mostly angry 🤬

The toff in this video who is using the language of violence to whip up civil strife against a manifesto pledge supported by a clear majority of British people, is the master of the Duke of Beaufort’s hunt. Who is the Duke of Beaufort? The Dukes were literally given their vast landholdings for free because their ancestor was the bastard offspring of Edward III. The Duke is worth hundreds of millions of pounds, has over 50,000 acres of land & thinks that you & I should be excluded from all of that land because he is better than us. He and his hunt also think they are above the law & that that they should be free to tear apart foxes because that is their birthright. I think we should truly listen to what the actual people of the countryside want, not what the aristocrat spin merchants in the ‘Country Alliance’ want. Let’s have rural citizens assemblies to discuss & vote on policies like: - Outlawing hunting & game bird shooting. - Land taxation on aristocratic estates, with the proceeds ring fenced for a rural community fund to buy out pubs, shops, community nature reserves etc. - A right to roam, so everyone can experience the beauty of these islands, not just a tiny few. - Compulsory purchase of aristocratic estates at agricultural land value, to be used for rural housing & rewilding. If the Master of Beaufort hunt wants a “fight”, maybe we need to show him what the majority of people in the countryside actually want and think?

Private health insurance companies should not exist

School is mandatory so school uniforms, school travel, school books, school stationary and school meals should be free. No parent should struggle, no child should be disadvantaged.

Drawn 133 years ago, and the con hasn't changed one bit.

🚨 BREAKING 🚨 The immigration crisis is manufactured hysteria - created by billionaires to cause panic and fear! Can we get this retweeted 10,000 times???

@paulmasonnews When you get so excited over finding one example of non-tory policy (only being considered, not a pledge) - it kinda proves our point.

If @jeremycorbyn joined @TheGreenParty then the surge @ZackPolanski is bringing would double as @yourparty and @UKLabour members would follow. What's stopping him?

Pretty much every major problem in the world would be solved by taxing billionaires out of existence

@labourlewis The trouble with left leaning MPs staying with @UKLabour is it works in reforms favour. Splitting the left vote is the only way reform win. A ballot with a left labour, @TheGreenParty , @yourparty and left independent candidates up against reform is a right wing dream.

Hi James, my thinking goes like this: However well the Greens or Your party might do, if Labour remains regressive and authoritarian, millions on the centre left will still vote for it out of habit or fear of the alternative. And as long as that’s true, all progressive politics will suffer. It’s like trying to row left while the tide drags right - you can make a bit of headway, but you’re still being pulled off course. A Labour Party with a healthier political culture is worth fighting for on that basis alone. It might never be radical enough for some, but a more benign, decent Labour still shifts the whole current of British politics in a better direction. While there’s still a chance to mitigate its worst instincts l and thousands of other good members remain inside it, doing just that. Perhaps we can agree that wherever we’re each fighting from, it’s all part of the same struggle. Treating it like some zero-sum game only helps the forces we both oppose. Ofc if you end up being thrown out, which is always possible under the current, intolerant leadership, you take the progressive fight elsewhere, as I know many already have.

@labourlewis @TheGreenParty will continue to grow over the next 4 years and it could be a 2 horse race between them and reform, I imagine a hung parliament with @UKLabour possibly having the seats to bolster one or the other. How would you react to propping up a farage government?

Yet another reason to vote @TheGreenParty #socialistsunday

If the left stop splitting the vote reform would get nowhere. @ZackPolanski @TheGreenParty

@sallonsax @cezthesocialist @JMell0r Some people plan to vote reform because they think only they can replace the current gov, these people need another choice. The left split the vote, if only one alternative to labour/tory/reform stood in each constituency the far right vote would be split. Reform would collapse.

@cezthesocialist @JMell0r Yeah there is, it isn't on the Green Party to win elections for other parties. It never has been. We have the right to stand candidates without the constant decades long calls to stand down because it's an inconvenient time.

There is no rational reason for the Greens not to withdraw and endorse Plaid here.

Your #5OClockInspiration ..

@Futurepilot1972 @EFCevie Seems to me that voting for a party that will be of the scale worse for the country than the two parties you're dissatisfied with is a very stupid reason.

@EFCevie But the other parties( if we are being honest) have zero chance of becoming the government, if you want to show your objection to the two party system you need to vote for a party that is capable of winning seats.

if you’re a woman who support reform can you tell me why without mentioning immigrants or people of colour.

Join the Green Party 👇 join.greenparty.org.uk

If you ban landlordism, it doesn't stop private companies building houses. It doesn't stop anyone from owning a house if they want too and can. We need to stop people owning MULTIPLE houses. We need to stop exploitative rents.

Want brash populism? Can you imagine why the *checks notes* taxpayers alliance might be sweating about an "eloquent and forceful" pointing out of the 99% Vs the 1%? Join.greenparty.org.uk