ChinWaggle

@XCOPYART A $ $ H * L E S turn up everyday

@onchainL00ps Love to see it man, I'm away but keeping an eye

NFT Treasury just swept (+offers) 22 more L00ps from non-believers using my creator royalties 🔥 Thank you. Working on something: Community royalties (3%) directly accumulated and claimable only by the L00ps in the less populated reality. The experiment is deepening… 👀

@KnightmaresETH 0xF37e7812A5Fbf4830b6Ff0737A84f49FfEC5a9EC

@XCOPYART A $ $ H * L E S turn up everyday

not showing up everyday is counterculture

@oranj0x @cartyisme

@cartyisme Bro seriously Just cost me $20 for nothing

FCFS will be delayed as I investigate the issue. Failed TX costs will be refunded.[And mint costs if need be.] I will update when FCFS goes live. Working to get everything fixed. Apologies for the technical issues here.

@onchainL00ps 🫡

@rustnfteth my favourite

@MintyBatman1 banger

secondary action on an art pfp collection? what is this? 2022?

@onchainL00ps Like I said man, hope it gets the attention it deserves. Looking forward to it.

@MintyBatman1 You've helped me draft this with your ideas, thank you! I've checked the feasability after our chat, it's totally technically doable. Now only requirement is to have the collection alive enough for this implementation to be worth its cost.

@Tma_420 100% this. @onchainL00ps might be what you're describing - original generative art, two competing onchain DAOs, no admins. Holders run everything. Not a derivative of anything. x.com/onchainL00ps/s…

5 years later the most hyped mint is still a punk derivative Says a lot of about it the NFT space And I’ve had many artist explain me why their derivative is better. It’s not disrespect to artists. But we gotta have something more original to be excited for?

@_ab83_ @opensea can you speed this up?

🧐

Request sent. Let's see when OS will approve it.

@niel0x0 0xF37e7812A5Fbf4830b6Ff0737A84f49FfEC5a9EC

@onchainL00ps @Tma_420 tbh @Tma_420 this deserves more attention, on par with Heraldia, all on chain, dev is still active

@Tma_420 Unfortunately marketing and noise matter more than originality...

@Tma_420 LEARN HOW TO SELL

Some of you list like your life depends on it. Then whine like little bitches that nothing runs. Nothing runs cause you don’t believe in anything

@loldrool drooling for these!

The window is open. Your chance is here. Let’s drool. 72 h only ⏳ loldrool.xyz

@mukanjonft failed three times trying to get in, but been here 🫡 can we get my small group some spots?

無感情 doesn’t walk alone. collabs incoming. which communities deserve to stand next to 無感情.

Thanks @MintyBatman1 for the cool suggestions for the upcoming DAO(s) implementation for hodlers to decide how to use the community treasury (3% royalties collected on every trade). Updates about that really soon 👀

@onchainL00ps See the effort you are putting in, this deserves more attention, just some small suggestions from me 🫡

@onchainL00ps Might be worth doing a small write up on the idea and giving a preview for what's to come to get people excited. Whatever you decide, looking for ard to it man

@MintyBatman1 Very cool ideas! Thanks for sharing those! Yes of course, we would need volume at some point for the whole mechanism to be useful...

Quick Founder Parenthesis LOOK ONCHAIN. If a brand new shiny collection is just a basic ERC721 SeaDrop smart contract with zero custom logic (spun up in 10 minutes via OpenSea Studio Interface) and they’re promising “onchain game” or deep interactions… maybe DYOR a bit harder. As an honest founder, it’s frustrating watching low-effort projects grab all the attention while real builds get ignored. But it’s nothing new. I don't want to spit on anyone, just to highlight the difference. For onchainL00ps we didn’t mint until everything was actually ready: - Custom smart contract, ERC721 seadrop compatible, with real onchain functionality (switch reality) - 2 Collections in one (hand-drawn art) - Custom HTML viewers on Opensea - Dedicated website interface for contract interaction - Lifetime IPFS storage for metadata No collabs, no marketing fluff: just concrete onchain facts. Next up: A fully onchain autonomous DAO so holders can directly manage their royalty share. Real work takes time. The shiny stuff usually doesn’t. Let’s put blockchain first again. The only source of truth. MisterLoops (End of parenthesis) Have a good sunday 😉

Sounds good man, small suggestions from me: 1. Could call it the identity war 2. I think having different types of proposals embedded could be fun as well as custom, like sweep floor, cash out, recruit bounty to attract others to their side of identity, sabotage to maybe buy and burn tokens and alliance if both sides agree for something. Maybe it all kicks off when both sides have a certain amount etc

I like the idea of 2 DAOs, one for each reality. The community royalty share could be splitted and sent equally to the 2 DAOs. Then up to holders to create proposals to decide if they want to sweep NFTs from the given reality or get their share directly. Voting power as well as per NFT shares would be impacted by the number of NFTs in the given reality. Switches would have to be done before someone puts up a proposal to have voting power... What do you think?