested we comment on your post. We will quickly before we take Mrs. USOGA out for date night. First - like you, we hope this war will end soon and things will return to normal. Until then - things will be what they will be. But high gas prices in your district aren’t “Trump’s war”—they’re Sacramento’s doing. California drivers pay nearly double the national average in state taxes, plus cap-and-trade, Low Carbon Fuel Standard, unique reformulated gasoline, refinery limits, and geographic isolation that blocks cheap imports. That adds $1.00–$1.78+ over the U.S. average. Here is our suggestion. Your proposed windfall profits tax will do nothing to bring relief to your overtaxed and underappreciated constituents. Instead -suspend those state-level taxes first and bring California prices in line with the national average. Put your state bureaucracy on a diet. They could stand to shed a few pounds. Encourage California domestic oil and gas production and expand your refinery capacity instead of shutting it down. Stand up to your Governor. You know he is wrong and you can be on the right side of things And let's talk windfall profits tax. They don't work. While you don't call it a windfall profits tax, California recently passed one and called it a "wealth tax" now you see high net worth individuals fleeing your state. History proves it backfires. The 1980 Crude Oil Windfall Profit Tax cut domestic production 1–8% (hundreds of millions of barrels lost), boosted imports 3–13%, raised far less revenue than projected after deductions, created massive bureaucracy, and was repealed in 1988 because it discouraged supply exactly when America needed more. That in turn led us to depend even more on Middle East imports for another 20 years right up until the shale revolution occurred. Kind of like how California is dependent on imports now. Your repeated sponsorship of a new Big Oil Windfall Profits Tax Act would repeat the exact same mistake—shrinking U.S. output and raising costs. Crude exports? They expand global supply, narrow price spreads (WTI-Brent) which is exerts downward pressure on world prices. It is directly helping allies in Europe and Asia counter China's skirting sanctions and colluding with Iran to purchase crude at huge discounts. Restricting exports would tighten markets, spike costs everywhere—including here—and hurt the consumers you claim to protect. Finally we must also point out that your voting record shows consistent opposition to our industry you want to tax. For example, you: Voted against leasing more public lands and waters for oil drilling (2023, Roll Call 23). Voted against reversing land-management protections to open the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge (ANWR) to oil and gas drilling—multiple times, including 2025 Roll Call 295 and earlier efforts to halt ANWR development. Opposed critical oil and gas leasing reforms and fast-tracking fossil-fuel infrastructure (2024 Roll Call 95; 2025 votes undermining LNG authority and blocking fracking bans). Voted NO on NDAA provisions that would expedite oil/gas permitting (2022–2023). You have a 99% lifetime League of Conservation Voters score—near-perfect opposition to domestic energy exploration, production and leasing. You’ve led hearings attacking us and sponsored bills to repeal industry tax provisions. Fine—own that record. But please stop shifting blame to “Trump’s war” or federal policy while California’s own choices keep your constituents paying the highest pump prices in America. Real relief comes from more American supply + streamlined permitting, not recycled 1980s taxes or more restrictions. Energy abundance, not rhetoric, lowers prices and bolsters U.S. and allied security. Mrs. USOGA has instructed us to put the phone away so we will do that. Have a good weekend.

English
297
71
464
46.4K