Mint

12.4K posts

Mint banner
Mint

Mint

@MintPurpose

Have not minted a dime! 2026?

Katılım Ocak 2022
490 Takip Edilen997 Takipçiler
Sabitlenmiş Tweet
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
we should stop calling perp dex scams just because they didn’t meet our expectations on airdrops. centralized exchanges have existed for years. most of them never did any airdrops, yet people still use them everyday. the core idea behind perp dex is giving users full control over their trades. that alone is a major shift, and credit to Hyperliquid for starting that narrative forward. the future is decentralized finance, and many of these perp platforms are experimenting with different designs to move closer to what defi should actually be. for years we complained about the unfair practices of some exchanges. now alternatives are emerging, yet when the airdrop doesn’t meet expectations, the first reaction is to call the project a scam. that mindset won’t help this space grow. if we want real innovation in defi, we also have to be open to trying new products and letting them evolve. that said, the $DIME execution still looks quite poor.
Mint tweet media
English
2
1
8
235
Mide Crypt
Mide Crypt@mide_crypt02·
Eid Mubarak to my Muslim brother and sister Love you all 🫶🏾
English
1
0
3
6
Beaulah
Beaulah@P_riestess7·
Happy Eid Mubarak CT! Today is the last day of @menacedotcom we hope for eligibility. Image from Pinterest 💕
Beaulah tweet media
English
49
1
56
215
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
gm CT. yesterday was good, today will be better. happy eid Mubarak ✨️
Mint tweet media
English
3
0
4
12
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
in 2012, Bitfloor lost 24,000 BTC in one of crypto's most avoidable breaches. not smart contract bug, not validator compromise. just unencrypted wallet backups and attackers who knew very well where to look. crypto infrastructure was still primitive at that time, so security practices were inconsistent and operational discipline was weak. Bitfloor stored private key backups in a way that wasn't properly encrypted. once attackers reached that location, they didn't need to break anything else cos they already had the keys. the breach exposed a myth the industry was still building around: > Cold storage = safe. not necessarily cos security isn't about where keys are stored, it's about how they're protected at every layer. hot wallets carry real risk, remote exploits, key exposure through active systems. what Bitfloor showed is that cold storage carries its own risks: > poor key generation > insecure backups > physical compromise > human error > no real-time monitoring to catch any of it. cold storage reduces attack surface, it does not eliminate risk. crypto security failures rarely come from one thing. they happen at the intersection of key management, operational process, human decisions, and system design. Bitfloor wasn't hacked in the traditional sense, it was misconfigured into vulnerability. the industry eventually moved past the hot vs. cold framing entirely. multi-signature wallets, MPC custody, hardware isolation, distributed key shards, the focus shifted from storage location to key control architecture. the goal became designing systems where no single point of failure could expose everything. if your keys are exposed, your assets are gone. it doesn't matter whether they were in a hot wallet, cold storage, or a backup file sitting in the wrong place. the industry is still building around that lesson.
Mint tweet media
English
0
1
2
39
D A R K A
D A R K A@darkanft·
gm crypto twitter, we have a community of 40 people, but always KOLs with big community gets spots, let's try our luck here... @RawCutsETH let's see if we can get a WL for them too? let's cut it raw (╯°□°)╯ #RAWCUTS
D A R K A tweet mediaD A R K A tweet media
RAW CUTS@RawCutsETH

THE STUDIO CHALLENGE IS OPEN. ✂️ Show us your grain. We want to see your real-life RAW CUTS builds. The Bounties: 🏆 Top 3: Free NFT Drop 📦 🏅 Top 50: Guaranteed spot. How to enter: - Build one character from image down. - Post a photo / video in a tweet. - Tag us + use #RAWCUTS 24 hours to create.

