Nyahuro

@MbalulaFikile Make it a holiday SG.

“Let us all unite and celebrate together, The victories won for our liberation, Let us dedicate ourselves to rise together, To defend our liberty and unity, O Sons and Daughters of Africa Flesh of the Sun and Flesh of the Sky, Let us make Africa the Tree of Life, Let us all unite and sing together, To uphold the bonds that frame our destiny, Let us dedicate ourselves to fight together For lasting peace and justice on earth.” Happy Africa Day!🌍

@DavidMakhu473 @LynneStactia Makumbo ane mateya haumsone? Kkk

@LynneStactia When did Rama become slimmer like that 🤔

Ramaphosa was lying that he doesn’t know Weak-Nail, yet Weak-Nail has a recorded video that was sent to an individual by Weak-Nail as a weapon of blackmail, and in return, Weak-Nail has gotten his ex-wife arrested because he assumed she was the one who forwarded the video to people like @matinyarare. Why not think of his victims? What if the video came from the person he was threatening? This is wrong. Weak-Nail must stop using the police for his shenanigans! 🚮🚮🚮

@LynneStactia Mukuru wembavha not Mazuva.

Highlanders fans singing “ Chivayo lisela” meaning Weak-Nail imbavha yemakoko! 📍

@Jamwanda2 Solid response backed by market research kkkk. Do I need a passport to sell lattice?

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@nickmangwana Bleachmore Obediah

Members of the clergy support #CAB3

@TembaMliswa Temba uchasiya vana wakumhanya zvakapinda nepamwe.

𝐁𝐞𝐰𝐚𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐅𝐚𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧𝐚𝐥 𝐄𝐥𝐞𝐦𝐞𝐧𝐭𝐬 𝐅𝐚𝐧𝐧𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐅𝐨𝐫 𝐂𝐚𝐫𝐧𝐚𝐠𝐞 I have consistently voiced my disapproval regarding the explicit maneuvers of certain politically unruly factions attempting to establish a secondary centre of power on Vice President Chiwenga, a move that seeks to undermine the authority of President ED. This position stems from my unwavering commitment to principles that, regardless of the circumstances, would apply equally should Vice President Chiwenga ascend to the presidency. I cannot agree to the establishment of a competing source of authority that jeopardizes the integrity of his own leadership; the matter is as straightforward as that. Nevertheless, there are more profound issues to support my opinion. The English philosopher Thomas Hobbes articulated a concept known as the "state of nature. Geberallt speaking, in a hypothetical political context, the "state of nature" is defined by rival centres of power, anarchy, and disorder, wherein human ambitions remain unconstrained, self-interest prevails, passions run rampant, and the carnage fosters a battleground of every individual against all others. Constantly looming within this scenario is the fear of violent mortality as individuals battle for power and positions. The doctrine of a One Centre of Power emerges as a necessary antidote to such disorder. Contrary to assertions from certain quarters that seek to frame this concept as undemocratic, genuine democracy flourishes in an environment marked by internal party stability, promoting robust participation in democratic processes. The principle of a singular centre of power assures stability, direction, and unity of command. In an ideal context, this approach stands in opposition to factionalism, anarchy, and the fragmentation of competing centres of authority, all of which can engender political turmoil. Individuals currently & prematurely advancing and mischievously hyping VP Chiwenga as an alternative centre of power are promoting this very carnage which is rampant in Hobbe's "state of nature". It is within this context that I have openly voiced opposition to attempts to construct an alternative centre of power during President ED’s administration. Such endeavors are utterly unacceptable, as they breed internal fragmentation and instability. Importantly, my opposition to the establishment of this competing centre transcends the duration of President ED's tenure. Even if Vice President Chiwenga were to assume the presidency, I would steadfastly oppose any factional attempts to create a rival centre of power!

@nickmangwana Saka ukupikisa VP

GETTING IT RIGHT Under Rhodesia’s UDI, your right to vote depended on race, gender, education, and wealth—not simply on being an adult human. People took up arms to end that exclusion, fighting for every adult’s vote to count. That principle—universal suffrage—is about who gets a vote, not whether the presidential vote is direct or indirect. Under #CAB3, every adult citizen still gets an equal vote for their MP. Your vote still counts.

@Jamwanda2 @MulakazuvaL Tiurairewo mapoliticians please kkkkkkkk.

HEYI!!!!!🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

@DougColtart @DavidColtart @AlickMacheso Ukuvafinhura kkkk

And to all those who say that I am not Zimbabwean because of the colour of my skin, may you find healing for the hate in your hearts. I don't hate you back. And I challenge you to a dance off!!!🕺😂 Name the time and place. @AlickMacheso please provide the music.🎶🇿🇼🖤🤎💛💚

@nickmangwana Bring referendum bro

Constitutional Amendment Bill Number 3 gets serious public support. #CAB3

@CrimeWatchZW Thus what they do they pay after semester results are out. It happened to me in 2015, it's evil.

