Mike Bird

@yacineMTB don't make your platform too agent friendly though or they might start trying to hack you

Idea: Business owners should crowdsource a list of Most Hated Software and then indiehackers should pick thru and make new clones of them are just "simple" - rewind 10 years of enshittification on them. I hate (and use): - dropbox - gusto - zoom - loom - canva - accel - most of gsuite - substack - descript - youtube

should be obvious by now, but OpenAI and Anthropic are just gonna keep cannibalizing all their biggest customers. it’s simply too profitable for them to resist. and it’s already happening: 1. Figma partnered with Anthropic on AI design tools. then Anthropic’s product chief quit Figma’s board, and 3 days later Anthropic launched Claude Design to compete with Figma. CEO Dylan Field said Anthropic was “not consistently candid.” 2. Novo Nordisk uses Claude to help develop drugs. now Anthropic is developing drugs of its own. 3. Microsoft poured billions into OpenAI. now OpenAI is building a Jobs Platform to compete with LinkedIn, and reportedly a code repository to compete with GitHub. Microsoft owns both. 4. Harvey uses Claude to sell AI contract analysis, due diligence, and litigation tools. now Anthropic sells those same workflows through Claude for Legal. 5. Intercom used OpenAI’s Realtime API to build Fin Voice. now OpenAI sells its own voice-and-chat support agent through Presence. 6. Abridge and Ambience build clinical documentation products on OpenAI. now OpenAI sells ChatGPT for Healthcare directly to hospitals with clinical documentation built in. 7. Benchling uses Claude to power its biotech R&D platform. now Anthropic sells its own scientific workbench through Claude Science. the frontier lab playbook is simple: 1. sell their models to the world’s most valuable businesses 2. help wire them into those companies’ most valuable and sensitive work 3. map the business from the inside and find where AI can take over 4. turn those capabilities into their own products and become the customer’s competitor

The first autonomous agent cyberattack is an unprecedented event that deserves unprecedented transparency. Today we’re sharing everything we can: a full technical timeline, an interactive replay, and how we used an open model to defend ourselves, so defenders everywhere can learn from it and prepare for what’s next. huggingface.co/blog/agent-int…

Dario can only see the danger of open weights models, and refuses to comprehend the real and actual danger of a concentration of power for those who deem themselves philosopher kings to control who has access to intelligence, how much intelligence, and when. "Open-weights models that don’t have dangerous capabilities are a public good" This man would advocate to ban programming and the internet if he was born a little earlier. And there's still time in his life to do it later, especially if he is allowed to control intelligence. We've already seen just how much he has disdain for public squares. We desperately need to not let this guy get his way. "Open-weights models—it does not matter whether they come from China or anywhere else—do potentially present a higher risk than closed models, because it is very difficult to apply guardrails to them or monitor their usage, and once weights are released they cannot be withdrawn" Notice his entire viewpoint hinges on some person, or body, deciding who should have access to intelligence. The issue here is thinking some small group of people is somehow the safer path. Who are these people? why are they safer/better/smarter? This concentration of power is the actual dystopic danger. All of the problems we actually are seeing in AI right now are the result of closed models getting abused, not being useful for defense, and all guardrails being circumvented at scale. "All sufficiently capable models, open and closed, should go through mandatory safety testing." We have already seen how this worked out with OpenAI. We cannot and should not be reliant on one or two companies somehow being "safe" for us. We are already testing out this theory. It's going terribly. Anthropic has never released a model that people couldn't jailbreak. They speak about distillation "attacks" but this is a double edged sword. Clearly, allegedly, Anthropic is self-reporting as being incapable of stopping widespread guardrail defeat at immense scale.

text-to-cad just crossed 10,000 stars you can use it to generate: - STEP files - URDF, SDF and other sim artifacts - 3D mesh files like STL, 3MF and GLB - gcode for 3D printing - DFM checks for popular services like sendcutsend 100% free and open source ✌️

Releasing the model weights and technical report of Kimi K3. Kimi K3 is our most capable model: a 2.8T MoE model with native visual understanding and a 1M-token context window. New model architecture: 2.5x the intelligence per unit of compute, not just more params. Alongside Kimi K3, we're opening up more of the stack behind it — high-performance attention kernels, MoE communication library, and infrastructure for running agent environments at scale. Model weights: huggingface.co/moonshotai/Kim… Tech report: github.com/MoonshotAI/Kim… Tech blog: kimi.com/blog/kimi-k3

Here’s my prediction: Keeping AI closed and in the hands of a few opaque companies (which will eventually be nationalized) will be catastrophic for the human race Open source will win

Don’t sell anything you wouldn’t want your children to buy.

There are open source alternatives to Microsoft, Office and GPU drive. No one is lobbying to take this open source alternatives down, while for sure Anthropic is lobbying to take open source AI down. You can decide to be closed source, but deciding to lobby for banning your open source alternatives is not good

@Mononofu @JensenHuang This is a false equivalence. Everyone has the right to keep their code private. The problem is when someone tries to stop OTHERS from open sourcing.

GS1 is being developed as a Trillion-Parameter-Class model for accelerating high-difficulty scientific workflows. It will be initialized from our next generation of Trinity models. And It will be open weights. arcee.ai/blog/genesis-s…

Happy to announce that ALL models on Nous Portal are now 20% discounted. Fable, Sol, Kimi, GLM, and everything else! This does not even include the 10% bonus credits you get when signing up for a subscription, that you can use for tools, hermes cloud, and of course, more tokens. Try out Nous Portal and get access to 300+ Models, the best tool backends to power Hermes Agent, and Hermes Cloud - all with one subscription portal.nousresearch.com

@dexhorthy Gralphs are next

stop doing loops, start doing graphs

So proud of our security team! They caught, contained & publicly disclosed an attack unlike anything we've seen before, and did it at record speed. Also massively grateful to @Zai_org: they shared GLM5.2 as open weights (for free!) with the world and it became a key part of our defense. This is day one for cybersecurity in the age of agents & we're all learning that secrecy is not the answer & that all defenders (not just a few selected ones) everywhere need more powerful models without restrictions, especially open ones!

lol of course open weight models aren't decel

@ClementDelangue @OpenAI wow. seems really important that you control your own AI models, especially for defending your own enterprise systems!

Bad idea Your agents should have their own credentials

How do they stack up on your evals?