English
5
0
8
252
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
@darkanft and you too my brother
English
0
0
0
1
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
gm CT. i think is high time to go back trading perps again. after few liquidations in last 2 months, I stopped. looks like I still have to try.
Mint tweet media
English
2
0
4
24
R2D2
R2D2@R2D2zen·
Gm No coffee mug today. Heading for my eye surgery. I will be off for the next 4 or 5 days. I will schedule some posts so my account does not go cold. I wish you all a productive rest of the week and see you back early next week.
R2D2 tweet media
English
306
1
356
4.6K
Shola 👑
Shola 👑@itsSh0la·
Barcelona 2 - 4 Newcastle Put your life savings.❤️
English
1.6K
244
3.4K
639.1K
Mint retweetledi
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
in 2011, one of crypto’s earliest exchanges was shut down after a hack that exposed something far more threatening than lost funds. bitcoin7 was hacked. btc was stolen and user kyc information went out the door with it. people forgot about this one. the lesson it carried 👇 back then, crypto was still regarded as experimental. security protocols were inadequate, the infrastructure was underdeveloped, and exchanges often operated with bare minimum protection. Bitcoin7 was a prime example of this vulnerability. The attackers targeted two things at once: > the hot wallet infrastructure > and the backend database systems. the attack wasn't just an attack on the financial systems of the exchange, it was an attack on the personal information of the users. the exchange closed immediately after the attack occurred. there was no plan in place to recover from it, no safety net. but the interesting part of the attack was not the way the exchange responded to it, or the fact that it closed immediately after the attack occurred. it was the way the attack highlighted the true nature of centralized exchanges. if someone steals your money, the damage is immediate and monetary. if someone leaks your identity information, the damage takes longer and is more difficult to reverse. you can recover your btc or any asset, you cannot recover your identity. this was why Bitcoin7 was important, regardless of the monetary value. the problem that was created by Bitcoin7 has not been fixed. It has been amplified. mordern platforms now store your emails, IDs, addresses, and all of your financial activity. one leak and everything is exposed. the problem has simply grown. this is why some of crypto is shifting towards more self-custody, less data collection, and decentralized identity. Bitcoin7 may be forgotten, the architecture that created this problem has not changed. if someone else stores your information, someone else can lose it. this was true in 2011 and still true today. always protect your personal information.
Mint tweet media
English
1
1
3
49
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
@0xsidiA Right now I don't have any heavy conviction on any aside from projects on hip-3
English
0
0
0
2
Sidi
Sidi@0xsidiA·
@MintPurpose What plays are you most confident in right now?
English
1
0
0
6
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
the next biggest cook of airdrops are currently on: > github > live only subgraph > deploying multiple testnet contracts for team the key is patience and learning. they might still end up calling their users farmers. but soon, low batteries will be charged again 🤝
English
2
0
8
56
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
@P_riestess7 they are kind of time consuming though. sometimes they don’t worth the effort put in, but they’re cool to keep hands busy and at the same time learning
English
0
0
0
14
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
@0xCrosss That options is a killer lmao. I always look forward for it to add options for my data analyst brainstorming
English
0
0
0
35
Mint
Mint@MintPurpose·
@MeshClans Even though lighter was airdrop farming, I think their zero fees trading is one of the most underrated feature so far. Hyperliquid is a solid, and was once airdrop driven too but not anymore, it has matured with crazy features. I'm hoping lighter would do better too.
English
1
0
1
34
Mesh
Mesh@MeshClans·
Perp DEXs just crossed a threshold that changes the entire conversation around on-chain derivatives. and the best part is that most people are still early to understanding what's happening. Daily volume jumped 35% from $22.7B in 2025 to $30.6B in 2026 YTD (as of mid-March), but the headline number barely scratches the surface of what's actually happening beneath the growth curve. This isn't just another bull market pump where everything goes up together and then crashes back down to baseline when the cycle turns. The growth trajectory is steepening while the broader market weakened through Q4 2025, which tells you something structural shifted in how capital allocates across crypto infrastructure. This is the migration everyone predicted, and it's happening faster than expected. The scale of the transformation: > 2025 volume: $7.9 trillion, representing 65% of lifetime cumulative activity in one year > DEX-to-CEX ratio: 11.7% in Nov 2025, up from 2.1% in Jan 2023 > This marks systematic migration, not temporary experimentation The October 2025 tariff shock was the real inflection point that crystallized everything. It liquidated $19B+ across centralized and decentralized platforms, and what happened next proved the thesis we've been building toward. CEXs went down during the most critical liquidation cascade in crypto history, while perp DEXs processed everything without a single outage. That single event transformed "not your keys, not your coins" from a libertarian slogan into proven infrastructure reality. The narrative became undeniable proof. Capital rotation explains the sustained momentum better than any narrative about retail FOMO or institutional adoption, and the smart money has been positioning for this exact shift. DeFi yield farming compressed as restaking incentives normalized and points programs matured, pushing passive capital to search for returns elsewhere. The yield arbitrage became obvious: > Fed rate: 3% > Stablecoin yields: sub-5% > Perp DEX hybrid yields: 6-18% Capital that couldn't justify sitting in compressed DeFi yields migrated to active trading infrastructure. The path forward became clear. The revenue numbers confirm this is real demand, not just incentive-driven wash trading, and the winners are establishing serious moats: > @HyperliquidX : $844M in 2025 (more than Ethereum's $524M in network fees) > @edgeX_exchange : $250M annualized (despite mid-cycle launch) The volume-to-open-interest ratios separate sustainable platforms from temporary plays, and this is the key metric that reveals quality: > Hyperliquid: 1.57 (healthy organic trading) > Lighter: 8.19 (airdrop farming) > EdgeX: 10.51 (points-driven activity) Lower vol/OI ratios like Hyperliquid's 1.57 signal sticky, organic trading, while sky-high ratios of 8-10+ usually flag airdrop-farming activity. This metric tells you which platforms have real staying power. The infrastructure matured into production-grade execution while capital simultaneously rotated from passive to active strategies, and we're still in the early stages of this transition. Tokenized equities now trade 24/7 on-chain with Nvidia, Tesla, and Google perpetuals generating real volume, expanding the addressable market beyond crypto-native assets. The infrastructure is ready for mainstream adoption. The 35% growth rate matters less than the quality of that growth. The platforms that thrive in 2026 will be the ones whose vol/OI ratios prove they're infrastructure, not just incentive casinos, and the leaders are already establishing their positions. This is where the real opportunity lives. h/t @NexusDataLabs @DefiLlama @coingecko for the data 🔥
Mesh tweet media
English
29
4
49
1.5K