Good evening Crime Watch. I need your help in exposing Great Zimbabwe University. I was given a part-time contract in July 2025. There are about 4–5 part-time lecturers in our department. We receive 6-month contracts, which are renewed twice a year. I still have my contract from last year if verification is needed. However, we have not been paid for the entire semester. So far, no clear explanation has been given. We have already started work again for 2026 under another 6-month contract (first semester), but we still have no idea when we will be paid. Personally, I am not employed elsewhere, so I continue working to avoid gaps on my CV, which could affect my chances when job hunting. I kindly request to remain anonymous, as I cannot afford to lose this job, even though we have not been paid yet. I am hoping your platform can help bring attention to this issue and possibly provide answers. Thank you, and please let me know if you need any documents to verify my story. @GreatZimUni

@nickmangwana Tiisirei referendum we will decide.

WHAT #CAB3 IS ALL ABOUT 1-President Elected by Parliamentarians 2-Election Cycles every 7 years 3- Voter’s Registration to be handled by ZEC 4- 90 Senators including 10 technocrats 5-Delimitation handled by its own Commission 6- Concourt to have extended powers 7- All Humans Rights to be handled by Human Rights Commission. 8- NPRC Dissolved 9- Judicial Appointments in Consultation with JSC

@Jamwanda2 Unfortunately they have been forgotten these war collaborators. Madzakutsaku are enjoying the liver.

LIKE I KEEP TELLING YOU GUYS IN NEWSROOMS, THE STORY OF OUR LIBERATION STRUGGLE TIMELESSLY SELLS!!!! Well done Cdes Barwe, Tapfumanei!!!!

@Jamwanda2 Yes we are ignorant given the diesel paChinhoyi incident.

ARE WE THAT IGNORANT? Nowhere in the world is diesel or petrol mined straight from Earth or Sea into your vehicle or machine. What is mined is CRUDE OIL which is liquid ORE requiring processing - REFINING - into diesel, petrol and many other products and by-products like plastics. Until recently, most African countries exported CRUDE OIL for processing (refining) abroad, to then import the refined products, principally diesel and petrol. There was no or very little BENEFICIATION of crude mined on the Continent, which is a net importer of fuels, by and large. The OIL SECTOR globally is highly cartelised. Countries like Nigeria and Angola have now started refining part of their crude, even then without meeting their national requirements, meaning fuel imports continue, side by side with CRUDE EXPORTS. Vehicles and machinery use REFINED PRODUCTS from CRUDE OIL, meaning you may export CRUDE OIL while still importing refined fuels, as is the case on the continent. CRUDE EXPORTS are not the same as diesel and petrol exports!! It makes no sense to come here to urge Zimbabwe to seek to import diesel and petrol from Angola, Nigeria, Equatorial Guinea merely because those countries export crude oil, while processing only a portion of it far too small to meet their own national requirements. They are yet to create surplus. Investing in a REFINERY is a major investment; it is also done over several months, if not a year. It is not an instant wonder. It also requires tertiary skills. While refining is a laudable goal for Africa, it is not an instant outcome, and it cannot immediately resolve the disruptions we face just now. As we acquire this capacity, our vehicles and machines still have to run!! I hope this raises the level of contributions on this matter.

@ProfJNMoyo @PedzisaiRuhanya @ProfMadhuku @PoliceZimbabwe Your 2030ists prof.

The brutal assault on @ProfMadhuku and some members of his NCA is shameful and deplorable; whatever hand is behind the shocking criminality should be exposed without delay and held accountable to the full extent of the law! @PoliceZimbabwe

@SengezoTsh17075 Wakadya Marika Lobengula

We might differ in political views but I wish to convey my congratulatory message to one fine Member of Parliament for Mabvuku Tafara Constituency, Honorable Pedzayi "Scott" Sakupwanya, may God grant you more years of success.

@lilomatic @MupambiAbigale @DavidMatsanga @Mavhure @WeArePindula @cdesetfree National projects are not for one person. ED completed parliament started by Mugabe

I strongly believe that about 3 of the proposed constitutional amendments seek to build a better future for Zimbabwe. From my view, some of the amendments will sincerely fix a broken system to create a more stable, unified, and prosperous Zimbabwe for everyone. It’s about moving away from constant political fighting and focusing on what really matters like development, unity, and a government that can deliver on its promises. Our country is stuck in a cycle of endless elections. As soon as one election ends, the next campaign begins. This means politicians are always focused on fighting each other instead of working for us. It creates division and stops long-term projects that would build a better Zimbabwe. The amendment to add 2 more years to the current 5 year term limit gives leaders in parliament and council more time to focus on real issues like fixing our roads, improving our hospitals, and creating jobs. A seven-year cycle means at least five solid years of work without the distraction of politics. It’s a “Sabbath for politics” so we can focus on development. Let's have a sober discussion on the merits and demerits of the term extension proposed amendment. #TogetherWeCan #TikabatanaTinokunda #SingabambanaSiyanqoba

@TembaMliswa Isao referendum period.

