OAV

If you see a propagandist telling you that the impeachment is a waste of time amidst oil price hikes struggles, tell them this: at least TWO BILLION pesos is alleged to have passed thru the Dutertes. That’s roughly 69,000 years worth of monthly income for the average Filipino family. Corruption, plunder, and betrayal of public trust is a crisis.

@Vpedrosa Winners are... oil firms using "replacement cost" pricing that shifts burden of cost volatility to consumers.

Her eyes are more like Brad's here no? She's soooo pretty.😍

Baby Steph.😍

😍😍😍

GOOD NEWS! Maaari nang kumuha ng digital version ng PSA documents tulad ng birth certificate, atbp! Paano? Watch this #LegalLifehack at i-share para malaman ng iba ang mas madaling prosesong ito. Birth Certificate Marriage Certificate CENOMAR Death Certificate PSA Documents PSA Helpline PSA

SPARE US, LORD, FROM THE HORRORS OF WAR 🙏 Let us join hands in praying the Oratio Imperata for the safety of the families affected by the conflict in the Middle East.

“Today more than ever, humanity cries out and pleads for peace,” ~ Pope Leo XIV

😂😂😂

Ganda sana nito kung Pres at VP.🥺

😍😍😍

As we begin our journey through #Lent, let us ask the Lord to grant us the gift of true conversion of heart, so that we may better respond to His love for us and share that love with those around us.

“No matter how much time you spend fasting, no matter how much you sleep on a hard floor and eat ashes and sigh continually, if you do no good to others, you do nothing great.” Pope Leo’s guide to Lent. thelettersfromleo.com/p/heres-what-p…

Look: FULL LIST OF CO-PERPETRATORS Ikulong na yan, mga kurakot at mamamatay tao!

🤯🤯🤯

Ang kulit ng mga batang to.😂😂😂

@NetworkDirecto1 @YallLuvCris They were separated for more than a year before he dated Taylor.

@YallLuvCris To be fair he probably would have dumped Beyonce or Sydney Sweeney if Taylor came along 😂

I have never seen so many people this obsessed over a white man not wanting to date a black woman anymore…

I grew up hearing this story told in simple contrasts. The raven was the “bad” bird. The dove was the “good” one. The raven left & never came back. The dove returned, gentle & faithful, carrying hope in its beak. That framing stayed with me for years. But reading the passage more slowly now, the detail feels less like a moral lesson & more like a careful observation. The text seems less interested in assigning virtue & more interested in showing how renewal actually unfolds. This detail appeared in Genesis 8:6–12, & it is easy to pass over & overlook especially with the familiar story we were taught as kids. After forty days, Noah opened the window of the ark & sent out a raven. The text says the raven “went to & fro until the waters were dried up from the earth.” Only after this did Noah send out a dove. The dove returned because it found no place to rest. Later, it returned again with a freshly plucked olive leaf. When it was sent out a third time, it did not return. This order matters, I believe. Noah did not choose the birds at random & the passage does not invite us to read this as a contrast between good & bad creatures. In the ancient world, even now, ravens are known as hardy scavengers. They could survive on remains & floating debris. They did not require clean ground or growing plants. If any bird could endure a world that was still unsettled & marked by judgment, it was a raven. So sending the raven first was a practical act. It tested whether life could persist outside the ark at all. Not whether the earth had been restored, but whether it was no longer entirely hostile. The raven did not need the world to be healed. It only needed enough to survive. This helps explain why the raven never returned. The text does not say the raven failed or disobeyed. It simply says it “went to & fro.” The ark was no longer its only place of refuge. The raven could land, feed, & move again, even while the earth was still unstable & incomplete. Survival was possible, even if restoration was not. The dove tells a different story. Doves are not scavengers. They require stable ground, vegetation, & safe places to rest. When Noah sent the dove the first time, it returned empty, not because nothing had changed, but because not enough had changed. The earth was exposed, but it was not yet hospitable. When the dove returned with an olive leaf, the signal it bore shifted. Vegetation had begun to grow again. The world was no longer only emerging from judgment, it was beginning to recover. And when the dove did not return the third time, Noah understood that the earth had become a place where gentle life could finally dwell. Seen this way, the raven & the dove are not opposing symbols. They serve different purposes in the story. The raven showed that judgment was easing enough for endurance. The dove showed that judgment was giving way to renewal. One marked survival. The other marked restoration. There is something quietly instructive here. Survival & restoration are not the same thing. A world can sustain life & still not be ready for new beginnings. Scripture slows us down by placing these two birds side by side, teaching us to recognize the difference. More importantly, the dove’s return, this time carrying an olive leaf, naturally draws the me forward in the larger story of Scripture. At the baptism of Jesus, the Holy Spirit is described as descending “like a dove” (Matthew 3:16). In both scenes, the dove appears not in chaos, but at the threshold of something new. In Noah’s day, it signaled that the earth was beginning to live again. At Jesus’ baptism, it marked the beginning of God’s work of renewal through Him. After that moment in Genesis, the dove was sent out once more & did not return. The work of restoration had begun, but its completion would take time.

Splash bros for life.😍😍😍

@piscesthevirgo @JungSpica @ultjoniean Nope. Heath did not go against Cap during those times.

LANDSLIDE VOTES FOR CAPRICE THANK U EVERYONE 😭!!!! #PBBCollab20SixthEviction #CapriceCayetano