Mike

Well without the US on your side you run a huge risk of losing freedom. US is the last beacon of potential freedom and that was about to be dissolved with globalist agendas. All roads lead to corruption, try to avoid the fast track but keep up with potential threats. Seems it’s a never ending dilemma no?

Is there anywhere on Earth I can go where people have the principles and commitment to living free? I thought it was the US, but it's not anymore. The people here give lip service to freedom but jump at every cult of personality handing their freedoms over to their dear leaders at the slightest despotic whim. Where can a freedom loving person exist anymore?

@CoralMarks0 @endless_frank @thedefivillain Who are primary examples of people in this category that are worth billions that either didn’t earn it through real innovation or unnecessarily horde it?

@endless_frank @thedefivillain You’re so close. It’s the incredibly wealthy that make things corrupt. It’s not the average millionaires it’s the people with multiple hundred million and billionaires. You have more in common with the people in blue cities than you do them. It’s a divide and conquer scheme.

I’m really sick of this shit. I’m a total Trump supporter. Never voted against him. For 6 months now, markets get fucking destroyed on every attempt to rally 1%. I understand that Iran was and is a threat and we need to do what’s right for humanity by neutralizing that threat, but I’m sick of this insider shit. Some large cohort of insiders knew for 6 months what was coming and sold every single fucking rally since. This is not a market, it’s a 3rd world casino and I’m really fucking tired of it. My vote will not EVER be for a democrat. I don’t believe in open borders to criminals, I don’t believe in shoving the LGBTQ flag and transgender’ism in anyone’s faces and I don’t believe in crooked politicians that enrich themselves through fraud LLC’s and NGO’s, but I also don’t believe in is this bullshit that I’m witnessing in markets. Everything is a complete fucking fraud and maybe @TuckerCarlson has a point. The American way has lost itself. There are frauds literally everywhere on both sides of the isle and it’s destroying this country inside out.

@mysteriouskat This is a clear indicator that you have no idea how the world works…

Before someone is allowed to post on social media, they should be able to pass a test on their ability to discern what is true and what is false. If they fail, they have to take a course on source evaluation & misleading framing.

@MarioNawfal This is the only reasonable solution. It’s this or endless conflict.

Here's the best case scenario for this war: - The Iranian regime capitulates - It is replaced by a transition Government, as the country prepares for its first election since 1952 - The U.S. gets more control of the Strait of Hormuz, giving it an edge over China in the AI race (i.e. energy race) - Iran goes back to its secular roots with a blossoming economy, normalizing relations with Israel - Hezbollah gives up its weapons, and Israel pulls out of Lebanon - Lebanon goes through a period of rapid economic growth as it gradually normalizes relations with Israel - Syria's President succesfuly unifies the country, and begins rebuilding as Israel pulls out of remaining territory - The Houthis move away from Iran and begin normalizing relations with neighboring Gulf nations - Hamas give up their weapons, and we finally start seeing progress towards a two-state solution I know this is a pipe dream, but hey, let's be optimistic for once

Mario what are you on man? If this is your back up rhetoric in case this goes badly, I totally get it. But we both know Irans tactic was to instigate chaos and instability anywhere it could. Then when they are the ones under threat they hypocritically hurt their neighbors AND hold the world economy hostage. They condemn Israel for the treatment of their neighbors when under threat then do far worse when it’s their own skin. The longer this went on the worse it would get. There will never be reconciliation with the Islamic regime. They will try to bring the world down with them

🇮🇷 The "told you so" crowd has it backwards... Every hawk on the internet is pointing at Iran's missile range and multi-country retaliation as vindication. "See? We had to hit them. Look how dangerous they are." That reasoning collapses under its own weight. Iran didn't launch anything until it was attacked. Responding to being bombed is not the same as posing an imminent threat. If self-defense proves you deserved to be attacked, then every country with a military is fair game for preemptive war. Capability without intent is not a threat. Brazil has a military. So does Indonesia. Nobody is suggesting they need to be neutralized. The moment you start treating the mere existence of weapons as justification for striking first, you've created a world where every nation on earth is either attacking or waiting to be attacked...

