Monty

@RDR_Eco $Scan will keep building to hit that !

$SID now live on @risedotrich 61FLXMXHqmDVUBG5a8qEk4fy4zC4xoxL85DmKB9xrise

What If?

This is sad day for Solana. $223M+ lost and that's on the conservative side: → $122M USDC (biggest single chunk) → $84M SOL (1M+ SOL flowed through) → $5.3M USDS → $7M jitoSOL/JitoSOL combined → $1.7M PYTH (42M tokens) → $1.5M mSOL, $811K bSOL, $587K zBTC This was NOT an oracle exploit or code bug. It looks like the admin key(s) were compromised. Drift uses cross-margin: deposit any collateral → borrow/withdraw from any vault. The attacker abused this with admin access: 1) Created spot market for CVT (a token they control) 2) Set CVT's collateral weights to maximum 3) Raised withdrawGuardThreshold on every major market 4) Deposited worthless CVT → margin check passes 5) Systematically withdrew from EVERY major vault Total operation: ~3 hours. 297 transactions (estimated from the limited sleuthing time) Addresses involved 55udxhScWQxM7cC9d1NPBQoEDC7B38w81EWKPZsM7ZCW (attacker) HkGz4KmoZ7Zmk7HN6ndJ31UJ1qZ2qgwQxgVqQwovpZES (staging) H7PiGqqUaanBovwKgEtreJbKmQe6dbq6VTrw6guy7ZgL (compromised admin key?) FnYXwy7qEtGV4cj1Sf6tht7VDsiytFjJeF9yd4LpAjjx (funder) G84LEhbNMR1yYbHgHbnNYNSK8mpTKcazh5jcW5yMPQKo (CVT mint) Admin key had no history before Mar 31, the staging wallet has 297 txs + first active on Mar 24 (so 1 week prep?)

It's time to disrupt the trenches RISE goes live April 2nd

@nikmcfly69 Getting this error when trying to start a new project. Any advice?

A Chinese student got $4M for an AI that simulates how thousands of people react to any event Problem: it was Chinese-only and required cloud APIs. I made it fully local + English Here's what MiroFish-Offline does and why it matters 🧵

SEND

this is the power of @risedotrich i dont think people are yet to understand, that memecoins dont have to be like they are now they dont have to be a race to 0 - if you are ready for a change, follow the @risedotrich account and be ready to trade

A year from now, 1000's of tokens will be built on top of our AVM The AVM makes value & liquidity properties of the tokens themselves And all roads will lead back to $ANA

Silence isn't death. It's focus. While the timeline was quiet @AutonomRWA was under the hood > zero downtime > adding RWA Perps > new engine being installed The 'maintenance era' is over The 're-Genesis' begins now

@TheWhiteWhaleV2 @MEXC_Official @Bybit_Official We all know mexc is a shady exchange, bring something new..

🚨 Warning - @MEXC_Official Caught "Red-Handed" Running Internal Order Desk 🚨 Imagine this: I’m at the command post, monitoring our live launch on @Bybit_Official (which is a pretty big deal). We’re tracking order flow, adjusting on-chain liquidity in real time, and coordinating with our team handling CEX-side liquidity when - boom! Someone drops a message in our token holders TG: “MEXC just listed us on perps!” Of course they did. They saw the Bybit announcement and countdown to go-live and rushed out a futures product. Ambulance-chasing, but for bucket-shop CEX perps. A couple things immediately stood out. Our MM team is handling all CEX-side liquidity. If another market maker was hedging - as market makers do - they’d have to come through us. And yet MEXC somehow went live before Bybit. That got the gears turning. If they weren’t routing through us, chances are they weren’t routing through anyone. On a hunch, I pulled their API and made a call. They’ll probably patch this after the post, but for now it conveniently returns server time (denominated in CST…for reasons known only to them). Sure enough: $WhiteWhale didn’t exist on any available API endpoint. I’ve attached a PDF showing the raw server response: drive.google.com/file/d/1KdqUGe… If the pair wasn’t even supported by their own API, it is actually impossible for an external market maker to be operating that order book. MM's don't log in and place orders on the web site. Which leaves only one option. They were running the order book internally - trading against their own users. A CEX running its own internal trading desk is a conflict-of-interest factory: the venue that sees everyone’s flow, risk, and liquidation levels is also the same entity incentivized to trade against that flow, lean on prices, or “manage” volatility in ways that conveniently benefit its own book. That’s why FTX became the cautionary tale - when an exchange and a closely tied trading arm blur lines, you get structurally unfair markets and a tempting path toward misuse of customer assets and preferential treatment. Legally, it raises serious issues around market manipulation, fraud/misrepresentation, breach of fiduciary-like duties (even if they deny having them), inadequate disclosures, and compliance failures around best execution, fair dealing, and segregation of customer funds - plus the obvious enforcement magnet: if users weren’t clearly told the exchange could be effectively the house, regulators and plaintiffs will argue the market was rigged from the start. I continued to refresh until they finally did add it to their API. The time they were 100% trading against their own users? 5 hours, 22 minutes. A market cannot be fair when the referee is also placing bets. That's pure extraction. Ironically, the very thing $WhiteWhale stands against. 🫡 From the depths — The White Whale 🐋

👀

@risedotrich No rug

Beta for the first true anti rug launchpad is coming soon Comment "No Rug" below to be considered

Sniper strategy will be released tonight (after GMT 8pm). This is our most aggressive strategy yet - if you like high risk high rewOre then this one's for you. Stay tuned for posts from @SpuddyA7X @willdxyz

Samsara is a new derivatives exchange that trades exclusively in navTokens. navTokens give holders several advantages over holding or trading the underlying token: - Amplified exposure with positive skew (greater upside amplification, reduced downside amplification) - Interest-free, non-liquidatable credit/leverage - “Borrow to exit” tax efficiency - Yield via “fees to NAV” floor growth The key innovation to note: A navToken’s floor price (NAV) will always outperform the underlying token over time. But Sir!? How is that possible? Let me explain 👇 navTokens have two values: 1. Market Price The price users buy/sell at - moves with order flow like any token. 2. NAV (Floor Price) The protocol-enforced, minimum redeemable value of each navToken. NAV can only increase with demand and volume generated fees. navTokens are priced in the underlying token (navBONK → $BONK, navSOL → $SOL, navORE → $ORE, etc.). THREE possible outcomes for Market Price: ⬆️ Market Price increases (unlimited) - navToken outperforms the underlying token ⬇️ Market Price decreases (bounded) - navToken underperforms, but only to the floor ➡️ Market Price stays flat - navToken tracks the USD value 1:1 with the underlying TWO possible outcomes for the NAV (Floor Price): ⬆️ NAV increases - navToken gains value vs. the underlying ➡️ NAV stays flat - navToken tracks the USD value 1:1 With this design, holding a navToken over time, presents holders an opportunity to significantly outperform the underlying tokens while greatly limiting the potential for underperformance. A new form of leverage emerges through a simple buy and hold UX without the complexity and liquidation risk of perpetual futures. We’re running a live demo on Solana devnet this week: break-samsara.nirvana.finance Tomorrow at 1pm EST / 6pm UTC, we’ll livestream a coordinated black swan event. Anyone can participate. Your goal: Sell your faucet-fed navTokens relentlessly into the floor and try to break it. The unbreakable math behind Samsara will be on full display. Don’t miss it. 🍿

Waitlist is now open. First 1500 signups will earn extra rewards! Link below 👇