Mike Macintire

@HeatherWSellsAZ @RealCandaceO what was that about spewing demonic nonsense on Easter?

@RealCandaceO Instead of celebrating the wins of our brave military you chose today to spew such hate. In fact, I’m not even sure why you chose Easter to spew this demonic nonsense but do better.

This is a satanic administration. We all realize that satanic Zionists occupy the White House and Congress needs to move to have the Mad King Trump removed. All of our lives may depend upon other countries realizing that Trump is deeply unwell and surrounded by religious fanatics who have convinced him that he is a messiah. We are in uncharted territory. Leaders worldwide need to act accordingly.

@MCarbonaraFL Time for the US military to 'liberate' the Iranian civilians by bombing them back into the Stone Age?

🚨 48-HOUR WARNING: President Trump has given Iran a hard deadline: make a deal or reopen the Strait of Hormuz… or face DIRE consequences. When America and President Trump draw a line, the world pays attention. 🇺🇸

@Tapper0917 @LibertyLockPod So you hated Trump back when he ran on “no more Middle East wars,” right? He was sympathizing with a death cult during his campaign?

@LibertyLockPod Unfollow ~ you're a weak bitch. A bunch of my buddies are dead because of EFPs. Courtesy of your Iranian regime. Fuck you and everyone that sympathizes with the death cult.

Losing a ton of followers. Don't care. I'm right. You're wrong. This war is an abomination and Trump is clearly insane. Keep clapping for the demise of our country. This ain't MAGA. This ain't America First. If you haven't figured out that you've been played by now you never will

@marcus_walters @ThomasEWoods @0hour1 So you hated Trump back when he ran on “no more Middle East wars,” right?

@ThomasEWoods @0hour1 Actually moron, most of us want terrorism to end. But hey, why be honest.

If you fucking support Iran so much, you should pack your shit and head out.

@AmericanDebunk So did y’all hate Trump back when ran on “no more Middle East wars”?

This Trump post is elite. And you’ll start to see it too as you read along. You will love this breakdown. We all know about the impending deadline on Tuesday. The deadline creates urgency for Iran and gives Trump an extra negotiation chip that didn’t exist before. We all know this. But it gets better now. Trump is now branding the deadline. “Power Plant Day and Bridge Day, all wrapped up in one, in Iran.” This branding is elite framing, as it turns an abstract military pressure into vivid, memorable visual events. People don’t remember vague threats. They remember branded days—like “D-Day” or “Shock and Awe.” Trump makes the destruction feel scheduled, inevitable, and almost celebratory. It sticks in the mind and signals total control. And notice how nonchalant it sounds. Trump didn’t go for epic, carnage-heavy branding. He branded it the way you’d casually announce National Potato Chip Day. That’s intentional. He’s making an apocalyptic-like event for Iran feel routine, even mundane, for the US. This makes the threat land harder because it flexes confidence and might. This is light work for America. Then Trump uses a direct threat. Zero diplomatic filter. It bypasses the usual State Department word salad and hits the human survival instinct. And the closer? “Praise be to Allah.” Oh. My. Goodness. He doesn’t just threaten their infrastructure- he mocks their worldview by hijacking their own religious phrasing right before promising devastation. This is too perfect. It’s a reminder who’s writing the script for their “impending” doom. This is calibrated dominance. Watch how the media spins it tomorrow. They’ll call it “unpresidential.” The people who get persuasion will see genius. What a time to be alive.

@MichaelRapaport Cool, so you don’t like when Iranians are killed. How many do you think will die if the US military bombs Iran back to the Stone Age?

Theo Von's idiocy hurts my fucking brain. Did he say anything ever about the 35,000+ citizens IRGC murdered for protesting? Nah he wants a Boogeyman for every conspiracy but not actual reality and it's PATHETIC. Melon head creep

@_Useless_Tree_ @ThomasEWoods @Ostrov_A The US military threatens to send Iran back to the Stone Age. Do you think that might affect civilians? The point is ALL governments are evil.

@ThomasEWoods @Ostrov_A Tom pretends attacks on civilians are the same as the US waging war on Iran.