I guess it hurts both ways when you have your radicals generalized as the whole party. Same tactic the democrats did when they had power. Who was it that called half the country deplorables? Right, Hillary Clinton. It’s pretty clear the tactic of anti-Trump is getting the country nowhere. For a reason. This is the Democrat Party, hijacked by a toxic ideology

Trump declares almost 50% of Americans to be public enemy number one – right after Iran. This is no longer politics; this is open civil war from the mouth of a president. Anyone who brands half of their own people – millions of ordinary Americans who simply vote differently – as the "greatest enemy" hasn't understood America; Trump hates it. This rhetoric isn't "tough," it's treacherous. It destroys precisely what makes America strong: the idea that Americans, despite all their differences, are one nation. Trump has just proven that he doesn't want to be president of all Americans – but merely the leader of a faction that considers the rest the enemy. Insane. And extremely dangerous.

Hard to balance moral judgment when promoting nationalism while claiming a commitment to condemning evil. Is it acceptable to feel satisfaction at someone’s death? Perhaps, if that person is widely regarded as acting with clear harm toward one’s identity. The real question is: how far should national identity extend in shaping or limiting our moral condemnations? How can we genuinely unite as a people if our identity is defined in ways that deepen division?

Lord have mercy Trump really did post this Mueller has died And he was not a good man But wow Trump is brutal

Imagine if the world would accept the legitimacy of Israel’s sovereignty. No more reason for buffer (occupation), no need for hostilities. The Middle East stabilizes and prospers. The rest of the world stabilizes and prospers. Now imagine if the Zionist project is abandoned. Millions of people uprooted again, relocation efforts, societal disruption continues. Why can’t this conflict be reconciled? Because entities like the IRGC / Islamic regime in Iran continue to press for conflict and turmoil. They will never stop until the Zionist project is ended. They have no desire to acknowledge Israeli aspirations. I see that as the problem

No matter what Trump does next, the Middle East will never look the same - Gulf countries are pissed - Iran is more hardline - Russia & China are salivating And if the regime survives, Trump loses any chance to control the Strait of Hormuz, the U.S. will come out much weaker, and China much stronger Trump should have never started this war, but at this stage may have no option but to finish the job.

The Iranian regime created an unrelenting machine of destruction pointed toward Israel. There was and never will be a reconciliation possible for this machine. With this obvious truth it was inevitable that Israel would be destroyed one way or another. Their government is taking a hardline approach, using the political influences they have established. It was the Iranian regime or Israel. That was the verdict. It may end up being that neither prevail.

