MikeMeisterling.og

6.2K posts

MikeMeisterling.og banner
MikeMeisterling.og

MikeMeisterling.og

@MikeMeisterling

Orthopedic Surgeon. Enjoying kids finance, crypto, web3, outdoors & ortho orthopedics orthotwitter orthopaedics shoulder knee. My opinions are my own

Katılım Nisan 2021
166 Takip Edilen1K Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
The Kobeissi Letter
The Kobeissi Letter@KobeissiLetter·
BREAKING: President Trump provides an update on his 48-hour visit to China for the US-China summit with 15+ US public company CEOs. Details include: 1. Tariffs were NOT discussed with China's President Xi, Trump says they were "not brought up" 2. Trump says he made "no commitment either way" on Taiwan during talks with 3. Trump says he could meet with China's President Xi four times in 2026 4. Trump says China has not purchased Nvidia’s H200 chips, despite US approval for sales 5. Trump says he and President Xi discussed the possibility of easing US sanctions on Chinese companies buying Iranian oil We expect further details shortly.
English
391
425
3.7K
586.5K
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
The 90% statistic is not just wrong. It is useful. RAND found that people with at least one chronic condition account for roughly 90% of spending. That does not mean 90% of spending treats chronic disease. This is why it pays to learn English as a second language. You actually pay attention to the order of the words. And the misquote creates a beautiful policy runway for the healthcare cartel. Call everything chronic disease. Then sell population health, value-based care, risk adjustment, care management, pharmacy control, food programs, and vertically integrated “prevention” platforms. Same consolidated players. New moral vocabulary.
Calley Means@calleymeans

90% of all healthcare costs are tied to chronic diseases that are often preventable and reversible by food. But to some swamp creatures, the F in FDA is silent. All that matters to them is American children get more drugs.

English
6
15
67
5K
MikeMeisterling.og
MikeMeisterling.og@MikeMeisterling·
@CrazyVibes_1 You forgot that they under pay the driver who expects a tip while your data is sold on a daily basis even when you aren't ordering
English
7
44
2.3K
76K
Crazy Vibes
Crazy Vibes@CrazyVibes_1·
Ordering a Pizza for Delivery 1995 – You call – You order in 2 minutes – It arrives in 30 minutes 2005 – You go to the website – You customize it – It arrives in 45 minutes 2026 – You download the app – You create an account with email verification – You add your address with a PIN on the map – The map can't find your street – You add it manually – You select a pizza – The ingredient you want has an extra charge – You add a card – Payment error – You pay with another method – "Your order will arrive in 85 to 140 minutes"
English
781
2.9K
22.7K
2.6M
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
The American Hospital Association and the Federation of American Hospitals are the two most powerful lobbying organizations in healthcare. Why do they continue to beat the daylights out of 1,000,080 physicians? Because physicians don't advocate, they don't hire lobbyists, and they argue with each other versus fighting the bad guys that hate patients. They set legislative priorities. They shape CMS rulemaking. They fund political campaigns. They write model legislation. Now look at their boards. The AHA board is populated by CEOs of the largest nonprofit hospital systems in the country. The FAH board is populated by executives of the largest for-profit chains. These are the people who benefit directly from the policies these organizations advocate. They're not representing hospitals generically. They're representing their own P&Ls. When the AHA lobbies against site-neutral payment, it's not protecting "community hospitals." It's protecting the facility fee income of the systems whose CEOs sit on its board. The conflict of interest isn't hidden. It's the organizational chart. It's a beautiful Tuesday, carry on.
English
10
24
88
2.9K
Bret Weinstein
Bret Weinstein@BretWeinstein·
Hantavirus is not new in humans. It is a very poor candidate for a global crisis. If this one becomes a matter of broad concern it suggests a psyop, a bioengineered virus, or both. In which case, there will be no obvious place to go for objective data. I suggest following those who shined during Covid.
English
124
596
4.1K
91.2K
Tom Steyer
Tom Steyer@TomSteyer·
Health insurance companies want to maximize profits, not your health. Single-payer healthcare is the only way to reduce costs and improve care.
English
85
77
719
12K
MikeMeisterling.og
MikeMeisterling.og@MikeMeisterling·
The alien files are a distraction Your job is to figure out what they are distracting you from!
English
0
0
1
24
MikeMeisterling.og retweetledi
Dutch Rojas
Dutch Rojas@DutchRojas·
Let's do some math that nobody in healthcare policy wants you to do. Nonprofit hospitals receive an estimated $28 billion per year in tax exemptions. Federal, state, local, property, sales. All of it. In exchange, the IRS requires them to provide "community benefit." That term is self-defined. Hospitals count bad debt, Medicaid shortfalls, and medical education as community benefit. In other words, they count the cost of doing business as charity. The median nonprofit hospital spends less on actual charity care than it receives in tax breaks. That's not a nonprofit. That's a tax play with a mission statement.
English
16
47
145
7.4K
MikeMeisterling.og
MikeMeisterling.og@MikeMeisterling·
@Scobleizer The problem with this style: Any student can get an allowance for unlimited time in today's system
English
0
0
1
5
Robert Scoble
Robert Scoble@Scobleizer·
This is just a total lack of creativity on behalf of educators. Years ago when I was going to college my chemistry professor said, on her first day in class, "you are allowed to cheat in my class." "You can bring the books to my chemistry exams." "You can bring a calculator or a computer." "You can write the answers on your arm." But then she continued. "All my tests are timed. If you have to look up the right equation to use you will not pass." She was right. If you didn't do the homework and study your ass off and really learn the topic you weren't gonna pass. Asking ChatGPT for the answer is slower than knowing the answer already. Education needs a complete overhaul. They should start by studying my chemistry teacher. She knew how to teach.
Luiza Jarovsky, PhD@LuizaJarovsky

