Monadic DNA

265 posts

Monadic DNA banner
Monadic DNA

Monadic DNA

@MonadicDNA

DNA insights with privacy, autonomy, and boundless curiosity.

Katılım Aralık 2024
79 Takip Edilen892 Takipçiler
zaimiri
zaimiri@zaimiri·
> you go to the doctor for a genetic test > they send your blood to a lab > they run 300 tests on your DNA over 26 years > one million people do the same thing > your doctor ordered it > insurance covered it > felt safe > someone bought all of it > became a billionaire with your DNA > you never consented to any of this > you became fuel for a $5 billion empire
zaimiri@zaimiri

x.com/i/article/2048…

English
11
0
34
1.9K
Uttam
Uttam@uttam_singhk·
uhmm is it just me or have people stopped trying to build new things in crypto over the past year or so ? it feels like it’s all perps and prediction markets now
English
185
6
237
21.2K
Monadic DNA retweetledi
Péter Szilágyi
Péter Szilágyi@peter_szilagyi·
First talk I'll ever give about Dark Bio... no pressure... none whatsoever... 🙈
Péter Szilágyi tweet media
English
24
21
295
22.2K
Monadic DNA
Monadic DNA@MonadicDNA·
And so many regular people are now entering their confidential medical information, including DNA and lab reports, into public AI tools and irrevocably hurting their future employability and insurability. Use Monadic DNA Explorer instead. We use Nillion's confidential LLMs and storage so nobody snoops on your data!
Nillion@nillion

57% of enterprise employees admit to entering confidential company data into public AI tools. That includes internal documents and business information. AI is already being used in sensitive environments.

English
1
1
6
382
Monadic DNA retweetledi
Clive G. Brown
Clive G. Brown@The__Taybor·
Following on from Kitchen table genomes/liquid biopsy. There are two forces at work, a centralization one and a decentralization one. Large companies are trying to trap everything in central data centers with proprietary data streams, giving them a moat and control, others are pushing to run AI and other things locally empowering individual users. Same is happening to bio/medical data including sequencing.
Simplifying AI@simplifyinAI

Microsoft just solved the context window problem. Right now, every AI suffers from a fatal flaw: the "context window problem." When an AI reasons through a complex problem, it generates a massive chain-of-thought. But there is a catch. It has to keep every single token of that thought in its active memory. The technical term is the "KV Cache." The longer the AI thinks, the heavier it gets. It slows down. It gets expensive. Eventually, it runs out of space. We thought the only fix was renting bigger, more expensive cloud GPUs to hold all that context. Microsoft just proved us wrong. They published a paper called "MEMENTO." Instead of giving the AI a bigger memory, they taught it how to forget. Here is how it works: Instead of generating one endless stream of consciousness, a Memento-trained model breaks its reasoning into small blocks. After it finishes a block, it writes a dense, highly compressed summary of its own logic—a "memento." Then, it does something unprecedented. It physically deletes the entire previous reasoning block from its memory cache. It only carries the memento forward. The model reasons, extracts the core logic, and instantly drops the dead weight. The results rewrite the economics of running AI. • Context length compressed by 6x. • Active memory usage (KV cache) reduced by 2.5x. • Zero loss in math, science, or coding accuracy. And here is the real implication. Big tech has been charging you by the token for massive context windows you don't actually need. With this architecture, small businesses and solo operators can run complex, multi-step autonomous agents entirely locally. You don't need an enterprise cloud setup. A standard machine running an open-source model can now reason indefinitely without overflowing its memory. No API fees. Complete privacy. We spent the last two years trying to give AI an infinite memory. It turns out, the secret to smarter AI isn't remembering everything. It's knowing exactly what to forget.