Dear Friends, Followers and Subscribers, our dear Americans, Seeing as one and all are reminiscing about Charlie Kirk today in light of the Iran war, I thought I would make something that happened crystal clear. Minds are for changing, and when the facts change we change our minds. We had dinner with Charlie Kirk in London last May 2025, and when Charlie I walked privately after dinner in Hyde Park, Charlie told me then that in his view Bibi Netanyahu was a psychopath and that the actions taken by his government in Gaza were psychopathic. We already knew that, so it was no shock to me, but it was good to see that his evaluation and capacity to observe the obvious was present and sane. Charlie had completely changed his mind and his position on Israel from when I first met him in Dec 2018, and in May 2025 he did not support their actions in Gaza or many of the actions of their government, particularly their growing destructive influence in America. Previously he had been one of Israel’s biggest champions, so this was indeed a complete change. We had witnessed his support of Israel previously as we had visited Israel with him in spring 2019 when he had held almost completely the opposite view. Charlie was also totally against any military engagement with Iran by America. And he told me in London that he had written a few days previously to Israeli leadership to express his disappointment. Erika, Charlie’s wife, shortly afterward on June 17th and 18th, communicated to us that she suported Charlie completely concerning his view of the insanity of involving the US in a war with Iran and the importance his attempts to achieve a peaceful resolution. And she communicated that directly to us in writing. She also, and most importantly, indicated that she did not agree with how biblical scripture was being used and was being twisted by pastors and politicians to justify their support of military action. This discussion is historically important in the light of discussions about dispensationalism* (see definition below) and how the Bible is being interpreted today by many politicians and military leaders to justify the current war. She stated very clearly that “the pastors” in Charlie’s orbit were “hungry for war.” That was her worry at that time, and Erika was VERY disturbed by it. Charlie was not alone in his views. Many feel the same way today. The elderly in America and the boomer generation seem to be somewhat unconscious on the subject of harmful Israeli government action and how it affects the entire future of America and the world. Charlie’s view was that most of the youth of today will never forgive Israel for the needless slaughter of innocent children in Gaza, and he suspected that they would not forgive Trump for a future war with Iran either. Charlie did his best to warn President Trump about this and what voters and the Trump base were telling him on June 18 last year. He did this knowingly at great personal risk to his personal relationship and friendship with the President. Today, the youth of the world and young voters in America, on the whole, have recognised that Trump’s actions in Iran are insane and that they have been encouraged by psychopaths. I personally believe that there is a possibility that Charlie was executed for his efforts to prevent the Iran war. This is my opinion. This matter and Charlie’s execution should be completely investigated. If an American citizen was executed by a foreign power for expressing their opinion, then we should be aware of that. I am not alone in that thought either. Charlie was one of my best friends; we communicated directly (often daily) since April 2018. We achieved a tremendous amount together. I have strong reason to believe that there is a possibility that he has been betrayed by several of those around him. @RealCandaceO @CarriePrejean1 @TuckerCarlson @BretWeinstein @piersmorgan @IanCarrollShow

@tommysantos14 @MarkS1724 No actually those admins don’t bring less scandals they get cover for the organized establishment by those career experts you speak of. You paint a picture of anti-reality that too many people have seen through already. It won’t happen as you say

Government will always have some level of corruption. The job of citizens is to keep fighting it and elect people who can actually clean it up. And over the past few decades, the pattern isn’t subtle. After Republican administrations, Democratic ones tend to bring less corruption, fewer scandals, and stronger economic growth. That's not an opinion. That's empirically true.

When Trump leaves office: The Department of War will go back to being the Defense Department. The Trump Kennedy Center will go back to being the Kennedy Center. The Gulf of America will once again be the Gulf of Mexico. The unfinished East Wing (it won't be finished by the end of Trump's term) will be rebuilt by the next president, and it will not be a ballroom. Federal agencies packed with unqualified loyalists will fire those people and rehire the career experts Trump fired. The Department of Justice will go back to enforcing the law instead of protecting the president. Scientific agencies like NOAA, the EPA, and the CDC will go back to publishing research without political interference. The U.S. will re-align with its allies and not with its enemies. The presidential pardon power will stop being used as a rewards program for loyalists. Inspectors General will go back to investigating corruption instead of getting fired for it. The White House press room will go back to having briefings, with real journalists and not podcasters. U.S. foreign policy will stop revolving around flattering dictators. And the world will progress as though Donald Trump never existed.

@MarioNawfal What indicates this is going to be a prolonged war? We are half way through the projected timeframe and supposedly ahead of schedule. If we eliminate the long range military capability, intelligence assets will be able to monitor more mobilization, where is this bad, honestly?

Why am I against this war? As someone who's been EXTREMELY critical of the Iranian regime, so much so I was labeled 'zio' by many, I've always advocated AGAINST regime change through military means The reason is simple: In over 100 years, there's been ZERO successful regime change operations without boots on the ground And we're seeing this play out right now: The Iranian regime's grip on power has strengthened under bombardment, and they've become even more brutal in suppressing dissent If the U.S. conducted a very limited military operation to give Iranians the chance to bring down the regime, then maybe I would have been supportive (assuming the country does not descend into civil war) But seeing Iran get bombed daily, Israel and the region get attacked, U.S. troops die, and the global economy cater... this is not what I envisaged for 2026. I want the U.S. to win against China I want the regime to fall I want Iran to be a democracy I want Hezbollah's military arm gone I want Lebanon and Iran to normalize with Israel But a prolonged war with Iran is NOT the way to achieve any of these goals

And persistent rumors that he is actually dead

@ColinDynamo @MattH_4America We will see. It’s still up in the air what will happen. If the region wants stability they will step up and not let another hostile regime gain power. Do you think this US administration wants stability in the ME?