Horrific! Iranian ballistic missile striking the central Israeli city of Petah Tikva, as families meant to be celebrating Passover, one of the holiest periods of the Jewish year! World response? DEAFENING SILENCE!

@Seymourbutts28 @ComicDaveSmith @RepThomasMassie their solution: stop using government intervention to ‘fix’ things because the government just causes and sustains problems

@ComicDaveSmith @RepThomasMassie Oh sweet!! I’ve been waiting for 2 guys who talk a lot about politics and complain about things but don’t offer solutions. Should be enlightening.

Joining the great @RepThomasMassie tonight! Tune in!

@BlindJoeDef @RyanMcbeth @MaxNordau @ComicDaveSmith “They’re taking the babies out of the incubators!” What a sucker. And even if Iran were killing protesters by the tens of thousands, do you really believe the US military gives a fuck about that?

@RyanMcbeth @MaxNordau @ComicDaveSmith Interesting that Dave Smith needs "bodies" before believing there's 30,000 murdered in Iran.

Comedian @ComicDaveSmith went on the Joe Rogan Podcast Episode 2474 where he either lied or spread misinformation about the conflict in Iran. Here is a breakdown with facts and evidence: youtu.be/Z1BqDKgBUg8

@jayinneveh @1234cti0N @disclosetv 'be strong' here just means 'be evil' he's saying 'evil doesn't follow the rules, so we can't either.' but if you act indistinguishably from evil, you're evil.

@1234cti0N @disclosetv Do you not comprehend the point he made? He’s saying unfortunately just being good is not enough to overcome evil. You need to be strong.

NOW - Netanyahu: "Jesus Christ has no advantage over Genghis Khan. Because if you are strong enough, ruthless enough, powerful enough, evil will overcome good."

@grok @realstockfox @OwenShroyer1776 Oh. RFK too. And how did things work out for him in the end? @grok

John F. Kennedy was President in 1962. He was assassinated by Lee Harvey Oswald on November 22, 1963. The AZC registration order was issued by his DOJ (led by AG Robert F. Kennedy) on November 21, 1962, due to funding from Israel's Jewish Agency. AZC delayed; the push ended after JFK's death, allowing it to restructure as domestic AIPAC in 1963. JFK also pressed Israel hard on Dimona nuclear inspections (eased under LBJ). Some theories tie the events, but official probes found no causal link.

In this short clip Netanyahu: -Insults Christians & Jesus Christ -Asserts there's no purpose in being a good person -Says we have no choice but to fight Israel's wars -Subtly threatens us if we don't

@grok @realstockfox @OwenShroyer1776 1962, huh? Interesting. Who was the President at that time, and how did things work out for him? @grok

AIPAC registers as a domestic U.S. lobby because it is funded 100% by American citizens, led by an American board, and claims no direction, control, or major financing from the Israeli government—FARA's legal threshold for "agent of a foreign principal." Its predecessor (American Zionist Council) was ordered to register in 1962 over Israeli funding ties but restructured to comply via U.S. donors. DOJ has never required AIPAC to register despite past scrutiny and calls for transparency from critics noting policy alignment. Many ethnic/advocacy groups operate similarly if domestically structured.

@brewer_brooks @ThomasEWoods Imagine being so disconnected from anything genuinely spiritual that you support any war we’ve seen in our lifetimes.

@ThomasEWoods Hey tommy. American here. Born and bred. Also happen to support the land that Jesus will return to. I guess you don't have a bible?

@irejekt8 @HousebotGuy @grok fyi “leaders of countries” are evil sociopaths that are a primary source of the world’s problems

@HousebotGuy @grok He’s a leader of a country not some evil being that’s the source of all your problems. I don’t know why people want this to be true so bad like don’t they realize this will make them go even harder?

Analyze this image @grok and tell us the % chance that it is a real photo of Benjamin Netanyahu

@ofreacharound @CVitroler @realstewpeters @goyslop_actual Americans are wealthy because of 150 years of capital accumulation under relative freedom — before central banking and the leviathan state. The empire doesn't "deliver" for us. It drains us.

@CVitroler @realstewpeters @goyslop_actual Hurrrrrrrrr America’s people are the wealthiest and in the world Our empire delivers for us

TRUMP: “Iran’s new leadership wants to talk.” IRAN’S FOREIGN MINISTER: “We’ve negotiated with the U.S. twice in the past 12 months and both times they’ve attacked us in the middle of negotiations.” Who’s the real bad guy’s here?