One enduring fallacy that has been repeated for far too long, so much so that it has gathered a following of misguided believers, is the notion of the Army's supremacy in the context of Operation Restore Legacy. This myth has been perpetuated ad nauseam, conveniently overlooking the evident fissures within the narrative. While the Army's initiative held significance, its most profound shortcoming lay in its lack of a practical endgame towards which it could strategically maneuver. Ultimately, it found itself reliant on the very figure they sought to unseat, namely President Mugabe. Their need for his resignation culminated in the Asante Sana moment, which, in reality, represented a formidable impasse. They had come to a dead end! This impasse necessitated that Emmerson Mnangagwa fulfill his role in the endeavor, particularly through the political avenue, which saw Parliament initiate impeachment motions this, ultimately, was the key resolution. The political momentum served as the catalyst for the dawn of the Second Republic. Therefore, it is a constrained interpretation to extol the Army as the benefactor that “bestowed” power upon Mnangagwa because they it never did! Such a claim is misleading because the Army executed its part yet found itself at a stalemate until the political impetus paved the way for the formation of the Second Republic. Ultimately the Second Republic was borne of the public and never any one entity or quarter! Anyone who suddenly seeks to hijack ownership of the enterprise is clearly on a path of building selfish political capital.

@daddyhope @HeraldZimbabwe ZITA rasekuru raanoshandisa rakatora pfungwa dzose.