@MikeNanceJr @MattH_4America Thats the American handbook. And Trump already tried to keep the oil flowing in the strait, but with his protection. No doubt he was charging a fee. The school that was hit has been proven to have been American. Its the Iraq war 2.0

I've been on this earth for over 40 years, and I never once feared Iran This argument "they were going to nuke us!" BS from the boomers is ridiculous These people's brains have rotted out - they can't even think anymore There is nothing "America First" about what we are doing

@ColinDynamo @MattH_4America What do you draw this conclusion from? I still wonder the answer to my other question.

@MikeNanceJr @MattH_4America This war is for territory, oil and resources. Thats it

@ColinDynamo @MattH_4America What does the region want that is not in the interest of Israel?

@MikeNanceJr @MattH_4America This will defo not allow the region to flourish and Israel are more than likely the main cause for this part of the region to be unsettled. The US and UK for the original destabilising of Iraq. Back in 2003. US also destabilised Iran years ago. Trump is not the answer

I agree Israel isn’t innocent either. But I’m not going to judge them on standards outside of the situation they are in. The Zionist project was legitimate, rejected by some, ok fair enough. But to say they don’t operate in the standards of countries with allies all around them is shallow bc many countries have been relentlessly hostile toward them despite their call for peace. I’m not getting into the weeds about this but what trump is pursuing with the Abraham accords and the Iran ultimatum is imo by far the best scenario to have the region flourish.

@MikeNanceJr @MattH_4America The middle East has been at war for centuries. We de stabilised it with Iraq. This created power vacuums. Israel arent innocent either. The West would be better staying out of and giving them weapons

@cenkuygur @RepOgles What does American leadership need to do to ensure security and prosperity for everyone?

@RepOgles You don't belong in Congress. You hate America. In this country, we believe in equality and justice. Bigotry and hatred are for people like you and your donors. We know you're trying to drive up hatred toward Muslims, so we can have more war for Israel. Get out of our country!

Muslims don't belong in American society. Pluralism is a lie.

Yeah I guess Iran doesn’t actually promote terrorism and chaos throughout the entire Middle East. They definitely want to find a way for everyone’s aspirations to be achieved. You act like there wasn’t a large amount of people that was already opposed to the trajectory of the western order pre-16. These “most” western countries are just western countries with opposition leaders. It doesn’t represent all of the constituents. The liberal western order has turned catastrophically toxic, that’s why we’re in the mess we are in.

@MikeNanceJr @MattH_4America Its words. Its not like its bombs. America is seen as a terrorist country from most western countries now. Thats y hes getting no backup and even Saudi have warned him. He'll die of old age and America will still be suffering from this

@ChrisWickNews I guess my question is, what about trumps ultimate aim is unacceptable? Just list points and address each one individually. There are many moves being made in pursuit of his vision, so which part is unacceptable, specifically, and why?

When I voted for Donald Trump I actually believed elections changed everything. "Did I ever get screwed" But what if that’s the biggest illusion of all? Every few years we argue with friends… fight with family… and divide ourselves over politicians. Left vs Right. Red vs Blue. Liberal vs Conservative. Meanwhile the same powerful institutions keep getting richer… the same wars keep happening… and ordinary people keep getting poorer. Different faces. Same system. Think about it… If voting really threatened the people who run the world… Would they make it so easy? Or would they do everything possible to stop it? I’m not saying voting is useless. But I am asking a question most people avoid. Are we choosing our leaders… Or are our leaders being chosen for us? Be honest. Do you think elections actually change who holds the real power? Yes or No?