English
1
5
15
2.2K
Benoit Dubosson
Benoit Dubosson@beniduboss·
Somebody could make a good business by making a privacy focused, no data kept, business that analyses people’s DNA and offers a full comprehensive report on it The machine is 5k, which still would make sense for people like me, but is too high of a barrier for most Keep no logs, work with an established lab or find a way to do it yourself, automate full report to share to customers Could do this in 2 days working with 3rd party labs in Switzerland Once you scale you could offer to create custom pills for each patient needs One of you should do this
Seth Howes@SethSHowes

I’ve wanted to do this for a decade. But I never did - I refuse to give any company my DNA. It is me. So this week I sequenced my genome entirely at home. Literally on my kitchen table. I never exposed my DNA sequence to the internet. Not at any point. I used a MinION to do the sequencing (it’s smaller + weighs less than an iPhone). I used open-source DNA models for the analysis (Evo2 and AlphaGenome) running locally on a DGX Spark and Mac Studio. I traced mechanisms behind my family’s multigenerational autoimmune conditions that no clinician has been able to understand. When I set out to do this I didn’t know if it would actually work. It does. Your genome is the most private data you will ever have. You probably shouldn’t let it leave your house.

English
17
5
117
27.1K
Monadic DNA
Monadic DNA@MonadicDNA·
At-home sequencing is the future! However, until it becomes cheap, easy and reliable, people will still turn to services which compromise their anonymity and privacy. Our upcoming Batcher app provides an anonymous mixing service using reliable lab partners for your DNA exploration needs!
Mihailo Bjelic@MihailoBjelic

Human genome sequencing: 2003: $3,000,000,000 global effort years of research 2026: your kitchen table a few hundred $ Hard not to be excited for the future. iwantosequencemygenomeathome.com iwantosequencemygenomeathome.com

English
0
2
7
603
Monadic DNA retweetledi
Nillion
Nillion@nillion·
The Vercel breach put the problem in plain sight. Too many systems still keep sensitive logic and data stored in one place. nilDB exists to break that pattern. - Sensitive data is split before it is stored - It is distributed across multiple nilDB nodes - No single node holds the complete secret - No single breach reveals the whole dataset That’s why Nillion matters: it gives builders a privacy layer for sensitive data.
Nillion tweet media
English
23
34
142
6.9K
Monadic DNA retweetledi
Morgan Cheatham, MD
Morgan Cheatham, MD@morgancheatham·
one of the reasons i became a medical geneticist: the genome is the only medical test where we measure once, but our interpretation evolves indefinitely. as our models and variant knowledge mature, the same data yields new truths, and eventually, actionabilities. the genome (and its derivative products) are the ultimate substrates for AI in medicine.
Patrick Collison@patrickc

I'm lucky enough to have a great doctor and access to excellent Bay Area medical care. I've taken lots of standard screening tests over the years and have tried lots of "health tech" devices and tools. With all this said, by far the most useful preventative medical advice that I've ever received has come from unleashing coding agents on my genome, having them investigate my specific mutations, and having them recommend specific follow-on tests and treatments. Population averages are population averages, but we ourselves are not averages. For example, it turns out that I probably have a 30x(!) higher-than-average predisposition to melanoma. Fortunately, there are both specific supplements that help counteract the particular mutations I have, and of course I can significantly dial up my screening frequency. So, this is very useful to know. I don't know exactly how much the analysis cost, but probably less than $100. Sequencing my genome cost a few hundred dollars. (One often sees papers and articles claiming that models aren't very good at medical reasoning. These analyses are usually based on employing several-year-old models, which is a kind of ludicrous malpractice. It is true that you still have to carefully monitor the agents' reasoning, and they do on occasion jump to conclusions or skip steps, requiring some nudging and re-steering. But, overall, they are almost literally infinitely better for this kind of work than what one can otherwise obtain today.) There are still lots of questions about how this will diffuse and get adopted, but it seems very clear that medical practice is about to improve enormously. Exciting times!