🚨 University professors have been saying AI is completely destroying learning and that we'll soon have an AI-powered, semi-illiterate workforce. Here's a glimpse into the educational apocalypse: "Sarah, a freshman at Wilfrid Laurier University in Ontario, said she first used ChatGPT to cheat during the spring semester of her final year of high school. (...) After getting acquainted with the chatbot, Sarah used it for all her classes: Indigenous studies, law, English, and a “hippie farming class” called Green Industries. “My grades were amazing,” she said. “It changed my life.” Sarah continued to use AI when she started college this past fall. Why wouldn’t she? Rarely did she sit in class and not see other students’ laptops open to ChatGPT. Toward the end of the semester, she began to think she might be dependent on the website. She already considered herself addicted to TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat, and Reddit, where she writes under the username maybeimnotsmart. “I spend so much time on TikTok,” she said. “Hours and hours, until my eyes start hurting, which makes it hard to plan and do my schoolwork. With ChatGPT, I can write an essay in two hours that normally takes 12.” - "By November, Williams estimated that at least half of his students were using AI to write their papers. Attempts at accountability were pointless. Williams had no faith in AI detectors, and the professor teaching the class instructed him not to fail individual papers, even the clearly AI-smoothed ones. “Every time I brought it up with the professor, I got the sense he was underestimating the power of ChatGPT, and the departmental stance was, ‘Well, it’s a slippery slope, and we can’t really prove they’re using AI,’” Williams said. “I was told to grade based on what the essay would’ve gotten if it were a ‘true attempt at a paper.’ So I was grading people on their ability to use ChatGPT.” - AI in education is a serious topic, and many schools and universities are blindly jumping into the "AI-first" wave without considering short and long-term consequences. It would be great to hear more from teachers and educators to understand potential solutions. This might be a great opportunity for rethinking the education system and how students are assessed. - 👉 Link to the full article below. 👉 To learn more about AI's legal and ethical challenges, join my newsletter's 94,700+ subscribers (link below).

