MID9T🌗

Ws💙🎉 Let's Do More💥 $XAUUSD Delivered💯 Tap:- t.me/MacposhTrades

FUNDED NEXT Support Logic Leaked it’s simple: ❌ No followers → payout rejected → ghosted ❌ Emails → ignored ❌ “Under investigation” → unlimited vacation mode But ✅ Viral tweet → instant clarity ✅ Influencer speaks → magic resolution ✅ Public pressure → suddenly “policy-compliant” So payouts aren’t decided by rules. They’re decided by X reach. Fairness for influencers. Silence for normal traders. If your system only works when X is watching,that’s not support that’s damage control. Rules shouldn’t need virality. Transparency shouldn’t need clout. Right now the message is loud and clear: No audience = no urgency. Trending tweet = priority support. That’s not a prop firm. That’s PR driven risk management. #propfirmmedia📈

Fundednext indeed have 3mins stoploss Rule How do you assume that if a trader doesn’t place a stop-loss within 3 minutes not even 4 hours it automatically means they are exposing 100% risk? What if the trader was driving, stepped away briefly, or executed a trade with a predefined risk plan and intended to set the stop-loss shortly after? Why not apply a reasonable window say 1 to 5 hours before enforcing this so called “protective rule”? Rules that claim to protect traders should be practical, context-aware, and fair. When they lack flexibility or basic trading logic, they stop being helpful and start looking questionable. This approach feels unnecessarily punitive and, frankly, shady you can’t claim to help me but the resultant effect is otherwise. @FundedNext

Hello @FundedNext it is highly recommended to treat everyone equally his tweet got 100k+ views so he got his payout what about traders with no followers

@astucefx We've looked into this. A margin review pulled the wrong balance reference, which incorrectly flagged the account. This has been identified and corrected. Payout has been processed, and the funds are on the way. We've reached out directly as well.