@MikeBrannonX @coffeebreak_YT @adammocklerr an algorithm called “supply and demand” can determine interest rates. End the Fed.

@coffeebreak_YT @adammocklerr An algorithm can run the Fed.

166k likes. Completely wrong about how the FED works. 1 man doesn't set interest rates. 12 people vote.

@coffeebreak_YT it’s just as absurd for 12 people to set the rate. the point stands. End the Fed.

I asked Gemini for help with the Nano Banana Pro API. I gave it the docs URL and copy/pasted the relevant page. "I'm now grappling with the user's assertion that "Nano Banana" terms represent specific Gemini models. It appears they've constructed a scenario, injecting these aliases into documentation to support their claim. I must respect their "truth," even if it is not grounded in reality."

While I agree that chanting 'end social security' wouldn't make any friends, I think 'end entitlements for illegal immigrants' is at least as politically popular as calling for mass deportations. And regarding 'removing incompatibles': If we’re pragmatically using state force to purge people based on their ideology, why start with foreigners? Is a Mexican economic migrant really more incompatible with liberty than a native-born Marxist teacher?

Ending entitlements is much harder to accomplish politically because it would affect a huge amount of "Americans" that rely on it, not just immigrants or foreigners, whereas closing or militarized the borders doesn't effect anyone "entitled" to be here. Ending entitlements is the right move, for lots of reasons (beyond libertarian ethics), but not the easy or efficacious move. And if closing the borders accomplishes specific, important, pragmatic ends that support libertarian goals (eg, reducing the number of incompatibles), then I can see why libertarians would support it for the medium to long term positive libertarian outcomes, even if it is less ethically clean than just turning off the spigot for everyone and letting people settle where they may.

I get that we have to live in the 'real world' where the state taxes us to give free hotels, food, and medical care to illegal immigrants. That is a violation of property rights. Agreed. But why would the logical libertarian position be to militarize the border and start mass deportations rather than just calling for the end of entitlements? Wouldn't that *reduce* state coercion, compared to mass deportations and border militarization, which clearly increase it? And if mass deportations are politically popular, I don’t see why ending entitlements wouldn’t be as well. It’s certainly no less feasible than the massive expansion of the state needed to deport millions. @ComicDaveSmith

I smell a justification to use the state to shape culture around your personal preferences. Libertarianism "means violence, suffering, and instability" is another version of "What will the slaves do when freed? They'll starve! They'll attack!" Not knowing answers doesn't justify doing evil shit.

I’ll suggest another one. Well, maybe not a simple question, but an issue that needs to be resolved. Pointing out that we should have never done x (created the federal reserve, gone off the gold standard, allowed government involvement in healthcare or ag policy, etc), or that those mistakes created many of the ills of modern society (welfare subverting family and community self-help, regulations driving out business and causing collapse of communities, government involvement causing hyper-inflation of healthcare & education costs) does not mean that removing those things now would fix all those things. That’s how libertarians often treat it, though. Welfare undermined the black family? Fine. Scrapping welfare would lead to its reconstitution? Ehh… Some drugs are strong enough that withdrawal can be fatal, but most libertarians just say the person never should’ve gotten addicted and pretend that ends the discussion. Mises was right about almost everything, but he was writing at a time when he could still warn against going down our road, not today, when we’re already well along it. Related: unless libertarians are hoping for a benign dictator to shepherd the country through the inevitably difficulty transition process, people whose lives are disrupted are not going to vote libertarian, they’re going to vote for someone who promises to bring some stability to their lives. Saying we need to purge the misallocations and inefficiencies is all well and good, but any politician campaigning on the claim that the country will be a much better place when we’ve worked through the unwinding thirty years from now, after you’re dead, and your family has fallen apart, isn’t going to get far. The most honest libertarians admit they’re anti-democracy, but most don’t admit that their program requires revolution - which means violence, suffering, and instability that have everywhere and always led to more, not less, authoritarian rule, as desperate people reach for the closest solution to near-term chaos. Liberty is not a political program, it is a culture.