English
59
34
272
34.3K
MikeMeisterling.og
MikeMeisterling.og@MikeMeisterling·
Book of Enoch downloads are going to be high for awhile
English
0
0
1
10
MikeMeisterling.og
MikeMeisterling.og@MikeMeisterling·
@babybeginner Should have been $566k per kid $566k isn't even a rounding error for the state No part of the state budget is seeing a consequence
English
0
0
11
79
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖
THE GIRLS WON! Big settlement to punish the school who punished the kids! You ask why girls don’t just refuse to play when a team sneaks a boy on it? Well, this school did. They even gave up their basketball playoffs. They sat out. But the state punished them severely. The principal’s association banned the entire school from any athletic competitions in the whole state. No team. Nothing. Not even spelling bees or science fairs. When the hammer of this ideology comes down it comes down hard. Any kid who might be facing a college scholarship for sports? Banned. Shut out. They did this to make an example of the school and terrify any other girls from refusing to participate. These were high school girls, children really, and the state made them pariahs in the school. Imagine how much guff they got from everyone else. Well, last year an appeals court told the school they couldn’t do that. But that was 2 years later. 2 years of banishment. The state just settled a lawsuit against it and thank goodness they won! Of course, it won’t cost the people anything who did this to high school kids. No, it will be taxpayers who pay. Ultimately, the families of the kids who got shatter. There is a lot of power behind this movement. Power, and bitterness, and abuse.
Jennifer 🟥🔴🧙‍♀️🦉🐈‍⬛ 🦖 tweet media
English
71
765
3.1K
27.9K
Nic
Nic@nicrypto·
Jamie Dimon today: "The way it's going now, there will be some kind of bond crisis." He added that when a credit recession hits across all lending, it will be "worse than people think. It might be terrible." This is the CEO of the world's largest bank. Nothing to see here...
English
117
482
3K
437.4K
Raoul Pal
Raoul Pal@RaoulGMI·
Forget UBI. The answer is Universal Basic Equity… and it’s humanity’s pension plan for the post-AGI world... The Economic Singularity is coming faster than people think and the default question is how humans make money in a world that doesn’t really need them anymore. The default answer is UBI, which is transfer payments from a state, funded by taxing an AI economy that nation states can neither see nor keep up with. It’s a 20th century answer to a 21st century problem and it’s broken before it even starts. Agents are becoming the dominant user of the internet, not humans. Your AI is becoming your entire front end UX. The clicks economy is dying everywhere except where humans pay to feel something - clothing, travel, luxury, experiences, culture. Agents run on crypto rails because nothing else works. The dollar doesn’t fractionalise below a cent, settlement isn’t instant, permissions are required, jurisdictions matter. Stablecoins handle the dollar leg and native tokens handle the rest. The biggest users of DeFi in five years won’t be humans farming yield… it’ll be agents managing treasuries, swapping, earning and spending at machine speed. Capital formation has already shown its new shape and it came from the most unexpected place. Memecoins. Everyone wrote them off as a casino but they were a prototype. Instant capital formation around the attention of an idea, raised by entities without legal personhood, settled in seconds. That is the template agent economies will use to fund themselves. And it’s not just agents... Robots will run on the same rails, with zk permissions issued from our wallets as the source of truth, because biometrics are far too flawed for that role Open source code itself gets tokenized and finally captures the value it creates, instead of being monetized through bolted-on services and subscriptions. Proof of humanhood becomes the trust layer that lets us release agents into the world without society collapsing under synthetic noise. Identity, authentication, verification, permissioning, all of it migrates onto the same substrate. So when you zoom out, the L1s aren’t just settling agent transactions but settling the entire coordination layer of the new economy… agents, robots, humans, code, capital, identity and trust. Every contract, every treasury, every permission, every stake. Open source finally captures the value it creates, at scale, for the first time, and truly vast value accrues to the coordination layer because everything routes through it. Which brings us to the actual answer to the Economic Singularity… Universal Basic Equity. Anyone on earth with a phone and an internet connection can buy a stake in the substrate that the new economy runs on. No KYC walls, no accreditation rules, no jurisdiction, no employer, no state, no permission. The first homogenous, permissionless, globally fractionalisable claim on the productive infrastructure of the world. It's not a slogan but a structural fact about how blockchains actually work. This is their purpose. Wealth comes from owning the substrate. Income comes from being human, because attention and experience remain the irreducible currency of culture, community and love. Abundance of goods and services from AI handles the cost of living. Taxing data center electricity use solves the tax issue. Four legs of a stool that holds up the post-singularity human world. So… just buy the fucking tokens. Bitcoin if you want pure store of value, a basket of the major L1s if you want the coordination layer. 10% of your earnings, every month, for a decade. You'll be wealthy and protected from the changes to come. Crypto is going to $100trn in the next 6 to 8 years and well beyond that after. You can choose to invest in your own economic disruption, or get left behind by it. And if you’re worried about timing the cycle… …adjust your time horizon. This is humanity’s pension plan. It's all so absurdly fucking obvious...
English
351
383
2.5K
235.5K