When legal scholar Dr Justice Mavedzenge retorted, during his constitutional debate with political scientist Prof Jonathan Moyo, that Zimbabwe’s Justice Minister, Ziyambi Ziyambi, has never practised law, what is in the attached Herald article is what he was referring to. A Justice Minister devoid of the ability to understand the Constitution he is supposed to guard and uphold. Zimbabwe’s Justice Minister, Ziyambi Ziyambi, has gone ahistorical, insulting Zimbabweans, including the country’s freedom fighters, by claiming that the liberation war was not about one man, one vote, but merely about land restoration rights. Such a claim distorts the historical record and reduces a broad liberation struggle for political rights and majority rule to a single issue. He advances this intellectual propaganda drivel to defend taking away the direct vote to elect a president from citizens, as espoused in his Constitutional Amendment Bill No. 3. It shows that he has never read liberation war literature, which consistently emphasised one man one vote as a central pillar of the liberation struggle. Zimbabweans did not go to war merely for land in isolation, they went to war for majority rule, for universal adult suffrage, for one man, one vote. That principle was entrenched in liberation literature, which articulated the clarion call for equal voting rights to justify the struggle that eventually ended minority. Land without political power would have been meaningless. The liberation struggle was about giving black Zimbabweans the authority to choose who governs them, and through that democratic power to determine land policy and every other national question. For the avoidance of doubt, I attach a video below of Robert Mugabe explicitly stating that the liberation struggle was about one man, one vote. This was in 1962. Ziyambia also argues, ridiculously, that you do not need a referendum to extend President Emmerson Mnangagwa’s tenure of office. Ziyambi confirms Mavedzenge’s assertion that he has never practised law, because one cannot separate the length of an election cycle from Presidential term limits as if they exist in different constitutional universes. They are inseparable, and only a bush lawyer would argue otherwise. The moment you extend an election cycle from five to seven years, you are automatically extending the tenure of the sitting President. This is first-year law degree material, and any serious student of constitutional law would understand that altering the duration of a term inevitably affects the term limit framework itself. That is not a neutral administrative adjustment, it is a substantive alteration to how long executive power is held. Section 91(2) of Zimbabwe’s constitution does not operate in a vacuum. It defines how many terms a President may serve, but the Constitution also defines how long each term is. If you stretch the duration of a term, you are materially affecting the term limit framework. You are extending the time a President holds office beyond what voters originally authorised under the existing constitutional order when they cast their vote. This is precisely why Section 328 was crafted with safeguards. It was meant to prevent incumbents from manipulating constitutional provisions, directly or indirectly, to prolong their stay in power. Whether you change the number of terms or the length of each term, the democratic effect is identical, you extend Presidential tenure. How a Minister of Justice fails to grasp that is astonishing. To argue that extending an election cycle does not touch term limits is like arguing that increasing the length of a school year does not affect how long pupils stay in school. It is a distinction without a difference. The 2007 harmonisation argument, which Ziyambi uses in a feeble attempt to defend an illegal constitutional mutilation, is also wildly misplaced. The 2007 adjustment aligned electoral calendars within an already existing constitutional framework. It did not extend the tenure of an incumbent President beyond the mandate voters had already given. There is a qualitative constitutional difference between administrative alignment and tenure extension. It is plain common sense, even before one applies constitutional law analysis. The claim that Ziyambi makes that even extending term limits to three terms would not require a referendum is equally alarming and legally outrageous. Section 328 was specifically designed to stop incumbency advantage and self-serving amendments. Any change that affects how long a President can remain in office, whether by number of terms or by their duration, triggers constitutional safeguards, including a referendum, especially where it benefits a sitting office holder like in this instance. Ziyambi’s attempt to anchor this in the so-called Vision 2030 or Covid-19 disruptions is empty political rhetoric, not constitutional law. Development agendas do not override constitutional protections. If anything, constitutionalism exists precisely to restrain power during moments when governments claim necessity to do so. The whole world knows that this minister, and other deeply corrupt and politically opportunistic elements working with him attempting to push these amendments illegally, are relying on a captured judiciary to pronounce on these issues through the same ridiculous lenses they are using to wrongly interpret the Constitution. That may well happen, but it renders the entire exercise illegitimate and unlawful, and it will ultimately be reversed, if they are able to force it through and attempt to implement it. The whole world is watching, and this may well become someone’s Waterloo if they are not careful. Also, for the avoidance of doubt, I place below a video of former ZANUPF Legal Secretary Patrick Chinamasa explicitly stating that the proposed changes require two referendums. He said this in front of President Emmerson Mnangagwa at a ZANUPF Annual Conference, and there was no objection to what he said. He was speaking in his capacity as ZANUPF Legal Secretary. ZANUPF and its leadership continue to be a laughing stock as they try to navigate a factional fight by attempting to strip and mutilate the Constitution to resolve internal power struggles. Unfortunately, it is not only ZANUPF that is becoming a laughing stock. Our country itself is becoming one, as the rest of the continent and the world watch a Justice Minister and a group of leaders publicly contradict their own Constitution. This simply exposes the depth of incompetence. Even where the intention is manipulative and corrupt, dictators elsewhere attempt such manoeuvres with a degree of legal sophistication. But here, we are being led by a regime full of people who do not even understand the Constitution upon which their authority is supposed to rest. They do not grasp the implications of what they are attempting to do. What serious investor would commit capital to a country where the judiciary pronounces itself in ways that are contrary to the Constitution, the supreme law of the land? It is absolutely ridiculous. We have people who are supposed to be educated publicly ridiculing themselves by articulating positions that are plainly inconsistent with the Constitution, yet insisting that this is what the Constitution provides. It is astonishing to witness how money and power can erode individuals to the point where they are prepared to destroy anything associated with their professional standing, whether intellectually, as scholars, or as lawyers. It is deeply embarrassing to watch this kind of constitutional drama unfolding in 2026. Imagine the level of shamelessness required for the Justice Minister of a republic born out of a war of independence to come out and claim that the republic was born out of a fight that had nothing to do with one man, one vote, that it was merely about land. In other words, he is suggesting that Zimbabweans who do not have land are not yet independent? Is he also implying that those of us without land are not independent? What, then, was the struggle for if it was only about land, which many citizens still do not possess? It would mean that only those who received land are the ones enjoying independence. He does not seem to realise the Pandora’s box he is opening with such shameless and anti-intellectual statements as Justice Minister of a country whose independence came through a protracted liberation struggle in which blood was spilled and thousands of Zimbabweans were killed fighting for one man, one vote. That position was articulated repeatedly, and it exists on record and on video. Now, in an attempt to resolve a factional fight, ZANUPF appears willing to walk back the very historical foundations of the liberation struggle. I never imagined I would live to see the day when a ZANUPF minister would shame not only himself, his party, and his President, but also embarrass the broader Pan-African community by claiming that Zimbabwe’s independence struggle had nothing to do with one man, one vote. By that logic, if Ian Smith had simply given Africans access to land, the war would have ended there. That is the dangerous and ignominious implication of what this minister is now advancing.

No need for referendum: Minister Ziyambi ․ . . We are amending election cycle not term limits heraldonline.co.zw/no-need-for-re…

@TembaMliswa Ingozi iyi yevanhu vaipondwa in the name of his father

For all that President Mugabe was it's very sad to see what is happening with his sons. Zvakaoma zvinoita kuzvara; a total opposite of their father. Mugabe must be turning in his grave as Bellarmine has been arrested for allegedly shooting someone in South Africa.