English
9
8
103
17.3K
Monadic DNA
Monadic DNA@MonadicDNA·
@koeng101 @iamnotnicola As the product grows it will come with harder guarantees. Eventually we may build a protocol out of it.
English
0
0
0
48
Keoni Gandall
Keoni Gandall@koeng101·
@MonadicDNA @iamnotnicola Batcher seems neat, just wish there was more hard legal language associated with the product. Sure you can say something is privacy focused, whole different game tho saying “we are liable if shared”
English
1
0
1
48
Keoni Gandall
Keoni Gandall@koeng101·
People are so concerned about the privacy of their genome. Thinking of starting a small company which only takes in monero + saliva sample (from PO box or whatever) and delivers back your genome. I don’t know who the hell you are, so privacy is by default
English
7
0
53
4.4K
nicola 🏟️
nicola 🏟️@iamnotnicola·
@MonadicDNA @koeng101 I think the problem is more sequencing the DNA privately more than computing on it, no? Computing is widely available, sequencing tech is not. I am not sure how anonymous sequencing can be done.
English
1
0
0
37
Patrick Collison
Patrick Collison@patrickc·
I'm lucky enough to have a great doctor and access to excellent Bay Area medical care. I've taken lots of standard screening tests over the years and have tried lots of "health tech" devices and tools. With all this said, by far the most useful preventative medical advice that I've ever received has come from unleashing coding agents on my genome, having them investigate my specific mutations, and having them recommend specific follow-on tests and treatments. Population averages are population averages, but we ourselves are not averages. For example, it turns out that I probably have a 30x(!) higher-than-average predisposition to melanoma. Fortunately, there are both specific supplements that help counteract the particular mutations I have, and of course I can significantly dial up my screening frequency. So, this is very useful to know. I don't know exactly how much the analysis cost, but probably less than $100. Sequencing my genome cost a few hundred dollars. (One often sees papers and articles claiming that models aren't very good at medical reasoning. These analyses are usually based on employing several-year-old models, which is a kind of ludicrous malpractice. It is true that you still have to carefully monitor the agents' reasoning, and they do on occasion jump to conclusions or skip steps, requiring some nudging and re-steering. But, overall, they are almost literally infinitely better for this kind of work than what one can otherwise obtain today.) There are still lots of questions about how this will diffuse and get adopted, but it seems very clear that medical practice is about to improve enormously. Exciting times!
English
488
641
9.6K
4.1M
Monadic DNA
Monadic DNA@MonadicDNA·
Genome editing is getting safer, but there’s an obvious question almost no one is asking: what happens to your DNA data once it’s sequenced? The new FDA guidance focuses on catching unintended edits, but it mostly skips over how this data is stored or who can access it, even though your genome is permanent and uniquely identifying. We think your genetic data should stay encrypted the whole time, and that analysis should happen without exposing the raw data using cryptographic techniques like FHE, MPC, TEEs, and zero-knowledge proofs. People should have clear control over what gets shared and when. Better editing is real progress, but without strong data protection, it creates new dangers.
Bruce Levine, Ph.D. 🇺🇦🥼🔬🧬🧪💉@BLLPHD

🚨NEW FDA Draft Guidance Safety Assessment of Genome Editing in Human Gene Therapy Products Using Next-Generation Sequencing #FDA #Regulatory #geneediting #genetherapy Top 5 Takeaways - 1) NGS becomes the regulatory backbone for genome editing safety 2) FDA expects a layered, redundant approach to off-target assessment 3) Low-frequency events matter and must be detectable 4) Patient genetics is now explicitly part of risk assessment 5) Genome integrity (translocations) is no longer optional for DSB-based gene editing systems fda.gov/regulatory-inf…

English
0
0
1
173
Monadic DNA
Monadic DNA@MonadicDNA·
Motion sickness is written into the body more than most people realize. In a genome-wide study of 80,494 individuals, researchers identified 35 SNPs significantly associated with susceptibility. Individuals in the top 5% of genetic risk had over 6× higher odds of frequent motion sickness compared to the bottom 5%. Some of the strongest signals: • rs66800491 near PVRL3 (eye development) • rs10514168 near TSHZ1 (inner ear development) • rs2153535 near MUTED (balance) • rs2551802 between HOXD3/HOXD4 • rs9906289 in HOXB3 These variants cluster around systems that maintain equilibrium. Inner ear structure, neural signaling, even glucose regulation all appear to shape how the brain processes motion. The biology extends further. The same genetic architecture overlaps with migraines, vertigo, morning sickness, and postoperative nausea. Several variants show effects up to 3× stronger in women. Motion sickness is not just situational. It reflects how sensory conflict is processed at a systems level, influenced by development, metabolism, and neural wiring. If you have your genetic data, you can look up your own propensity in Explorer. explorer.monadicdna.com Study: Genetic variants associated with motion sickness point to roles for inner ear development, neurological processes and glucose homeostasis Authors: Hromatka, Tung , et al
Monadic DNA tweet media
English
0
0
4
134